Advertisement

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 1405–1421 | Cite as

Tissue growth constrained by extracellular matrix drives invagination during optic cup morphogenesis

  • Alina OlteanEmail author
  • Jie Huang
  • David C. Beebe
  • Larry A. Taber
Original Paper

Abstract

In the early embryo, the eyes form initially as relatively spherical optic vesicles (OVs) that protrude from both sides of the brain tube. Each OV grows until it contacts and adheres to the overlying surface ectoderm (SE) via an extracellular matrix (ECM) that is secreted by the SE and OV. The OV and SE then thicken and bend inward (invaginate) to create the optic cup (OC) and lens vesicle, respectively. While constriction of cell apices likely plays a role in SE invagination, the mechanisms that drive OV invagination are poorly understood. Here, we used experiments and computational modeling to explore the hypothesis that the ECM locally constrains the growing OV, forcing it to invaginate. In chick embryos, we examined the need for the ECM by (1) removing SE at different developmental stages and (2) exposing the embryo to collagenase. At relatively early stages of invagination (Hamburger–Hamilton stage HH14\(-\)), removing the SE caused the curvature of the OV to reverse as it ‘popped out’ and became convex, but the OV remained concave at later stages (HH15) and invaginated further during subsequent culture. Disrupting the ECM had a similar effect, with the OV popping out at early to mid-stages of invagination (HH14\(-\) to HH14\(+\)). These results suggest that the ECM is required for the early stages but not the late stages of OV invagination. Microindentation tests indicate that the matrix is considerably stiffer than the cellular OV, and a finite-element model consisting of a growing spherical OV attached to a relatively stiff layer of ECM reproduced the observed behavior, as well as measured temporal changes in OV curvature, wall thickness, and invagination depth reasonably well. Results from our study also suggest that the OV grows relatively uniformly, while the ECM is stiffer toward the center of the optic vesicle. These results are consistent with our matrix-constraint hypothesis, providing new insight into the mechanics of OC (early retina) morphogenesis.

Keywords

Eye development Retina development Biomechanics  Computational models Chick embryo 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Philip Bayly, Ruth Okamoto, Kristen Naegle, and members of the LAT laboratory for helpful discussions. We thank the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science for use of the confocal microscope. This work was supported by NIH Grant R01 NS070918 (LAT) and a fellowship for AO through the Imaging Sciences Pathway at Washington University (NIH T32 EB014855).

Supplementary material

10237_2016_771_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.5 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 1497 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (avi 7601 KB)

Supplementary material 3 (avi 9106 KB)

Supplementary material 4 (avi 8584 KB)

10237_2016_771_MOESM5_ESM.avi (2.6 mb)
Supplementary material 5 (avi 2616 KB)
10237_2016_771_MOESM6_ESM.avi (4.3 mb)
Supplementary material 6 (avi 4376 KB)

References

  1. Adler R, Canto-Soler MV (2007) Molecular mechanisms of optic vesicle development: complexities, ambiguities and controversies. Dev Biol 305(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blatz PJ, Ko WL (1962) Application of finite elastic theory to the deformation of rubbery materials. Trans Soc Rheol 6(1):223–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borges RM, Lamers ML, Forti FL, Santos MFd, Yan CYI (2011) Rho signaling pathway and apical constriction in the early lens placode. Genesis 49(5):368–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Božanić D, Saraga-Babić M (2004) Cell proliferation during the early stages of human eye development. Anat Embryol 208(5):381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brady RC, Hilfer SR (1982) Optic cup formation: a calcium-regulated process. Proc Natl Acad Sci 79(18):5587–5591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chauhan BK, Disanza A, Choi SY, Faber SC, Lou M, Beggs HE, Scita G, Zheng Y, Lang RA (2009) Cdc42-and IRSp53-dependent contractile filopodia tether presumptive lens and retina to coordinate epithelial invagination. Development 136(21):3657–3667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daley WP, Yamada KM (2013) Ecm-modulated cellular dynamics as a driving force for tissue morphogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 23(4):408–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davidson LA, Koehl M, Keller R, Oster GF (1995) How do sea urchins invaginate? Using biomechanics to distinguish between mechanisms of primary invagination. Development 121(7):2005–2018Google Scholar
  9. Davidson L, Oster G, Keller R, Koehl M (1999) Measurements of mechanical properties of the blastula wall reveal which hypothesized mechanisms of primary invagination are physically plausible in the sea urchin strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Dev Biol 209(2):221–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eiraku M, Takata N, Ishibashi H, Kawada M, Sakakura E, Okuda S, Sekiguchi K, Adachi T, Sasai Y (2011) Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature 472(7341):51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eiraku M, Adachi T, Sasai Y (2012) Relaxation–expansion model for self-driven retinal morphogenesis. Bioessays 34(1):17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuhrmann S (2010) Eye morphogenesis and patterning of the optic vesicle. Curr Top Dev Biol 93:61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grobstein C, Cohen J (1965) Collagenase: effect on the morphogenesis of embryonic salivary epithelium in vitro. Science 150(3696):626–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88(1):49–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hendrix R, Zwaan J (1974) Changes in the glycoprotein concentration of the extracellular matrix between lens and optic vesicle associated with early lens differentiation. Differentiation 2(6):357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hendrix RW, Zwaan J (1975) The matrix of the optic vesicle-presumptive lens interface during induction of the lens in the chicken embryo. J Embryol Exp Morphol 33(4):1023–1049Google Scholar
  17. Hilfer SR, Randolph GJ (1993) Immunolocalization of basal lamina components during development of chick otic and optic primordia. Anat Rec 235(3):443–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hosseini HS, Beebe DC, Taber LA (2014) Mechanical effects of the surface ectoderm on optic vesicle morphogenesis in the chick embryo. J Biomech 47(16):3837–3846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang J, Rajagopal R, Liu Y, Dattilo LK, Shaham O, Ashery-Padan R, Beebe DC (2011) The mechanism of lens placode formation: a case of matrix-mediated morphogenesis. Dev Biol 355(1):32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hyer J, Kuhlman J, Afif E, Mikawa T (2003) Optic cup morphogenesis requires pre-lens ectoderm but not lens differentiation. Dev Biol 259(2):351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jidigam VK, Gunhaga L (2013) Development of cranial placodes: insights from studies in chick. Dev Growth Differ 55(1):79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kakou A, Bézie Y, Mercier N, Louis H, Labat C, Challande P, Lacolley P, Safar ME (2009) Selective reduction of central pulse pressure under angiotensin blockage in SHR: role of the fibronectin-\(\alpha 5\beta 1\) integrin complex. Am J Hypertens 22(7):711–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kwan KM (2014) Coming into focus: the role of extracellular matrix in vertebrate optic cup morphogenesis. Dev Dyn 243(10):1242–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lane MC, Koehl M, Wilt F, Keller R (1993) A role for regulated secretion of apical extracellular matrix during epithelial invagination in the sea urchin. Development 117(3):1049–1060Google Scholar
  25. Li Z, Joseph NM, Easter SS (2000) The morphogenesis of the zebrafish eye, including a fate map of the optic vesicle. Dev Dyn 218(1):175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martinez-Morales JR, Wittbrodt J (2009) Shaping the vertebrate eye. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19(5):511–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mic FA, Molotkov A, Molotkova N, Duester G (2004) Raldh2 expression in optic vesicle generates a retinoic acid signal needed for invagination of retina during optic cup formation. Dev Dyn 231(2):270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nakano T, Ando S, Takata N, Kawada M, Muguruma K, Sekiguchi K, Saito K, Yonemura S, Eiraku M, Sasai Y (2012) Self-formation of optic cups and storable stratified neural retina from human escs. Cell Stem Cell 10(6):771–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Norden C, Young S, Link BA, Harris WA (2009) Actomyosin is the main driver of interkinetic nuclear migration in the retina. Cell 138(6):1195–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oberhauser AF, Badilla-Fernandez C, Carrion-Vazquez M, Fernandez JM (2002) The mechanical hierarchies of fibronectin observed with single-molecule afm. J Mol Biol 319(2):433–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Plageman TF, Chauhan BK, Yang C, Jaudon F, Shang X, Zheng Y, Lou M, Debant A, Hildebrand JD, Lang RA (2011) A Trio-Rhoa-Shroom3 pathway is required for apical constriction and epithelial invagination. Development 138(23):5177–5188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramasubramanian A, Taber LA (2008) Computational modeling of morphogenesis regulated by mechanical feedback. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 7(2):77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rifes P, Thorsteinsdóttir S (2012) Extracellular matrix assembly and 3d organization during paraxial mesoderm development in the chick embryo. Dev Biol 368(2):370–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rodriguez EK, Hoger A, McCulloch AD (1994) Stress-dependent finite growth in soft elastic tissues. J Biomech 27(4):455–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sasai Y, Eiraku M, Suga H (2012) In vitro organogenesis in three dimensions: self-organising stem cells. Development 139(22):4111–4121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Slavotinek AM (2011) Eye development genes and known syndromes. Mol Genet Metab 104(4):448–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith AN, Miller LAD, Song N, Taketo MM, Lang RA (2005) The duality of \(\beta \)-catenin function: a requirement in lens morphogenesis and signaling suppression of lens fate in periocular ectoderm. Dev Biol 285(2):477–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spemann H (1901) Über Korrelationen in der Entwicklung des Auges. Verh Anat Ges 15:61–79Google Scholar
  39. Taber LA (2004) Nonlinear theory of elasticity: applications in biomechanics. World Scientific, New JerseyCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Taber LA (2014) Morphomechanics: transforming tubes into organs. Curr Opin Genet Dev 27:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tsukiji N, Nishihara D, Yajima I, Takeda K, Shibahara S, Yamamoto H (2009) Mitf functions as an in ovo regulator for cell differentiation and proliferation during development of the chick RPE. Dev Biol 326(2):335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Essen DC, Drury HA, Dickson J, Harwell J, Hanlon D, Anderson CH (2001) An integrated software suite for surface-based analyses of cerebral cortex. J Am Med Inf Assoc 8(5):443–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Voronov DA, Taber LA (2002) Cardiac looping in experimental conditions: effects of extraembryonic forces. Dev Dyn 224(4):413–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Webster EH, Silver AF, Gonsalves NI (1983) Histochemical analysis of extracellular matrix material in embryonic mouse lens morphogenesis. Dev Biol 100(1):147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Webster EH, Silver AF, Gonsalves NI (1984) The extracellular matrix between the optic vesicle and presumptive lens during lens morphogenesis in an anophthalmic strain of mice. Dev Biol 103(1):142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wessells NK, Cohen JH (1968) Effects of collagenase on developing epithelia in vitro: lung, ureteric bud, and pancreas. Dev Biol 18(3):294–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wride MA (1996) Cellular and molecular features of lens differentiation: a review of recent advances. Differentiation 61(2):77–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xu G, Kemp PS, Hwu JA, Beagley AM, Bayly PV, Taber LA (2010) Opening angles and material properties of the early embryonic chick brain. J Biomech Eng 132(1):011,005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang Y, Niswander L (1995) Interaction between the signaling molecules WNT7a and SHH during vertebrate limb development: dorsal signals regulate anteroposterior patterning. Cell 80(6):939–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zamir EA, Srinivasan V, Perucchio R, Taber LA (2003) Mechanical asymmetry in the embryonic chick heart during looping. Ann Biomed Eng 31(11):1327–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zolessi FR, Arruti C (2001) Apical accumulation of marcks in neural plate cells during neurulation in the chick embryo. BMC Dev Biol 1(1):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zwaan J, Hendrix RW (1973) Changes in cell and organ shape during early development of the ocular lens. Am Zool 13(4):1039–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zwaan J, Bryan PR, Pearce TL et al (1969) Interkinetic nuclear migration during the early stages of lens formation in the chicken embryo. J Embryol Exp Morphol 21(1):71–83Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alina Oltean
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jie Huang
    • 2
  • David C. Beebe
    • 2
  • Larry A. Taber
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringWashington UniversitySaint LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ophthalmology and Visual SciencesWashington UniversitySaint LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations