Advertisement

Journal of Plant Research

, 122:597 | Cite as

Embryology of Petrosavia (Petrosaviaceae, Petrosaviales): evidence for the distinctness of the family from other monocots

  • Hiroshi Tobe
  • Hiroshi Takahashi
Regular Paper

Abstract

The affinities of Petrosavia, a rare, leafless, mycoheterotrophic genus composed of two species indigenous to East to Southeast Asia, have long been uncertain. However, recent molecular analyses show that the genus is sister to Japonolirion osense. Japonolirion and Petrosavia comprise the Petrosaviaceae, which are now placed in its own order, Petrosaviales, distinct from other monocots based on molecular analyses. We conducted an embryological study of Petrosavia, comparing it to Japonolirion, as well as to basal monocots (Acorus and Araceae) and more derived monocots (Nartheciaceae, Velloziaceae, and Triuridaceae). Our results showed that Petrosavia is very similar in embryology to Japonolirion, with both genera sharing a glandular anther tapetum, simultaneous cytokinesis in microspore mother cells, anatropous and crassinucellate ovules, T-shaped tetrads of megaspores, ab initio Cellular-type endosperm, and a mature seed coat composed of the exotesta, endotesta, and endotegmen. The two genera of Petrosaviaceae are clearly distinct from Acorus, and all Araceae, Nartheciaceae, Velloziaceae, and Triuridaceae genera in various combinations of characters. Thus, both molecular and embryological evidence support the distinctness of the Petrosaviaceae from other monocots and its placement in its own order, Petrosaviales.

Keywords

Embryology Japonolirion Monocots Petrosavia Petrosaviaceae Petrosaviales 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 21510240).

References

  1. Barabé D, Lacroix C, Bruneau A, Archambault A, Gibernau M (2004) Floral development and phylogenetic position of Schismatoglottis (Araceae). Int J Plant Sci 165:173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biddle JA (1979) Anther and pollen development in garden pea and cultivated lentil. Can J Bot 57:1883–1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Browne ET Jr (1961) Morphological studies in Aletris. I. Development of the ovule, megaspores and megagametophyte of A. aurea and their connection with the systematics of the genus. Am J Bot 48:143–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buell MF (1935) Seed and seedling of Acorus calamus. Bot Gaz 96:758–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buell MF (1938) Embryogeny of Acorus calamus. Bot Gaz 99:556–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caddick LR, Rudall PJ, Wilkin P, Chase MW (2000) Yams and their allies: systematics of Dioscoreales. In: Wilson KL, Morrison DA (eds) Monocots: systematics and evolution, vol 1. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 475–487Google Scholar
  7. Cameron KM, Chase MW, Rudall PJ (2003) Recircumscription of the monocotyledonous family Petrosaviaceae to include Japonolirion. Brittonia 55:214–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chase MW, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Rudall PJ, Fay MF, Hahn WH, Sullivan S, Joseph J, Givinish TJ, Systma KJ, Pires JC (2000) Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: an assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. In: Wilson KL, Morrison DA (eds) Monocots: systematics and evolution, vol 1. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 3–16Google Scholar
  9. Chase MW, Fay MF, Devey DS, Maurin O, Ronsted N, Davies TJ, Pillon Y, Petersen G, Seberg O, Tamura MN, Asmussen CB, Hilu K, Borsch T, Davis JI, Stevenson DW, Pires JC, Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ, McPherson MA, Graham SW, Rai HS (2006) Multigene analyses of monocot relationships: a summary. Aliso 22:63–75Google Scholar
  10. Corner EJH (1976) The seeds of the dicotyledons, vol 2. Oxford, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis GL (1966) Systematic embryology of flowering plants. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Duvall MR (2001) An anatomical study of anther development in Acorus L.: phylogenetic implications. Plant Syst Evol 228:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Floyd SK, Friedman WE (2000) Evolution of endosperm developmental patterns among basal flowering plants. Int J Plant Sci 161(6 Suppl):S57–S81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Furness CA, Rudall PJ (1999) Microsporogenesis in monocotyledons. Ann Bot 84:475–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuse S, Tamura MN (2000) A phylogenetic analysis of the plastid matK gene with emphasis on Melanthiaceae sensu lato. Plant Biol 2:415–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Givnish TJ, Pires JC, Graham SW, McPherson MA, Prince LM, Patterson TB, Rai HS, Roalson EH, Evans TM, Hahn WJ, Millam KC, Meerow AW, Molvray M, Kores PJ, O’Brien HE, Hall JC, Kress WJ, Sytsma KJ (2006) Phylogenetic relationships of monocots based on the highly informative plastid gene ndhF: evidence for widespread concerted convergence. In: Columbus JT et al (eds) Monocots: comparative biology and evolution (excluding Poales). Rancho Santa Ana Botanical Garden, Claremont, pp 28–51 [Aliso 22: 28–51]Google Scholar
  17. Gow JE (1907) Morphology of Spathyeme foetida. Bot Gaz 43:131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graham SW, Zgurski JM, McPherson MA, Cherniawsky DM, Saarela JM, Horne EFC, Smith SY, Wong WA, O’Brien HE, Biron VL, Pires JC, Olmstead RG, Chase MW, Rai HS (2006) Robust inference of monocot deep phylogeny using an expanded multigene plastid data set. In: Columbus JT et al (eds) Monocots: comparative biology and evolution (excluding Poales). Rancho Santa Ana Botanical Garden, Claremont, pp 3–21 [Aliso 22: 3–21]Google Scholar
  19. Groom P (1892) On the embryo of Petrosavia, Beccari. Ann Bot (London) 6:380–382Google Scholar
  20. Groom P (1895) On a new saprophytic monocotyledon. Ann Bot (London) 9:45–58Google Scholar
  21. Johri BM, Ambegaokar KB, Srivastava PS (1992) Comparative embryology of angiosperms, vol 2. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  22. Jüssen FJ (1929) Die Haploidgeneration der Araceen und ihre Verwertung für das System. Bot Jahrb Syst 62:155–283Google Scholar
  23. Rosendahl CO (1909) Embryo-sac development and embryology of Symplocarpus foetidus. Minnesota Bot Stud IV Bot Ser 7(4):1–9Google Scholar
  24. Rübsamen-Weustenfeld T (1991) Morphologische, embryologische und systematische Untersuchungen an Triuridaceae. Biblio Bot 140:1–113Google Scholar
  25. Rudall PJ, Furness CA (1997) Systematics of Acorus: ovule and anther. Int J Plant Sci 158:640–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sato Y, Kirito E (1988) Formation of embryo-sac and callose deposition during its development in Aletris luteoviridis. Sci Rep Yokohama Natl Univ (Sect II) 35:47–56Google Scholar
  27. Schmid R (1986) On cornerian and other terminology of angiospermous and gymnospermous seed coats: historical perspective and terminological recommendations. Taxon 35:476–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Seubert E (1993) Die Samen der Araceen. Koeltz Scientific Books, KoenigsteinGoogle Scholar
  29. Soltis DE, Mort ME, Soltis PS, Albach DC, Zanis M, Savolainen V, Hahn WH, Hoot SB, Fay MF, Axtell M, Swensen SM, Price LM, Kress WJ, Nixon KC, Farris JS (2000) Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot J Linn Soc 133:381–461Google Scholar
  30. Stenar H (1931) Die Art der Pollenbildung bei Narthecium ossifragum Huds. Bot Notiser 1931:51–54Google Scholar
  31. Sterling C (1978) Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Liliaceae: Hewardieae, Petrosavieae, and Tricyrteae. Bot J Linn Soc 77:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stevens PF (2001) Angiosperm phylogeny website, version 9. Website http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/. Accessed 29 July 2009
  33. Takhtajan A (1997) Diversity and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Tam S-M, Boyce PC, Upson TM, Barabé D, Bruneau A, Forest F, Parker JS (2004) Intergeneric and infrafamilial phylogeny of subfamily Monsteroideae (Araceae) revealed by chloroplast trnL-F sequences. Am J Bot 9:490–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tamura MN, Yamashita J, Fuse S, Haraguchi M (2004) Molecular phylogeny of monocotyledons inferred from combined analysis of plastid matK and rbcL sequences. J Plant Res 117:109–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tobe H (1989) The embryology of angiosperms: its broad application to the systematic and evolutionary study. Bot Mag (Tokyo) 102:351–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tobe H (2008) Embryology of Japonolirion (Petrosaviaceae, Petrosaviales): a comparison with other monocots. J Plant Res 121:407–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tobe H, Kadokawa T (2008) Embryology of the Araceae: variation and character evolution. Makinoa N S 7:29–53Google Scholar
  39. Tobe H, Raven PH (1984) The number of cells in the pollen of Melastomataceae (Myrtales). Bot Mag (Tokyo) 97:131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Varitchak B (1940) Le développement du sac embryonnaíre et le nombre de chromosomes chez la plante Narthecium scadicum Kosanin. Bull Acad Sci (Beograd) Ser B 6:97–105Google Scholar
  41. Vázquez-Santana S, Engelman EM, Martínez-Mena A, Márquez-Guzmán J (1998) Ovule and seed development of Lacandonia schismatica (Lacandoniaceae). Am J Bot 85:299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Botany, Graduate School of ScienceKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Faculty of EducationGifu UniversityGifuJapan

Personalised recommendations