Effects of velopharyngeal openings on flow characteristics of nasal emission
- 35 Downloads
Nasal emission is a speech disorder where undesired airflow enters the nasal cavity during speech due to inadequate closure of the velopharyngeal valve. Nasal emission is typically inaudible with large velopharyngeal openings and very distorting with small openings. This study aims to understand how flow characteristics in the nasal cavity change as a function of velopharyngeal opening using computational fluid dynamics. The model is based on a subject who was diagnosed with distorting nasal emission and a small velopharyngeal opening. The baseline geometry was delineated from CT scans that were taken, while the subject was sustaining a sibilant sound. Modifications to the model were done by systematically widening or narrowing the velopharyngeal opening while keeping the geometry constant elsewhere. Results show that if the flow resistance across the velopharyngeal valve is smaller than resistance across the oral constriction, flow characteristics such as velocity and turbulence are inversely proportional to the size of the opening. If flow resistance is higher across the velopharyngeal valve than the oral constriction, turbulence in the nasal cavity will be reduced at a higher rate. These findings can be used to generalize that the area ratio of the velopharyngeal opening to the oral constriction is a factor that determines airflow characteristics and subsequently its sound during production of sibilant sound. It implies that the highest level of turbulence in the nasal cavity, and subsequently the sound that will likely be perceived as the most severe nasal emission is produced when the size of openings is equal.
KeywordsNasal emission Velopharyngeal valve opening Turbulence Computational fluid dynamics
The authors acknowledge the support of NIH Grant No. K25DC014755.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest that could influence their work.
- Cimbala YA, Cengel JM (2003) Fluid mechanics: fundamentals and applications, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Ferziger JH, Perić M (2012) Computational methods for fluid dynamics, 3rd rev. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Hinze JO (1975) Turbulence, 2nd edn. MacGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hixon TJ, Weismer G, Hoit JD (2014) Preclinical speech science: Anatomy, physiology, acoustics, perception. Plural Publishing, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Lien K, Monty JP, Chong MS, Ooi A (2004) The entrance length for fully developed turbulent channel flow. In: 15th Australasian fluid mechanics conference (Sydney, Australia)Google Scholar
- McWilliams BJ, Morris HL, Shelton RL (1990) Cleft palate speech. Mosby Elsevier Health Science, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Peterson-Falzone SJ, Trost-Cardamone J, Karnell MP, Hardin-Jones MA (2016) The Clinician’s guide to treating cleft palate Speech-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Rodi W (1991) Experience with two-layer models combining the k-epsilon model with a one-equation model near the wall. In: 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA 91-0216Google Scholar
- Rollins M, Oren L (2019) Aerodynamic flow variables as a function of velopharyngeal gap size. In: 177th Meeting: Acoustical Society of America, vol 36, p 060001. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0001022
- Sarkar S, Hussaini MY (1993) Computation of the sound generated by isotropic turbulence. NASA Report 191543, ICASE Report No. 93–74Google Scholar
- Warren DW (1979) Perci: a method for rating palatal efficiency. Cleft Palate J 16:279Google Scholar