Advertisement

Statistical Methods & Applications

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 191–209 | Cite as

Tukey’s M-estimator of the Poisson parameter with a special focus on small means

  • Hanan Elsaied
  • Roland Fried
Article

Abstract

We treat robust M-estimators for independent and identically distributed Poisson data. We introduce modified Tukey M-estimators with bias correction and compare them to M-estimators based on the Huber function as well as to weighted likelihood and other estimators by simulation in case of clean data and data with outliers. In particular, we investigate the problem of combining robustness and high efficiencies at small Poisson means caused by the strong asymmetry of such Poisson distributions and propose a further estimator based on adaptive trimming. The advantages of the constructed estimators are illustrated by an application to smoothing count data with a time varying mean and level shifts.

Keywords

Count data Poisson model Huber M-estimator Tukey M-estimator Outliers Robustness 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

62-07 62F35 62G05 62G35 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The FCS data are kindly provided by the Department of Systemic Cell Biology of the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology in Dortmund, Germany. The authors are very grateful for the stimulating comments of two reviewers and the editor which were very helpful for improving the paper.

References

  1. Agostinelli C (2013) Wle. Version 0.9-9. Available from http://cran.r-project.org/
  2. Bernholt T, Fried R, Gather U, Wegener I (2006) Modified repeated median filters. Stat Comput 16:177–192MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Cadigan NG, Chen J (2001) Properties of robust M-estimators for Poisson and negative binomial data. J Stat Comput Simul 70:273–288Google Scholar
  4. Cantoni E, Ronchetti E (2001) Robust inference for generalized linear models. J Am Stat Assoc 96:1022–1030MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Chu CK, Glad IK, Godtliebsen F, Marron JS (1998) Edge-preserving smoothers for image processing. J Am Stat Assoc 93:526–541Google Scholar
  6. Hampel F (1974) The influence curve and its role in robust estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 69:383–393MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Huber P (1981) Robust statistic of location parameter. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Kohl M, Ruckdeschel P (2010) R package distrMod: object-oriented implementation of probability models. J Stat Softw 35:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kohl M, Ruckdeschel P (2013) ROptEst. Version 0.9. Available from http://cran.r-project.org/
  10. Lee Y, Kassam S (1985) Generalized median filtering and related nonlinear filtering techniques. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 33:672–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Markatou M, Basu A, Lindsay B (1997) Weighted likelihood estimating equations: the discrete case with applications to logistic regression. J Stat Plan Inference 57:215–232MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Marazzi A, Yohai V (2010) Optimal robust estimates using the Hellinger distance. Adv Data Anal Classif 4:169–179MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Maronna RA, Martin RD, Yohai VJ (2006) Robust Statistics. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. R version 3.0.2 (2013) Copyright (C) 2013 The R Foundation for Statistical ComputingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Statistics, Faculty of CommerceSuez Canal UniversityIsmailiaEgypt
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsTU Dortmund UniversityDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations