Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 371–382

The collagen fibril architecture in the lamina cribrosa and peripapillary sclera predicted by a computational remodeling approach

Original Paper


The biomechanics of the optic nerve head is assumed to play an important role in ganglion cell loss in glaucoma. Organized collagen fibrils form complex networks that introduce strong anisotropic and nonlinear attributes into the constitutive response of the peripapillary sclera (PPS) and lamina cribrosa (LC) dominating the biomechanics of the optic nerve head. The recently presented computational remodeling approach (Grytz and Meschke in Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9:225–235, 2010) was used to predict the micro-architecture in the LC and PPS, and to investigate its impact on intraocular pressure–related deformations. The mechanical properties of the LC and PPS were derived from a microstructure-oriented constitutive model that included the stretch-dependent stiffening and the statistically distributed orientations of the collagen fibrils. Biomechanically induced adaptation of the local micro-architecture was captured by allowing collagen fibrils to be reoriented in response to the intraocular pressure–related loading conditions. In agreement with experimental observations, the remodeling algorithm predicted the existence of an annulus of fibrils around the scleral canal in the PPS, and a predominant radial orientation of fibrils in the periphery of the LC. The peripapillary annulus significantly reduced the intraocular pressure–related expansion of the scleral canal and shielded the LC from high tensile stresses. The radial oriented fibrils in the LC periphery reinforced the LC against transversal shear stresses and reduced LC bending deformations. The numerical approach presents a novel and reasonable biomechanical explanation of the spatial orientation of fibrillar collagen in the optic nerve head.


Glaucoma Remodeling Collagen fibril networks Intraocular pressure Fiber dispersion Optic nerve head Lamina cribrosa Sclera 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

ESM 1 (MOV 22,739 kb)


  1. Anderson DR, Hendrickson A (1974) Effect of intraocular pressure on rapid axoplasmic transport in monkey optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol 13: 771–783Google Scholar
  2. Başar Y, Grytz R (2004) Incompressibility at large strains and finite-element implementation. Acta Mechanica 168: 75–101MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boote C, Sorensen T, Coudrillier B, Myers K, Meek K, Quigley H, Nguyen T (2010) Posterior scleral collagen architecture in normal and glaucoma human eyes, as determined using wide-angle x-ray scattering. ARVO Abstract 51: 4900Google Scholar
  4. Burgoyne CF, Downs JC, Bellezza A, Suh JF, Hart RT (2005) The optic nerve head as a biomechanical structure: a new paradigm for understanding the role of IOP-related stress and strain in the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic nerve head damage. Progr Ret Eye Res 24: 39–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Curtin BJ, Iwamoto T, Renaldo DP (1979) Normal and staphylomatous sclera of high myopia. Arch Ophthalmol 97(5): 912–915Google Scholar
  6. Dongqi H, Zeqin R (1999) A biomathematical model for pressure-dependent lamina cribrosa behavior. J Biomech 32(6): 579–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Downs JC, Suh JK, Thomas KA, Bellezza AJ, Burgoyne CF, Hart RT (2003) Viscoelastic characterization of peripapillary sclera: Material properties by quadrant in rabbit and monkey eyes. J Biom Eng 125: 124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Downs JC, Suh JK, Thomas KA, Bellezza AJ, Hart RT, Burgoyne CF (2005) Viscoelastic material properties of the peripapillary sclera in normal and early-glaucoma monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46: 540–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaasterland D, Tanishima T, Kuwabara T (1978) Axoplasmic flow during chronic experimental glaucoma. 1. Light and electron microscopic studies of the monkey optic nervehead during development of glaucomatous cupping. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17(9): 838–846Google Scholar
  10. Gasser TC, Ogden RW, Holzapfel GA (2006) Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J R Soc Interface 3(6): 15–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Girard MJA, Downs JC, Bottlang M, Burgoyne CF, Suh J-KF (2009a) Peripapillary and posterior scleral mechanics–Part II: Experimental and inverse finite element characterization. J Biom Eng 131(5): 051012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Girard MJA, Downs JC, Burgoyne CF, Suh J-KF (2009b) Peripapillary and posterior scleral mechanics—Part I: development of an anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive model. J Biom Eng 131(5): 051011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Girard MJA, Suh J-KF, Bottlang M, Burgoyne CF, Downs JC (2009) Scleral biomechanics in the aging monkey eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(11): 5226–5237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gleason RL, Humphrey JD (2004) A mixture model of arterial growth and remodeling in hypertension: altered muscle tone and tissue turnover. J Vasc Res 41(4): 352–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldbaum MH, Jeng SY, Logemann R, Weinreb RN (1989) The extracellular matrix of the human optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol 107(8): 1225–1231Google Scholar
  16. Grytz R (2008) Computational modeling and remodeling of human eye tissues as biomechanical structures at multiple scales. Ph.D. thesis, Ruhr-University Bochum, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  17. Grytz R, Meschke G (2009) Constitutive modeling of crimped collagen fibrils in soft tissues. J Mech Behav Biomed Mat 2(5): 522– 533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grytz R, Meschke G (2010) A computational remodeling approach to predict the physiological architecture of the collagen fibril network in corneo-scleral shells. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9: 225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hariton I, de Botton G, Gasser TC, Holzapfel GA (2007) Stress-driven collagen fiber remodeling in arterial walls. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 6(3): 163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hernandez MR, Gong H (1996) Extracellular matrix of the trabecular meshwork and optic nerve head. In: Ritch R, Shields M, Krupin T (eds) The glaucomas: basic sciences, Ch 11. Mosby-Year Book, St Louis, pp 213–249Google Scholar
  21. Hernandez MR, Luo XX, Igoe F, Neufeld AH (1987) Extracellular matrix of the human lamina cribrosa. Am J Ophthalmol 104: 567–576Google Scholar
  22. Holzapfel G (2000) Nonlinear solid mechanics. A continuum approach for engineering. Wiley, ChichesterMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Itskov M, Aksel N (2004) A class of orthotropic and transversely isotropic hyperelastic constitutive models based on a polyconvex strain energy function. Int J Solids Struc 41: 3833–3848MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jonas J, Berenshtein E, Holbach L (2004) Lamina cribrosa thickness and spatial relationships between intraocular pressure and cerebrospinal fluid space in highly myopic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45: 2660–2665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lampert PW, Vogel MH, Zimmerman LE (1968) Pathology of the optic nerve in experimental acute glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol 7: 199–213Google Scholar
  26. Lanchares E, Calvo B, Cristóbal J, Doblaré M (2008) Finite element simulation of arcuates for astigmatism correction. J Biomech 41: 797–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshall GE, Konstas AG, Lee WR (1993) Collagens in the aged human macular sclera. Curr Eye Res 12: 143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Minckler DS (1980) The organization of nerve fiber bundles in the primate optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol 98: 1630–1636Google Scholar
  29. Minckler DS, Bunt AH, Johanson GW (1977) Orthograde and retrograde axoplasmic transport during acute ocular hypertension in the monkey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 16: 426–441Google Scholar
  30. Morrison JC, L’Hernault NL, Jerdan JA, Quigley HA (1989) Ultrastructural location of extracellular matrix components in the optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol 107(1): 123–129Google Scholar
  31. Pandolfi A, Manganiello F (2006) A model for the human cornea: constitutive formulation and numerical analysis. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 5(4): 237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pinsky PM, Datye DV (1991) A microstructurally-based finite element model of the incised human cornea. J Biomech 24(10): 907–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pinsky PM, van der Heide D, Chernyak D (2005) Computational modeling of the mechanical anisotropy in the cornea and sclera. J Cataract Refract Surg 31: 136–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Quigley HA, Addicks EM (1980) Chronic experimental glaucoma in primates. II. Effect of extended intraocular pressure elevation on optic nerve head and axonal transport. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 19(2): 137–152Google Scholar
  35. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR, Maumenee AE (1981) Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. II. The site of injury and susceptibility to damage. Arch Ophthalmol 99: 635–649Google Scholar
  36. Quigley HA, Anderson DR (1976) The dynamics and location of axonal transport blockade by acute intraocular pressure elevation in primate optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol 15: 606–616Google Scholar
  37. Quigley HA, Brown AE, Dorman-Pease ME (1991) Alterations in elastin of the optic nerve head in human and experimental glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 75: 552–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Radius RL, Anderson DR (1979a) The course of axons through the retina and optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol 97: 1154–1158Google Scholar
  39. Radius RL, Anderson DR (1979b) The histology of retinal nerve fiber layer bundles and bundle defects. Arch Ophthalmol 97: 948–950Google Scholar
  40. Radius RL, Anderson DR (1981) Rapid axonal transport in primate optic nerve. Distribution of pressure-induced interruption. Arch Ophthalmol 99: 650–659Google Scholar
  41. Ricken T, Schwarza A, Bluhm J (2007) A triphasic model of transversely isotropic biological tissue with applications to stress and biologically induced growth. Comput Mat Sc 39: 124–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roberts MD, Grau V, Grimm J, Reynaud J, Bellezza AJ, Burgoyne CF, Downs JC (2009) Remodeling of the connective tissue microarchitecture of the lamina cribrosa in early experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(2): 681–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roberts MD, Liang Y, Sigal IA, Grimm J, Reynaud J, Bellezza A, Burgoyne CF, Downs JC (2010a) Correlation between local stress and strain and lamina cribrosa connective tissue volume fraction in normal monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(1): 295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roberts MD, Sigal IA, Liang Y, Burgoyne CF, Downs JC (2010b) Changes in the biomechanical response of the optic nerve head in early experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  45. Schröder J, Neff P (2003) Invariant formulation of hyperelastic transverse isotropy based on polyconvex free energy functions. Int J Solids Struc 40: 401–445MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sigal IA (2009) Interactions between geometry and mechanical properties on the optic nerve head. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(6): 2785–2795MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Ethier CR (2005) Factors influencing optic nerve head biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46(11): 4189–4199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I, Ethier CR (2004) Finite element modeling of optic nerve head biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45: 4378–4387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I, Ethier CR (2007) Predicted extension, compression and shearing of optic nerve head tissues. Exp Eye Res 85: 312–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I, Ethier CR (2009a) Modeling individual-specific human optic nerve head biomechanics. Part I: IOP-induced deformations and influence of geometry. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 8(2): 85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I, Ethier CR (2009b) Modeling individual-specific human optic nerve head biomechanics. Part II: influence of material properties. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 8(2): 99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taber LA, Humphrey JD (2001) Stress-modulated growth, residual stress, and vascular heterogeneity. J Biom Eng 123: 528–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thale A, Tillmann B, Rochels R (1996) SEM studies of the collagen architecture of the human lamina cribrosa: Normal and pathological findings. Ophthalmologica 210: 142–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thornton IL, Dupps WJ, Roy AS, Krueger RR (2009) Biomechanical effects of intraocular pressure elevation on optic nerve/lamina cribrosa before and after peripapillary scleral collagen cross-linking. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(3): 1227–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vena P, Gastaldi D, Socci L, Pennati G (2008) An anisotropic model for tissue growth and remodeling during early development of cerebral aneurysms. Comput Mat Sc 43(3): 565–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Winkler M, Jester B, Nien-Shy C, Massei S, Minckler DS, Jester JV, Brown DJ (2010) High resolution three dimensional reconstruction of the collagenous matrix of the human optic nerve head. Brain Res Bul 81(3): 339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Woo SL, Kobayashi AS, Lawrence C, Schlegel WA (1971) Mathematical model of the corneo-scleral shell as applied to intraocular pressure-volume relations and applanation tonometry. Ann Biomed Eng 1: 87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Woo SL, Kobayashi AS, Schlegel WA, Lawrence C (1972) Non-linear material properties of intact cornea and sclera. Exp Eye Res 14: 29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang H, Downs JC, Girkin C, Sakata L, Bellezza A, Thompson H, Burgoyne CF (2007) 3-D histomorphometry of the normal and early glaucomatous monkey optic nerve head: lamina cribrosa and peripapillary scleral position and thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(10): 4597–4607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yang H, Downs JC, Sigal IA, Roberts MD, Thompson H, Burgoyne CF (2009) Deformation of the normal monkey optic nerve head connective tissue following acute iop elevation within 3-D histomorphometric reconstructions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(12): 5785–5799CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafael Grytz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Günther Meschke
    • 1
  • Jost B. Jonas
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Structural MechanicsRuhr-University BochumBochumGermany
  2. 2.Ocular Biomechanics LaboratoryDevers Eye InstitutePortlandUSA
  3. 3.Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty MannheimRuprecht-Karls-University of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations