Advertisement

Autonomous self-fertilization in Linum sulcatum, a native annual with a previously unknown mating system

  • Matthew R. JahnkeEmail author
  • Julie R. Etterson
Regular Paper
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

The mating systems of wild plant populations have profound effects on their genetic structure and evolution, yet remain unknown or incompletely described for many species. One such species, the herbaceous native annual Linum sulcatum Riddell (Linaceae), is thought to be self-compatible, but there has been no experimental evidence to date to support this claim. To assess the breeding system of this species, seeds were collected from wild populations and reared in a controlled environment. Floral manipulations and controlled pollinations were conducted to determine the degree of self-compatibility of this species and to distinguish between autonomous and facilitated modes of selfing. Additional controlled within- and between-population crosses were conducted to determine the relative degree to which this species can outcross. This study showed that self-fertilization was highly successful and can occur autonomously. In contrast, outcrossing success, both within and between populations, was very limited, suggesting this species may exhibit an extreme degree of cross-incompatibility. A pollen tube growth experiment showed that self-pollination resulted in the formation of more pollen tubes relative to cross-pollination and that complete pollen tube growth can occur less than 2 h following self-pollination. This information is relevant to the future persistence of this species, as much of its remaining habitat is distributed among small, highly fragmented patches subjected to current and future environmental stressors.

Keywords

Linum sulcatum mating system Pollen tube Self-fertilization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Andrew Olufson for assistance with pollen tube staining, Bryan Bandli for assistance with confocal microscopy, and Sonja Smerud for assistance with the map. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation grant DEB-1142784 to JRE.

Supplementary material

10265_2018_1076_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (229 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 228 KB)

References

  1. Armbruster WS, Pérez-Barrales R, Arroyo J, Edwards ME, Vargas P (2006) Three-dimensional reciprocity of floral morphs in wild flax (Linum suffruticosum): a new twist on heterostyly. New Phytol 171:581–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett SC (2002) The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat Rev Genet 3:274–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett SC, Harder LD (2017) The ecology of mating and its evolutionary consequences in seed plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 48:135–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett SC, Harder LD, Worley AC (1996) The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants. Philos Trans Biol Sci 351:1271–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biale JB (1964) Growth, maturation, and senescence in fruits: recent knowledge on growth regulation and on biological oxidations has been applied to studies with fruits. Science 146:880–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonnin I, Ronfort J, Wozniak F, Olivieri I (2001) Spatial effects and rare outcrossing events in Medicago truncatula (Fabaceae). Molec Ecol 10:1371–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlesworth D (2003) Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:1051–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charlesworth D (2006) Evolution of plant breeding systems. Curr Biol 16:R726–R735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheptou PO, Hargreaves AL, Bonte D, Jacquemyn H (2017) Adaptation to fragmentation: evolutionary dynamics driven by human influences. Philos Trans R Soc 372:20160037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crnokrak P, Barrett SC (2002) Perspective: purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56:2347–2358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cronk Q (2016) Plant extinctions take time. Science 353:446–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darwin C (1876) The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. John Murray, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darwin C (1877) The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. John Murray, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis MB, Shaw RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science 292:673–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dole JA (1990) Role of corolla abscission in delayed self-pollination of Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 77:1505–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eckert CG, Kalisz S, Geber MA, Sargent R, Elle E, Cheptou PO, Goodwille C et al (2010) Plant mating systems in a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol 25:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edmands S (1999) Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 53:1757–1768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Etterson JR, Mazer SJ (2016) How climate change affects plants’ sex lives. Science 353:32–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Etterson JR, Keller SR, Galloway LF (2007) Epistatic and cytonuclear interactions govern outbreeding depression in the autotetraploid Campanulastrum americanum. Evolution 61:2671–2683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fenster CB, Galloway LF (2000) Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in natural populations of Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae). Conserv Biol 14:1406–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fisher RA (1941) Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann Eugen 11:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Franklin-Tong VE (2008) Self-incompatibility in flowering plants: evolution, diversity, and mechanisms. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuentes M, Schupp EW (1998) Empty seeds reduce seed predation by birds in Juniperus osteosperma. Evol Ecol 12:823–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galen C (2000) High and dry: drought stress, sex-allocation trade-offs, and selection on flower size in the alpine wildflower Polemonium viscosum (Polemoniaceae). Am Nat 156:72–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Glémin S, Bazin E, Charlesworth D (2006) Impact of mating systems on patterns of sequence polymorphism in flowering plants. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273:3011–3019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldberg EE, Kohn JR, Lande R, Robertson KA, Smith SA, Igić B (2010) Species selection maintains self-incompatibility. Science 330:493–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goodwillie C, Weber J (2018) The best of both worlds? A review of delayed selfing in flowering plants. Am J Bot 105:641–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG (2005) The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:47–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grossenbacher D, Briscoe Runquist R, Goldberg EE, Brandvain Y (2015) Geographic range size is predicted by plant mating system. Ecol Lett 18:706–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamrick JL, Godt MW (1996) Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 351:1291–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris BD (1968) Chromosome numbers and evolution in North American species of Linum. Am J Bot 55:1197–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Igic B, Busch JW (2013) Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? New Phytol 198:386–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kalisz S, Vogler DW (2003) Benefits of autonomous selfing under unpredictable pollinator environments. Ecology 84:2928–2942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. JMP®, Pro, Version 10, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, 1989–2012Google Scholar
  35. Kalisz S, Vogler D, Fails B, Finer M, Shepard E, Herman T, Gonzales R (1999) The mechanism of delayed selfing in Collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 86:1239–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kalisz SD, Vogler DW, Hanley KM (2004) Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. Nature 430:884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1994) Fly pollination of Linum lewisii (Linaceae). Am J Bot 81:1091–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Klips RA, Snow AA (1997) Delayed autonomous self-pollination in Hibiscus laevis (Malvaceae). Am J Bot 84:48–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kramer AT, Havens K (2009) Plant conservation genetics in a changing world. Trends Plant Sci 14:599–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuhn M (1867) Einige Bemerkungen über Vandellia und den Blüten dimorphismus. Bot Zeitung 25:65–67Google Scholar
  42. Leimu R, Vergeer P, Angeloni F, Ouborg N (2010) Habitat fragmentation, climate change, and inbreeding in plants. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1195:84–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lloyd DG (1992) Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. Int J Plant Sci 153:370–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lloyd DG, Schoen DJ (1992) Self-and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. Int J Plant Sci 153:358–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lord EM (1981) Cleistogamy: a tool for the study of floral morphogenesis, function and evolution. Bot Rev 47:421–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mazer SJ, Hove AA, Miller BS, Barbet-Massin M (2010) The joint evolution of mating system and pollen performance: predictions regarding male gametophytic evolution in selfers vs. outcrossers. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 12:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McDill J, Repplinger M, Simpson BB, Kadereit JW (2009) The phylogeny of Linum and Linaceae subfamily Linoideae, with implications for their systematics, biogeography, and evolution of heterostyly. Syst Bot 34:386–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Müller H (1883) The fertilisation of flowers. Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nasrallah JB (2017) Plant mating systems: self-incompatibility and evolutionary transitions to self-fertility in the mustard family. Curr Opin Genet Dev 47:54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Noël E, Chemtob Y, Janicke T, Sarda V, Pélissié B, Jarne P, David P (2016) Reduced mate availability leads to evolution of self-fertilization and purging of inbreeding depression in a hermaphrodite. Evolution 70:625–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ornduff R (1969) Reproductive biology in relation to systematics. Taxon 1:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Petry WK, Soule JD, Iler AM, Chicas-Mosier A, Inouye DW, Miller TE, Mooney KA (2016) Sex-specific responses to climate change in plants alter population sex ratio and performance. Science 353:69–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Qu R, Li X, Luo Y, Dong M, Xu H, Chen X, Dafni A (2007) Wind-dragged corolla enhances self-pollination: a new mechanism of delayed self-pollination. Ann Bot 100:1155–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rathcke B, Jules E (1993) Habitat fragmentation and plant-pollinator interactions. Curr Sci 65:273–277Google Scholar
  55. Richards AJ (1997) Plant breeding systems. Garland Science, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roels SAB, Kelly JK (2011) Rapid evolution caused by pollinator loss in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 65:2541–2552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rogers CM (1963) Yellow flowered species of Linum in eastern North America. Brittonia 15:97–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rogers CM (1969) Relationships of the North American species of Linum (flax). Bull Torrey Bot Club 96:176–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rogers CM, Xavier KS (1972) Parallel evolution in pollen structure in Linum. Grana 12:41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Samson F, Knopf F (1994) Prairie conservation in North America. Bioscience 44:418–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schoen DJ, Brown A (1991) Intraspecific variation in population gene diversity and effective population size correlates with the mating system in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88:4494–4497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schoen DJ, Lloyd DG (1992) Self-and cross-fertilization in plants. III. Methods for studying modes and functional aspects of self-fertilization. Int J Plant Sci 153:381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shaw RG, Etterson JR (2012) Rapid climate change and the rate of adaptation: insight from experimental quantitative genetics. New Phytol 195:752–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spira TP, Snow AA, Whigham DF, Leak J (1992) Flower visitation, pollen deposition, and pollen-tube competition in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae). Am J Bot 79:428–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stebbins GL (1950) Variation and evolution in plants. Geoffrey Cumberlege, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Stebbins GL (1970) Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms, I: pollination mechanisms. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:307–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sun SG, Guo YH, Gituru RW, Huang SQ (2005) Corolla wilting facilitates delayed autonomous self-pollination in Pedicularis dunniana (Orobanchaceae). Plant Syst Evol 251:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Traveset A (1993) Deceptive fruits reduce seed predation by insects in Pistacia terebinthus L. (Anacardiaceae). Evol Ecol 7:357–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vogler DW, Kalisz S (2001) Sex among the flowers: the distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution 55:202–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vogler DW, Das C, Stephenson AG (1998) Phenotypic plasticity in the expression of self-incompatibility in Campanula rapunculoides. Heredity 81:546–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Williams JH (2012) Pollen tube growth rates and the diversification of flowering plant reproductive cycles. Int J Plant Sci 173:649–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Winn AA, Elle E, Kalisz S, Cheptou PO, Eckert CG, Goodwillie C, Johnston MO et al (2011) Analysis of inbreeding depression in mixed-mating plants provides evidence for selective interference and stable mixed mating. Evolution 65:3339–3359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wright SI, Kalisz S, Slotte T (2013) Evolutionary consequences of self-fertilization in plants. Proc R Soc B 280:20130133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11:413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zaremba RE (2003) Linum sulcatum Riddell grooved flax. New England plant conservation programGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Minnesota DuluthDuluthUSA

Personalised recommendations