Advertisement

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 1697–1707 | Cite as

Characterization of the mechanical properties for cranial bones of 8-week-old piglets: the effect of strain rate and region

  • Zhigang LiEmail author
  • Guangliang Wang
  • Cheng Ji
  • Jinzhong Jiang
  • Jiawei Wang
  • Jian Wang
Original Paper
  • 95 Downloads

Abstract

Due to ethical reasons, piglets have often been employed as surrogates for children in biomechanics studies. To our knowledge, no public data detailing the mechanical properties of cranial bones for 8-week-old piglets are available. In this study, tensile tests were conducted on frontal, parietal, and occipital bone specimens derived from 8-week-old piglets at different strain rates. The cranial bone specimens exhibit obvious linear elastic behavior and an insignificant plastic stage prior to failure. The mechanical property of the parietal bone is very close to that of the frontal bone, and the property differs significantly from that of the occipital bone. The average elastic modulus and ultimate stress of the parietal/frontal bone are 4.19 times and 2.75 times as high as occipital bone, respectively, whereas the average ultimate strain is about 25% times lower than that of the occipital bone. In addition, the cranial bone exhibits significant strain-rate characteristics. As the strain rate increases from 0.001 to 10 s−1, the average elastic modulus and ultimate stress of the parietal/frontal and occipital bone increase by about 88% and 59%, and 94% and 96%, respectively. In contrast, the average ultimate strain of the parietal/frontal and occipital bone decreases by about 32% and about 17%, respectively. The quantitative relationship between the mechanical parameters of the cranial bone and the strain rate based on the experimental data is established. A strain-rate-dependent elastic constitutive model was developed through user material subroutine and implemented into LS-DYNA. Simulation results using the self-developed material subroutine code showed that this constitutive model can be used to predict the responses of cranial bone specimens under different tensile speeds.

Keywords

Pediatric head injury Piglet cranium Mechanical properties Cranium region Strain rate Computational modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51505024). The authors thank Xiaoming Wang from TA Instruments for his assistance in tensile testing.

References

  1. Auperrin A, Delille R, Lesueur D, Bruyère K, Masson C, Drazétic P (2014) Geometrical and material parameters to assess the macroscopic mechanical behaviour of fresh cranial bone samples. J Biomech 47:1180–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumer TG, Powell BJ, Fenton TW, Haut RC (2009) Age dependent mechanical properties of the infant porcine parietal bone and a correlation to the human. J Biomech Eng 131:111006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biswas S, Pramanik PC, Dasgupta P, Chanda A (2017) Study of microstructure and mechanical properties of human cortical bone. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 65:688–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boruah S, Subit DL, Paskoff GR, Shender BS, Crandall JR, Salzar RS (2017) Influence of bone microstructure on the mechanical properties of skull cortical bone–a combined experimental and computational approach. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 65:688–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coats B, Margulies S (2003) Characterization of pediatric porcine skull properties during impact. In: Proceedings of the international research council on the biomechanics of injury conference. International research council on biomechanics of injury, 57–67Google Scholar
  6. Coats B, Margulies SS (2006) Material properties of human infant skull and suture at high rates. J Neurotrauma 23:1222–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coats B, Margulies SS, Ji S (2007) Parametric study of head impact in the infant. Stapp Car Crash J 51:1–15Google Scholar
  8. Couper Z, Albermani F (2008) Infant brain subjected to oscillatory loading: material differentiation, properties, and interface conditions. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 7:105–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis MT, Loyd AM, H-yH Shen, Mulroy MH, Nightingale RW, Myers BS, Bass CD (2012) The mechanical and morphological properties of 6 year-old cranial bone. J Biomech 45:2493–2498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hubbard RP (1971) Flexure of layered cranial bone. J Biomech 4:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Irwin A, Mertz HJ (1997) Biomechanical basis for the CRABI and hybrid III child dummies. SAE paper, No. 973317Google Scholar
  12. Klinich KD, Hulbert GM, Schneider LW (2002) Estimating infant head injury criteria and impact response using crash reconstruction and finite element modeling. Stapp Car Crash J 46:165–194Google Scholar
  13. Langlois JA (2000) Traumatic brain injury in the United States; assessing outcomes in children: summary and recommendations from the expert working group, Atlanta, GA, October 26–27, 2000Google Scholar
  14. Li Z, Hu J, Reed MP, Rupp JD, Hoff CN, Zhang J, Cheng B (2011) Development, validation, and application of a parametric pediatric head finite element model for impact simulations. Ann Biomed Eng 39:2984–2997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li Z, Luo X, Zhang J (2013) Development/global validation of a 6-month-old pediatric head finite element model and application in investigation of drop-induced infant head injury. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 112:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li Z, Han X, Ge H, Ma C (2016) A semi-automatic method of generating subject-specific pediatric head finite element models for impact dynamic responses to head injury. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 60:557–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li X, Sandler H, Kleiven S (2017) The importance of nonlinear tissue modelling in finite element simulations of infant head impacts. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 16:823–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mao H, Gao H, Cao L, Genthikatti VV, Yang KH (2013) Development of high-quality hexahedral human brain meshes using feature-based multi-block approach. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 16:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Margulies SS, Thibault KL (2000) Infant skull and suture properties: measurements and implications for mechanisms of pediatric brain injury. J Biomech Eng 122:364–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McElhaney JH, Fogle JL, Melvin JW, Haynes RR, Roberts VL, Alem NM (1970) Mechanical properties of cranial bone. J Biomech 3:495–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McPherson GK, Kriewall TJ (1980) The elastic modulus of fetal cranial bone: a first step towards an understanding of the biomechanics of fetal head molding. J Biomech 13:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mertz HJ (1984) A procedure for normalizing impact response data. SAE paper, No. 840884Google Scholar
  23. Motherway JA, Verschueren P, Van der Perre G, Vander Sloten J, Gilchrist MD (2010) The mechanical properties of cranial bone. In: 6th world congress of biomechanics (WCB 2010). August 1–6, 2010 Singapore, Springer, pp 776–779Google Scholar
  24. Pasquesi SA, Margulies SS (2017) Failure and fatigue properties of immature human and porcine parasagittal bridging veins. Ann Biomed Eng 45:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterson J, Dechow PC (2003) Material properties of the human cranial vault and zygoma. Anat Rec part A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 274:785–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rahmoun J, Auperrin A, Delille R, Naceur H, Drazetic P (2014) Characterization and micromechanical modeling of the human cranial bone elastic properties. Mech Res Commun 60:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roth S, Raul JS, Ludes B, Willinger R (2007a) Finite element analysis of impact and shaking inflicted to a child. Int J Legal Med 121:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roth S, Raul JS, Ruan J, Willinger R (2007b) Limitation of scaling methods in child head finite element modeling. Int J Veh Saf 2(4):404–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roth S, Raul JS, Willinger R (2008) Biofidelic child head FE model to simulate real world trauma. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 90:262–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roth S, Vappou J, Raul JS, Willinger R (2009) Child head injury criteria investigation through numerical simulation of realworld trauma. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 93(1):32–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roth S, Raul JS, Willinger R (2010) Finite element modelling of paediatric head impact: global validation against experimental data. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 99:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruan SJ, Li PD, Li H, Zhao W (2012) Development and validation of a 6-year-old child finite element head model. Chin J Biomed Eng 31:502–506 (In Chinese) Google Scholar
  33. Sahli F, Cuellar J, Pérez A, Fields AJ, Campos M, Ramos-Grez J (2015) Structural parameters determining the strength of the porcine vertebral body affected by tumours. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 18:890–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schutzman SA, Greenes DS (2001) Pediatric minor head trauma. Ann Emerg Med 37:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thibault KL, Kurtz SM, Runge CF, Giddings VL, Thibault LE (1999) Material properties of the infant skull and application to numerical analysis of pediatric head injury. In: International IRCOBI conference proceedings. pp 73–82Google Scholar
  36. Wang J, Zou D, Li Z, Huang P, Li D, Shao Y, Wang H, Chen Y (2014) Mechanical properties of cranial bones and sutures in 1–2-year-old infants. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res 20:1808–1813Google Scholar
  37. Wood JL (1971) Dynamic response of human cranial bone. J Biomech 4:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhou Z, Jiang BH, Cao LB, Zhu F, Mao HJ, Yang KH (2016) Numerical simulations of the 10-year-old head response in drop impacts and compression tests. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 131:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhigang Li
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guangliang Wang
    • 1
  • Cheng Ji
    • 1
  • Jinzhong Jiang
    • 2
  • Jiawei Wang
    • 1
  • Jian Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control EngineeringBeijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine of Hebei ProvinceCangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations