We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Advertisement

A novel strain energy relationship for red blood cell membrane skeleton based on spectrin stiffness and its application to micropipette deformation

Abstract

Red blood cell (RBC) membrane skeleton is a closed two-dimensional elastic network of spectrin tetramers with nodes formed by short actin filaments. Its three-dimensional shape conforms to the shape of the bilayer, to which it is connected through vertical linkages to integral membrane proteins. Numerous methods have been devised over the years to predict the response of the RBC membrane to applied forces and determine the corresponding increase in the skeleton elastic energy arising either directly from continuum descriptions of its deformation, or seeking to relate the macroscopic behavior of the membrane to its molecular constituents. In the current work, we present a novel continuum formulation rooted in the molecular structure of the membrane and apply it to analyze model deformations similar to those that occur during aspiration of RBCs into micropipettes. The microscopic elastic properties of the skeleton are derived by treating spectrin tetramers as simple linear springs. For a given local deformation of the skeleton, we determine the average bond energy and define the corresponding strain energy function and stress–strain relationships. The lateral redistribution of the skeleton is determined variationally to correspond to the minimum of its total energy. The predicted dependence of the length of the aspirated tongue on the aspiration pressure is shown to describe the experimentally observed system behavior in a quantitative manner by taking into account in addition to the skeleton energy an energy of attraction between RBC membrane and the micropipette surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. An X, Mohandas N (2008) Disorders of red cell membrane. Br J Haematol 141:367–375

  2. Byers TJ, Branton D (1985) Visualization of protein associations in the erythrocyte-membrane skeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:6153–6158

  3. Chen M, Boyle FJ (2014) Investigation of membrane mechanics using spring networks: application to red-blood-cell modelling. Mater Sci Eng C 43:506–516

  4. Dao M, Li J, Suresh S (2006) Molecularly based analysis of deformation of spectrin network and human erythrocyte. Mater Sci Eng C 26:1232–1244

  5. Dimitrakopoulos P (2012) Analysis of the variation in the determination of the shear modulus of the erythrocyte membrane: effects of the constitutive law and membrane modeling. Phys Rev E 85:041917 (1–10)

  6. Discher DE, Mohandas N (1996) Kinematics of red cell aspiration by fluorescence-imaged microdeformation. Biophys J 71:1680–1694

  7. Discher DE, Mohandas N, Evans EA (1994) Molecular maps of red cell deformation: hidden elasticity and in situ connectivity. Science 266:1032–1035

  8. Discher DE, Boal DH, Boey SK (1998) Simulations of the erythrocyte skeleton at large deformation. II. Micropipette aspiration. Biophys J 75:1584–1597

  9. Evans EA (1973) New membrane concept applied to the analysis of fluid shear- and micropipette-deformed red blood cells. Biophys J 13:941–954

  10. Fedosov DA, Caswell B, Karniadakis GE (2010) A multiscale red blood cell model with accurate mechanics, rheology, and dynamics. Biophys J 98:2215–2225

  11. Grey JL, Kodippili GC, Simon K, Low PS (2012) Identification of contact sites between ankyrin and band 3 in the human erythrocyte membrane. Biochemistry 51:6838–6846

  12. Hansen JC, Skalak R, Chien S, Hoger A (1996) An elastic network model based on the structure of the red blood cell membrane skeleton. Biophys J 70:146–166

  13. Hansen JC, Skalak R, Chien S, Hoger A (1997) Influence of network topology on the elasticity of the red blood cell membrane skeleton. Biophys J 72:2369–2381

  14. Hartmann D (2010) A multiscale model for red blood cell mechanics. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9:1–17

  15. Hochmuth RM, Waugh RE (1987) Erythrocyte membrane elasticity and viscosity. Ann Rev Physiol 49:209–219

  16. Ipsaro JJ, Harper SL, Messick TE, Marmorstein R, Mondragón A, Speicher DW (2010) Crystal structure and functional interpretation of the erythrocyte spectrin tetramerization domain complex. Blood 115:4843–4852

  17. Kuzman D, Svetina S, Waugh RE, Žekš B (2004) Elastic properties of the red blood cell membrane that determine echinocyte deformability. Eur Biophys J 33:1–15

  18. Law R, Carl P, Harper S, Dalhaimer P, Spreicher DW, Discher DE (2003) Cooperativity in forced unfolding of tandem spectrin repeats. Biophys J 84:533–544

  19. Li J, Dao M, Lim CT, Suresh S (2005) Spectrin-level modeling of the cytoskeleton and optical tweezers stretching of the erythrocyte. Biophys J 88:3707–3718

  20. Li X, Vlahovska PM, Karniadakis GE (2013) Continuum- and particle-based modeling of shapes and dynamics of red blood cells in health and disease. Soft Matter 9:28–37

  21. Lim GHW, Wortis M, Mukhopadhyay R (2002) Stomatocyte–discocyte–echinocyte sequence of the human red blood cell: evidence for the bilayer–couple hypothesis from membrane mechanics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:16766–16769

  22. Liu SC, Derick H, Palek J (1987) Visualization of the hexagonal lattice in the erythrocyte membrane skeleton. J Cell Biol 104:527–536

  23. Markin VS, Kozlov MM (1988) Mechanical properties of the red cell membrane skeleton—analysis of axisymmetric deformations. J Theor Biol 133:147–167

  24. Mohandas N, Evans EA (1994) Mechanical properties of the red cell membrane in relation to molecular structure and genetic effects. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 23:787–818

  25. Mukhopadhyay R, Lim GHW, Wortis M (2002) Echinocyte shapes: bending, stretching, and shear determine spicule shape and spacing. Biophys J 82:1756–1772

  26. Paramore S, Voth GA (2006) Examining the influence of linkers and tertiary structure in the forced unfolding of multiple-repeat spectrin molecules. Biophys J 91:3436–3445

  27. Peng Z, Asaro RJ, Zhu Q (2010) Multiscale simulation of erythrocyte membranes. Phys Rev E 81:031904 (1–11)

  28. Pivkin IV, Karniadakis GE (2008) Accurate coarse-grained modelling of red blood cells. Phys Rev Lett 101:118115

  29. Randles LG, Rounsevell RWS, Clarke J (2007) Spectrin domains lose cooperativity in forced unfolding. Biophys J 92:571–577

  30. Rief M, Pascual J, Saraste M, Gaub HE (1999) Single molecule force spectroscopy of spectrin repeats: low unfolding forces in helix bundles. J Mol Biol 286:553–561

  31. Skalak R, Torezen A, Zarda RP, Chien S (1973) Strain energy function of red blood cell membrane. Biophys J 13:245–264

  32. Stokke BT, Mikkelsen A, Elgsaeter A (1986) The human-erythrocyte membrane skeleton may be an ionic gel. 1. Membrane mechanochemical properties. Eur Biophys J 13:203–218

  33. Svetina S, Žekš B (1992) The elastic deformability of closed multilayered membranes is the same as that of a bilayer membrane. Eur Biophys J 21:251–255

  34. Svetina S, Žekš B (2014) Nonlocal membrane bending: a reflection, the facts and its relevance. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 208:189–196

  35. Waugh RE, Evans EA (1979) Thermoelasticity of the red blood cell membrane. Biophys J 26:115–132

  36. Zarda PR, Chien S, Skalak R (1977) Elastic deformation of red blood cells. J Biomech 10:211–221

  37. Zhu Q, Asaro RJ (2008) Spectrin folding versus unfolding reactions and RBC membrane stiffness. Biophys J 94:2529–2545

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Richard E. Waugh.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest for these studies.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (mp4 506 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (mp4 817 KB)

Supplementary material 1 (mp4 506 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (mp4 817 KB)

Appendices

Appendix 1: Description of the numerical procedure

Equation 18 is a differential equation of second order, and we translate it to a system of two differential equations of first order:

$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{\hbox {d}s_0 }{\hbox {d}s}=\frac{1}{\lambda _\mathrm{m} }\nonumber \\&\begin{aligned} \frac{d\lambda _\mathrm{m} }{\hbox {d}s}&=\left( {r_0 \frac{\partial ^{2}u}{\partial \lambda _\mathrm{m}^2 }} \right) ^{-1}\left[ \frac{\partial ^{2}u}{\partial \lambda _\mathrm{m} \partial \lambda _\mathrm{p}}\left( {\frac{1}{\lambda _\mathrm{m} }\frac{r}{r_0 }\frac{\hbox {d}r_0 }{\hbox {d}s_0 }-\frac{\hbox {d}r}{\hbox {d}s}} \right) \right. \\&\quad \left. +\,\,\frac{1}{\lambda _\mathrm{m} }\left( {\frac{\partial u}{\partial \lambda _\mathrm{p}}\frac{\hbox {d}r}{\hbox {d}s}-\frac{\partial u}{\partial \lambda _\mathrm{m} }\frac{\hbox {d}r_0 }{\hbox {d}s_0 }} \right) \right] \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(30)

The undeformed RBC area is a disk with radius \(R_{\mathrm{III}}= (A_{0}/4\pi )^{1/2}\) and is divided into three sections, each corresponding to a different region of the deformed membrane: cap, cylinder and annulus. Because each section has a different contour function s(r), the corresponding deformations are obtained from different versions of Eq. 30 subject to the constraints that s and \(s_{0}\) must be continuous across boundaries from the beginning of Sect. 1 to the end of Sect. 3 (Fig. 6a).

The contour functions in case of deformation from a flat disk to a spherical cap are:

$$\begin{aligned}&r = R\sin \frac{s}{R} \nonumber \\&r_0 =s_0 \end{aligned}$$
(31)

where R is the radius of the spherical cap and can be determined from the meniscus height h and the pipette radius \(R_{p}\)

$$\begin{aligned} R=\frac{h^{2}+R_\mathrm{p}^2 }{2h} \end{aligned}$$
(32)

For the cylindrical section, the contour functions are:

$$\begin{aligned}&r = R_\mathrm{p}\nonumber \\&r_0 = s_0 \end{aligned}$$
(33)

and for deformation from a larger to a smaller annulus, the relationships are:

$$\begin{aligned}&r = s-s_\mathrm{p}+R_\mathrm{p}\nonumber \\&r_0 =s_0 \end{aligned}$$
(34)

where \(s_\mathrm{p}\) is the length of the contour within the micropipette. The mapping function between the shapes \(s_0 \left( s \right) \) is determined by requiring area preservation and applying the condition that the extension ratios at the pole are the same \(\lambda _\mathrm{m} =\lambda _\mathrm{p}\). Numerically, we set the value of \(\lambda _\mathrm{m}\) at the pole as \(\lambda _\mathrm{m} =1/\gamma \) and making the first step of integration \(s_0 =\gamma s\). The value of \(\upgamma \) is obtained by iteration to satisfy the requirement that the value of \(s_0 \) at the end of the third section matches the initial disk radius \(R_{\mathrm{III}}\).

Appendix 2

For our present model, it is straightforward to calculate the dependence of the continuum moduli \(\kappa \) and \(\mu \) on extension ratios:

$$\begin{aligned} \mu= & {} \frac{Kn_0 X_0^2 }{2}\left\{ \lambda _1 \lambda _2 -\frac{4}{\pi }\frac{\lambda _1^2 \lambda _2^3 }{\left( {\lambda _1^2 -\lambda _2^2 } \right) ^{2}}\right. \nonumber \\&\times \left. \left[ {\left( {\frac{\lambda _1^2 }{\lambda _2^2 }+1} \right) E\left( {1-\frac{\lambda _2^2 }{\lambda _1^2 }} \right) -2K\left( {1-\frac{\lambda _2^2 }{\lambda _1^2 }} \right) } \right] \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(35)
$$\begin{aligned} \kappa= & {} \frac{Kn_0 X_0^2 }{2\pi }\frac{1}{\lambda _1 \lambda _2^2 }E\left( {1-\frac{\lambda _2^2 }{\lambda _1^2 }} \right) \end{aligned}$$
(36)

for \(\lambda _{1} > \lambda _{2}\), and with indices interchanged when the inequality is not satisfied. At first, the second term in the expression for \(\mu \) appears to be singular for \(\lambda _{1}=\lambda _{2}\), but a careful analysis of this term reveals the following limit:

$$\begin{aligned} \mathop {\lim }\limits _{\lambda _1 \rightarrow \lambda _2 } \left( \mu \right) =\frac{Kn_0 X_0^2 }{2}\left( {\lambda _1 \lambda _2 -\frac{3\lambda _2 }{4}} \right) \end{aligned}$$
(37)

From Fig. 9, it is evident that these two coefficients for a material made up of randomly oriented springs are strongly dependent on deformation, with the shear modulus increasing dramatically with extension and the area modulus decreasing with expansion. This indicates that such a material would “prefer” to decrease its local density than stretch when membrane deformations are large. As indicated in the discussion, experiments involving aspiration of small portions of red cell membrane into a micropipette, by themselves, do not enable us to determine whether this behavior is exhibited by RBC membrane, but future experiments using fluorescence to image changes in local skeletal density could provide a test of this prediction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Svetina, S., Kokot, G., Kebe, T.Š. et al. A novel strain energy relationship for red blood cell membrane skeleton based on spectrin stiffness and its application to micropipette deformation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 15, 745–758 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-015-0721-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Strain Energy Function
  • Membrane Skeleton
  • Projection Length
  • Extension Ratio
  • Micropipette Aspiration