Advertisement

Information Systems and e-Business Management

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 831–842 | Cite as

Online inter-provincial trade in China

  • Yang Yang
  • Yuan Liu
  • Ming Fan
Original Article

Abstract

There is a large disparity in terms of per capital e-commerce consumption between more developed east coastal provinces and less developed inner provinces in China, which reflects the disparities in economic development and income between these regions. E-commerce could integrate China’s domestic economy as it facilitates cross-region flow of goods, strengthens regional linkage, and becomes the channel through which economic growth in one region spills over to other regions. On the other hand, e-commerce could also make regions more divergent. With a reduced trading cost, regions with comparative advantages in certain industries could have even wider and farther reaches and enjoy increasing returns. In this study, we specifically examine the pattern of e-commerce activities in China over time. We find that the production and sales of agricultural and clothing products have become more concentrated over time. The trade pattern as measured by trade flows among different provinces is mixed. While the pattern is slightly more concentrated in B2C platform, the pattern is more diversified for C2C market. Our regression analysis indicates that GDPs in origin provinces positively affect the trade flows, but distances impede trade, consistent with the gravity model. Interestingly, GDPs of the destination provinces are not significant. Home market effect is also supported.

Keywords

E-commerce Online trade Gravity model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first two authors would like to thank the support from the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 14ZDB137).

References

  1. Anand K, Bianconi G (2009) Entropy measures for networks: toward an information theory of complex topologies. Phys Rev E 80:045102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JE, Van Wincoop E (2001) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. National Bureau of economic researchGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai C-E, Ma H, Pan W (2012) Spatial spillover and regional economic growth in China. China Econ Rev 23:982–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barabási A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrat A, Barthelemy M, Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2004) The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:3747–3752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brakman S, Garretsen H, Van Marrewijk C (2009) Economic geography within and between European nations: the role of market potential and density across space and time. J Reg Sci 49:777–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Candelaria C, Daly M, Hale G (2015) Persistence of regional wage differences in China. Pac Econ Rev 20:365–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chern C-C, Wei C-P, Shen F-Y, Fan Y-N (2015) A sales forecasting model for consumer products based on the influence of online word-of-mouth. Inf Syst E-Bus Manag 13:445–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corden W (1970) A note on economies of scale, the size of the domestic market and the pattern of trade. In: McDougall IA, Snape RH (eds) Studies in international economics. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  10. Deardorff AV (1984) Testing trade theories and predicting trade flows. In: Jones R, Kenen P (eds) Handbook of international economics. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Eagle N, Macy M, Claxton R (2010) Network diversity and economic development. Science 328:1029–1031. doi: 10.1126/science.1186605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gómez E, Martens B, Turlea G (2012) The drivers and impediments for online cross-border trade in goods in the EU. Digital economy research programme working paperGoogle Scholar
  13. Krugman P (1980) Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. Am Eco Rev 70:950–959Google Scholar
  14. Lendle A, Schropp S, Olarreaga M, Vezina P-L (2012) There goes gravity: how eBay reduces trade costs. From CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP9094. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2153544
  15. Liljeros F, Edling CR, Amaral LAN, Stanley HE, Åberg Y (2001) The web of human sexual contacts. Nature 411:907–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Newman ME (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Serrano MÁ, Boguñá M (2003) Topology of the world trade web. Phys Rev E 68:015101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wimble M, Tripp J, Phillps B, Milic N (2016) On search cost and the long tail: the moderating role of search cost. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 14:507–531Google Scholar
  19. Wolf HC (2000) Intranational home bias in trade. Rev Econ Stat 82:555–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations