Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 1729–1741 | Cite as

A diffusion-weighted imaging informed continuum model of the rabbit triceps surae complex

Original Paper

Abstract

The NZ white rabbit is the animal of choice for much experimental work due to its muscular frame and similar response to human diseases, and is one of the few mammals that have had their genome sequenced. However, continuum-level computational models of rabbit muscle detailing fibre architecture are limited in the literature, especially the triceps surae complex (gastrocnemius, plantaris and soleus), which has similar biomechanics and translatable findings to the human. This study presents a geometrical model of the rabbit triceps surae informed with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-based fibres. Passive rabbit-specific material properties are estimated using known muscle deformation inferred from magnetic resonance imaging data and dorsiflexion force measured with a custom-built rabbit rig and transducer. Muscle shape prediction is evaluated against a second rabbit. This study revealed that the triceps surae steady-state force post-rigor is close to post-mortem for small deformations but increases by a fixed ratio as the deformation increases and can be used to evaluate the passive behaviour of muscle. DWI fibre orientation significantly influences shape and mechanics during simulated computational muscle contraction. The presented triceps surae force and material properties may be used to inform the constitutive behaviour of continuum rabbit muscle models used to investigate pathology and musculotendon treatments that may be translated to the human condition.

Keywords

DWI DTI Muscle fibres Rabbit triceps surae Rabbit force rig 

References

  1. Alföldi J, Di Palma F, Lindblad-Toh K (2009) The European rabbit genome. In: Houdebine L, Fan J (eds) Rabbit biotechnology. Springer, New york pp 129–129Google Scholar
  2. Babarenda Gamage TP, Rajagopal V, Ehrgott M, Nash MP, Nielsen PMF (2011) Identification of mechanical properties of heterogeneous soft bodies using gravity loading. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 27:391–407CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Bammer R et al (2002) Diffusion tensor imaging using single-shot SENSE-EPI. Magn Resonan Med 48:128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C (1996) Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson Ser B 111:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blemker SS, Pinsky PM, Delp SL (2005) A 3D model of muscle reveals the causes of nonuniform strains in the biceps brachii. J Biomech 38:657–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley C, Pullan A, Hunter P (1997) Geometric modeling of the human torso using cubic Hermite elements. Ann Biomed Eng 25:96–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Damon BM, Ding Z, Anderson AW, Freyer AS, Gore JC (2002) Validation of diffusion tensor MRI-based muscle fiber tracking. Magn Reson Med 48:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis J, Kaufman KR, Lieber RL (2003) Correlation between active and passive isometric force and intramuscular pressure in the isolated rabbit tibialis anterior muscle. J Biomech 36:505–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernandez J, Hunter P (2005) An anatomically based patient-specific finite element model of patella articulation: towards a diagnostic tool. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 4:20–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fernandez J, Pandy M (2006) Integrating modelling and experiments to assess dynamic musculoskeletal function in humans. Exp Physiol 91:371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandez JW, Mithraratne P, Thrupp SF, Tawhai MH, Hunter PJ (2004) Anatomically based geometric modelling of the musculo-skeletal system and other organs. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2:139–155. doi:10.1007/s10237-003-0036-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galban CJ, Maderwald S, Uffmann K, de Greiff A, Ladd ME (2004) Diffusive sensitivity to muscle architecture: a magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging study of the human calf. Eur J Appl Physiol 93:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grover DM, Chen AA, Hazelwood SJ (2007) Biomechanics of the rabbit knee and ankle: muscle, ligament, and joint contact force predictions. J Biomech 40:2816–2821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gushue DL, Houck J, Lerner AL (2005) Rabbit knee joint biomechanics: motion analysis and modeling of forces during hopping. J Orthop Res 23:735–742. doi:10.1016/j.orthres.2005.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henderson DW (1968) Effect of temperature on post-mortem structural changes in rabbit, bovine and porcine skeletal muscle. Iowa State University, AmesGoogle Scholar
  16. Herzog W, Longino D (2007) The role of muscles in joint degeneration and osteoarthritis. J Biomech 40:S54–S63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hsu EW, Buckley DL, Bui JD, Blackband SJ, Forder JR (2001) Two-component diffusion tensor MRI of isolated perfused hearts. Magn Reson Med 45:1039–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunter PJ (1995) Myocardial constitutive laws for continuum mechanics models of the heart. In: Sideman S, Beyar R (eds) Molecular and subcellular cardiology. Springer, New York pp 303–318Google Scholar
  19. Hunter PJ, Borg TK (2003) Integration from proteins to organs: the Physiome Project. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunter P, Sideman S, Fozzard H (1995) Myocardial constitutive laws for continuum mechanics models of the heart. Adv Exp Med Biol 382:303–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunter P, McCulloch A, Ter Keurs H (1998) Modelling the mechanical properties of cardiac muscle. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 69:289–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones DK, Simmons A, Williams SCR, Horsfield MA (1999) Non-invasive assessment of axonal fiber connectivity in the human brain via diffusion tensor MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Komi P, Belli A, Huttunen V, Bonnefoy R, Geyssant A, Lacour J (1996) Optic fibre as a transducer of tendomuscular forces. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 72:278–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levin DIW, Gilles B, Mädler B, Pai DK (2011) Extracting skeletal muscle fiber fields from noisy diffusion tensor data. Med Image Anal 15(3):340–353. doi:10.1016/j.media.2011.01.005
  25. Locker RH (1959) Striation patterns of ox muscle in rigor mortis. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 6:419–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nash MP, Hunter PJ (2000) Computational mechanics of the heart from tissue structure to ventricular function. J Elast 61:113–141MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Olsen NJ, Qi J, Park JH (2005) Imaging and skeletal muscle disease. Curr Rheumatol Rep 7:106–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scollan DF, Holmes A, Winslow R, Forder J (1998) Histological validation of myocardial microstructure obtained from diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory. Physiology 275:H2308–H2318Google Scholar
  29. Sharma P, Maffulli N (2005) Tendon injury and tendinopathy: healing and repair. J Bone Joint Surg 87:187–202Google Scholar
  30. Siebert T et al (2015) Three-dimensional muscle architecture and comprehensive dynamic properties of rabbit gastrocnemius. Plantaris and soleus: input for simulation studies. PLoS One 10:e0130985. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stejskal EO, Tanner J (1965) Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 42:288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sun J-S, Tsuang Y-H, Liu T-K, Hang Y-S, Cheng C-K (1994) Failure sites and peak tensile forces of the composite triceps surae muscle by passive extension in the rabbit. Clin Biomech 9:310–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Trudeau JD, Dixon WT, Hawkins J (1995) The effect of inhomogeneous sample susceptibility on measured diffusion anisotropy using NMR imaging. J Magn Reson B 108:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Donkelaar C, Kretzers L, Bovendeerd P, Lataster L, Nicolay K, Janssen J, Drost M (1999) Diffusion tensor imaging in biomechanical studies of skeletal muscle function. J Anat 194:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Ee C, Chasse A, Myers B (2000) Quantifying skeletal muscle properties in cadaveric test specimens: effects of mechanical loading, postmortem time, and freezer storage. J Biomech Eng 122:9Google Scholar
  36. Wang CJ, Wang FS, Yang KD, Weng LH, Hsu CC, Huang CS, Yang LC (2003) Shock wave therapy induces neovascularization at the tendon-bone junction. A study in rabbits. J Orthop Res 21:984–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. West JR, Juncosa N, Galloway MT, Boivin GP, Butler DL (2004) Characterization of in vivo Achilles tendon forces in rabbits during treadmill locomotion at varying speeds and inclinations. J Biomech 37:1647–1653. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Winters TM, Takahashi M, Lieber RL, Ward SR (2011) Whole muscle length-tension relationships are accurately modeled as scaled sarcomeres in rabbit hindlimb muscles. J Biomech 44:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Auckland Bioengineering InstituteUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of Engineering ScienceUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations