Advertisement

Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 132, Issue 6, pp 789–811 | Cite as

Response of juveniles of seven forest tree species and their populations to different combinations of simulated climate change-related stressors: spring-frost, heat, drought, increased UV radiation and ozone concentration under elevated CO2 level

  • Alfas PliūraEmail author
  • Jurga Jankauskienė
  • Gintarė Bajerkevičienė
  • Vaidotas Lygis
  • Vytautas Suchockas
  • Juozas Labokas
  • Rita Verbylaitė
Regular Paper

Abstract

The study aimed to assess response of juvenile progeny of seven forest tree species, Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pendula, Alnus glutinosa, Populus tremula, Quercus robur and Fraxinus excelsior, and their populations to different combinations of climate change-related multiple stressors, simulated in a phytotron under elevated CO2 concentration: (1) heat + elevated humidity (HW); (2) heat + frost + drought (HFD); (3) heat + elevated humidity + increased UV-B radiation doses + elevated ozone concentration (HWUO); and (4) heat + frost + drought + increased UV-B radiation doses + elevated ozone concentration (HFDUO). Effects of the complex treatments, species and species-by-treatment interaction were highly significant in most of the growth, physiological and biochemical traits studied, indicating general and species-specific responses to the applied treatments. For deciduous trees, height increment was much higher under HW treatment than in ambient conditions (control) indicating a positive effect of elevated temperature and better water and CO2 availability. HFD treatment caused reduction of height increment in comparison to HW treatment in most species except for Q. robur and F. excelsior which benefited from lower humidity. Treatments HWUO and HFDUO have caused substantial damages to leaves in fast growing deciduous P. tremula, A. glutinosa and B. pendula, and resulted in their lower height increment than in HW treatment, although it was the same or even higher than that in the control. Rates of photosynthesis in most of the tree species were greatest in HFD treatment. A lower photosynthetic rate (compared to control) was observed in B. pendula, P. tremula and F. excelsior in HW treatment, and in most species—in HWUO treatment. Compared to control, intrinsic water use efficiency in all treatments was significantly lower in P. tremula, A. glutinosa and F. excelsior and higher in conifers P. sylvestris and P. abies. Significant population-by-treatment interactions found for most traits showed variation in response of populations, implying that this reflects adaptive potential of each tree species. The observed responses may not always be considered as adaptive as deteriorating growth of some populations or species may lead to loss of their competitiveness thus compromising regeneration and natural successions.

Keywords

Complex treatments Controlled environment Growth Phenotypic plasticity Physiology Phytotron Stress 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by a grant (no. SIT-4/2015) from the Research Council of Lithuania. We are grateful to the staff of the phytotron for technical assistance in running the experiments and performing measurements. We are grateful to anonymous reviewers and Editor for their constructive comments and recommendations.

References

  1. Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Ann Rev Plant Biol 55:373–399Google Scholar
  2. Bacelar EA, Santos DL, Moutinho-Pereira JM, Lopes JI, Goncalves BC, Ferreira T, Correia CM (2007) Physiological behaviour, oxidative damage and antioxidative protection of olive trees grown under different irrigation regimes. Plant Soil 292:1–12Google Scholar
  3. Bachelet D, Neilson RP, Lenihan JM, Drapek RJ (2001) Climate change effects on vegetation distribution and carbon budget in the United States. Ecosystems 4:164–185Google Scholar
  4. Bahari ZA, Pallardy SG, Parker WC (1985) Photosynthesis, water relations, and drought adaptation in six woody species of oak-hickory forests in central Missouri. For Sci 31:557–569Google Scholar
  5. Baliuckas V (2002) Life history traits and broadleaved tree genetics. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesGoogle Scholar
  6. Baliuckas V, Pliura A (2003) Genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity of Quercus robur populations and open pollinated families in Lithuania. Scand J For Res 18:305–319Google Scholar
  7. Belkadhi A, De Haro A, Soengas P, Obregon S, Cartea ME, Chaibi W, Djebali W (2014) Salicylic acid increases tolerance to oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide accumulation in leaves of cadmium-exposed flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). J Plant Interact 9:647–654Google Scholar
  8. Bhargava S, Sawant K (2013) Drought stress adaptation: metabolic adjustment and regulation of gene expression. Plant Breed 132:21–32Google Scholar
  9. Bojović M, Nikolić N, Borišev M et al (2017) The diurnal time course of leaf gas exchange parameters of pedunculate oak seedlings subjected to experimental drought conditions. Balt For 23:584–594Google Scholar
  10. Bunce JA (1992) Stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and respiration of temperate deciduous tree seedlings grown outdoors at an elevated concentration of carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ 15:541–549Google Scholar
  11. Caldwell MM, Flint SD (1994) Stratospheric ozone reduction, solar UV-B radiation and terrestrial ecosystems. Clim Change 28:375–394Google Scholar
  12. Cheeseman JM (2007) Hydrogen peroxide and plants stress: a challenging relationship. Plant Stress 1(1):4–15Google Scholar
  13. Chromov SP (1968) Meteorológia a klimatológia [Meteorology and climatology]. Vydavateľstvo Slovenskej Academievied, Bratislava (in Slovak) Google Scholar
  14. Csaikl UM, Glaz I, Baliuckas V, Petit RJ (2002) Chloroplast DNA variation of white oak in the Baltic countries and Poland. For Ecol Manag 156(1–3):211–222Google Scholar
  15. Davis MB, Shaw RG, Etterson JR (2005) Evolutionary responses to changing climate. Ecology 86:1704–1714Google Scholar
  16. DeLucia EH, Naidu SL, Chen J (1994) Effects of simulated stratospheric ozone depletion on seedling growth of several species of hardwood trees. Erigenia 13:132–140Google Scholar
  17. Dickson RE, Coleman MD, Riemenschneider DE, Isebrands JG, Hogan GD, Karnosky DF (1998) Growth of five hybrid poplar genotypes exposed to interacting elevated CO2 and O3. Can J For Res 28:1706–1716Google Scholar
  18. Duchovskis P, Brazaitytė A, Juknys R, Žukauskaitė I, Sliesaravičius A (2002) Kompleksinis antropogeninių veiksnių poveikis pigmentų kiekiui pomidorų lapuose [The impact of cadmium on pigments accumulation in tomato leaves at background of different amount of the biogenic materials and substratum acidity]. Sodininkystė ir Daržininkystė 21:111–118 (in Lithuanian) Google Scholar
  19. Ellstrand NC (1992) Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos 63:77–86Google Scholar
  20. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2006a) Air quality criteria for ozone and related photochemical oxidants, vol I. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, p E-1–34Google Scholar
  21. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2006b) Air quality criteria for ozone and related photochemical oxidants, vol III. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, p AX9-87-155Google Scholar
  22. Eriksson G (1998) Evolutionary forces influencing variation among populations of Pinus sylvestris. Silva Fenn 32:173–184Google Scholar
  23. Eriksson G (2001) Conservation of noble hardwoods in Europe. Can J For Res 31:577–587Google Scholar
  24. Eriksson G, Jonsson A, Lauteri M, Pliura A (2005) Genetic variation in drought response of Castanea sativa Mill. seedlings. Acta Hortic 693:247–254Google Scholar
  25. European Environment Agency (EEA) (2002) Europe’s biodiversity—biogeographical regions and seas. EEA Report no. 1/2002, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/_2002_0524_154909. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
  26. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:503–537Google Scholar
  27. Flexas J, Bota J, Loreto F, Cornic G, Sharkey TD (2004) Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant Biol 6:269–279PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Flexas J, Bota J, Galmes J, Medrano H, Ribas-Carbo M (2006) Keeping a positive carbon balance under adverse conditions: responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress. Physiol Plant 127:343–352Google Scholar
  29. Ghalambor CK, McKay JK, Carrol SP, Reznick DN (2007) Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct Ecol 21:394–407Google Scholar
  30. Griffin JJ, Ranney TG, Pharr DM (2004) Heat and drought influence photosynthesis, water relations, and soluble carbohydrates of two ecotypes of redbud (Cercis canadensis). J Am Soc Hortic Sci 129:497–502Google Scholar
  31. Guo Y-P, Zhou H-F, Zhang L-C (2006) Photosynthetic characteristics and protective mechanisms against photooxidation during high temperature stress in two citrus species. Sci Hortic 108:260–267Google Scholar
  32. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1989) Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS (eds) Plant population genetics, breeding and genetic resources. Sinouer Association, Sunderland, pp 43‒63Google Scholar
  33. Hanson PJ, Samuelson LJ, Wullschleger SD, Tabberer TA, Edwards GS (1994) Seasonal patterns of light-saturated photosynthesis and leaf conductance for mature and seedling Quercus rubra L. foliage: differential sensitivity to ozone. Tree Physiol 14:1351–1366PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hernandez M, Fernandez-Garcia N, Diaz-Vivancos P, Olmos E (2010) A different role for hydrogen peroxide and the antioxidative system under short and long salt stress in Brassica oleracea roots. J Exp Bot 61:521–535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hollosy F (2002) Effects of ultraviolet radiation on plant cells. Micron 33:179–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hough AM, Derwent RG (1990) Changes in the global concentration of tropospheric ozone due to human activities. Nature 344:645–648Google Scholar
  37. Huttunen S, Manninen S, Timonen U (2002) Ozone ffects on forest vegetation in Europe. In: Szaro RC, Bytnerowicz A, Oszlanzyi J (eds) Effects of air pollution on forest health and biodiversity in forests of the Carpathian mountains. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 43–49Google Scholar
  38. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. University Press, Cambridge, p 196Google Scholar
  39. Izuta T, Umemoto M, Horie K, Aoki M, Totsuka T (1996) Effects of ambient levels of ozone on growth, gas exchange rates and chlorophyll contents of Fagus crenata seedlings. J Jpn Soc Atmos Environ 31:95–105Google Scholar
  40. Jajic I, Sarna T, Strzalka K (2015) Senescence, stress, and reactive oxygen species. Plants 4:393–411PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Jansen MAK, Gaba V, Greenberg B (1998) Higher plants and UV-B radiation: balancing damage, repair and acclimation. Trends Plant Sci 4:131–135Google Scholar
  42. Jensen JS, Hansen JK (2010) Genetic variation in response to different soil water treatments in Quercus robur L. Scand J For Res 25:400–411Google Scholar
  43. Karnosky DF, Podila GK, Gagnon Z et al (1998) Genetic control of responses to interacting tropospheric ozone and CO2 in Populus tremuloides. Chemosphere 36:807–812Google Scholar
  44. Kattenberg F, Giorgi F, Grassl H et al (1996) Climate models—projections of future climate. In: Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K (eds) Climate change 1995. The science of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 289‒357Google Scholar
  45. Kellomäki S, Wang KY (2001) Growth and resource use of birch seedlings under elevated carbon dioxide and temperature. Ann Bot 87:669–682Google Scholar
  46. Kleinschmit J, Svolba J, Rau HM, Weisgerber H (1996) The IUFRO Abies grandis provenance experiment in Germany. Results at age 18/19. Silvae Genet 45:311–317Google Scholar
  47. Kolb TE, Fredericksen TS, Steiner KC, Skelly JM (1997) Issues in scaling tree size and age responses to ozone: a review. Environ Pollut 98:195–208Google Scholar
  48. Koskela J, Lefèvre F (2013) Genetic diversity of forest trees. In: Kraus D, Krumm F (eds) Integrative approaches as an opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 232–241Google Scholar
  49. Kramer GF, Norman HA, Krizek DT, Mirecki RM (1991) Influence of UV-B radiation on polyamines, lipid peroxidation and membrane lipids in cucumber. Phytochemistry 30:2101–2108Google Scholar
  50. Kramer K, Leinonen I, Loustau D (2000) The importance of phenology for the evaluation of impact of climate change on growth of boreal, temperate and Mediterranean forests ecosystems: an overview. Int J Biometeorol 44:67–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kull O, Sober A, Coleman MD, Dickson RE, Isebrands JG, Gagnon Z, Karnosky DF (1996) Photosynthetic response of aspen clones to simultaneous exposures of ozone and CO2. Can J For Res 16:639–648Google Scholar
  52. Larcher WP (1995) Physiological plant ecology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Lauteri M, Monteverdi MC, Sansotta A et al (1999) Adaptation to drought in European chestnut: evidences from a hybrid zone and from controlled crosses between drought and wet adapted populations. In: Salesse G (ed) Proceedings of 2nd international symposium on chesnut. Acta Hortic 494:345‒353Google Scholar
  54. Lauteri M, Pliūra A, Monteverdi M-C, Brugnoli E, Villani F, Eriksson G (2004) Genetic variation in carbon isotope discrimination in six European populations of Castanea sativa Mill. originating from contrasting localities. J Evol Biol 17:1286–1297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Lee JC, Steiner KC, Zhang JW, Skelly JM (2002) Heritability of ozone sensitivity in open-pollinated families of black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.). For Sci 48:111–117Google Scholar
  56. Li C, Ren J, Luo J, Lu R (2004) Sex-specific physiological and growth responses to water stress in Hippophae rhamnoides L. populations. Acta Physiol Plant 26:123–129Google Scholar
  57. Ma F, Xu TT, Ji MF, Zhao CM (2014) Differential drought tolerance in tree populations from contrasting elevations. AoB Plants 6:plu69Google Scholar
  58. Matsumura H (2001) Impacts of ambient ozone and/or acid mist on the growth of 14 tree species: an open-top chamber study conducted in Japan. Water Air Soil Pollut 130:959–964Google Scholar
  59. Matsumura H, Kobayashi T, Kohno Y (1998) Effects of ozone and/or simulated acid rain on dry weight growth and gas exchange rates of Japanese cedar, Nikko fir, Japanese white birch and Japanese zelkova seedlings. J Jpn Soc Atmos Environ 33:16–35 (in Japanese with English summary) Google Scholar
  60. Matsumura H, Mikami C, Sakai Y, Murayama K, Izuta T, Yonekura T, Miwa M, Kohno Y (2005) Impacts of elevated O3 and/or CO2 on growth of Betula platyphylla, Betula ermanii, Fagus crenata, Pinus densiflora and Cryptomeria japonica seedlings. J Agric Meteorol 60:1121–1124Google Scholar
  61. Medrano H, Tomas M, Martorell S, Flexas J, Hernandez E, Rossello J, Pou A, Escalona J-M, Bota J (2015) From leaf to whole-plant water use efficiency (WUE) in complex canopies: limitations of leaf WUE as a selection target. Crop J 3:220–228Google Scholar
  62. Monclus R, Dreyer E, Villar M, Delmotte FM, Delay D, Petit JM, Barbaroux C, Thiec DL, Bréchet C, Brignolas F (2006) Impact of drought on productivity and water use efficiency in 29 genotypes of Populus deltoides × Populus nigra. New Phytol 169:765–777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Morison JIL, Lawlor DW (1999) Interactions between increasing CO2 concentration and temperature on plant growth. Plant Cell Environ 22:659–682Google Scholar
  64. Nakaji T, Kobayashi T, Kuroha M, Omori K, Matsumoto Y, Yonekura T, Watanabe K, Utriainen J, Izuta T (2004) Growth and nitrogen availability of red pine seedlings under high nitrogen load and elevated ozone. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 4:277–287Google Scholar
  65. Ni B, Pallardy SG (1991) Response of gas exchange to water stress in seedlings of woody angiosperms. Tree Physiol 8:1–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Niinemets U, Valladares F (2006) Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate northern hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecol Monogr 76:521–547Google Scholar
  67. Oksanen E, Rousi M (2001) Differences of Betula origins in ozone sensitivity based on open-field experiment over two growing seasons. Can J For Res 31:804–811Google Scholar
  68. Oksanen E, Saleem A (1999) Ozone exposure results in various carry-over effects and prolonged reduction in biomass in birch (Betula pendula Roth). Plant Cell Environ 22:1401–1411Google Scholar
  69. Pääkkönen E, Holopainen T (1995) Influence of nitrogen supply on the response of clones of birch (Betula pendula Roth.) to ozone. New Phytol 129:595–603Google Scholar
  70. Pääkkönen E, Paasisalo S, Holopainen T, Kärenlampi L (1993) Growth and stomatal responses of birch (Betula pendula Roth.) clones to ozone in open-air and chamber fumigations. New Phytol 125:615–623Google Scholar
  71. Paoletti E, Schaub M, Matyssek R et al (2010) Advances of air pollution science: from forest decline to multiple-stress effects on forest ecosystem services. Environ Pollut 158:1986–1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Pettersson R, McDonald AJS (1992) Effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentration on photosynthesis and growth of small birch plants (Betula pendula Roth.) at optimal nutrition. Plant Cell Environ 15:911–919Google Scholar
  73. Pliūra A, Eriksson G (2002) Genetic variation in juvenile height and biomass of open pollinated families of six Castanea sativa Mill. populations in a 2 × 2 factorial temperature × watering experiment. Silvae Genet 51:152–160Google Scholar
  74. Pliūra A, Baliuckienė A, Baliuckas V (2008) Phenogenetic response of silver birch populations and half-sib families to elevated ozone and ultraviolet-B radiation at juvenile age. Environ Pollut 156:152–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Prozherina N, Freiwald V, Rousi M, Oksanen E (2003) Interactive effect of springtime frost and elevated ozone on early growth, foliar injuries and leaf structure of birch (Betula pendula). New Phytol 159:623–636Google Scholar
  76. Reddy AR, Chaitanya KV, Vivekanandan M (2004) Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J Plant Physiol 161:1189–1202Google Scholar
  77. Reyer C, Lasch-Born P, Suckow F, Gutsch M, Murawski A, Pilz T (2014) Projections of regional changes in forest net primary productivity for different tree species in Europe driven by climate change and carbon dioxide. Ann For Sci 71:211–225Google Scholar
  78. Romero P, Botia P (2006) Daily and seasonal patterns of leaf water relations and gas exchange of regulated deficit-irrigated almond trees under semiarid conditions. Environ Exp Bot 56:158–173Google Scholar
  79. Rozema J, Van de Staiij J, Bjorn LO, Caldwell MM (1997) UV-B as an environmental factor in plant life: stress and regulation. Trends Ecol Evol 12:22–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Sabin TE, Stafford SG (1990) Assessing the need for transformation of response variables. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Special publication no. 20Google Scholar
  81. Sage RF, Sharkey TD, Seemann JR (1989) Acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2 in five C3 species. Plant Physiol 89:590–596PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. SAS Institute Inc (2017) SAS® Analytics Pro 9.4. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA. [online] http://support.sas.com/documentation/121/. Accessed Nov 5 2017
  83. Schlyter P, Stjernquist I, Bärring L, Jönsson AM, Nilsson C (2006) Assessment of the impacts of climate change and weather extremes on boreal forests in northern Europe, focusing on Norway spruce. Clim Res 31:75–84Google Scholar
  84. Schwanz P, Polle A (2001) Differential stress responses of antioxidative system to drought in pendunculate oak (Quercus robur) and maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) grown under high CO2 concentrations. J Exp Bot 52:133–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Searles PS, Caldwell MM, Winter KW (1995) The response of five tropical dicotyledon species to solar ultraviolet-B radiation. Am J Bot 82:445–453Google Scholar
  86. Shah A (2015) Climate change and global warming introduction. http://www.globalissues.org/article/233/climate-change-and-global-warming-introduction. Accessed 15 Dec 2016
  87. Shriner DS, Heck WW, McLaughlin SB et al (1990) Response of vegetation to atmospheric deposition and air pollution. NAPAP SOS/T report 18, In: Acidic deposition: state of science and technology, vol III. National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  88. Shukla GK (1972) Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype–environment components of variability. Heredity 29:237–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Skärby L, Pleijel H (eds) (1996) Critical levels for ozone—experiments with crops, wild plants and forest tree species in the Nordic countries. Nordic Council of Ministers, Tema Nord Environment, Copenhagen, pp 7–98Google Scholar
  90. Skre O (1991) Growth experiments with seedlings of mountain birch (Betula pubescens Ehrh.) and lowland birch (Betula pendula Roth.) grown at varying temperature, light and day length. Communications SkogForsk 44.6Google Scholar
  91. Song Y, Chen Q, Ci D, Shao X, Zhang D (2014) Effects of high temperature on photosynthesis and related gene expression in poplar. BMC Plant Biol 14:111–130PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Tezara W, Lawlor DW (1995) Effects of water stress on the biochemistry and physiology of photosynthesis in sunflower. In: Mathis P (ed) Photosynthesis: from light to biosphere, vol IV. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 625–628Google Scholar
  93. Tognetti R, Longobuco A, Raschi A et al (1999) Response of two Populus clones to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration in the field. Ann For Sci 56:493–500Google Scholar
  94. VanderHeyden D, Skelly J, Innes J, Hug C, Zhang J, Landolt W, Bleule P (2001) Ozone exposure thresholds and foliar injury on forest plants in Switzerland. Environ Pollut 111:321–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Velikova V, Yordanov I, Edreva A (2000) Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants. Plant Sci 151:59–66Google Scholar
  96. Veljovic-Jovanovic S, Noctor G, Foyer CH (2002) Are leaf hydrogen peroxide concentrations commonly overestimated? The potential influence of artefactual interference by tissue phenolics and ascorbate. Plant Physiol Biochem 40:501–507Google Scholar
  97. Villani F, Pigliucci M, Lauteri M, Cherubini M, Sun O (1992) Congruence between genetic, morphometric and physiological data on differentiation of Turkish chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.). Genome 35:251–256Google Scholar
  98. Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Exp Bot 61:199–223Google Scholar
  99. Watanabe M, Yonekura T, Honda Y, Yoshidome M, Nakaji T, Izuta T (2005) Effects of ozone and soil water stress, singly and in combination, on leaf antioxidative systems of Fagus crenata seedlings. J Agric Meteorol 60:1105–1108Google Scholar
  100. Watanabe M, Yamaguchi M, Iwasaki M et al (2006) Effects of ozone and/or nitrogen load on the growth of Larix kaempferi, Pinus densiflora and Cryptomeria japonica seedlings. J Jpn Soc Atmos Environ 41:320–334Google Scholar
  101. Watanabe M, Yamaguchi M, Matsumura H, Kohno Y, Izuta T (2008) Effects of ozone on the growth and photosynthesis of Castanopsis sieboldii seedlings grown under different nitrogen loads. J Agric Meteorol 64:143–155Google Scholar
  102. Watanabe M, Umemoto-Yamaguchi M, Koike T, Izuta T (2010) Growth and photosynthetic response of Fagus crenata seedlings to ozone and/or elevated carbon dioxide. Landsc Ecol Eng 6:181–190Google Scholar
  103. Watanabe M, Kamimaki Y, Mori M et al (2018) Mesophyll conductance to CO2 in leaves of Siebold’s beech (Fagus crenata) seedlings under elevated ozone. J Plant Res 131:907–914PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Weiser F (1995) Beitrag zur Existenz von Okotypen bei Gemeiner Esche (Fraxinus excelsior L.) [Studies into the existence of ecotypes of ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.)]. Forstliche Forschungsanstalt Eberswalde e.V., Forstarchiv 66:251–257 (in German) Google Scholar
  105. Wellburn AR (1994) The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J Plant Physiol 144:307–313Google Scholar
  106. Wikberg J, Ogren E (2007) Variation in drought resistance, drought acclimation and water conservation in four willow cultivares used for biomass production. Tree Physiol 27:1339–1346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Wittig VE, Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2007) To what extent do current and projected increases in surface ozone affect photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of trees? A meta-analytic review of the last 3 decades of experiments. Plant Cell Environ 30:1150–1162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Wricke G (1962) Über eine Methode zur Erfassung der ökologischen Streubreite in Feldversuchen [About a method for detection of environmental variation range in field trials]. Z Pflanzenzucht 47:92–96 (in German) Google Scholar
  109. Xu X, Yang F, Xiao X, Zhang S, Korpelainen H, Li C (2008) Sex-specific responses of Populus cathayana to drought and elevated temperatures. Plant Cell Environ 31:850–860PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Yamaguchi M, Watanabe M, Matsumura H, Kohno Y, Izuta T (2011) Experimental studies on the effects of ozone on growth and photosynthetic activity of Japanese forest tree species. Asian J Atmos Environ 5–2:65–78Google Scholar
  111. Yin C, Peng Y, Zang R, Zhu Y, Li C (2005) Adaptive responses of Populus kangdingensis to drought stress. Physiol Plantarum 123:445–451Google Scholar
  112. Yonekura T, Dokiya Y, Fukami M, Izuta T (2001) Effects of ozone and/or soil water stress on growth and photosynthesis of Fagus crenata seedlings. Water Air Soil Pollut 130:965–970Google Scholar
  113. Zhang X, Zang R, Li C (2004) Population differences in physiological and morphological adaptations of Populus davidiana seedlings in response to progressive drought stress. Plant Sci 166:791–797Google Scholar
  114. Zhang X, Wu N, Li C (2005) Physiological and growth responses of Populus davidiana ecotypes to different soil water contents. J Arid Environ 60:567–579Google Scholar
  115. Zhang L, Hoshika Y, Carrari E et al (2018) Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus imbalance on photosynthetic traits of poplar Oxford clone under ozone pollution. J Plant Res 131:915–924PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Zhao XX, Huang LK, Zhang XQ, Li Z, Peng Y (2014) Effects of heat acclimation on photosynthesis, antioxidant enzyme activities, and gene expression in orchardgrass under heat stress. Molecules 19:13564–13576PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of ForestryLithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and ForestryKaunasLithuania
  2. 2.Vytautas Magnus University, Academy of AgricultureKaunasLithuania
  3. 3.Institute of Botany of Nature Research CentreVilniusLithuania
  4. 4.Kaunas Forestry and Environmental Engineering University of Applied SciencesKaunasLithuania

Personalised recommendations