Advertisement

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 99–110 | Cite as

Heterogeneous blood flow in microvessels with applications to nanodrug transport and mass transfer into tumor tissue

  • Z. Xu
  • C. KleinstreuerEmail author
Original Paper
  • 148 Downloads

Abstract

Nanodrug transport in tumor microvasculature and deposition/extravasation into tumor tissue are an important link in the nanodrug delivery process. Considering heterogeneous blood flow, such a dual process is numerically studied. The hematocrit distribution is solved by directly considering the forces experienced by the red blood cells (RBCs), i.e., the wall lift force and the random cell collision force. Using a straight microvessel as a test bed, validated computer simulations are performed to determine blood flow characteristics as well as the resulting nanodrug distribution and extravasation. The results confirm that RBCs migrate away from the vessel wall, leaving a cell-free layer (CFL). Nanodrug particles tend to preferentially accumulate in the CFL, leading to increased concentration near the endothelial surface layer. However, shear-induced NP diffusion is diminished within the CFL, causing to a much slower lateral transport rate into tumor tissue. These competing effects determine the NP deposition/extravasation rates. The present modeling framework and NP flux results provide new physical insight. The analysis can be readily extended to simulations of NP transport in blood microvessels of actual tumors.

Keywords

Computer simulation Cell-free layer Nanodrug delivery Extravasation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The use of ANSYS software (Canonsburg, PA) as part of the ANSYS-NCSU Professional Agreement is gratefully acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aarts PA, Van Den Broek SA, Prins GW, Kuiken GD, Sixma JJ, Heethaar RM (1988) Blood platelets are concentrated near the wall and red blood cells, in the center in flowing blood. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 8(6):819–824Google Scholar
  2. Abkarian M, Lartigue C, Viallat A (2002) Tank treading and unbinding of deformable vesicles in shear flow: determination of the lift force. Phys Rev Lett 88(6):068103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagchi P (2007) Mesoscale simulation of blood flow in small vessels. Biophys J 92(6):1858–1877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breedveld V, van den Ende D, Jongschaap R, Mellema J (2001) Shear-induced diffusion and rheology of noncolloidal suspensions: time scales and particle displacements. J Chem Phys 114(13):5923–5936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchanan JR, Kleinstreuer C, Comer JK (2000) Rheological effects on pulsatile hemodynamics in a stenosed tube. Comput Fluids 29(6):695–724CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Callens N, Minetti C, Coupier G, Mader MA, Dubois F, Misbah C, Podgorski T (2008) Hydrodynamic lift of vesicles under shear flow in microgravity. Europhys Lett 83(2):24002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corley RA, Kabilan S, Kuprat AP, Carson JP, Jacob RE, Minard KR, Teeguarden JG, Timchalk C, Pipavath S, Glenny R, Einstein DR (2015) Comparative risks of aldehyde constituents in cigarette smoke using transient computational fluid dynamics/physiologically based pharmacokinetic models of the rat and human respiratory tracts. Toxic Sci 146:65–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Danhier F, Feron O, Préat V (2010) To exploit the tumor microenvironment: passive and active tumor targeting of nanocarriers for anti-cancer drug delivery. J Control Release 148(2):135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Apolito R, Taraballi F, Minardi S, Liu X, Caserta S, Cevenini A, Tasciotti E, Tomaiuolo G, Guido S (2016) Microfluidic interactions between red blood cells and drug carriers by image analysis techniques. Med Eng Phys 38(1):17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Einstein A (1905) The theory of the brownian movement. Ann der Physik 17:549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fedosov DA, Pan W, Caswell B, Gompper G, Karniadakis GE (2011) Predicting human blood viscosity in silico. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(29):11772–11777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fricke H (1924) A mathematical treatment of the electric conductivity and capacity of disperse systems I. The electric conductivity of a suspension of homogeneous spheroids. Phys Rev 24(5):575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grandchamp X, Coupier G, Srivastav A, Minetti C, Podgorski T (2013) Lift and down-gradient shear-induced diffusion in red blood cell suspensions. Phys Rev Lett 110(10):108101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haun JB, Hammer DA (2008) Quantifying nanoparticle adhesion mediated by specific molecular interactions. Langmuir 24(16):8821–8832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hund SJ, Antaki JF (2009) An extended convection diffusion model for red blood cell-enhanced transport of thrombocytes and leukocytes. Phys Med Biol 54(20):6415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ishii M, Mishima K (1984) Two-fluid model and hydrodynamic constitutive relations. Nucl Eng Des 82(2–3):107–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jung J, Hassanein A, Lyczkowski RW (2006) Hemodynamic computation using multiphase flow dynamics in a right coronary artery. Ann Biomed Eng 34(3):393–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Junttila MR, de Sauvage FJ (2013) Influence of tumour micro-environment heterogeneity on therapeutic response. Nature 501(7467):346–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kleinstreuer C (2003) Two-phase flow: theory and applications. CRC Press, Boca RatonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Kleinstreuer C (2015) Methods and Devices for Targeted Injection of Microspheres. U.S. Patent 9,149,605 issued 10/06/2015Google Scholar
  21. Kleinstreuer C, Xu Z (2016) Mathematical modeling and computer simulations of nanofluid flow with applications to cooling and lubrication. Fluids 1(2):16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kleinstreuer C, Xu Z (2018) Computational microfluidics applied to drug delivery in pulmonary and arterial systems. In: Song Y, Cheng D, Zhao L (eds) Microfluidics: fundamentals, devices, and applications. Wiley, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  23. Kleinstreuer C, Feng Y, Childress E (2014) Drug-targeting methodologies with applications: a review. World J Clin Cases 2(12):742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kleinstreuer C, Chari SV, Vachhani S (2018) Potential use of multifunctional nanoparticles for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. J Cardiol Cardiovasc Sci 2(3):30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar A, Graham MD (2012) Mechanism of margination in confined flows of blood and other multicomponent suspensions. Phys Rev Lett 109(10):108102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee TR, Choi M, Kopacz AM, Yun SH, Liu WK, Decuzzi P (2013) On the near-wall accumulation of injectable particles in the microcirculation: smaller is not better. Sci Rep 3:2079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lei H, Fedosov DA, Caswell B, Karniadakis GE (2013) Blood flow in small tubes: quantifying the transition to the non-continuum regime. J Fluid Mech 722:214–239CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu Y, Liu WK (2006) Rheology of red blood cell aggregation by computer simulation. J Comput Phys 220(1):139–154MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Mansour MH, Bressloff NW, Shearman CP (2010) Red blood cell migration in microvessels. Biorheology 47(1):73–93Google Scholar
  30. Massoudi M, Kim J, Antaki JF (2012) Modeling and numerical simulation of blood flow using the theory of interacting continua. Int J Nonlinear Mech 47(5):506–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McWhirter JL, Noguchi H, Gompper G (2009) Flow-induced clustering and alignment of vesicles and red blood cells in microcapillaries. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(15):6039–6043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moyers-Gonzalez M, Owens RG, Fang J (2008) A non-homogeneous constitutive model for human blood. Part 1. Model derivation and steady flow. J Fluid Mech 617:327–354MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Müller K, Fedosov DA, Gompper G (2014) Margination of micro-and nano-particles in blood flow and its effect on drug delivery. Sci Rep 4:4871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Namdee K, Thompson AJ, Charoenphol P, Eniola-Adefeso O (2013) Margination propensity of vascular-targeted spheres from blood flow in a microfluidic model of human microvessels. Langmuir 29(8):2530–2535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olla P (1997) The lift on a tank-treading ellipsoidal cell in a shear flow. J Phys II 7(10):1533–1540Google Scholar
  36. Olla P (1999) Simplified model for red cell dynamics in small blood vessels. Phys Rev Lett 82(2):453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillips RJ, Armstrong RC, Brown RA, Graham AL, Abbott JR (1992) A constitutive equation for concentrated suspensions that accounts for shear-induced particle migration. Phys Fluids 4(1):30–40CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Richards AL, Kleinstreuer C, Kennedy AS, Childress E, Buckner GD (2012) Experimental microsphere targeting in a representative hepatic artery system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59(1):198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saadatmand M, Ishikawa T, Matsuki N, Abdekhodaie MJ, Imai Y, Ueno H, Yamaguchi T (2011) Fluid particle diffusion through high-hematocrit blood flow within a capillary tube. J Biomech 44(1):170–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Secomb TW (2017) Blood flow in the microcirculation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 49:443–461MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Seifert U (1999) Hydrodynamic lift on bound vesicles. Phys Rev Lett 83(4):876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sohrabi S, Yunus DE, Xu J, Yang J, Liu Y (2016) Characterization of nanoparticle binding dynamics in microcirculation using an adhesion probability function. Microvasc Res 108:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sukumaran S, Seifert U (2001) Influence of shear flow on vesicles near a wall: a numerical study. Phys Rev E 64(1):011916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sun C, Munn LL (2005) Particulate nature of blood determines macroscopic rheology: a 2-D lattice Boltzmann analysis. Biophys J 88(3):1635–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Swartz MA, Fleury ME (2007) Interstitial flow and its effects in soft tissues. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 9:229–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tan J, Thomas A, Liu Y (2012) Influence of red blood cells on nanoparticle targeted delivery in microcirculation. Soft Matter 8(6):1934–1946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tan J, Keller W, Sohrabi S, Yang J, Liu Y (2016) Characterization of nanoparticle dispersion in red blood cell suspension by the lattice Boltzmann-immersed boundary method. Nanomaterials 6(2):30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomas A, Tan J, Liu Y (2014) Characterization of nanoparticle delivery in microcirculation using a microfluidic device. Microvasc Res 94:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tilles AW, Eckstein EC (1987) The near-wall excess of platelet-sized particles in blood flow: its dependence on hematocrit and wall shear rate. Microvasc Res 33(2):211–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Torchilin VP (2000) Drug targeting. Eur J Pharm Sci 11:S81–S91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Uijttewaal WS, Nijhof EJ, Bronkhorst PJ, Den Hartog E, Heethaar RM (1993) Near-wall excess of platelets induced by lateral migration of erythrocytes in flowing blood. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 264(4):H1239–H1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xu Z, Kleinstreuer C (2018) Direct nanodrug delivery for tumor targeting subject to shear-augmented diffusion in blood flow. Med Biol Eng Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1818-z Google Scholar
  53. Xu Z, Jernigan S, Kleinstreuer C, Buckner GD (2016) Solid tumor embolotherapy in hepatic arteries with an anti-reflux catheter system. Ann Biomed Eng 44(4):1036–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhao H, Shaqfeh ES, Narsimhan V (2012) Shear-induced particle migration and margination in a cellular suspension. Phys Fluids 24(1):011902CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Joint Department of Biomedical EngineeringNorth Carolina State University and University of North Carolina at Chapel HillRaleighUSA
  3. 3.Corporate Research and TechnologyEaton CorporationMenomonee FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations