Advertisement

IT-enabled transparent electronic markets: the case of the air travel industry

  • Nelson F. Granados
  • Alok Gupta
  • Robert J. Kauffman
Original Article

Abstract

The electronic market hypothesis predicts that by reducing coordination costs, information technology (IT) will shift industrial organization from hierarchical to market-based forms of economic activity. While academic researchers and practitioners have witnessed these shifts with the advent of the Internet, there is little understanding about the process and the underlying forces that drive them. In this paper, we provide an in-depth analysis of the air travel industry, which has recently experienced significant IT-driven transformations. We conclude that, together with IT, pro-competitive laws and the information-intensive nature of air travel products have triggered competition for consumers with transparent market mechanisms, which is leading to the emergence of more transparent electronic markets in the air travel industry.

Keywords

Market Mechanism Price Discovery Travel Agency Electronic Market Market Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and co-chairs of the 28th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science in the B2B E-Commerce mini-track. We especially benefited from personal interactions and comments on the content of this work from Charles Steinfield, Fu-ren Lin, Lynne Markus, and Rolf Wigand. Rob Kauffman thanks Donna Sarppo and the MIS Research Center at the University of Minnesota for partial support. Nelson Granados acknowledges funding through a Graduate School Fellowship and thesis costs support from the University of Minnesota. Alok Gupta’s work is supported by National Science Foundation Grant #IIS-0092780, for which he kindly acknowledges funding. All errors of fact or interpretation are the sole responsibility of the authors.

References

  1. Anandalingam G, Day RW, Raghavan S (2005) The landscape of electronic market design. Manage Sci 51(3):316–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakos JY, Brynjolfsson E (1993) IT, incentives, and the optimal number of suppliers. J Manage Inf Syst 10(2):37–53Google Scholar
  3. Campbell C, Gautam R, Muhanna WA (2005) Search and collusion in electronic markets. Manage Sci 51(3):497–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chircu AM, Kauffman RJ (2000) Reintermediation strategies in business-to-business electronic commerce. Int J Electron Commerce 4(4):7–42Google Scholar
  5. Chircu AM, Kauffman RJ, Keskey D (2001) Maximizing the value of corporate travel reservation systems. Commun ACM 44(1):57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christie WG, Schultz PH (1995) Did NASDAQ market makers implicitly collude? J Econ Perspect 9(3):199–208Google Scholar
  7. Clemons EK, Reddi SP, Row MC (1993) The impact of IT on the organization of economic activity: the ‘move to the middle’ hypothesis. J Manage Inf Syst 10(2):9–35Google Scholar
  8. Copeland DG, McKenney JL (1988) Airline reservation systems: lessons from history. MIS Q 12(3):353–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duliba K, Kauffman RJ, Lucas HC Jr (2001) Appropriation and value of airline computer reservation systems. Organ Sci 12(6):702–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Global Aviation Associates (2001) The history and outlook for travel distribution in the PC-based Internet environment. Available at www.intervistas.com/4/presentations.asp. Accessed April 15, 2006
  11. Granados NF, Kauffman RJ (2003) Can you see what I see? Transparency, consumer demand, and strategic pricing in B2C electronic commerce. In: Bharadwaj A, Narasimhan S, Santhanam R (eds) Proceedings of the INFORMS conference on IS and technology, Atlanta, October 2003Google Scholar
  12. Granados NF, Kauffman RJ (2005) Identifying facilitators and inhibitors of market structure change: a hybrid theory of unbiased electronic markets. In: Sprague R (ed) Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii international conference in system sciences, Kona, January 2005. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los AlamitosGoogle Scholar
  13. Granados NF, Gupta A, Kauffman RJ (2006) The impact of IT on market information and transparency: a unified theoretical framework. J Assoc Inf Syst 7(3):148–178Google Scholar
  14. Grover V, Ramanlal P (1999) Six myths of information and markets: IT networks, electronic commerce, and the battle for consumer surplus. MIS Q 23(4):465–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hess CM, Kemerer CF (1994) Computerized loan origination systems: an industry case study of the electronic markets hypothesis. MIS Q 18(3):251–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hotwire (2002) Hotwire Q4 new users exceed priceline. Press release, Hotwire, San Francisco, February 4, 2002. Available at press.hotwire.com/index.php/press_releases/ pr2002/29.html. Accessed April 15, 2006Google Scholar
  17. Jupiter Research (2004) Jupiter research forecasts the online travel industry will reach $91 billion by 2009, with supplier web sites increasing market share. Press release, Jupiter Media Corporation, Darien, November 10, 2004. Available at jupitermedia.com/ corporate/releases/04.11.10-newjupresearch.html. Accessed April 15, 2006Google Scholar
  18. Kauffman RJ, Mohtadi H (2004) Proprietary and open systems adoption in e-procurement: a risk-augmented transactions cost perspective. J Manage Inf Syst 21(1):137–166Google Scholar
  19. Klein S, Teubner RA (2000) Web-based procurement: new roles for intermediaries. Inf Syst Front 2(1):19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Madhavan A (2000) Market microstructure: a survey. J Financ Markets 3(3):205–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Malone TW, Yates J, Benjamin RI (1987) Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Commun ACM 30(6):484–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mead KM (2002) OIG comments on DOT study of air travel services. Memorandum CC-2002–061, Office of the Secretary, from K. M. Mead, Inspector General, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, December 13, 2002Google Scholar
  23. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter (2000) The B2B Internet report: collaborative commerce. Equity Research, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Morrison SA, Winston C (1996) Causes and consequences of airline fare wars. Brookings papers on economic activity: microeconomics. Brookings Institution, Washington, pp 85–131Google Scholar
  25. Nielsen Net Ratings (2001) Online travel industry captures $1.2 billion in January, Led by Travelocity, according to Nielsen Net Ratings and Harris Interactive. Press release, Nielsen Net Ratings, New York, March 20, 2001. Available at www.netratings.com/pr/pr_010320.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2006
  26. O’Toole K (2003) IT trends survey 2003. Airline Business Magazine, August 2003, pp 40–52Google Scholar
  27. Regan K (2001) Study: economic slowdown aids online travel. E-commerce times, April 23, 2001. Available at www.ecommercetimes.com/perl/story/9156.html. Accessed, April 15, 2006
  28. Regan K (2002a) Orbitz to list fares offline. E-Commerce Times, May 17, 2002. Available at www.ecommercetimes.com/perl/story/17807.html. Accessed April 15, 2006
  29. Regan K (2002b) Orbitz unveils direct reservation system. E-Commerce Times, August 19, 2002. Available at www.ecommercetimes.com/perl/story/19060.html. Accessed April 15, 2006
  30. Salkever A (1999) Dogfight in cyberspace: the online travel biz heats up. Daily briefing, BusinessWeek Online, November 15, 1999. Available at www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/ dnflash/nov1999/nf91115a.html. Accessed April 15, 2006
  31. Stigler GJ (1964) A theory of oligopoly. J Polit Econ 72(1):44–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. United States Census Bureau (2005) United States Department of Commerce News. February 24, 2005. Available at www.census.gov/mrts/www/data/pdf/04Q4.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2006

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nelson F. Granados
    • 1
  • Alok Gupta
    • 1
  • Robert J. Kauffman
    • 1
  1. 1.Information and Decision Sciences Department, 3-365 Carlson School of ManagementUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations