Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 11, Issue 7, pp 995–1000 | Cite as

A perturbation solution of the mechanical bidomain model

Original Paper

Abstract

This research focuses on finding analytical solutions to the mechanical bidomain model for cardiac tissue. In particular, a perturbation expansion is used to analyze the equations, with the perturbation parameter being inversely proportional to the spring constant coupling the intracellular and extracellular spaces. The results indicate that the intracellular and extracellular pressures are not equal and that the two spaces can move relative to each other. This calculation is complicated enough to illustrate the implications of the mechanical bidomain model but is nevertheless simple enough to solve analytically. One application of the calculation is to the mechanical behavior of active cardiac tissue surrounding an ischemic region.

Keywords

Mechanical bidomain Cardiac tissue Perturbation expansion Pressure Stream function 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Henriquez CS (1993) Simulating the electrical behavior of cardiac tissue using the bidomain model. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 21(1): 1–77MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Jean C, Gravelle P, Fournie JJ, Laurent G (2011) Influence of stress on extracellular matrix and integrin biology. Oncogene 30(24): 2697–2706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Johnson RS (2005) Singular perturbation theory—mathematical and analytical techniques with applications to engineering. Springer, NYMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Katare RG, Ando M, Kakinuma Y, Sato T (2010) Engineered heart tissue: a novel tool to study ischemic changes of the heart in vitro. PLoS One 5(2): e9275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kresh JY, Chopra A (2011) Intercellular and extracellular mechanotransduction in cardiac myocytes. Pflugers Arch Eur J Phys 462(1): 75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kohl P, Sachs F (2001) Mechanoelectric feedback in cardiac cells. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 359: 1173–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Latimer DC, Roth BJ, Parker KK (2003) Analytical model for predicting mechanotransduction effects in engineered cardiac tissue. Tissue Eng 9: 283–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McCain ML, Parker KK (2011) Mechanotransduction: the role of mechanical stress, myocyte shape, and cytoskeletal architecture on cardiac function. Pflugers Arch Eur J Phys 462(1): 89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Naito H, Melnychenko I, Didie M, Schneiderbanger K, Schubert P, Rosenkranz S, Eschenhagen T, Zimmermann W (2006) Optimizing engineered heart tissue for therapeutic applications as surrogate heart muscle. Circulation 114: I-72–I-78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ohayon J, Chadwick RS (1988) Effects of collagen microstructure on the mechanics of the left ventricle. Biophys J 54: 1077–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Puwal S, Roth BJ (2010) Mechanical bidomain model of cardiac tissue. Phys Rev E 82: 041904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rodriguez F, Langer F, Harrington KB, Cheng A, Daughters GT, Criscione JC, Ingels NB, Miller DC (2005) Alterations in transmural strains adjacent to ischemic myocardium during acute midcircumflex occlusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129: 791–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Dyke M (1964) Perturbation methods in fluid mechanics. Academic Press, NYMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsOakland UniversityRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations