Peer-to-peer sharing and collaborative consumption platforms: a taxonomy and a reproducible analysis

  • Friedrich Chasin
  • Moritz von Hoffen
  • Marcus CramerEmail author
  • Martin Matzner
Original Article


Airbnb and Uber enable private individuals to share physical resources via their Internet platforms, and both have become popular subjects of information systems and e-business research. In the top dogs’ slipstream resides a variety of less-known platforms that allow to share different resources or to share resources in different ways. Researchers who study these platforms and the underlying consumer behaviors face the problem of situating their findings precisely. Practitioners lack an overview of the diversity of these platforms and their characteristics too. This article suggests a taxonomy that helps to better characterize platforms for Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Sharing and Collaborative Consumption (SCC). We used the taxonomy to describe the evolution of 522 P2P SCC platforms over the period of 35 months and to demonstrate and partly evaluate its application. All descriptions taken together constitute a comprehensive data source to study P2P SCC platforms. When researchers use the taxonomy, they can describe and situate insights precisely so that stakeholders can access them more easily. Furthermore, researchers and practitioners can use our database as well as the analyses we made based on the data for their purpose. Because we deliver the computer scripts that we used in our analysis, our study can easily be reproduced in the future to investigate the dynamics of the P2P SCC market.


Taxonomy Sharing Economy Collaborative Consumption P2P Peer-to-Peer Platforms Reproducible research 


  1. Albinsson PA, Yasanthi Perera B (2012) Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: building community through sharing events. J Consum Behav 11(4):303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson M, Hjalmarsson A, Avital M (2013) Peer-to-Peer service sharing platforms: driving share and share alike on a mass-scale. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information systems (ICIS 2013)Google Scholar
  3. Bailey K (1994) Numerical taxonomy and cluster analysis. Typol Taxon 34:24Google Scholar
  4. Baker D (2014) Don’t buy the ’Sharing Economy’ hype: Airbnb and Uber are facilitating rip-offs (Electronic Version).
  5. Bardhi F, Eckhardt GM (2012) Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing. J Consum Res 39(December):881–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belk R (2007) Why not share rather than own? Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 611(1):126–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belk R (2010) Sharing. J Consum Res 36(5):715–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belk R (2014a) Sharing versus pseudo-sharing in web 2.0. Anthropologist 18(1):7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belk R (2014b) You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online. J Bus Res 67(8):1595–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bendapudi N, Leone R (2003) Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production. J Mark 67(1):14–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benkler Y (2004) Sharing nicely: on shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. Yale Law J 114(2):273–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benkler Y (2007) The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. Inf Econ Policy 29(2):278–282Google Scholar
  13. Bernstam E, Shelton D, Walji M, Meric-Bernstam F (2005) Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the world wide web: what can our patients actually use? Int J Med Inform 74(1):13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boesler M (2013) The rise of the renting and sharing economy could have catastrophic ripple effects. Business Insider
  15. Botsman R, Rogers R (2010) What’s mine is yours: the rise of collaborative consumption. HarperBusiness, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Calder BJ, Malthouse EC (2013) Managing media and advertising change with integrated marketing request permissions: click here managing media and advertising change with integrated marketing. J Advert Res 45(May):356–361Google Scholar
  17. Chase R (2013) The rise of the collaborative economy.
  18. Chasin F (2014) Sustainability: are we all talking about the same thing?. In: Proceedings of the ICT for sustainability. Stockholm, pp 342–351Google Scholar
  19. Sc Chen, Li Sh (2010) Consumer adoption of e-service: integrating technology readiness with the theory of planned behavior. J Bus 4(16):3556–3563Google Scholar
  20. Chen Y (2009) Possession and access: consumer desires and value perceptions regarding contemporary art collection and exhibit visits. J Consum Res 35(6):925–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Conrad M, Funk C, Raabe O, Waldhorst OP (2010) Legal complicance by design: technical solutions for future distributed electronic markets. J Intell Manuf 21(3):321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De P (2013) The rise of the sharing economy (electronic version.
  23. Firnkorn J, Müller M (2012) Selling mobility instead of cars: new business strategies of automakers and the impact on private vehicle holding. Bus Strategy Environ 21(4):264–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fogg BJ, Iizawa D (2008) Online persuasion in facebook and mixi: a cross-cultural comparison. In: Oinas-Kukkonen H, Hasle P, Harjumaa M, Segerståhl K, Øhrstrøm P (eds) Persuasive technology, Lecutre notes in computer science (LNCS), vol 5033. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 35–46Google Scholar
  25. Gallant LM, Boone GM, Heap A (2007) Five heuristics for designing and evaluating web-based communities (electronic version). First Monday 12(3):Google Scholar
  26. Gansky L (2010) The mesh: why the future of business is sharing. Penguin Group US, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Gorenflo N (2012) Researchers flub conclusions about sharers due to limited zipcar survey.
  28. Gregor S (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q Manag Inf Syst 30(3):611–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haas P, Blohm I, Leimeister Jb (2014) An empirical taxonomy of crowdfunding intermediaries. In: 35th International conference on information systems ”building a better world through information systems”, ICIS 2014, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  30. Heinrichs H (2013) Sharing economy: a potential new pathway to sustainability. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci 22(4):228–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hughes J, Lang KR, Vragov R (2008) An analytical framework for evaluating peer-to-peer business models. Electron Commer Res Appl 7(1):105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. John NA (2013) The social logics of sharing. The Commun Rev 16(3):113–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kassan J, Orsi J (2012) The legal landscape of the sharing economy. J Environ Law Litigat 27(1):1–20Google Scholar
  34. Kreyer N, Pousttchi K, Turowski K (2007) Standardized payment procedures as key enabling factor for mobile commerce. In: Bauknecht K, Tjoa AM, Quirchmayr G (eds) Proceedings of the third international conference on e-commerce and web technologies (EC-Web 2002). Lecture notes in computer science (LNCS), vol 2455. Springer, Aix-en-Provence, pp 400–409Google Scholar
  35. Lamberton CP, Rose RL (2012) When is ours better than mine: a framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. J Mark 76(4):109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leismann K, Schmitt M, Rohn H, Baedeker C (2013) Collaborative consumption: towards a resource-saving consumption culture. Resources 2(3):184–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Malhotra A, Van Alstyne M (2014) The dark side of the sharing economy.. and how to lighten it. Commun ACM 57(11):24–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marx P (2011) The borrowers (electronic version). The New Yorker
  39. Mentzas G (1994) A functional taxonomy of computer based information systems. Int J Inf Manag 14(6):397–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Micheletti M, Follesdal A, Stolle D (2004) Politics, products, and markets: exploring political consumerism past and present. Transaction Publishers, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  41. Mills P, Morris J (1986) Clients as partial employees of service organizations: role development in client participation. Acad Manag Rev 11(4):726–735Google Scholar
  42. Mont OK (2002) Clarifying the concept of product-service system. J Clean Prod 10(3):237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nickerson RC, Varshney U, Muntermann J (2013) A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur J Inf Syst 22(3):336–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Okaie Y, Nakano T (2011) A game theoretic framework for peer-to-peer market economy. Int J Grid Util Comput 2(3):183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Owyang J (2015) Large companies ramp up adoption in the collaborative economy. Web strategistGoogle Scholar
  46. Owyang J, Tran C, Silva C (2013) The collaborative economy. Tech. rep., Altimeter Group, San Maeto
  47. Peng RD (2011) Reproducible research in computing science. Science 334(6060):1226–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. PWC (2015) The sharing economy. Tech. rep, PricewaterhouseCoopersGoogle Scholar
  49. Rappa MA (2004) The utility business model and the future of computing services. IBM Syst J 43(1):32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rifkin J (2000) The age of access: the new culture of hypercapitalism, where all of life is a paid-for experience. Jermey P. Tarcher/Putna, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(4):990–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sabherwal R, King WR (1995) An empirical taxonomy of the decision-making processes concerning strategic applications of information systems. J Manag Inf Syst 11(4):177–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Slee T (2016) The ’sharing economy’ isn’t about sharing: the dark reality behind this major workplace shift | Alternet.
  54. Sokal RR, Sneath PHA (1963) Principles of numerical taxonomy. Taxon 12(5):359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tencati A, Zsolnai L (2012) Collaborative enterprise and sustainability: the case of slow food. J Bus Ethics 110(3):345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. The New York Times (2014) The dark side of the sharing
  57. Tilson D, Sorensen C, Lyytinen K (2013) Platform complexity: lessons from the music industry. In: Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS 2013). Wailea, pp 4625–4634Google Scholar
  58. Walsh B (2011) 10 ideas that will change the world.
  59. Wand Y, Monarchi DE, Parsons J, Woo CC (1995) Theoretical foundations for conceptual modelling in information systems development. Decis Support Syst 15(4):285–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Williams K, Chatterjee S, Rossi M (2008) Design of emerging digital services: a taxonomy. Eur J Inf Syst 17(5):505–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wittel A (2011) Qualities of sharing and their transformations in the digital age. Int Rev Inf Ethics 15(9):3–8Google Scholar
  62. World Intellectual Property Organization (2014) International classification of goods and services (Electronic Version).

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS)University of MuensterMünsterGermany
  2. 2.Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergNürnbergGermany

Personalised recommendations