Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 627–644 | Cite as

Reversible network reconnection model for simulating large deformation in dynamic tissue morphogenesis

  • Satoru Okuda
  • Yasuhiro Inoue
  • Mototsugu Eiraku
  • Yoshiki Sasai
  • Taiji AdachiEmail author
Original Paper


Morphogenesis of tissues in organ development is accompanied by large three-dimensional (3D) deformations, in which mechanical interactions among multiple cells are spatiotemporally regulated. To reveal the deformation mechanisms, in this study, we developed the reversible network reconnection (RNR) model. The model is developed on the basis of 3D vertex model, which expresses a multicellular aggregate as a network composed of vertices. 3D vertex models have successfully simulated morphogenetic dynamics by expressing cellular rearrangements as network reconnections. However, the network reconnections in 3D vertex models can cause geometrical irreversibility, energetic inconsistency, and topological irreversibility, therefore inducing unphysical results and failures in simulating large deformations. To resolve these problems, we introduced (1) a new definition of the shapes of polygonal faces between cellular polyhedrons, (2) an improved condition for network reconnections, (3) a new condition for potential energy functions, and (4) a new constraint condition for the shapes of polygonal faces that represent cell–cell boundaries. Mathematical and computational analyses demonstrated that geometrical irreversibility, energetic inconsistency, and topological irreversibility were resolved by suppressing the geometrical gaps in the network and avoiding the generation of irreversible network patterns in reconnections. Lastly, to demonstrate the applicability of the RNR model, we simulated tissue deformation of growing cell sheets and showed that our model can simulate large tissue deformations, in which large changes occur in the local curvatures and layer formations of tissues. Thus, the RNR model enables in silico recapitulation of complex tissue morphogenesis.


Tissue morphogenesis Large deformation Multicellular dynamics Vertex model Reversible network reconnection model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

10237_2012_430_MOESM1_ESM.mpg (9.6 mb)
ESM 1 (MPG 9862 kb)


  1. Bellaiche Y, Segalen M (2009) Cell division orientation and planar cell polarity pathways. Semin Cell Dev Biol 20(8): 972–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanchard GB, Murugesu S et al (2010) Cytoskeletal dynamics and supracellular organisation of cell shape fluctuations during dorsal closure. Development 137(16): 2743–2752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bragg L, Nye JF (1947) A dynamical model of a crystal structure. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 190(1023): 474–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davies JA (2005) Mechanisms of morphogenesis: the creation of biological form. Elsevier Academic Press, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Eiraku M, Takata N et al (2011) Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature 472(7341): 51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eiraku M, Adachi T et al (2012) Relaxation-expansion model for self-driven retinal morphogenesis. Bioessays 34(1): 17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farhadifar R, Röper JC et al (2007) The influence of cell mechanics, cell–cell interactions, and proliferation on epithelial packing. Curr Biol 17(24): 2095–2104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forgacs G, Newman SA (2005) Biological physics of the developing embryo. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedlander DR, Mège RM et al (1989) Cell sorting-out is modulated by both the specificity and amount of different cell-adhesion molecules (CAMs) expressed on cell-surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86(18): 7043–7047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuchizaki K, Kusaba T et al (1995) Computer modelling of three-dimensional cellular pattern growth. Philos Mag B 71(3): 333–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heisenberg CP, Tada M et al (2000) Silberblick/Wnt11 mediates convergent extension movements during zebrafish gastrulation. Nature 405(6782): 76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Honda H, Ogita Y et al (1982) Cell movements in a living mammalian tissue: long-term observation of individual cells in wounded corneal endothelia of cats. J Morphol 174(1): 25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Honda H, Tanemura M et al (2004) A three-dimensional vertex dynamics cell model of space-filling polyhedra simulating cell behavior in a cell aggregate. J Theor Biol 226(4): 439–453MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Honda H, Motosugi N et al (2008) Computer simulation of emerging asymmetry in the mouse blastocyst. Development 135(8): 1407–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Honda H, Nagai T et al (2008) Two different mechanisms of planar cell intercalation leading to tissue elongation. Dev Dyn 237(7): 1826–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ingber DE, Mammoto T (2010) Mechanical control of tissue and organ development. Development 137(9): 1407–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Inoue Y, Adachi T (2011) Coarse-grained Brownian ratchet model of membrane protrusion on cellular scale. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 10(4): 495–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jamali Y, Azimi M, et al (2010) A sub-cellular viscoelastic model for cell population mechanics. PLoS One 5(8)Google Scholar
  19. Kikuchi R (1956) Shape distribution of two-dimensional soap froths. J Chem Phys 24(4): 861–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lecuit T, Lenne PF (2007) Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8(8): 633–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lecuit T, Rauzi M et al (2008) Nature and anisotropy of cortical forces orienting Drosophila tissue morphogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 10(12): 1401–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lecuit T, Rauzi M et al (2010) Planar polarized actomyosin contractile flows control epithelial junction remodelling. Nature 468(7327): 1110–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Letizia A, Sotillos S et al (2011) Regulated Crb accumulation controls apical constriction and invagination in Drosophila tracheal cells. J Cell Sci 124(2): 240–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin AC, Kaschube M et al (2009) Pulsed contractions of an actin-myosin network drive apical constriction. Nature 457(7228): 495–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nagai T, Honda H (2001) A dynamic cell model for the formation of epithelial tissues. Philos Mag B 81(7): 699–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nagai T, Honda H (2009) Computer simulation of wound closure in epithelial tissues: Cell–basal-lamina adhesion. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 80(6): 061903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nagai T, Kawasaki K et al (1988) Vertex dynamics of two-dimensional cellular-patterns. J Phys Soc Jpn 57(7): 2221–2224MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nagai T, Ohta S et al (1990) Computer simulation of cellular pattern growth in two and three dimensions. Phase Transit 28: 177–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Odell GM, Oster G et al (1981) The mechanical basis of morphogenesis. 1. Epithelial folding and invagination. Dev Biol 85(2): 446–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rauzi M, Verant P et al (2008) Nature and anisotropy of cortical forces orienting Drosophila tissue morphogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 10(12): 1401–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Solon J, Kaya-Copur A et al (2009) Pulsed forces timed by a ratchet-like mechanism drive directed tissue movement during dorsal closure. Cell 137(7): 1331–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Staple DB, Farhadifar R et al (2010) Mechanics and remodelling of cell packings in epithelia. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter 33(2): 117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taniguchi K, Maeda R et al (2011) Chirality in planar cell shape contributes to left-right asymmetric epithelial morphogenesis. Science 333(6040): 339–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. VanEssen DC (1997) A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system. Nature 385(6614): 313–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weaire D, Kermode JP (1983) Computer-simulation of a two-dimensional soap froth. 1. Method and motivation. Philos Mag B 48(3): 245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weaire D, Kermode JP (1984) Computer-simulation of a two-dimensional soap froth. 2. Analysis of results. Philos Mag B 50(3): 379–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weliky M, Oster G (1990) The mechanical basis of cell rearrangement. 1. Epithelial morphogenesis during fundulus epiboly. Development 109(2): 373–386Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Satoru Okuda
    • 1
  • Yasuhiro Inoue
    • 1
  • Mototsugu Eiraku
    • 3
  • Yoshiki Sasai
    • 3
  • Taiji Adachi
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biomechanics, Institute for Frontier Medical SciencesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.KyotoJapan
  3. 3.Organogenesis and Neurogenesis Group, Center for Developmental BiologyRIKENKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations