Sensitivity analysis of muscle mechanics-based voice simulator to determine gender-specific speech characteristics
- 36 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to investigate the gender differences in voice simulation using a sensitivity analysis approach. A global, Monte Carlo-based approach was employed, and the relationships between biomechanical inputs (lung pressure and muscle activation levels) and acoustic outputs (fundamental frequency, f0, and sound pressure level, SPL) were investigated for male and female versions of a voice simulator model. The gender distinction in the model was based on an anatomical scaling of the laryngeal structures. Results showed strong relationships for f0 and SPL as functions of lung pressure, as well as for f0 as a function of cricothyroid and thyroarytenoid muscle activity, in agreement with previous literature. Also expected was a systematic shift in f0 range between the genders. It was found that the female model exhibited greater pitch strength (saliency) than the male model, which might equate to a perceptually more periodic or higher-quality voice for females. In addition, the female model required slightly higher lung pressures than the male model to achieve the same SPL, suggesting a possibly greater phonatory effort and predisposition for fatigue in the female voice. The methods and results of this study lay the groundwork for a complete mapping of simulator sound signal characteristics as a function of simulator input parameters and a better understanding of gender-specific voice production and vocal health.
KeywordsVoice biomechanics Voice simulation Sensitivity analysis
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Grant No. R01DC012315. The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
This study was funded by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, grant number R01DC012315
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Alipour-Haghighi F, Titze IR (1983) Simulation of particle trajectories of vocal fold tissue during phonation. In: Titze I, Scherer R (eds) Vocal fold physiology: biomechanics, acoustics and phonatory control. Denver Center for the Performing Arts, Denver, pp 183–190Google Scholar
- Camacho A (2012) On the use of auditory models’ elements to enhance a sawtooth waveform inspired pitch estimator on telephone-quality signals. In: 11th International conference on information science, signal processing, and their applications (ISSPA), Montreal QC, pp 1107–1112. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSPA.2012.6310450
- Kob M, Dejonckere P, Calderon E, Kaynar S (2009) Simulation of differences between male and female vocal fold configuration during phonation. In: NAG/DAGA international conference on acoustics, Rotterdam, pp 1755–1756Google Scholar
- Roy N, Merrill RM, Gray SD, Smith EM (2005) Voice disorders in the general population: prevalence, risk factors, and occupational impact. Laryngoscope 115(11):1988–1995. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000179174.32345.41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Titze IR (2000) Principles of voice production, second printing. National Center for Voice and Speech, Iowa CityGoogle Scholar
- Titze IR (2006) The myoelastic aerodynamic theory of phonation. National Center for Voice and Speech, Iowa CityGoogle Scholar
- Zheng X, Mittal R, Xue Q (2011) Direct-numerical simulation of the glottal jet and vocal-fold dynamics in a three-dimensional laryngeal model. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3592216