Maintenance mechanisms of the pipe model relationship and Leonardo da Vinci’s rule in the branching architecture of Acer rufinerve trees
- 306 Downloads
The pipe model relationship (constancy of branch cross-sectional area/leaf area) and Leonardo da Vinci’s rule (equality of total cross-sectional area of the daughter branches and cross-sectional area of their mother branch) are empirical rules of tree branching. Effects of branch manipulation on the pipe model relationships were examined using five Acer rufinerve trees. Half the branches in each tree were untreated (control branches, CBs), and, for the others (manipulated branches, MBs), either light intensity or leaf area (both relating to photosynthetic source activity), or shoot elongation (source + sink activities), was reduced, and responses of the pipe model relationships were followed for 2 years. The pipe model relationship in MBs changed by suppression of source activity, but not by simultaneous suppression of source + sink activities. The manipulations also affected CBs in the year of manipulation and both branches in the next year. The branch diameter growth was most affected by light, followed by shoot elongation and leaf area, in that order. Because of the decussate phyllotaxis of A. rufinerve, one branching node can potentially have one main and two lateral branches. Analysis of 295 branching nodes from 13 untreated trees revealed that the da Vinci’s rule held in branching nodes having one shed branch but not in the nodes without branch shedding, indicating the necessity of natural shedding of branches for da Vinci’s rule to hold. These analyses highlight the importance of the source–sink balance and branch shedding in maintenance of these empirical rules.
KeywordsBranch shedding Diameter growth Interaction Leaf area:branch-area ratio Light intensity Source-sink
This research was financially supported by a Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from the Japan Science Society. We thank Drs. Y. Chiba, T. Hachiya, H. Ishii, T. Kubo, H. Muraoka, E. Nabeshima, K. Niiyama, R. Oguchi, T. Saito, T. Shirota, A. Sumida, A. Takenaka, H. Taneda, and K. Umeki for their constructive comments. We also thank the staff of the Ashu Experimental Forest of Kyoto University for their help and support.
- Buck-Sorlin GH (1998) A quantification of shoot shedding in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.). Bot J Linn Soc 127:371–391Google Scholar
- Horn HS (2000) Twigs, trees, and the dynamics of carbon in the landscape. In: Brown JH, West GB (eds) Scaling in biology. Oxford, New York, pp 99–220Google Scholar
- Kikuzawa K (1983) Leaf survival of woody plants in deciduous broad-leaved forests. 1. Tall trees. Can J Bot 61:2133–2139Google Scholar
- Komiyama A, Matsuhashi T, Kurumado K, Inoue S (1989) Relationships between leaf development and trunk diameter growth in white birch forest (in Japanese). J Jpn For Soc Chubu Branch 37:51–52Google Scholar
- Nikinmaa E (1992) Analyses of the growth of Scots pine: matching structure with function. Acta For Fenn 235:1–68Google Scholar
- Richter JP (1970) The notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Ruohomäki K, Haukioja E, Repka S, Lehtila K (1997) Leaf value: effects of damage to individual leaves on growth and reproduction of mountain birch shoots. Ecology 78:2105–2117Google Scholar
- Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964) A quantitative analysis of plant form—the pipe model theory. I. Basic analyses. Jpn J Ecol 14:97–105Google Scholar
- Terashima I, Kimura K, Sone K, Noguchi K, Ishida A, Uemura A, Matsumoto Y (2002) Differential analysis of the effects of the light environment on development of deciduous trees: basic studies for tree growth modeling. In: Nakashizuka T, Matsumoto Y (eds) Diversity and interaction in a temperature forest community: Ogawa Forest Reserve of Japan. Ecological studies vol 158. Springer, Tokyo, pp 187–200Google Scholar