Expression of the CLE-RS3 gene suppresses root nodulation in Lotus japonicus
Cell-to-cell communication, principally mediated by short- or long-range mobile signals, is involved in many plant developmental processes. In root nodule symbiosis, a mutual relationship between leguminous plants and nitrogen-fixing rhizobia, the mechanism for the autoregulation of nodulation (AON) plays a key role in preventing the production of an excess number of nodules. AON is based on long-distance cell-to-cell communication between roots and shoots. In Lotus japonicus, two CLAVATA3/ESR-related (CLE) peptides, encoded by CLE-ROOT SIGNAL 1 (CLE-RS1) and -RS2, act as putative root-derived signals that transmit signals inhibiting further nodule development through interaction with a shoot-acting receptor-like kinase HYPERNODULATION ABERRANT ROOT FORMATION 1 (HAR1). Here, an in silico search and subsequent expression analyses enabled us to identify two new L. japonicusCLE genes that are potentially involved in nodulation, designated as CLE-RS3 and LjCLE40. Time-course expression patterns showed that CLE-RS1/2/3 and LjCLE40 expression is induced during nodulation with different activation patterns. Furthermore, constitutive expression of CLE-RS3 significantly suppressed nodule formation in a HAR1-dependent manner. TOO MUCH LOVE, a root-acting regulator of AON, is also required for the CLE-RS3 action. These results suggest that CLE-RS3 is a new component of AON in L. japonicus that may act as a potential root-derived signal through interaction with HAR1. Because CLE-RS2, CLE-RS3 and LjCLE40 are located in tandem in the genome and their expression is induced not only by rhizobial infection but also by nitrate, these genes may have duplicated from a common gene.
KeywordsAutoregulation of nodulation CLE Legume Lotus japonicus Nodulation Root nodule symbiosis
In plants, cell-to-cell communication has important roles not only for development but also for responses to environmental stimuli. There are diverse kinds of mobile signals that may include phytohormones, small RNAs, transcription factors, or small peptides. Among these signaling molecules, recent genetic and biochemical studies have focused on the roles of small peptides (Djordjevic et al. 2015; Endo et al. 2014). The CLAVATA3 (CLV3)/ESR-related (CLE) family is one of the best characterized small peptide family in plants, and in most cases leucine-rich repeat (LRR) receptor-like kinases (RLKs) function as the receptors that transmit signals to the downstream pathway (Cock and McCormick 2001; Miyawaki et al. 2013). In plant development, the currently available data indicate that a significant feature of the signal transduction events mediated by CLE-LRR-RLK modules are associated with controlling the balance between cell proliferation and differentiation in stem cells. First, Arabidopsis CLV3 is expressed in the stem cell region located at the tip of the shoot apical meristem (SAM). CLV3 non-cell autonomously represses the expression of WUSCHEL (WUS), which encodes a WUS-related homeobox (WOX) transcription factor (Brand et al. 2000; Fletcher et al. 1999; Haecker et al. 2004; Mayer et al. 1998; Schoof et al. 2000). CLV3 physically interacts with an LRR-RLK, CLV1, that is located in cells beneath the stem cell region that overlaps with WUS-expressing cells (Clark et al. 1997; Ogawa et al. 2008). WUS also acts as a mobile signal and can move to the stem cell region, thereby directly activating CLV3 expression (Daum et al. 2014; Yadav et al. 2011). The CLV-WUS negative feedback loop is crucial for the maintenance of stem cell homeostasis in the SAM. Second, in the Arabidopsis root apical meristem (RAM), CLE40 is expressed in differentiated columella cells, and the encoded peptide is transferred to the columella stem cell region, where it controls stem cell fate (Stahl et al. 2009). Genetic data suggest that ARABIDOPSIS CRINKLY 4 (ACR4), which is not an LRR-RLK but another type of RLK, is required for CLE40 action. In addition, CLV1 is expressed in the RAM and physically interacts with ACR4 (Stahl et al. 2013). The CLE40/ACR4-CLV1 signaling pathway appears to be involved in the down-regulation of WOX5, a key regulator of quiescent center specification. Finally, in Arabidopsis vascular stem cells, proliferation is controlled by an interaction between a CLE peptide, TRACHEARY ELEMENT DIFFERENTIATION INHIBITORY FACTOR (TDIF), and an LRR-RLK, TDIF RECEPTOR (TDR)/PHLOEM INTERCALATED WITH XYLEM (PXY) (Fisher and Turner 2007; Hirakawa et al. 2008; Ito et al. 2006). WOX4 is identified as a key target of the TDIF–TDR/PXY signaling pathway (Hirakawa et al. 2010).
The signaling pathways mediated by the above-mentioned CLE peptides can be characterized as types of short-range cell-to-cell communication, in which the peptides move within a local region such as between adjacent cells or in the most distant cases across several cell layers. In contrast, long-distance action of Arabidopsis CLE6 has been shown; the root-specific expression of CLE6 rescues the shoot phenotype caused by gibberellin deficiency (Bidadi et al. 2014). Recently, the production of several small peptides that belong to the C-terminally encoded peptide (CEP) family were reported to be induced in the root in response to nitrogen deficiency (Tabata et al. 2014). Subsequently, these CEP family peptides are translocated to the shoot and recognized by two LRR-LRKs (Tabata et al. 2014). In addition, using soybean xylem sap, several small peptides were identified as long-distance mobile signals that belong to the CLE and CEP families (Okamoto et al. 2015). Although the emerging roles for CLE peptides indicate their use as long-distance mobile signals and other key peptides have been identified, there is little known of the molecular function of long-distance signals in comparison with short-range signals.
Autoregulation of nodulation (AON) is a conserved mechanism observed among diverse leguminous species by which plants restrict the number of root nodules, the symbiotic organs containing nitrogen-fixing rhizobia, to conserve energy related to nodulation (Caetano-Anolles and Gresshoff 1991; Oka-Kira and Kawaguchi 2006; Suzaki et al. 2015). The basic concept of AON is as follows. Rhizobial infection not only initiates a signaling pathway resulting in nodule formation but also induces the production of mobile negative factors for nodulation called root-derived signals that are translocated to the shoot through the xylem. When the signal is perceived in the shoot, the second signals, referred to as shoot-derived inhibitors (SDIs), are generated. The SDIs are then transferred to the root through the phloem and block further nodule development. Among the 39 LjCLE genes identified from Lotus japonicus, the expression of 2 CLE genes, CLE-ROOT SIGNAL 1 (CLE-RS1) and -RS2, is induced immediately in response to rhizobial inoculation after direct activation by an RWP-RK type transcription factor NODULE INCEPTION (NIN) (Okamoto et al. 2009; Schauser et al. 1999; Soyano et al. 2014). In addition, in Medicago truncatula, exogenous application of cytokinin to roots induces the expression of MtCLE13, a functional counterpart of the CLE-RS1/2 genes (Mortier et al. 2010, 2012), suggesting that activation of the nodulation-related CLE genes occur at the downstream part of cytokinin signaling in roots, of which finding was recently confirmed in L. japonicus (Soyano et al. 2014). There is direct evidence that CLE-RS2 meets at least one criterion for a root-derived signal because mature CLE glycopeptides derived from the CLE domain of CLE-RS2 are detected in xylem sap of plants that express CLE-RS2 (Okamoto et al. 2013). The mature CLE-RS2 peptide can physically interact with HYPERNODULATION ABERRANT ROOT FORMATION 1 (HAR1), an LRR-RLK that is orthologous to CLV1 (Krusell et al. 2002; Nishimura et al. 2002; Okamoto et al. 2013). The constitutive expression of either CLE-RS1 or CLE-RS2 almost completely abolishes nodulation, and functional HAR1 is required for CLE-RS1/2 action (Okamoto et al. 2009). Moreover, a loss-of function mutation in the HAR1 gene significantly increases nodule numbers, and reciprocal grafting experiments between roots and shoots indicate that shoot-acting HAR1 is involved in the control of nodule number (Krusell et al. 2002; Nishimura et al. 2002; Wopereis et al. 2000). Hence, the CLE-RS1/2–HAR1 module is hypothesized to play a pivotal role in the negative regulation of nodulation in AON. KLAVIER (KLV), another shoot-acting LRR-RLK, seems to be involved in CLE-RS1/2-mediated negative regulation of nodulation (Miyazawa et al. 2010; Oka-Kira et al. 2005). Recently cytokinin production was reported to be induced in the shoot by the downstream part of the CLE-RS1/2–HAR1 signaling pathway (Sasaki et al. 2014). In addition, shoot-applied cytokinin is able to move to roots and inhibit nodulation. These results suggest that shoot-derived cytokinin may be an SDI candidate. There might be a proteasome-mediated degradation process for an unidentified protein in the most downstream part of AON in roots because the negative effect of shoot-applied cytokinin is masked by a mutation in the F-box protein TOO MUCH LOVE (TML) (Magori et al. 2009; Sasaki et al. 2014; Takahara et al. 2013). In soybean, microRNA (miR) 172c appears to control nodule number by repressing its target gene, NODULE NUMBER CONTROL 1 encoding an AP2-type transcription factor, and a mutation in the NODULE AUTOREGULATION RECEPTOR KINASE gene, which encodes an LRR-RLK that is orthologous to HAR1, increases the expression level of miR172c in roots (Searle et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2014). These results suggest that in soybean SDIs may play a role in the miRNA-mediated transcriptional control of genes involved in the regulation of nodulation. Although our knowledge of AON has been furthered, identification of additional components of AON will be undoubtedly essential for a deeper understanding of the mechanism.
In this study, an in silico search enabled us to identify five new CLE genes from the L. japonicus genome. Expression analyses of the LjCLE genes suggested that it is likely that two of them are involved in nodulation. In addition, our data revealed that nodulation-related CLE genes had diverse expression patterns. Constitutive expression of CLE-RS3 in the root significantly suppressed nodulation possibly through long-distance communication between roots and shoots. Functional HAR1 was required for CLE-RS3 action. These results place CLE-RS3 as the third CLE peptide involved in AON in L. japonicus.
Materials and methods
Plant materials and growth conditions
The Miyakojima MG-20 ecotype of L. japonicus (Kawaguchi 2000) was used as the wild-type plant in this study. A description of har1–7 and tml-4 plants was published previously (Takahara et al. 2013). Plants were grown with or without Mesorhizobium loti MAFF 303099 as previously described (Suzaki et al. 2013).
Identification of new CLE genes in L. japonicus
Five new CLE genes were identified using the deduced amino acid sequence of a CLE domain from CLE-RS1 as a query for a BLAST search of a database (http://mycorrhiza.nibb.ac.jp) that contains the reference sequence data set for the L. japonicus genome assembly Lj2.5 and the unique de novo assembled contigs derived from L. japonicus (Handa et al. 2015). The cDNA sequences of the genes were determined by rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) methods using a SMARTer RACE cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The putative signal sequence cleavage sites were predicted by SignalP 3.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP-3.0/).
The primers used for PCR are listed in Table S2. Total RNA was isolated from respective organs using the PureLink Plant RNA Reagent (Invitrogen). First-strand cDNA was prepared using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA Remover (Toyobo). Real-time RT-PCR was performed using a Light Cycler 96 System (Roche) with a THUNDERBIRD SYBR qPCR Mix (Toyobo) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The expression of LjUBQ was used as the reference.
Constructs and hairy root transformation of L. japonicus
The primers used for PCR are listed in Table S2. The β-glucuronidase (GUS) gene in pENTR-gus (Invitrogen) was inserted into pCAMBIA1300-GW-GFP-LjLTI6b (Suzaki et al. 2014) by the LR recombination reaction to create the vector, pCAMBIA1300-GUS-GFP-LjLTI6b. The 3.0- or 1.1-kb fragments of the promoter region of CLE-RS3 or LjCLE40 were, respectively, amplified by PCR from wild-type genomic DNA, and inserted between the SacI and SmaI sites of pCAMBIA1300-GUS-GFP-LjLTI6b that are located upstream of the GUS gene. The coding sequence of CLE-RS3 was amplified by PCR from template cDNA prepared from wild-type L. japonicus and cloned into the pENTR/D-TOPO vector (Invitrogen). The insert was transferred into pH7WG2D,1 (Karimi et al. 2002) by the LR recombination reaction to make the p35S::CLE-RS3 construct. The plasmids used for the constitutive expression of CLE-RS1, CLE-RS2 or GUS were previously described (Okamoto et al. 2009). The resulting constructs were introduced into L. japonicus plants by Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated hairy root transformation as previously described (Suzaki et al. 2012).
Stable transformation of L. japonicus
The p35S::CLE-RS3 described above or p35S::GUS (Okamoto et al. 2009) plasmids were introduced into L. japonicus plants by A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation as previously described (Suzaki et al. 2012). Transformed plants were identified by amplifying the HYGROMYCIN PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE (HPT) gene. The primers used for PCR are listed in Table S2.
Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries under the following accession numbers: CLE-RS1, AP010912; CLE-RS2, AP010911; CLE-RS3, LC120808; LjCLE39, LC120809; LjCLE40, LC120810; LjCLE41, LC120811; LjCLE42, LC120812.
Identification of five new CLE genes in L. japonicus
Features of the CLE genes examined in this study
Number of amino acid residues
SP cleavage site
Expression of CLE-RS3 and LjCLE40 is induced during nodulation
Constitutive expression of CLE-RS3 suppresses nodulation
As previously shown, constitutive expression of either CLE-RS1 or -RS2 attenuates nodulation (Miyazawa et al. 2010; Okamoto et al. 2009; Sasaki et al. 2014; Suzaki et al. 2012; Takahara et al. 2013). In our experimental conditions, the effect of constitutive expression of CLE-RS3 was significantly weaker in comparison with those of CLE-RS1 or -RS2. Nodule development was almost completely compromised in plants that constitutively expressed the CLE-RS1 or -RS2 genes, whereas a few nodules were formed in plants that expressed CLE-RS3 (Fig. 4a–g). The negative CLE-RS1/2 effect on nodulation is required for shoot-acting HAR1 and root-acting TML, which, respectively, encode an LRR-RLK that acts as a putative receptor for the CLE peptides and a putative F-box protein. Thus, the CLE-RS1/2-mediated suppression of nodulation activity was masked in the har1 or tml mutants (Okamoto et al. 2009). In order to elucidate the HAR1- or TML-dependency of CLE-RS3 action, we next constitutively expressed CLE-RS3 in the corresponding mutants. The hypernodulating phenotype of the har1 and tml plants was unaffected by the constitutive expression of CLE-RS3 (Fig. 4h–l), suggesting that HAR1 and TML is required for the suppression of nodulation mediated by CLE-RS3.
CLE-RS3 and LjCLE40 expression is responsive to nitrate
Cytokinin is another known factor involved in the activation of nodulation-related CLE genes (Mortier et al. 2012; Soyano et al. 2014). CLE-RS1 and -RS2 expressions are activated in response to exogenous cytokinin treatment as previously shown (Fig. 6b, Soyano et al. 2014). In contrast, the expression of other five CLE genes was unaffected by cytokinin (Fig. 6b).
Prior to this investigation, only two nodulation-related CLE genes in L. japonicus, CLE-RS1 and -RS2, were well characterized. Additionally, LjCLE3 and LjCLE16 may have roles related to nodulation because their expression is upregulated in nodulated roots (Handa et al. 2015; Okamoto et al. 2009). A previous split-root experiment using L. japonicus indicates that the negative effect on nodulation by AON starts to be observed at 3 dai, and full inhibition of nodulation is accomplished at 5 dai (Suzuki et al. 2008). This observation implies that production of root-derived signals should occur at a much earlier timing than 3 dai. Following the initiation of NIN expression at 3 h after inoculation, the expression of CLE-RS1/2, direct targets of NIN, is detected at the latest at 6 h after inoculation (Okamoto et al. 2009; Soyano et al. 2014). These immediate responses of CLE-RS1/2 by rhizobial inoculation correspond to the expected behavior for root-derived signals. Here, we have newly identified another L. japonicus nodulation-related CLE gene, designated as CLE-RS3, of which expression is induced by rhizobial inoculation and constitutive expression of the gene results in a reduction in nodule number. In our experimental conditions, the activation of CLE-RS3 expression starts to be detected at 3 dai, although the level is much less than the expression of CLE-RS1/2. CLE-RS3 expression continues to increase with time after inoculation. In contrast, after 5 dai, when nodulation seems fully inhibited, CLE-RS1/2 expression levels gradually decrease as the nodulation process proceeds. The seemingly transient, high expression of CLE-RS1/2 before 5 dai suggests that upregulation of the genes may play a major role in the AON in order to establish immediate control of nodulation in response to rhizobial infection. On the other hand, we never observed an exponential increase in the number of nodules, even if the plants were grown for an extremely long time. Therefore, we hypothesize that there is a mechanism enabling long-term control of nodule numbers. One possibility is that in the downstream part of the CLE-RS1/2–HAR1 signaling module, there might be a mechanism to memorize the activation of the signal transduction to continuously produce SDI. Alternatively, other CLE peptides can be replaced with CLE-RS1/2 at a later stage to predominantly interact with HAR1, resulting in the production of SDI. The prolonged, higher expression of CLE-RS3 may account for the latter case. We, however, cannot rule out the possibility that the CLE-RS3 expression at the later stages may be related to different aspects of root nodule symbiosis other than AON, such as nitrogen fixation and utilization processes. If the CLE gene has a role related to innate nitrogen control, it is notable that its expression is induced by nitrate application. The expression of LjCLE40, another newly identified, was not detected in infection foci and started to be specifically expressed after the formation of nodule primordia bulges, suggesting that it has a role during nodulation. Nevertheless, we currently cannot reach the convincing conclusion regarding the effect of LjCLE40 overexpression on nodulation due to the probable instability of LjCLE40 overexpression. LjCLE40 expression responds to nitrate application as well. The nitrate responsiveness of some nodulation-related CLE genes is thought to be conserved in leguminous plants because in soybean the expression of the NITRATE-INDUCED CLE 1 gene also responds to nitrate (Reid et al. 2011). Further functional analyses focusing on the role of CLE-RS3 and LjCLE40 at the later nodulation stages may provide new insights into the role of CLE peptides in the control of root nodule symbiosis. Although rhizobial infection or nitrate treatment commonly activates the CLE-RS2, CLE-RS3 and LjCLE40 expression, cytokinin treatment can induce only CLE-RS2 expression. Thus, there may be both common and context-dependent mechanisms with respect to the activation of these genes.
Like CLE-RS1/2, constitutive expression of CLE-RS3 suppresses nodulation. On the other hand, the effect of p35::CLE-RS3 on nodulation is weaker than those of p35::CLE-RS1 or p35::CLE-RS2. It is unlikely that different expression levels of the respective genes are attributable to the differences in response because the same promoter was used in this assay. Generally, CLE genes encode a small protein with a conserved CLE domain at the C-terminus. In the case of CLE-RS2, the 12 amino acid peptide derived from the CLE domain can function similarly to the mature active form. In soybean, RHIZOBIA-INDUCED CLE 1 (RIC1), which has a CLE domain that is considerably conserved with those of CLE-RS1/2, has a negative effect on nodulation (Reid et al. 2011). A site-directed mutagenesis study of the CLE domain of RIC1 showed that the Arg1, Ala3, Pro4, Gly6, Pro7, Asp8, His11, and Asn12 residues are critical for its nodulation suppression activity (Reid et al. 2013). Alignment of CLE domain sequences of CLE-RS1, -RS-2, RS3 and RIC1 showed that the Arg1 residue is not conserved in CLE-RS3, whereas the other potentially important amino acid residues are mostly conserved among the CLE peptides (Fig. 1). The small difference in the CLE domain may determine the relatively weaker suppression activity of CLE-RS3. Root-specific constitutive expression of CLE-RS3 suppressed nodulation of both transformed and untransformed roots. The result indirectly suggests that CLE-RS3 can act as a long-distance signal between roots and shoots, of which conclusion needs to be confirmed by more rigid assay such as split-root experiments. The suppression effects were masked in the har1 mutants; therefore, HAR1 may be required for CLE-RS3 action. CLE-RS1 and -RS2 also have negative effects on nodulation in a HAR1-dependent manner (Okamoto et al. 2009). Currently, there is direct evidence that CLE-RS2 physically interacts with HAR1 (Okamoto et al. 2013). On the basis that the CLE domain of CLE-RS1 is completely identical to that of CLE-RS2 (Fig. 1), it seems reasonable to propose that HAR1 can also recognize CLE-RS1. Although 3 of 12 residues in the CLE domain of CLE-RS3 are different from those of CLE-RS1/2 (Fig. 1), is it possible for CLE-RS3 to interact with HAR1? In Arabidopsis, CLV1 can bind to CLE2 or CLE9, both of which belong to phylogenetically different clades from CLV3 (Ogawa et al. 2008). CLV1 was recently shown to be required for CLE3-mediated control of root architecture in response to nitrogen-deficiency (Araya et al. 2014). The genetic data suggest that CLE3, which also belongs to a phylogenetically different clade than CLV3, can be recognized by CLV1. In addition, the expression of rice FLORAL ORGAN NUMBER 2 (FON2), which encodes a CLE protein, can rescue the clv3 mutant phenotype, although 3 of 12 residues of the FON2 CLE domain are different from those of CLV3 (Suzaki et al. 2006). These observations suggest that, in addition to CLV3, CLV1 can recognize other CLE peptides with some affinity within a permissible range. It is therefore possible that CLE-RS3 acts as a negative regulator of nodulation through interaction with HAR1.
With respect to the genetic relationship between CLE-RS3 and known components of AON, in addition to HAR1, TML may be required for the CLE-RS3 action, because the tml mutation suppresses the effect of CLE-RS3 overexpression. Given that klv nodulation phenotype is almost identical to har1 and KLV can physically interact with HAR1 (Miyazawa et al. 2010), we can presume that KLV can be required for the CLE-RS3 action.
We thank Makoto Hayashi for providing M. loti MAFF303099 expressing DsRED. We also thank Satoru Okamoto for providing the p35S::CLE-RS1, p35S::CLE-RS2 and p35S::GUS plasmids. This work was supported by the National Institute for Basic Biology (NIBB) Core Research Facilities, the NIBB Model Plant Research Facility and by MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI, Japan (16H01457 to T.S. and 25291066 to M.K.).
- Araya T, Miyamoto M, Wibowo J, Suzuki A, Kojima S, Tsuchiya YN, Sawa S, Fukuda H, von Wirén N, Takahashi H (2014) CLE-CLAVATA1 peptide-receptor signaling module regulates the expansion of plant root systems in a nitrogen-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:2029–2034CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Handa Y, Nishide H, Takeda N, Suzuki Y, Kawaguchi M, Saito K (2015) RNA-seq transcriptional profiling of an arbuscular mycorrhiza provides insights into regulated and coordinated gene expression in Lotus japonicus and Rhizophagus irregularis. Plant Cell Physiol 56:1490–1511CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miyazawa H, Oka-Kira E, Sato N, Takahashi H, Wu GJ, Sato S, Hayashi M, Betsuyaku S, Nakazono M, Tabata S, Harada K, Sawa S, Fukuda H, Kawaguchi M (2010) The receptor-like kinase KLAVIER mediates systemic regulation of nodulation and non-symbiotic shoot development in Lotus japonicus. Development 137:4317–4325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oka-Kira E, Tateno K, K-i Miura, Haga T, Hayashi M, Harada K, Sato S, Tabata S, Shikazono N, Tanaka A, Watanabe Y, Fukuhara I, Nagata T, Kawaguchi M (2005) klavier (klv), a novel hypernodulation mutant of Lotus japonicus affected in vascular tissue organization and floral induction. Plant J 44:505–515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sato S, Nakamura Y, Kaneko T, Asamizu E, Kato T, Nakao M, Sasamoto S, Watanabe A, Ono A, Kawashima K, Fujishiro T, Katoh M, Kohara M, Kishida Y, Minami C, Nakayama S, Nakazaki N, Shimizu Y, Shinpo S, Takahashi C, Wada T, Yamada M, Ohmido N, Hayashi M, Fukui K, Baba T, Nakamichi T, Mori H, Tabata S (2008) Genome structure of the legume, Lotus japonicus. DNA Res 15:227–239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Stahl Y, Grabowski S, Bleckmann A, Kühnemuth R, Weidtkamp-Peters S, Pinto KG, Kirschner Gwendolyn K, Schmid JB, Wink RH, Hülsewede A, Felekyan S, Seidel CAM, Simon R (2013) Moderation of Arabidopsis root stemness by CLAVATA1 and ARABIDOPSIS CRINKLY4 receptor kinase complexes. Curr Biol 23:362–371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takahara M, Magori S, Soyano T, Okamoto S, Yoshida C, Yano K, Sato S, Tabata S, Yamaguchi K, Shigenobu S, Takeda N, Suzaki T, Kawaguchi M (2013) TOO MUCH LOVE, a novel Kelch repeat-containing F-box protein, functions in the long-distance regulation of the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis. Plant Cell Physiol 54:433–447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Wang L, Zou Y, Chen L, Cai Z, Zhang S, Zhao F, Tian Y, Jiang Q, Ferguson BJ, Gresshoff PM, Li X (2014) Soybean miR172c targets the repressive AP2 transcription factor NNC1 to activate ENOD40 expression and regulate nodule initiation. Plant Cell 26:4782–4801CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar