Refeeding reverses fasting-induced remodeling of afferent nerve activity in rat small intestine
- 115 Downloads
Intestinal afferents play an important role in coordinating intestinal motor control. Fasting induces morpho-mechanical intestinal remodeling. This study aimed to characterize the effect of fasting and refeeding on mechanosensitivity in mesenteric afferent nerves in isolated Sprague–Dawley rat jejunum. A control group fed ad libitum, a group fasted for 7 days and a group refed 7 days after 7 days fasting were studied. Jejunal segments were used for electrophysiological, histomorphological and mechanical studies. Mesenteric afferent nerve firing was recorded during a ramp distension up to 40 mmHg luminal pressure. Multiunit afferent recordings were separated into low threshold and wide-dynamic-range single-unit activity. Intestinal deformation (strain), bowel distension load (stress) and firing frequency of mesenteric afferent nerve bundles [spike rate increase ratio (SRIR)] were compared among groups. Fasting induced intestinal histomorphometric remodeling, which was reversed by refeeding. The firing frequency increased with distension in all groups. SRIR was largest in the fasting group (P < 0.05). Compared to the control group, fasting increased afferent activity in whole nerve bundles and wide-dynamic-range units at high degrees of distensions (P < 0.05 at pressure 40 mmHg; P < 0.05 at strain 1.2; P < 0.01 at stress 8 kPa). Refeeding reversed the fasting-induced afferent hypersensitivity and the shift between receptor subtypes. In conclusion, refeeding reversed fasting-induced remodeling.
KeywordsFasting Ramp distension Mesenteric afferents Mechanosensitivity Remodeling
The studies were financially supported by grants from Chongqing Science and Technology Commission (cstc2013kjrc-ljrccj10003), National “111 Plan” Base (B06023) and Danish Karen Elise Jensen Foundation (Grant No. 903959).
All authors participated in the study design and contributed to the manuscript. LB conducted the animal experiments and analyzed the data with JZ and DL. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data. LB drafted the manuscript that was revised by the coauthors. HG obtained the funding. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Burdyga G, de Lartigue G, Raybould HE, Morris R, Dimaline R, Varro A, Thompson DG, Dockray GJ (2008) Cholecystokinin regulates expression of Y2 receptors in vagal afferent neurons serving the stomach. J Neurosci 28(45):11583–11592. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2493-08.2008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gomes OA, Castelucci P, de Vasconcellos Fontes RB, Liberti EA (2006) Effects of pre- and postnatal protein deprivation and postnatal refeeding on myenteric neurons of the rat small intestine: a quantitative morphological study. Auton Neurosci 126–127:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2006.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gomez R, Navarro M, Ferrer B, Trigo JM, Bilbao A, Del Arco I, Cippitelli A, Nava F, Piomelli D, Rodriguez de Fonseca F (2002) A peripheral mechanism for CB1 cannabinoid receptor-dependent modulation of feeding. J Neurosci 22(21):9612–9617. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-21-09612.2002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Konturek SJ, Konturek JW, Pawlik T, Brzozowski T (2004) Brain-gut axis and its role in the control of food intake. J Physiol Pharmacol 55(1 Pt 2):137–154Google Scholar
- Langley K (1994) The neuroendocrine concept today. Ann N Y Acad Sci 733:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb17251.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar