Experimental measurement of dynamic fluid shear stress on the ventricular surface of the aortic valve leaflet
Aortic valve (AV) calcification is a highly prevalent disease with serious impact on mortality and morbidity. The exact causes and mechanisms of AV calcification are unclear, although previous studies suggest that mechanical forces play a role. It has been clinically demonstrated that calcification preferentially occurs on the aortic surface of the AV. This is hypothesized to be due to differences in the mechanical environments on the two sides of the valve. It is thus necessary to characterize fluid shear forces acting on both sides of the leaflet to test this hypothesis. The current study is one of two studies characterizing dynamic shear stress on both sides of the AV leaflets. In the current study, shear stresses on the ventricular surface of the AV leaflets were measured experimentally on two prosthetic AV models with transparent leaflets in an in vitro pulsatile flow loop using two-component Laser Doppler Velocimetry (LDV). Experimental measurements were utilized to validate a theoretical model of AV ventricular surface shear stress based on the Womersley profile in a straight tube, with corrections for the opening angle of the valve leaflets. This theoretical model was applied to in vivo data based on MRI-derived volumetric flow rates and valve dimension obtained from the literature. Experimental results showed that ventricular surface shear stress was dominated by the streamwise component. The systolic shear stress waveform resembled a half-sinusoid during systole and peaks at 64–71 dyn/cm2, and reversed in direction at the end of systole for 15–25 ms, and reached a significant negative magnitude of 40–51 dyn/cm2. Shear stresses from the theoretical model applied to in vivo data showed that shear stresses peaked at 77–92 dyn/cm2 and reversed in direction for substantial period of time (108–110 ms) during late systole with peak negative shear stress of 35–38 dyn/cm2.
KeywordsAortic valve Fluid shear stress Laser Doppler Velocimetry Ventricular surface Aortic valve fluid mechanics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bellhouse BJ, Reid KG (1969) Fluid mechanics of the aortic valve. Br Heart J 31(3): 391Google Scholar
- Hale JF, Mc DD, Womersley JR (1955) Velocity profiles of oscillating arterial flow, with some calculations of viscous drag and the Reynolds numbers. J Physiol 128(3): 629–640Google Scholar
- Langerak SE, Kunz P, Vliegen HW, Lamb HJ, Jukema JW, van Der Wall EE, de Roos A (2001) Improved MR flow mapping in coronary artery bypass grafts during adenosine-induced stress. Radiology 218(2): 540–547Google Scholar
- Leyh RG, Schmidtke C, Sievers HH, Yacoub MH (1999) Opening and closing characteristics of the aortic valve after different types of valve-preserving surgery. Circulation 100(21): 2153–2160Google Scholar
- Stevens T, Rosenberg R, Aird W, Quertermous T, Johnson FL, Garcia JG, Hebbel RP, Tuder RM, Garfinkel S (2001) NHLBI workshop report: endothelial cell phenotypes in heart, lung, and blood diseases. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 281(5): C1422–C1433Google Scholar
- Thubrikar M (1990) The aortic valve. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Thubrikar M, Piepgrass WC, Shaner TW, Nolan SP (1981) The design of the normal aortic valve. Am J Physiol 241(6): H795–H801Google Scholar
- Yap CH, Saikrishnan N, Tamilselvan G, Yoganathan AP (2011) Experimental measurement of dynamic fluid shear stress on the aortic surface of the aortic valve leaflet. Biomech Model Mechanobiol [Accepted 4 March 2011]Google Scholar