Journal of Plant Research

, 123:79 | Cite as

Seasonal shift in factors controlling net ecosystem production in a high Arctic terrestrial ecosystem

  • Masaki UchidaEmail author
  • Ayaka Kishimoto
  • Hiroyuki Muraoka
  • Takayuki Nakatsubo
  • Hiroshi Kanda
  • Hiroshi Koizumi
Regular Paper


We examined factors controlling temporal changes in net ecosystem production (NEP) in a high Arctic polar semi-desert ecosystem in the snow-free season. We examined the relationships between NEP and biotic and abiotic factors in a dominant plant community (Salix polaris–moss) in the Norwegian high Arctic. Just after snowmelt in early July, the ecosystem released CO2 into the atmosphere. A few days after snowmelt, however, the ecosystem became a CO2 sink as the leaves of S. polaris developed. Diurnal changes in NEP mirrored changes in light incidence (photosynthetic photon flux density, PPFD) in summer. NEP was significantly correlated with PPFD when S. polaris had fully developed leaves, i.e., high photosynthetic activity. In autumn, NEP values decreased as S. polaris underwent senescence. During this time, CO2 was sometimes released into the atmosphere. In wet conditions, moss made a larger contribution to NEP. In fact, the water content of the moss regulated NEP during autumn. Our results indicate that the main factors controlling NEP in summer are coverage and growth of S. polaris, PPFD, and precipitation. In autumn, the main factor controlling NEP is moss water content.


Carbon dioxide Climate change High Arctic Moss Net ecosystem production Salix polaris 



This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. We thank H. Koike at Meiwafosis Co. Ltd., Tokyo, for technical support in the development of the NEP chamber. Thanks are also due to the anonymous reviewer for respectful comments on our manuscript.


  1. ACIA (2005) Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Argus GW (2007) Salix (Salicaceae) distribution maps and a synopsis of their classification in North America, north of Mexico. Harv Pap Bot 12:335–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bekku Y, Kume A, Nakatsubo T, Masuzawa T, Kanda H, Koizumi H (1999) Microbial biomass in relation to primary succession on arctic deglaciated moraines. Polar Biosci 12:47–53Google Scholar
  4. Bekku YS, Nakatsubo T, Kume A, Koizumi H (2004) Soil microbial biomass, respiration rate, and temperature dependence on a successional glacier foreland in Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. Arct Antarct Alp Res 36:395–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Björk RG, Klemedtsson L, Molau U, Harndorf J, Ödman A, Giesler R (2007) Linkages between N turnover and plant community structure in a tundra landscape. Plant Soil 294:247–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper EJ (2006) Reindeer grazing reduces seed and propagule bank in the High Arctic. Can J Bot 84:1740–1752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grøndahl L, Friborg T, Christensen TR, Ekberg A, Elberling B, Illeris L, Nordstrøm C, Rennermalm Å, Sigsgaard C, Søgaard H (2008) Spatial and inter-annual variability of trace gas fluxes in a heterogeneous high-Arctic landscape. In: Meltofte H, Christensen TR, Elberling B, Forchhammer MC, Rasch M (eds) High-Arctic ecosystem dynamics in a changing climate. Academic, London, pp 473–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. IPCC (2007b) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones MH, Fahnestock JT, Stahl PD, Welker JM (2000) A note on summer CO2 flux, soil organic matter, and microbial biomass from different high arctic ecosystem types in northwestern Greenland. Arct Antarct Alp Res 32:104–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kienast F, Schirrmeister L, Wetterich S (2008) Vegetation differentiation across a topographic Yedoma–Alas transect in the high Arctic tundra of Oyogos Yar, east Siberia. In: Kane DL, Hinkel KM (eds) Ninth international conference on permafrost. Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, pp 937–940Google Scholar
  12. Lloyd CR (2001) The measurement and modelling of the carbon dioxide exchange at a high Arctic site in Svalbard. Glob Change Biol 7:405–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marchand FL, Nijs I, Heuer M, Mertens S, Kockelbergh F, Pontailler J-Y, Impens I, Beyens L (2004) Climate warming postpones senescence in high Arctic tundra. Arct Antarct Alp Res 36:390–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Muraoka H, Uchida M, Mishio M, Nakatsubo T, Kanda H, Koizumi H (2002) Leaf photosynthetic characteristics and net primary production of the polar willow (Salix polaris) in a high Arctic polar semidesert, Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. Can J Bot 80:1193–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Muraoka H, Noda H, Uchida M, Ohtsuka T, Koizumi H, Nakatsubo T (2008) Photosynthetic characteristics and biomass distribution of the dominant vascular plant species in a high Arctic tundra ecosystem, Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard: implications for their role in ecosystem carbon gain. J Plant Res 121:137–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Myklestad Å (1993) The distribution of Salix species in Fennoscandia—a numerical analysis. Ecography 16:329–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nakatsubo T, Bekku Y, Kume A, Koizumi H (1998) Respiration of the belowground parts of vascular plants: its contribution to total soil respiration on a successional glacier foreland in Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. Polar Res 17:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nakatsubo T, Bekku YS, Uchida M, Muraoka H, Kume A, Ohtsuka T, Masuzawa T, Kanda H, Koizumi H (2005) Ecosystem development and carbon cycle on a glacier foreland in the high Arctic, Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. J Plant Res 118:173–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Oechel WC, Billings WD (1992) Effects of global change on the carbon balance of Arctic plants and ecosystems. In: Chapin FS III, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J, Chu EW (eds) Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate: an ecophysiological perspective. Academic, San Diego, pp 139–168Google Scholar
  20. Ohtsuka T, Adachi M, Uchida M, Nakatsubo T (2006) Relationships between vegetation types and soil properties along a topographical gradient on the northern coast of the Brøgger Peninsula, Svalbard. Polar Biosci 19:63–72Google Scholar
  21. Rice SK, Collins D, Anderson AM (2001) Functional significance of variation in bryophyte canopy structure. Am J Bot 88:1568–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rozema J, Boelen P, Blokker P (2005) Depletion of stratospheric ozone over the Antarctic and Arctic: responses of plants of polar terrestrial ecosystems to enhanced UV-B, an overview. Environ Pollut 137:428–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shaver GR, Street LE, Rastetter EB, van Wijk MT, Williams M (2007) Functional convergence in regulation of net CO2 flux in heterogeneous tundra landscapes in Alaska and Sweden. J Ecol 95:802–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skarpe C, van der Wal R (2002) Effects of simulated browsing and length of growing season on leaf characteristics and flowering in a deciduous Arctic shrub, Salix polaris. Arct Antarct Alp Res 34:282–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sturm M, Racine C, Tape K (2001) Climate change: increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature 411:546–547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Uchida M, Muraoka H, Nakatusbo T, Bekku Y, Ueno T, Kanda H, Koizumi H (2002) Net photosynthesis, respiration, and production of the moss Sanionia uncinata on a glacier foreland in the high Arctic, Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. Arct Antarct Alp Res 32:287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. van der Wal R, Brooker RW (2004) Mosses mediate grazer impacts on grass abundance in arctic ecosystems. Funct Ecol 18:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yoshitake S, Uchida M, Koizumi H, Nakatsubo T (2007) Carbon and nitrogen limitation of soil microbial respiration in a high Arctic successional glacier foreland near Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. Polar Res 26:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masaki Uchida
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ayaka Kishimoto
    • 2
  • Hiroyuki Muraoka
    • 3
  • Takayuki Nakatsubo
    • 4
  • Hiroshi Kanda
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Koizumi
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of BiologyNational Institute of Polar ResearchTachikawaJapan
  2. 2.Carbon and Nutrient Cycles DivisionNational Institute for Agro-Environmental SciencesTsukubaJapan
  3. 3.Institute for Basin Ecosystem StudiesGifu UniversityGifuJapan
  4. 4.Department of Environmental Dynamics and Management, Graduate School of Biosphere ScienceHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan
  5. 5.Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and SciencesWaseda UniversityShinjuku-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations