Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Inverse finite element characterization of the human thigh soft tissue in the seated position

  • 165 Accesses

Abstract

Pressure ulcers are localized damage to the skin and underlying tissues caused by sitting or lying in one position for a long time. Stresses within the soft tissue of the thigh and buttocks area play a crucial role in the initiating mechanism of these wounds. Therefore, it is crucial to develop reliable finite element models to evaluate the stresses caused by physiological loadings. In this study, we compared how the choice of material model and modeling area dimension affect prediction accuracy of a model of the thigh. We showed that the first-order Ogden and Fung orthotropic material models could approximate the mechanical behavior of soft tissue significantly better than neo-Hookean and Mooney–Rivlin. We also showed that, significant error results from using a semi-3D model versus a 3D model. We then developed full 3D models for 20 participants employing Ogden and Fung material models and compared the estimated material parameters between different sexes and locations along the thigh. We showed that males tissues are less deformable overall when compared to females and the material parameters are highly dependent on location, with tissues getting softer moving distally for both men and women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Reference

  1. Al-Dirini RMA, Reed MP, Thewlis D (2015) Deformation of the gluteal soft tissues during sitting. Clin Biomech 30:662–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.05.008

  2. Al-Dirini RMA, Reed MP, Hu J, Thewlis D (2016) Development and validation of a high anatomical fidelity FE model for the buttock and thigh of a seated individual. Ann Biomed Eng 44:2805–2816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1560-3

  3. Al-Dirini RMA, Nisyrios J, Reed MP, Thewlis D (2017) Quantifying the in vivo quasi-static response to loading of sub-dermal tissues in the human buttock using magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Biomech 50:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.09.017

  4. Alexis B (2016) James (human body for scale) | 3D CAD model library | GrabCAD. In: GRABCAD. https://grabcad.com/library/james-human-body-for-scale-1. Accessed 10 Apr 2018

  5. Ateshian GA, Costa KD (2009) A frame-invariant formulation of Fung elasticity. J Biomech 42:781–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.01.015

  6. Bouten CV, Oomens CW, Baaijens FP, Bader DL (2003) The etiology of pressure ulcers: skin deep or muscle bound? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:616–619. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2003.50038

  7. Brandon SCE, Smith CR, Thelen DG (2017) Simulation of soft tissue loading from observed movement dynamics. In: Müller B, Wolf SI, Brueggemann G-P et al (eds) Handbook of human motion. Springer, Cham, pp 1–34

  8. Brosh T, Arcan M (2000) Modeling the body/chair interaction–an integrative experimental–numerical approach. Clin Biomech 15:217–219

  9. Chow WW, Odell EI (1978) Deformations and stresses in soft body tissues of a sitting person. J Biomech Eng 100:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3426196

  10. Dabnichki PA, Crocombe AD, Hughes SC (1994) Deformation and stress analysis of supported buttock contact. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 208:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/095441199420800102

  11. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators (2015) Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 385:117–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2

  12. Gefen A (2008) How much time does it take to get a pressure ulcer? Integrated evidence from human, animal, and in vitro studies. Ostomy Wound Manag 54(26–8):30–35

  13. Gordon CC, Churchill T, Clauser CE et al (1989) Anthropometric survey of U.S. Army personnel: summary statistics, interim report for 1988. Anthropology Research Project Inc., Yellow Springs

  14. Herrman EC, Knapp CF, Donofrio JC, Salcido R (1999) Skin perfusion responses to surface pressure-induced ischemia: implication for the developing pressure ulcer. J Rehabil Res Dev Wash 36:109–120

  15. Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW (2004) Comparison of a Multi-layer structural model for arterial walls with a Fung-type model, and issues of material stability. J Biomech Eng 126:264–275. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1695572

  16. Kanehisa H, Ikegawa S, Fukunaga T (1994) Comparison of muscle cross-sectional area and strength between untrained women and men. Eur J Appl Physiol 68:148–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00244028

  17. Linder-Ganz E, Gefen A (2007) The effects of pressure and shear on capillary closure in the microstructure of skeletal muscles. Ann Biomed Eng 35:2095–2107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-007-9384-9

  18. Linder-Ganz E, Shabshin N, Itzchak Y, Gefen A (2007) Assessment of mechanical conditions in sub-dermal tissues during sitting: a combined experimental-MRI and finite element approach. J Biomech 40:1443–1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.06.020

  19. Looker AC, Beck TJ, Orwoll ES (2001) Does body size account for gender differences in femur bone density and geometry? J Bone Miner Res 16:1291–1299. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.7.1291

  20. Makhsous M, Lim D, Hendrix R et al (2007) Finite element analysis for evaluation of pressure ulcer on the buttock: development and validation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 15:517–525. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2007.906967

  21. Manafi-Khanian B, Arendt-Nielsen L, Graven-Nielsen T (2016) An MRI-based leg model used to simulate biomechanical phenomena during cuff algometry: a finite element study. Med Biol Eng Comput 54:315–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1291-x

  22. Manorama AA, Baek S, Vorro J et al (2010) Blood perfusion and transcutaneous oxygen level characterizations in human skin with changes in normal and shear loads—implications for pressure ulcer formation. Clin Biomech 25:823–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.06.003

  23. Mergl C, Anton T, Madrid-Dusik R et al (2004) Development of a 3D finite element model of thigh and pelvis. SAE International, Warrendale, PA. https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-2132

  24. Myers KM, Hendon CP, Gan Y et al (2015) A continuous fiber distribution material model for human cervical tissue. J Biomech 48:1533–1540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.060

  25. Nordqvist C (2017) Bed sores or pressure sores: what you need to know. In: Medical news today. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/173972.php. Accessed 10 Apr 2018

  26. Ogden RW (1972) Large deformation isotropic elasticity—on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Proc R Soc Lond A 326:565–584. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1972.0026

  27. Oomens CWJ, Bressers OFJT, Bosboom EMH et al (2003) Can loaded interface characteristics influence strain distributions in muscle adjacent to bony prominences? Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 6:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1025584031000121034

  28. Ragan R, Kernozek TW, Bidar M, Matheson JW (2002) Seat-interface pressures on various thicknesses of foam wheelchair cushions: a finite modeling approach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:872–875. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.32677

  29. Reddy NP, Cochran GVB, Krouskop TA (1981) Interstitial fluid flow as a factor in decubitus ulcer formation. J Biomech 14:879–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(81)90015-4

  30. Reddy M, Gill SS, Rochon PA (2006) Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review. JAMA 296:974–984. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.8.974

  31. Rivlin RS (1948) Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials. I. Fundamental concepts. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 240:459–490. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1948.0002

  32. Rivlin RS (1949) Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials VI. Further results in the theory of torsion, shear and flexure. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 242:173–195. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1949.0009

  33. Rohan P-Y, Badel P, Lun B et al (2015) Prediction of the biomechanical effects of compression therapy on deep veins using finite element modelling. Ann Biomed Eng 43:314–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1121-6

  34. Ryan TJ (1990) Cellular responses to tissue distortion. In: Bader DL (ed) Pressure sores - clinical practice and scientific approach. Palgrave, London, pp 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10128-3_11

  35. Sadler Z, Scott J, Drost J et al (2018) Initial estimation of the in vivo material properties of the seated human buttocks and thighs. Int J Non-Linear Mech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2018.09.007

  36. Shoham N, Levy A, Kopplin K, Gefen A (2015) Contoured foam cushions cannot provide long-term protection against pressure-ulcers for individuals with a spinal cord injury: modeling studies. Adv Skin Wound Care 28:303. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000465300.99194.27

  37. Silva E, Parente M, Brandão S et al (2018) Characterizing the biomechanical properties of the pubovisceralis muscle using a genetic algorithm and the finite element method. J Biomech Eng 141:011009–011009–011009–011011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041524

  38. Sonenblum SE, Sprigle SH (2013) Response of the authors to: comments on “validation of an accelerometer-based method to measure the use of manual wheelchairs” by Sonenblum et al. Med Eng Phys 2012; 34(6):781–6. Med Eng Phys 35:556–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.01.005

  39. Sonenblum SE, Sprigle SH, Cathcart JM, Winder RJ (2015) 3D anatomy and deformation of the seated buttocks. J Tissue Viability 24:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2015.03.003

  40. Strandberg S, Wretling M-L, Wredmark T, Shalabi A (2010) Reliability of computed tomography measurements in assessment of thigh muscle cross-sectional area and attenuation. BMC Med Imaging 10:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-10-18

  41. Sun W, Sacks MS (2005) Finite element implementation of a generalized Fung-elastic constitutive model for planar soft tissues. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 4:190–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-005-0075-x

  42. Verver MM, van Hoof J, Oomens CWJ et al (2004) A finite element model of the human buttocks for prediction of seat pressure distributions. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 7:193–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255840410001727832

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge funding for this work from National Science Foundation (CBET 1603646).

Author information

Correspondence to Sara Roccabianca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, S., Scott, J., Bush, T.R. et al. Inverse finite element characterization of the human thigh soft tissue in the seated position. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19, 305–316 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01212-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Soft tissue
  • Nonlinear mechanical behavior
  • Finite element
  • Optimization
  • Pressure ulcer