Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 753–766 | Cite as

Brain pressure responses in translational head impact: a dimensional analysis and a further computational study

Original Paper

Abstract

Brain pressure responses resulting from translational head impact are typically related to focal injuries at the coup and contrecoup sites. Despite significant efforts characterizing brain pressure responses using experimental and modeling approaches, a thorough investigation of the key controlling parameters appears lacking. In this study, we identified three parameters specific and important for brain pressure responses induced by isolated linear acceleration \((a_{\text {lin}} )\) via a dimensional analysis: \(a_{\text {lin}} \) itself (magnitude and directionality), brain size and shape. These findings were verified using our recently developed Dartmouth Head Injury Model (DHIM). Applying \(a_{\text {lin}} \) to the rigid skull, we found that the temporal profile of the given \(a_{\text {lin}} \) directly determined that of pressure. Brain pressure was also found to be linearly proportional to brain size and dependent on impact direction. In addition, we investigated perturbations to brain pressure responses as a result of non-rigid skull deformation. Finally, DHIM pressure responses were quantitatively validated against two representative cadaveric head impacts (categorized as “good” to “excellent” in performance). These results suggest that both the magnitude and directionality of \(a_{\text {lin}} \) as well as brain size and shape should be considered when interpreting brain pressure responses. Further, a model validated against pressure responses alone is not sufficient to ensure its fidelity in strain-related responses. These findings provide important insights into brain pressure responses in translational head impact and the resulting risk of pressure-induced injury. In addition, they establish the feasibility of creating a pre-computed atlas for real-time tissue-level pressure responses without a direct simulation in the future.

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury Finite element model Linear acceleration Rotational acceleration Dartmouth Head Injury Model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was sponsored, in part, by the NIH Grant R21 NS078607 and the Dartmouth Hitchcock Foundation.

Conflict of interest

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  1. Abaqus (2012) Abaqus Online Documentation. Abaqus 6:12Google Scholar
  2. Arun K, Huang T, Blostein S (1987) Least-squares fitting of two 3-D point sets. Pattern Anal Mach Intell PAMI 9:698–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2003) Report to congress on mild traumatic brain injury in the United States: steps to prevent a serious public health problem, pp 1–45Google Scholar
  4. Chafi MS, Dirisala V, Karami G, Ziejewski M (2009) A finite element method parametric study of the dynamic response of the human brain with different cerebrospinal fluid constitutive properties. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 223:1003–1019. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y, Ostoja-Starzewski M (2010) MRI-based finite element modeling of head trauma: spherically focusing shear waves. Acta Mech 213:155–167. doi: 10.1007/s00707-009-0274-0 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Lange R, van Rooij L, Mooi H, Wismans J (2005) Objective biofidelity rating of a numerical human occupant model in frontal to lateral impact. Stapp Car Crash J 49:457–79Google Scholar
  7. Gibson LJ (2006) Woodpecker pecking: how woodpeckers avoid brain injury. J Zool 270:462–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00166.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenwald R, Gwin J, Chu J, Crisco J (2008) Head impact severity measures for evaluating mild traumatic brain injury risk exposure. Neurosurgery 62:789–798. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000311244.05104.96 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gurdjian E, Lissner H, Evans F et al (1961) Intracranial pressure and acceleration accompanying head impacts in human cadavers. Surg Gynecol Obstet 113:185–190Google Scholar
  10. Hardy WN, Mason MJ, Foster CD et al (2007) A study of the response of the human cadaver head to impact. Stapp Car Crash J 51:17–80Google Scholar
  11. Horgan TJ, Gilchrist MD (2003) The creation of three-dimensional finite element models for simulating head impact biomechanics. Int J Crashworthiness 8:353–366. doi: 10.1533/cras.8.4.353.19278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horgan TJ, Gilchrist MD (2004) Influence of FE model variability in predicting brain motion and intracranial pressure changes in head impact simulations. Int J Crashworthiness 9:401–418. doi: 10.1533/ijcr.2004.0299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ji S, Zhao W (2014) A pre-computed brain response atlas for instantaneous strain estimation in contact sports. Ann Biomed Eng (in press)Google Scholar
  14. Ji S, Ghadyani H, Bolander RP et al (2014a) Parametric Comparisons of Intracranial Mechanical Responses from three validated finite element models of the human head. Ann Biomed Eng 42:11–24. doi: 10.1007/s10439-013-0907-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ji S, Zhao W, Ford JC et al (2014b) Group-wise evaluation and comparison of white matter fiber strain and maximum principal strain in sports-related concussion. J Neurotrauma (in press). doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3268
  16. Ji S, Zhao W, Li Z, McAllister TW (2014c) Head impact accelerations for brain strain-related responses in contact sports: a model-based investigation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 13:1121–36. doi: 10.1007/s10237-014-0562-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kang H, Willinger R, Diaw B, Chinn B (1997) Validation of a 3D anatomic human head model and replication of head impact in motorcycle accident by finite element modeling. In: Proceedings of the 41st stapp car crash conferenceGoogle Scholar
  18. Kimpara H, Iwamoto M (2012) Mild traumatic brain injury predictors based on angular accelerations during impacts. Ann Biomed Eng 40:114–26. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0414-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kimpara H, Nakahira Y, Iwamoto M et al (2006) Investigation of anteroposterior head-neck responses during severe frontal impacts using a brain-spinal cord complex FE model. Stapp Car Crash J 50:509–44Google Scholar
  20. King A, Ruan J, Zhou C (1995) Recent advances in biomechanics of brain injury research: a review. J Neurotrauma 12:651–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King A, Yang K, Zhang L (2003) Is head injury caused by linear or angular acceleration. In: Proceedings of international research conference on the biomechanics of impacts. Lisbon, Portugal, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  22. Kleiven S (2006) Evaluation of head injury criteria using a finite element model validated against experiments on localized brain motion, intracerebral acceleration, and intracranial pressure. Int J Crashworthiness 11:65–79. doi: 10.1533/ijcr.2005.0384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kleiven S (2007) Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions. Stapp Car Crash J 51:81–114Google Scholar
  24. Kleiven S, Hardy WN (2002) Correlation of an FE model of the human head with local brain motion—consequences for injury prediction. Stapp Car Crash J 46:123–144Google Scholar
  25. Kleiven S, von Holst H (2002) Consequences of head size following trauma to the human head. J Biomech 35:153–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kraft RH, McKee PJ, Dagro AM, Grafton ST (2012) Combining the finite element method with structural connectome-based analysis for modeling neurotrauma: connectome neurotrauma mechanics. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002619 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levin H, Kraus MF (1994) The frontal lobes and traumatic brain injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 6:443–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Libertiaux V, Pascon F, Cescotto S (2011) Experimental verification of brain tissue incompressibility using digital image correlation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4:1177–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.03.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mao H, Zhang L, Jiang B et al (2013) Development of a finite element human head model partially validated with thirty five experimental cases. J Biomech Eng 135:111002–15. doi: 10.1115/1.4025101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meaney DF, Morrison B, Bass CR (2014) The mechanics of traumatic brain injury: a review of what we know and what we need to know for reducing its societal burden. J Biomech Eng. doi: 10.1115/1.4026364
  31. Morse JD, Franck J, a, Wilcox BJ, et al (2014) An experimental and numerical investigation of head dynamics due to stick impacts in Girls’ Lacrosse. Ann Biomed Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10439-014-1091-8
  32. Nahum A, Smith R, Ward C (1977) Intracranial pressure dynamics during head impact. SAE technical paper no. 770922Google Scholar
  33. Newman J (1986) A generalized acceleration model for brain injury threshold (GAMBIT). In: Proceedings of international research conference on the biomechanics of impacts, pp 121–131Google Scholar
  34. Newman J, Shewchenko N (2000) A proposed new biomechanical head injury assessment function—the maximum power index. Stapp Car Crash J 44:215–247Google Scholar
  35. Rowson S, Duma SM (2013) Brain injury prediction: assessing the combined probability of concussion using linear and rotational head acceleration. Ann Biomed Eng 41:873–882. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0731-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ruan J, Prasad P (2006) The influence of human head tissue properties on intracranial pressure response during direct head impact. Int J Veh Saf 1:281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruan J, Prasad P (2001) The effects of skull thickness variations on human head dynamic impact responses. Stapp Car Crash J 45:395–414Google Scholar
  38. Ruan JS, Khalil T, King AI (1994) Dynamic response of the human head to impact by three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Biomech Eng 116:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sano K, Norio N (1967) Mechanism and dynamics of closed head injuries (preliminary report). Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 9:21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sonin A (2001) The physical basis of dimensional analysis, 2nd edn. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Takhounts EG, Craig MJ, Moorhouse K et al (2013) Development of brain injury criteria (Br IC). Stapp Car Crash J 57:243–266Google Scholar
  42. Takhounts EG, Ridella SA, Tannous RE et al (2008) Investigation of traumatic brain injuries using the next generation of simulated injury monitor (SIMon) finite element head model. Stapp Car Crash J 52:1–31Google Scholar
  43. Thomas LM, Roberts VL, Gurdjian ES (1966) Experimental intracranial pressure gradients in the human skull. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 29:404–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Trosseille X, Tarriere C, Lavaste F et al (1992) Development of a FEM of the human head according to a specific test protocol. In: Proceedings of the 46th stapp car conference, pp 235–253Google Scholar
  45. Tse K, Tan L, Lee S (2013) Development and validation of two subject-specific finite element models of human head against three cadaveric experiments. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 30:397–415. doi: 10.1002/cnm CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ward C, Chan M, Nahum A (1980) Intracranial pressure-A brain injury criterion. SAE technical paper 801304. doi: 10.4271/801304
  47. Wright RM, Post A, Hoshizaki B, Ramesh KT (2013) A multiscale computational approach to estimating axonal damage under inertial loading of the head. J Neurotrauma 30:102–18. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yoganandan N, Arun MWJ, Pintar FA (2014) Normalizing and scaling of data to derive human response corridors from impact tests. J Biomech 47:1749–1756. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yoganandan N, Gennarelli Ta, Zhang J et al (2009) Association of contact loading in diffuse axonal injuries from motor vehicle crashes. J Trauma 66:309–315. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181692104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Sances A et al (1995) Biomechanics of skull fracture. J Neurotrauma 12:659–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang L, Yang K, King A (2001a) Comparison of brain responses between frontal and lateral impacts by finite element modeling. J Neurotrauma 18:21–30. doi: 10.1089/089771501750055749 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang L, Yang KH, Dwarampudi R et al (2001b) Recent advances in brain injury research: a new human head model development and validation. Stapp Car Crash J 45:369–94Google Scholar
  53. Zhang L, Yang KH, King AI (2004) A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. J Biomech Eng. doi: 10.1115/1.1691446

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Thayer School of EngineeringDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA
  2. 2.Tianjin University of Science and TechnologyTianjinPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, Geisel School of MedicineDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA
  4. 4.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisel School of MedicineDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA

Personalised recommendations