Portuguese Economic Journal

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 155–181 | Cite as

What drives idiosyncratic volatility over time?

Original Article

Abstract

We document the patterns of market-wide and firm-specific volatility in the Portuguese stock market over the 1991–2005 period and test several explanations for the behavior of firm-level idiosyncratic volatility. Unlike previous studies we find no evidence of a statistically significant rise in firm-specific volatility. On the contrary, the ratio of firm-specific risk to total risk slightly decreases. We show that this result stems from new listings of large privatized companies that display lower firm-specific risk. Our findings are consistent with the idea that changes in idiosyncratic volatility are related to changes in the composition of the market.

Keywords

Idiosyncratic volatility Firm-specific risk Volatility components 

JEL Classification

G15 

References

  1. Bali T, Cakici N, Zhang Z, Yan X (2005) Does idiosyncratic risk really matter? J Finance 60:905–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bekaert G, Hodrick RJ, Zhang X (2008) Is there a trend in idiosyncratic volatility? SSRN, New York, Working paper 1108170Google Scholar
  3. Bennett J, Sias R (2005) Why has firm-specific risk increased over time? Financ Anal J 62:89–100, September/OctoberCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandt M, Brav A, Graham J, Kumar A (2008) The idiosyncratic volatility puzzle: time trend or speculative periods? SSRN, New York, Working paper 1141219Google Scholar
  5. Brown G, Kapadia N (2007) Firm-specific risk and equity market development. J Financ Econ 84:358–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell J, Lettau M, Malkiel B, Xu Y (2001) Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. J Finance 56:1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Comin D, Philippon T (2005) The rise in firm-level volatility: causes and consequences. NBER, Cambridge, Working paper 11388Google Scholar
  8. Cooper D, Woglom G (2002) The S&P500 effect: not such good news. FEDS, New York, Working paper 48Google Scholar
  9. Dickey D, Fuller W (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427–431Google Scholar
  10. Durnev A, Morck R, Young B, Zarowin P (2003) Does greater firm-specific return variation mean more or less informed stock pricing? J Acc Res 41:797–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferreira M, Gama P (2004) Have world, country and industry risks changed over time? An investigation of developed stock markets volatility. J Financ Quant Anal 40:195–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferreira M, Laux P (2007) Corporate governance, idiosyncratic risk, and information flow. J Finance 62:951–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaspar J, Massa M (2006) Idiosyncratic volatility and product market competition. J Bus 79:3125–3152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goyal A, Santa Clara P (2003) Idiosyncratic risk matters! J Finance 58:975–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo H, Savickas R (2006) Idiosyncratic volatility, stock market volatility and expected stock returns. J Bus Econ Stat 24:43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jin L, Myers SC (2006) R2 around the world: new theory and new tests. J Financ Econ 79:257–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kearney C, Potì V (2004) Idiosyncratic risk, market risk and correlation dynamics in European equity markets. Institute for International Integration Studies, Dublin, Working PapersGoogle Scholar
  18. Li K, Morck R, Yang F, Yeung B (2004) Firm-specific variation and openness in emerging markets. Rev Econ Stat 86:658–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morck R, Yeung B, Yu W (2000) The information content of stock markets: why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements? J Financ Econ 58:215–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Newey W, West K (1994) Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Rev Econ Stud 61:631–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schwert GW (1989) Why does stock market volatility change over time? J Finance 44:1115–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vogelsang T (1998) Trend function hypothesis testing in the presence of serial correlation. Econometrica 66:123–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vuolteenaho T (2002) What drives firm-level stock returns? J Finance 57:233–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wei S, Zhang C (2006) Why did individual stocks become more volatile? J Bus 79:259–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xu Y, Malkiel B (2003) Investigating the behavior of idiosyncratic volatility. J Bus 76:613–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculdade de Economia and CEMPREUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Faculdade de EconomiaUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations