Portuguese Economic Journal

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 47–64 | Cite as

Business cycle and level accounting: the case of Portugal

Original Article


This paper studies what accounts for the recent business cycles phenomena in Portugal and why it is depressed relatively to the United States. The business accounting procedure applied here suggests that most of the changes in output per worker in Portugal over the period (mainly, from 1979 to 1991) can be attributed to changes in economic efficiency. For instance, the strong economic recovery in output per worker just after Portugal joined the European Union until the first years of the 1990s can be essentially attributed to improvements in economic efficiency. From 1979 to 2000, Portugal caught up with the industrial leader. Its output per worker is currently depressed by about 46% relative to the United States level (it was depressed by 57% in 1979). In the 1980s all of this depression in output per worker relative to the United States was due to the productivity factor. By 2000 Portugal depression relative to the United States was a mix of the French and Japanese depression. The labor factor accounted for roughly 24% of this depression, while the economic efficiency accounted by about 89%.

JEL Classification

C68 E32 O47 


Depression Business cycles Development 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alvarez F, Veracierto M (1999) Labor market policies in an equilibrium search model. NBER Macroeconomic Annual 14:263–304Google Scholar
  2. Antunes A, Cavalcanti T, Villamil A (2006) The effect of financial repression & enforcement on entrepreneurship and economic development. Working paper, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  3. Antunes AR, Cavalcanti TV (2007) Start up costs, limited enforcement, and the hidden economy. Eur Econ Rev 51(1):203–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baer W, Leite AN (1992) The peripheral economy, its performance in isolation and with integration: The case of Portugal. Luso-Braz Rev 29(2):1–43Google Scholar
  5. Baer W, Leite AN (2003) The economy of Portugal within the European Union: 1990–2002. Q Rev Econ Finance 43(5):738–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailly MN, Solow RM (2001) International productivity comparisons built from the firm level. J Econ perspect 15(3):151–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertola G, Rogerson R (1997) Institutions and labor reallocation. Eur Econ Rev 41(6):1147–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanchard O, Portugal P (2001) What hides behind an unemployment rate: comparing Portuguese and US labor markets. Am Econ Rev 91:187–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavalcanti T (2004) Layoff costs, tenure, and the labor market. Econ Lett 84(3):383–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavalcanti T, Novo A (2005) Institutions and economic development: how strong is the relationship? Empir Econ 30(2):263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chari VV, Kehoe PJ, McGrattan ER (2006) Business cycle accounting. Econometrica (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  12. Correia I, Neves JC, Rebelo S (1995) Business cycles in a small open economy. Eur Econ Rev 39:1089–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gollin D (2002) Getting income shares right. J Polit Econ 110(2)Google Scholar
  14. Groningen Growth and Development Centre and The Conference Board (2003) Total Economy Database. http://www.ggdc.net
  15. Hayashi F, Prescott E (2002) The 1990s in Japan: a lost decade. Rev Econ Dyn 5(1):206–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heston A, Summers R, Aten B (2002) Penn World Table Version 6.1. Center for International Comparisons, University of Pensylvania, PA (CICUP)Google Scholar
  17. Jeong H, Townsend RM (2005) Sources of TFP growth: occupational choice and financial deepening. Working Paper, University of Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  18. Lucas Jr RE (1980) Methods and problems in business cycle theory. J Money Credit Bank 12(4):696–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parente SL, Prescott E (2000) Barriers to Riches, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Pinheiro M et al (1997) Séries longas para a economia portuguesa. Banco de PortugalGoogle Scholar
  21. Prescott E (2002) Prosperity and depression. Am Econ Rev 92(2):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tauchen G (1986) Finite state Markov-Chain approximations to univariate and vector autoregressions. Econ lett 20:177–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tavares J (2004) Institutions and economic growth in Portugal: a quantitative exploration. Portuguese Economic Journal 3(1):49–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de EconomiaUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, and INOVA, Universidade NOVA de LisboaPernambucoBrasil

Personalised recommendations