Deficiencies in numerical models of anisotropic nonlinearly elastic materials
- 507 Downloads
Incompressible nonlinearly hyperelastic materials are rarely simulated in finite element numerical experiments as being perfectly incompressible because of the numerical difficulties associated with globally satisfying this constraint. Most commercial finite element packages therefore assume that the material is slightly compressible. It is then further assumed that the corresponding strain-energy function can be decomposed additively into volumetric and deviatoric parts. We show that this decomposition is not physically realistic, especially for anisotropic materials, which are of particular interest for simulating the mechanical response of biological soft tissue. The most striking illustration of the shortcoming is that with this decomposition, an anisotropic cube under hydrostatic tension deforms into another cube instead of a hexahedron with non-parallel faces. Furthermore, commercial numerical codes require the specification of a ‘compressibility parameter’ (or ‘penalty factor’), which arises naturally from the flawed additive decomposition of the strain-energy function. This parameter is often linked to a ‘bulk modulus’, although this notion makes no sense for anisotropic solids; we show that it is essentially an arbitrary parameter and that infinitesimal changes to it result in significant changes in the predicted stress response. This is illustrated with numerical simulations for biaxial tension experiments of arteries, where the magnitude of the stress response is found to change by several orders of magnitude when infinitesimal changes in ‘Poisson’s ratio’ close to the perfect incompressibility limit of 1/2 are made.
KeywordsNonlinear soft tissues Anisotropy Additive decomposition Finite element simulations
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abaqus Analysis User’s Manual, version 6.10. https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Abaqus610/Documentation/docs/v6.10/books/usb/default.htm.
- Adams LH, Gibson RE (1930) The compressibility of rubber. J Wash Acad Sci 20: 213–223Google Scholar
- Bridgman PW (1944) The compression of sixty-one solid substances to 25000 kg cm2, determined by a new rapid method. Proc Am Acad Arts Sci 76: 9–24Google Scholar
- Christensen RG, Hoeve CAJ (1970) Comparison between theoretical and experimental values of the volume changes accompanying rubber extension. J Polym Sci A 1(8): 1503–1512Google Scholar
- FEBio Documentation, http://mrl.sci.utah.edu/software/febio. 2012
- Hearmon, RF (1974) The elastic constants of crystals and other anisotropic materials. In: Hellwege KH (ed) Landolt-Börnstein Tables, Group III, vol 11, pp 1–154Google Scholar
- LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual, version 971 (2007) Livermore Software Technology CorporationGoogle Scholar
- Ogden RW (1997) Nonlinear elastic deformations. Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1984). Reprinted by Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Ogden RW (2003) Nonlinear elasticity, anisotropy, material stability and residual stresses in soft tissue, CISM courses and lectures series no. 441. Springer, Wien, 65–108Google Scholar
- Rashid B, Destrade M, Gilchrist MD (2012b) Mechanical characterization of brain tissue in tension at dynamic strain rates. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.07.015