Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 125, Issue 5, pp 661–668 | Cite as

Arabidopsis ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 protein required for leaf morphogenesis consistently forms speckles during mitosis of tobacco BY-2 cells via signals in its specific sequence

  • Lilan Luo
  • Sayuri Ando
  • Michiko Sasabe
  • Chiyoko Machida
  • Daisuke Kurihara
  • Tetsuya Higashiyama
  • Yasunori Machida
Open Access
Regular Paper


Leaf primordia with high division and developmental competencies are generated around the periphery of stem cells at the shoot apex. Arabidopsis ASYMMETRIC-LEAVES2 (AS2) protein plays a key role in the regulation of many genes responsible for flat symmetric leaf formation. The AS2 gene, expressed in leaf primordia, encodes a plant-specific nuclear protein containing an AS2/LOB domain with cysteine repeats (C-motif). AS2 proteins are present in speckles in and around the nucleoli, and in the nucleoplasm of some leaf epidermal cells. We used the tobacco cultured cell line BY-2 expressing the AS2-fused yellow fluorescent protein to examine subnuclear localization of AS2 in dividing cells. AS2 mainly localized to speckles (designated AS2 bodies) in cells undergoing mitosis and distributed in a pairwise manner during the separation of sets of daughter chromosomes. Few interphase cells contained AS2 bodies. Deletion analyses showed that a short stretch of the AS2 amino-terminal sequence and the C-motif play negative and positive roles, respectively, in localizing AS2 to the bodies. These results suggest that AS2 bodies function to properly distribute AS2 to daughter cells during cell division in leaf primordia; and this process is controlled at least partially by signals encoded by the AS2 sequence itself.


Arabidopsis AS2 protein Cell division Leaf development Nuclear speckles Subnuclear localization 


By means of the coordinated control of cell differentiation and proliferation, leaves develop from the peripheral zone of the shoot apical meristem (SAM) with indeterminate stem cells. Initially, a group of cells, which might be in a determinate state, is generated along the proximal–distal axis. Subsequently, the adaxial-abaxial axis in early-stage leaf primordia is established for further leaf development, as cells proliferate along the medial-lateral axis, and results in flat symmetrical leaves (Steeves and Sussex 1989; Hudson 2000; Tsukaya 2006; Szakonyi et al. 2010).

In Arabidopsis thaliana, several members of the class III homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-ZIPIII) gene family determine adaxial cell fate (McConnell and Barton 1998; McConnell et al. 2001; Emery et al. 2003) and are negatively regulated by microRNAs (Bao et al. 2004; Mallory et al. 2004). Members of the YABBY (YAB) and the KANADI (KAN) gene families are involved in the specification of abaxial cell fate in the leaf lamina (Sawa et al. 1999; Siegfried et al. 1999; Bowman and Smyth 1999; Kerstetter et al. 2001; Eshed et al. 2001, 2004; Kumaran et al. 2002; Wu et al. 2008; Sarojam et al. 2010). In addition, ETTIN/AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR3 (ETT/ARF3) and ARF4 specify both abaxial cell fate and lateral growth of leaves (Pekker et al. 2005). Transcripts of these genes are down-regulated by a trans-acting small interfering RNA in the adaxial domain of leaf primordia (Montgomery et al. 2008; Chitwood et al. 2009; Schwab et al. 2009). Although these effector genes required for the establishment of polarity have been identified, the system controlling the expression of such effector genes remains to be identified.

The ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 (AS1) and AS2 genes of A. thaliana are involved in the formation of appropriately expanded and flat symmetrical leaves (Rédei and Hirono 1964; Tsukaya and Uchimiya 1997; Byrne et al. 2000; Ori et al. 2000; Semiarti et al. 2001; Iwakawa et al. 2002). Mutations in these genes are associated with pleiotropic abnormalities in leaves observed along the three developmental axes described above. AS1 and AS2 proteins form a complex (Xu et al. 2003; Yang et al. 2008), hereinafter referred to as AS2/AS1. In leaf primordia, AS2/AS1 represses both the expression of genes for such abaxial determinants as ETT/ARF3 (Iwakawa et al. 2007; Takahashi et al. 2008) and the expression of class 1 KNOTTED-like homeobox (KNOX) genes, such as BREVIPEDICELLUS (BP), which are normally expressed in the SAM and its periphery and apparently function in maintaining the indeterminate cell state (Long et al. 1996; Ori et al. 2000; Byrne et al. 2000; 2002; Semiarti et al. 2001; Lin et al. 2003). In addition, AS2/AS1 directly represses the transcription of BP and KNAT2 by binding to their 5′-upstream regions (Guo et al. 2008). Some of the pleiotropic abnormalities of as2 and as1 plants, such as short leaves and decreases in the efficiency of root regeneration, have been attributed to the ectopic expression of class 1 KNOX genes (Ikezaki et al. 2010). Recently, Ishibashi et al. (2012) showed that enhanced expression of the ETT/ARF3 gene in the as2 mutant is responsible for less efficient adaxialization and asymmetric leaf lamina in as2 (and also as1). Thus, AS1/AS2 participates in repressing the expression of class 1 KNOX and ARF genes to form expanded and flat symmetric leaves; however, the means by which KNOX and ARF gene expression is controlled by AS1/AS2 remains to be elucidated.

Both AS1 and AS2 genes encode nuclear proteins and are expressed in cells having high cell-division competence. AS1, which is expressed mainly around vascular tissues of cotyledonary nodes and leaf primordia (Iwakawa et al. 2007), encodes a myb-domain protein (Byrne et al. 2000). AS2 is expressed mainly in the adaxial domain of embryonic cotyledons and leaf primordia and encodes a plant-specific protein having an AS2/LOB domain near the amino terminus (N-terminus) that consists of cysteine repeats (the C-motif) (Iwakawa et al. 2002; Shuai et al. 2002; Matsumura et al. 2009). In addition, AS2 protein is present in subnuclear bodies in and around the nucleoli as well as the nucleoplasm in some epidermal cells of A. thaliana leaves (Ueno et al. 2007). AS1 proteins are also present in subnuclear bodies, some of which co-localize to the bodies formed by AS2 (Ueno et al. 2007; Zhu et al. 2008). Investigation of the molecular and cellular bases behind the characteristic localization of AS2 protein should be one of the tactically available approaches for understanding the molecular mechanism of gene expression that is regulated by AS2 (also AS1).

In the present study, we investigated sub-nuclear localization of the AS2-fused yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) (AS2-YFP) in the tobacco cultured cell line BY-2, which is considered to be a typical and highly proliferative cell line. We observed that subnuclear speckles showing the YFP signal were present in only a limited portion of BY-2 interphase cells, whereas such speckles were seen in almost all cells undergoing mitosis, with distribution patterns that do not seem to be stochastic. We then performed deletion analysis of the AS2 sequence to seek for signal sequences required for the localization to the speckles. Here, we report our results showing that two short stretches of the AS2 sequence including the C-motif play critical roles in the localization of AS2 to the speckles.

Materials and methods

Construction of plasmids carrying the AS2 sequence and its derivatives

To express YFP fusions in cells, full-length AS2 cDNA and its truncated cDNA fragments, which are shown in Fig. 2a, were PCR-amplified with specific primer pairs (Table S1 and Fig. S1) and cloned into YFP fusion vector pEYFP (CLONTECH, Mountain view, CA, USA). Structures of all constructs were verified by sequencing. The resulting AS2-EYFP and truncated AS2-EYFP cDNA fragments were subcloned into the binary vector pER8 (Zuo et al. 2000).

Cell culture and transformation

The tobacco cell line BY-2 was maintained in suspension culture at 26°C in the dark with weekly subculturing in modified Linsmaier and Skoog medium (Banno et al. 1993). Transformed BY-2 cells were generated by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (An 1985).

Chemicals and induction of transgene expression

17-β-estradiol was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA), prepared as a 20 mM stock solution in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and stored at −20°C in small aliquots. DMSO alone had no effect on transgene expression (data not shown). Independent transformants were separately subcultured in liquid LS medium containing 0.05 μM 17-β-estradiol for 16 h at 26°C in the dark. Several lines expressing YFP fusions were selected and analyzed.

Fluorescence microscopy

For DAPI staining, cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde in sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 15 min and stained with 0.2 μg/ml of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Images were recorded by confocal microscopy with a 40 × 1.3 NA plan apochromat oil immersion objective (FV1000 laser scanning microscope, OLYMPUS, Japan).


AS2 bodies are detected in BY-2 cells undergoing progression of M phase and a limited proportion of cells at interphase of the cell cycle

We made the XVE:AS2-YFP DNA construct, in which the coding sequence of AS2 cDNA was fused in frame to the coding sequence for yellow fluorescent protein (YFP). This fusion gene was driven by the estrogen-inducible promoter (Zuo et al. 2000) and introduced into cells of the tobacco cultured-cell line BY-2. As described in “Materials and methods”, we cultured the transformed BY-2 cells in liquid medium containing 0.05 μM 17-β-estradiol for 16 h to induce transcription of the AS2-YFP gene. We then examined those cells for subcellular and subnuclear localization of AS2-YFP proteins by observing randomly dividing cells for the fluorescent signals of AS2-YFP. As shown in Fig. 1, 4.7% of interphase cells exhibited YFP signals in subnuclear speckles in and around the nucleolus in addition to the nucleoplasm (Fig. 1, 2nd row). When only YFP was expressed in BY-2 cells (Fig. 1, 1st row), the signal was detected mainly in the nucleoplasm, as well as cytoplasm, similarly as was seen in the remaining cells at interphase with AS2-YFP (data not shown).
Fig. 1

Subcellular localization of AS2-YFP in BY-2 cells at interphase and during mitosis. Expression of AS2-YFP and YFP is controlled under the estrogen-inducible promoter. Transformed BY-2 cell lines harboring AS2-YFP and YFP constructs were incubated for 16 h in the presence of 0.05 μM 17-β-estradiol. Cells were fixed and stained with 4′6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), which is specific for nuclei. Fluorescence of DAPI (blue) and fluorescence of YFP (yellow) in BY-2 cells at the different cell cycle stages are visualized by using confocal fluorescence microscopy. Merged images (blue DAPI, yellow YFP) are shown on the right (Merged). Nomarski images are also shown (DIC). Numbers on the right represent ratios of cells showing AS2 bodies to total cells examined at specific phases of the cell cycle. In anaphase and telophase cells, AS2 bodies that seem to belong to the same pair are marked with a common shape of arrowheads or arrows. Bars 20 μm

A small proportion (5.5%) of the culture of randomly dividing transformed BY-2 cells underwent mitosis (Fig. 1). Signals from AS2-YFP were detected in several concentrated speckles in all mitotic cells (prophase to telophase in Fig. 1). Interestingly, these speckles were observed to localize in pairwise patterns adjacent to both separating sets of daughter chromosomes after metaphase (Fig. 1, 5th and 6th rows: each pair is marked by the same symbol). There were no sets of daughter chromosomes that were not accompanied by the speckles, even when only a small number of the speckles were present in the parental nuclei (see also Fig. 3). The speckles appeared to be localized to regions among condensed chromosomes in the cells at prophase. From metaphase to telophase, however, the speckles seem to locate in peripheral regions of the chromosomes. Since the signals of AS2-YFP (seen in yellow in Fig. 1) in these phases were distinct from those of DAPI (seen in blue), speckles were not always associated with segregating daughter chromosomes. The numbers and sizes of speckles were variable from cell to cell, although most of the cells at interphase and in mitosis contained 2–6 speckles (data not shown). The number of speckles in mitotic cells was also variable, but interestingly the average numbers at metaphase and anaphase-telophase were 2.0 (81 speckles in 41 cells) and 3.8 (68 speckles in 18 cells), respectively.

In summary, patterns of subnuclear localization of the AS2 protein were dynamically altered during progression of the cell division cycle of BY-2 cells. AS2 was consistently incorporated into several speckles in cells undergoing mitosis and also in a small portion of cells at interphase; conversely, AS2 was also dispersed in the nucleoplasm of almost all cells at interphase. We hereinafter refer to these speckles in BY-2 cells as AS2 bodies.

The short amino-terminal region of AS2 protein plays a negative role in the formation of AS2 bodies in interphase cells

To seek for internal regions of the AS2 protein that might be responsible for its sub-nuclear localization patterns, we introduced a series of deletions into the AS2 moiety in AS2-YFP (Fig. 2a) and investigated the localization patterns of signals from the YFP fusions (Fig. 2b). As shown in Fig. 2b(ii), 66.1% of cells that expressed AS2ΔN-YFP (Fig. 2a(ii)), which had a deletion of the amino-terminal (N-terminal) short sequence (from residues 1 to 7), exhibited YFP signals in AS2 bodies during interphase. Thus, the proportion of cells that generate AS2 bodies increased markedly, suggestive of a negative role for the N-terminal sequence of AS2 protein in the formation of the AS2 bodies during interphase.
Fig. 2

Subcellular localization of wild-type AS2 and its deletion mutants that were fused to YFP. a Schematic representation of wild-type and deletion mutants. Predicted domain organization and relevant amino-acid positions for AS2 are indicated above and below, respectively, in the wild-type schematics. Coding sequences for all AS2 proteins (i–v) were fused to the sequence corresponding to the N-terminus of the YFP sequence. These fusion constructs were linked to the estrogen-inducible promoter. b Subcellular localization of deletion mutants of AS2 in interphase cells of transformed BY-2 lines. The transformed cells harboring these fusion constructs were incubated for 16 h in the presence of 0.05 μM 17-β-estradiol. Living cells were observed by confocal fluorescence microscopy to detect fluorescence of YFP (yellow YFP). Nomarski (DIC) and merged images (Merged) are also shown. Numbers on the right represent ratios of cells showing AS2 bodies to interphase cells examined. Bars 20 μm

When the deleted region was extended into the C-motif, which is perfectly conserved in all members of the AS2/LOB family (Fig. 2a(iii)), signals from AS2ΔN-Cm-YFP were observed in the nucleoplasm in all randomly dividing BY-2 cells at interphase (Fig. 2b(iii)), which suggests that the C-motif is required for the localization of AS2 protein to AS2 bodies.

We deleted the carboxy-terminal (C-terminal) domain of AS2 in the AS2-YFP fusion (Fig. 2a(iv): designated AS2ΔC). Figure 2b(iv) shows that YFP signals in only a small portion of the interphase cells (3.4%) were visible in AS2 bodies. These results demonstrate that the C-terminal domain is not involved in the formation of AS2 bodies in interphase. Signals from AS2ΔNΔC-YFP that contained only the AS2/LOB domain sequence (Fig. 2a(v), b(v)), which is highly conserved in all members of the AS2/LOB family, were localized to AS2 bodies in 85% of cells at interphase, showing that the AS2/LOB domain is sufficient for the AS2 body formation.

The C-motif in the AS2/LOB domain is essential for the formation of AS2 bodies during mitosis in BY-2 cells

In the preceding sections, we have shown that the N-terminal short sequence and the C-motif have negative and positive roles, respectively, in the formation of AS2 bodies in cells at interphase. We addressed how mutations of these AS2 regions affect the formation of AS2 bodies in cells during mitosis. In cells expressing AS2ΔN-YFP, AS2ΔC-YFP, and AS2ΔNΔC-YFP, pairs of YFP signals were detected in AS2 bodies in all mitotic cells we examined (Fig. 3a, c, d), which suggests that the N-terminal short sequence and the C-terminal half are not required for the formation of AS2 bodies in mitotic cells. Distinct speckles were not observed in cells expressing AS2ΔN-Cm-YFP, however, even during mitosis (Fig. 3b). These results show that the C-motif is essential for the formation of AS2 bodies in cells during mitosis as well as in interphase.
Fig. 3

Subcellular localization of deletion mutants of AS2 in M phase cells of transformed BY-2 lines. BY-2 cells harboring each mutant construct were incubated for 16 h in the presence of 0.05 μM 17-β-estradiol. Cells were fixed and stained with DAPI. Fluorescence of DAPI (blue) and fluorescence of YFP (yellow) in the M-phase cells are visualized by using confocal fluorescence microscopy. Nomarski images (DIC) and merged images of YFP and DAPI (Merged) are shown in the left panels and the right panels, respectively. Numbers on the right represent ratios of cells showing AS2 bodies to total M phase cells examined. In anaphase and telophase cells, AS2 bodies that seem to belong to the same pair are marked with a common shape of arrowheads or arrows. Bars 20 μm


AS2 bodies are consistently formed in cells during mitosis

In the present study, we have shown that AS2 bodies were detected in all BY-2 cells undergoing mitosis and in a small proportion of interphase cells. In mitotic cells, the AS2 bodies consistently existed in a pairwise fashion during the segregation of chromosomes (Figs. 1, 3). This suggests that the separation of the AS2 bodies might not be a random behavior but appears instead to be coupled with the segregation of sets of daughter chromosomes. In addition, the average number of AS2 bodies in cells increased by approximately two-fold during the segregation (see the first section of “Results”). Therefore, there might be a mechanism by which the number of AS2 bodies could multiply and at least some amounts of AS2 proteins could be inevitably distributed into daughter cells after cell division. Our results, however, did not clearly show that the AS2 bodies were physically associated with segregating chromosomes. Further examinations are required for understanding how the bodies could be precisely distributed into daughter nuclei.

In addition to M phase cells, a small proportion of interphase cells also contained AS2 bodies, which is consistent with a previous report (Zhu et al. 2008). Most interphase cells (approximately 90%) did not form AS2 bodies. Since the AS2 bodies were associated with the nucleolus, which is present in cells in interphase but disappears in cells during mitosis (Leung et al. 2004), the formation of AS2 bodies might be related to such turnover of nucleoli. It is worth investigating whether the presence of AS2 bodies in interphase cells might be related to a specific phase or status in interphase of the cell cycle.

We have previously reported that when AS1-GFP and AS2-YFP proteins are synthesized in leaf cells of A. thaliana, both proteins are co-localized to the AS2 bodies (Ueno et al. 2007). When AS1-YFP and AS2-CFP are synthesized in BY-2 cells, signals from AS1-YFP are detected in both nucleoplasm and nucleolar speckles in interphase cells and in some metaphase cells (Zhu et al. 2008), which is consistent with our present and previous data (Ueno et al. 2007).

In the present study, we used tobacco BY-2 cells to investigate the formation of AS2 bodies. It has not yet been examined whether AS2 bodies in BY-2 cells might have the same or similar structural and functional characteristics as the bodies formed in the Arabidopsis epidermis (Ueno et al. 2007). Our recent results of the deletion analysis of AS2, however, showed that the C-motif was required for the formation of AS2 bodies both in the mitotic cells of BY-2 and in Arabidopsis epidermal cells (our unpublished data), suggesting that both bodies might have similar molecular characteristics. The consistent formation and biological relevance of the AS2 bodies at mitosis should be investigated by further experimentations with Arabidopsis plants.

The N-terminal half of AS2 protein is crucial for its functions in leaf morphogenesis and the formation of AS2 bodies

The N-terminal short sequence has an inhibitory function in the formation of AS2 bodies, whereas the C-terminal half has no significant effect on AS2 body formation (Fig. 2b). Deletion of the N-terminal region (AS2ΔN) yielded a markedly elevated ability to form the AS2 bodies, but no ability to restore abnormalities of the as2-1 mutant (our unpublished result). These results imply that the N-terminal sequence plays an essential role in the formation of proper leaf shape and that the highly efficient formation of the AS2 bodies has a negative effect on proper leaf morphogenesis. On the other hand, the deletion including both the N-terminal region and the C-motif (AS2ΔN-Cm) abolished the abilities to form AS2 bodies and to rescue the mutant phenotypes of as2-1. Our results of experiments with both deletion mutants suggest that proper regulation of the formation of AS2 bodies by these regions is crucial for functions of the AS2 protein in leaf morphogenesis.

AS2 bodies exhibit unique characteristics as nuclear speckles

Cajar bodies are nuclear speckles that dynamically move throughout the cell cycle of animal cells (Sleeman et al. 2003). As shown in the present study, the AS2 bodies consistently existed in BY-2 cells undergoing mitosis and were distributed in a pairwise manner after metaphase, which seems to be different from the dynamic random behavior of Cajal bodies, suggesting that the AS2 bodies are distinct from the Cajar bodies. This suggestion, however, should be confirmed by experiments with marker proteins for the Cajar bodies in cells of A. thaliana.

In human cells, the foci of lamin B1, the major B-type lamin protein, are associated with chromosomes during mitosis, but their separation does not take place in a pairwise fashion (Martin et al. 2010). To our knowledge, the mode of distribution for the AS2 bodies should be the first example for speckles that are distributed in a pairwise manner to daughter nuclei during the mitotic progression, although a number of nuclear speckles have been characterized (Bernardi and Pandolfi 2007; Matera et al. 2009; Krieghoff-Henning and Hofmann 2008; Pollock and Huang 2010). Such dynamic behavior of the AS2 protein might be critical for transmission of this protein through cell divisions that are associated with leaf morphogenesis.

In the present studies, we used the YFP-fused AS2 cDNA, which was genetically functional because it restored the as2 mutant to a wild-type phenotype. Although examinations of endogenous AS2 proteins would be ideal to approach an in vivo status of this protein, markedly low amounts of AS2 in cells of A. thaliana make it difficult to clearly visualize sub-cellular distribution of the AS2 protein.

In conclusion, AS2 protein forms speckles designated as AS2 bodies during mitosis of tobacco BY-2 cells. These bodies distribute in a pairwise fashion after metaphase, which suggests that they play a role in transmitting AS2 proteins to daughter cells during cell division and that this process is controlled at least partially by signals encoded by the AS2 sequence itself.



The authors thank Drs. Yoko Matsumura, Nanako Ishibashi (Nagoya University, Japan), Ayami Nakagawa and Hidekazu Iwakawa (Chubu University, Japan), and other members of the Machida laboratory for helpful discussions, their encouragement and support. This work was supported, in part, by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (no. 19060003) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT). LL was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for the Global Center of Excellence Program, awarded to the Division of Biological Science of Nagoya University from MEXT.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Supplementary material

10265_2012_479_MOESM1_ESM.doc (29 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 29 kb)
10265_2012_479_MOESM2_ESM.tif (1.5 mb)
Fig. S1 Primer pairs used for cloning full-length and deletion mutants of AS2. The schematic representation of each gene and the primer pairs used for PCR-amplification are illustrated. The sequences of each primer are shown in Table S1 (TIFF 1579 kb)


  1. An G (1985) High efficiency transformation of cultured tobacco cells. Plant Physiol 79:568–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banno H, Hirano K, Nakamura T, Irie K, Nomoto S, Matsumoto K, Machida Y (1993) NPK1, a tobacco gene that encodes a protein with a domain homologous to yeast BCK1, STE11, and Byr2 protein kinases. Mol Cell Biol 13:4745–4752PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao N, Lye KW, Barton MK (2004) MicroRNA binding sites in Arabidopsis class III HD-ZIP mRNAs are required for methylation of the template chromosome. Dev Cell 7:653–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernardi R, Pandolfi PP (2007) Structure, dynamics and functions of promyelocytic leukaemia nuclear bodies. Natl Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:1006–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowman JL, Smyth DR (1999) CRABS CLAW, a gene that regulates carpel and nectary development in Arabidopsis, encodes a novel protein with zinc finger and helix-loop-helix domains. Development 126:2387–2396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne ME, Barley R, Curtis M, Arroyo JM, Dunham M, Hudson A, Martienssen RA (2000) Asymmetric leaves1 mediates leaf patterning and stem cell function in Arabidopsis. Nature 408:967–971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne ME, Simorowski J, Martienssen RA (2002) ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 reveals knox gene redundancy in Arabidopsis. Development 129:1957–1965PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chitwood DH, Nogueira FT, Howell MD, Montgomery TA, Carrington JC, Timmermans MC (2009) Pattern formation via small RNA mobility. Genes Dev 23:549–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emery JF, Floyd SK, Alvarez J, Eshed Y, Hawker NP, Izhaki A, Baum SF, Bowman JL (2003) Radial patterning of Arabidopsis shoots by class III HD-ZIP and KANADI genes. Curr Biol 13:1768–1774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eshed Y, Baum SF, Perea JV, Bowman JL (2001) Establishment of polarity in lateral organs of plants. Curr Biol 11:1251–1260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eshed Y, Izhaki A, Baum SF, Floyd SK, Bowman JL (2004) Asymmetric leaf development and blade expansion in Arabidopsis are mediated by KANADI and YABBY activities. Development 131:2997–3006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo M, Thomas J, Collins G, Timmermans MC (2008) Direct repression of KNOX loci by the ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 complex of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20:48–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hudson A (2000) Development of symmetry in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 51:349–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ikezaki M, Kojima M, Sakakibara H, Kojima S, Ueno Y, Machida C, Machida Y (2010) Genetic networks regulated by ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 (AS1) and AS2 in leaf development in Arabidopsis thaliana: KNOX genes control five morphological events. Plant J 61:70–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ishibashi N, Kanamaru K, Ueno Y, Kojima S, Kobayashi T, Machida C, Machida Y (2012) ASYMMETRIC-LEAVES2 and an ortholog of eukaryotic NudC domain proteins repress AUXIN-RESPONSE-FACTOR and class 1 KNOX homeobox expression for development of flat symmetric leaves in Arabidopsis. Biology Open (accepted)Google Scholar
  16. Iwakawa H, Ueno Y, Semiarti E, Onouchi H, Kojima S, Tsukaya H, Hasebe M, Soma T, Ikezaki M, Machida C, Machida Y (2002) The ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana, required for formation of a symmetric flat leaf lamina, encodes a member of a novel family of proteins characterized by cysteine repeats and a leucine zipper. Plant Cell Physiol 43:467–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iwakawa H, Iwasaki M, Kojima S, Ueno Y, Soma T, Tanaka H, Semiarti E, Machida Y, Machida C (2007) Expression of the ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 gene in the adaxial domain of Arabidopsis leaves represses cell proliferation in this domain and is critical for the development of properly expanded leaves. Plant J 51:173–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kerstetter RA, Bollman K, Taylor RA, Bomblies K, Poethig RS (2001) KANADI regulates organ polarity in Arabidopsis. Nature 411:706–709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krieghoff-Henning E, Hofmann TG (2008) Role of nuclear bodies in apoptosis signalling. Biochim Biophys Acta 1783:2185–2194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumaran MK, Bowman JL, Sundaresan V (2002) YABBY polarity genes mediate the repression of KNOX homeobox genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14:2761–2770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leung AK, Gerlich D, Miller G, Lyon C, Lam YW, Lleres D, Daigle N, Zomerdijk J, Ellenberg J, Lamond AI (2004) Quantitative kinetic analysis of nucleolar breakdown and reassembly during mitosis in live human cells. J Cell Biol 166:787–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin WC, Shuai B, Springer PS (2003) The Arabidopsis LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES-domain gene ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 functions in the repression of KNOX gene expression and in adaxial-abaxial patterning. Plant Cell 15:2241–2252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Long JA, Moan EI, Medford JI, Barton MK (1996) A member of the KNOTTED class of homeodomain proteins encoded by the STM gene of Arabidopsis. Nature 379:66–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mallory AC, Reinhart BJ, Jones-Rhoades MW, Tang G, Zamore PD, Barton MK, Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNA control of PHABULOSA in leaf development: importance of pairing to the microRNA 5′ region. EMBO J 23:3356–3364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin C, Chen S, Jackson DA (2010) Inheriting nuclear organization: can nuclear lamins impart spatial memory during post-mitotic nuclear assembly? Chromosome Res 18:525–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matera AG, Izaguire-Sierra M, Praveen K, Rajendra TK (2009) Nuclear bodies: random aggregates of sticky proteins or crucibles of macromolecular assembly? Dev Cell 17:639–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matsumura Y, Iwakawa H, Machida Y, Machida C (2009) Characterization of genes in the ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2/LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES (AS2/LOB) family in Arabidopsis thaliana, and functional and molecular comparisons between AS2 and other family members. Plant J 58:525–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McConnell JR, Barton MK (1998) Leaf polarity and meristem formation in Arabidopsis. Development 125:2935–2942PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. McConnell JR, Emery J, Eshed Y, Bao N, Bowman J, Barton MK (2001) Role of PHABULOSA and PHAVOLUTA in determining radial patterning in shoots. Nature 411:709–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Montgomery TA, Howell MD, Cuperus JT, Li D, Hansen JE, Alexander AL, Chapman EJ, Fahlgren N, Allen E, Carrington JC (2008) Specificity of ARGONAUTE7-miR390 interaction and dual functionality in TAS3 trans-acting siRNA formation. Cell 133:128–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ori N, Eshed Y, Chuck G, Bowman JL, Hake S (2000) Mechanisms that control knox gene expression in the Arabidopsis shoot. Development 127:5523–5532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pekker I, Alvarez JP, Eshed Y (2005) Auxin response factors mediate Arabidopsis organ asymmetry via modulation of KANADI activity. Plant Cell 17:2899–2910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pollock C, Huang S (2010) The perinucleolar compartment. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2:a000679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rédei GP, Hirono Y (1964) Linkage studies. Arabidopsis Inf Serv 1:9Google Scholar
  35. Sarojam R, Sappl PG, Goldshmidt A, Efroni I, Floyd SK, Eshed Y, Bowman JL (2010) Differentiating Arabidopsis shoots from leaves by combined YABBY activities. Plant Cell 22:2113–2130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sawa S, Watanabe K, Goto K, Liu YG, Shibata D, Kanaya E, Morita EH, Okada K (1999) FILAMENTOUS FLOWER, a meristem and organ identity gene of Arabidopsis, encodes a protein with a zinc finger and HMG-related domains. Genes Dev 13:1079–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwab R, Maizel A, Ruiz-Ferrer V, Garcia D, Bayer M, Crespi M, Voinnet O, Martienssen RA (2009) Endogenous TasiRNAs mediate non-cell autonomous effects on gene regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 4:e5980Google Scholar
  38. Semiarti E, Ueno Y, Tsukaya H, Iwakawa H, Machida C, Machida Y (2001) The ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana regulates formation of a symmetric lamina, establishment of venation and repression of meristem-related homeobox genes in leaves. Development 128:1771–1783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Shuai B, Reynaga-Peña CG, Springer PS (2002) The lateral organ boundaries gene defines a novel, plant-specific gene family. Plant Physiol 129:747–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Siegfried KR, Eshed Y, Baum SF, Otsuga D, Drews GN, Bowman JL (1999) Members of the YABBY gene family specify abaxial cell fate in Arabidopsis. Development 126:4117–4128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sleeman JE, Trinkle-Mulcahy L, Prescott AR, Ogg SC, Lamond AI (2003) Cajal body proteins SMN and Coilin show differential dynamic behaviour in vivo. J Cell Sci 116:2039–2050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Steeves TA, Sussex IM (1989) Patterns in plant development. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Szakonyi D, Moschopoulos A, Byrne M (2010) Perspectives on leaf dorsoventral polarity. J Plant Res 123:281–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Takahashi H, Iwakawa H, Nakao S, Ojio T, Morishita R, Morikawa S, Machida Y, Machida C, Kobayashi T (2008) Knowledge-based fuzzy adaptive resonance theory and the application to gene expression analysis of plants. J Biosci Bioeng 106:587–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tsukaya H (2006) Mechanism of leaf-shape determination. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:477–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tsukaya H, Uchimiya H (1997) Genetic analyses of the formation of the serrated margin of leaf blades in Arabidopsis: combination of a mutational analysis of leaf morphogenesis with the characterization of a specific marker gene expressed in hydathodes and stipules. Mol Gen Genet 256:231–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ueno Y, Ishikawa T, Watanabe K, Terakura S, Iwakawa H, Okada K, Machida C, Machida Y (2007) Histone deacetylases and ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 are involved in the establishment of polarity in leaves of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19:445–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wu G, Lin WC, Huang T, Poethig RS, Springer PS, Kerstetter RA (2008) KANADI1 regulates adaxial-abaxial polarity in Arabidopsis by directly repressing the transcription of ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16392–16397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xu L, Xu Y, Dong A, Sun Y, Pi L, Xu Y, Huang H (2003) Novel as1 and as2 defects in leaf adaxial-abaxial polarity reveal the requirement for ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and 2 and ERECTA functions in specifying leaf adaxial identity. Development 130:4097–4107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang JY, Iwasaki M, Machida C, Machida Y, Zhou X, Chua NH (2008) ßC1, the pathogenicity factor of TYLCCNV, interacts with AS1 to alter leaf development and suppress selective jasmonic acid responses. Genes Dev 22:2564–2577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhu Y, Li ZY, Xu B, Li HD, Wang LJ, Dong AW, Huang H (2008) Subcellular localizations of AS1 and AS2 suggest their common and distinct roles in plant development. J Intern Plant Biol 50:897–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zuo J, Niu QW, Chua NH (2000) An estrogen receptor-based transactivator XVE mediates highly inducible gene expression in transgenic plants. Plant J 24:265–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lilan Luo
    • 1
  • Sayuri Ando
    • 2
  • Michiko Sasabe
    • 1
  • Chiyoko Machida
    • 2
  • Daisuke Kurihara
    • 1
    • 3
  • Tetsuya Higashiyama
    • 1
    • 3
  • Yasunori Machida
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of ScienceNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Graduate school of Bioscience and BiotechnologyChubu UniversityKasugaiJapan
  3. 3.JST ERATO Higashiyama Live-Holonics ProjectNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations