A comparative study of exchange and aggregation models in the B2B e-marketplace
This research seeks to provide an economic framework for understanding two major forms of e-marketplaces: aggregation-oriented vs. exchange-oriented e-marketplaces. By analyzing the marginal benefit per transaction in alternative models, we are able to determine the most suitable B2B e-marketplace for a wide variety of product categories, market conditions, and procurement methods. For example, when companies sell commodities in a fragmented market, the aggregation model is suitable for spot purchasing, and the exchange model works best for systematic purchasing. In addition, the effect of supplier consolidation and information technology-enabled cost reduction on model selection is discussed.
Key wordssupply chain management electronic marketplace market channel selection demand aggregation B2B exchange
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bakos Y (1997) Reducing buyer search costs: implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Science 43 (12): 1672–1692Google Scholar
- Chang H, Shen S, Schlueter-Langdon C, Shaw M (2003) A Survey on the Industry Sponsored e-Marketplaces, In: Shaw M (ed) E-Business Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 277–310Google Scholar
- Choi SC (1991) Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer Marketing Science 10(4): 271–296Google Scholar
- Jeuland AP, Shugan SM (1983) Managing Channel Profits. Marketing Science 2(3): 239–272Google Scholar
- Kaplan S, Sawhney M. (2000) E-Hubs: The New B2B Marketplaces. Harvard Business Review, May–June pp. 97–103.Google Scholar
- Lal R, Sarvary M (1999) When and How is the Internet Likely to Decrease Price Competition? Marketing Science 18(4): 485–503Google Scholar
- McGuire TW, Staelin R (1983) An Industry Equilibrium Analysis of Downstream Vertical Integration. Marketing Science 2(2) Spring 161–191Google Scholar
- McGuire TW, Staelin R (1986) Channel Efficiency, Incentive Compatibility, Transfer, Pricing, and Market Structure: An Equilibrium Analysis of Channel Relationships. Research in Marketing: Distribution Channels and Institutions, 8, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 181–223Google Scholar
- Moorthy KS (1988) Strategic Decentralization in Channels. Marketing Science 7(4), Fall 335–355Google Scholar
- Sculley BA Woods WA (2000) B2B Exchange: The Killer Application in the Business-to-Business Internet Revolution, 1st Edition, ISI publications JanuaryGoogle Scholar