Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 203–219 | Cite as

On the collagen criss-cross angles in the annuli fibrosi of lumbar spine finite element models

  • Jérôme Noailly
  • Josep A. Planell
  • Damien Lacroix
Original Paper


In the human lumbar spine, annulus fibrosus fibres largely contribute to intervertebral disc stability. Detailed annulus models are therefore necessary to obtain reliable predictions of lumbar spine mechanics by finite element modelling. However, different definitions of collagen orientations coexist in the literature for healthy human lumbar annuli. Therefore, four annulus fibre-induced anisotropy models were built from reported anatomical descriptions, and inserted in a L3–L5 lumbar bi-segment finite element model. Annulus models were, respectively, characterized by radial, tangential, radial and tangential, and no fibre orientation gradients. The effect of rotational and axial compressive loadings was simulated and first, predictions were compared to experimental data. Then, intervertebral disc local biomechanics was studied under axial rotation and axial compression. A new parameter, i.e. the fibre contribution quality parameter, was computed in the anterior, lateral, postero-lateral, and posterior annuli of each model, in function of fibre stresses, radial load distributions, and matrix shear strains. Locally, each annulus model behaved differently, affecting intervertebral disc biomechanics and segmental motions. The fibre contribution quality parameter allowed establishing direct links between local annulus fibre organization and local annulus loadings, while other kinematical and biomechanical data did not. It was concluded that functional relations should exist between local annulus fibre orientations and overall segment morphology. The proposed fibre contribution quality parameter could be used to examine such relations and calibrate lumbar spine finite element models by locally adjusting the annulus bundle criss-cross angles. Conclusions of this study are particularly relevant to patient-specific models or artificial disc designs.


Lumbar spine Finite element analysis Annulus fibrosus Intervertebral disc stabilization Fibre-induced anisotropy Collagen criss-cross angle 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams MA (1995) Spine update. Mechanical testing of the spine. An appraisal of methodology, results, and conclusions. Spine 20: 2151–2156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams MA, Green TP (1993) Tensile properties of the annulus fibrosus. I. The contribution of fibre-matrix interactions to tensile stiffness and strength. Eur Spine J 2: 203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer AE, Laursen TA, Guilak F, Setton LA (2003) The micromechanical environment of intervertebral disc cells determined by a finite deformation, anisotropic and biphasic finite element model. J Biomech Eng 125:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Best BA, Guilak F, Setton LA, Zhu W, Saed-Nejad F, Ratcliffe A, Weidenbaum M, Mow VC (1994) Compressive mechanical properties of the human anulus fibrosus and their relationship to biochemical composition. Spine 19:212–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brickley-Parson D, Glimcher MJ (1984) Is the chemistry of collagen in the intervertebral discs an expression of Wolff’s Law? A study of the human lumbar spine. Spine 9: 148–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruehlmann SB, Rattner JB, Matyas JR, Duncan NA (2002) Regional variations in the cellular matrix of the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc. J Anat 201: 159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cassidy JJ, Hiltner A, Baer E (1989) Hierarchical structure of the intervertebral disc. Connect Tissue Res 23: 75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eberlein R, Holzapfel GA, Schultze-Bauer CAJ (2001) An anisotropic constitutive model for annulus tissue and enhanced finite element analysis of intact lumbar disc bodies. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 4: 209–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliot DM, Setton LA (2001) Anisotropic and inhomogeneous tensile behavior of human anulus fibrosus: experimental measurement and material model predictions. J Biomech Eng 123: 256–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fujita Y, Duncan NA, Lotz JC (1997) Radial tensile properties of the lumbar annulus fibrosus are site and degeneration dependent. J Orthop Res 15: 814–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galante JO (1967) Tensile properties of the human lumbar annulus fibrosus. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl 100):1–91Google Scholar
  12. Gloria A, Causa F, DeSantis R, Netti PA, Ambrosio F (2007) Dynamic-mechanical properties of a novel composite intervertebral disc prosthesis. J Mater Sci Mater Med 18: 2159–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goel VK, Ramirez SA, Kong W, Gilbertson LG (1995) Cancellous bone Young’s modulus variation within the vertebral body of a ligamentous lumbar spine—Application of bone adaptive remodelling concepts. J Biomech Eng 117: 266–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gore DM, Higginson GR, Minns RJ (1983) Compliance of articular cartilage and its variations through the thickness. Phys Med Biol 28: 233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grosland NM, Goel VK (2007) Vertebral endplate morphology follows bone remodeling principles. Spine 32: E667–E673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guerin HAL, Elliot DM (2006) Degeneration affects the fiber reorientation of human annulus fibrosus under tensile load. J Biomech 39: 1410–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haut RC, Little RW (1972) A constitutive equation for collagen fibres. J Biomech 5: 423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heuer F, Schmidt H, Claes L, Wilke H-J (2007a) Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase vertebral translation and intradiscal pressure. J Biomech 4: 795–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heuer F, Schmitt H, Schmidt H, Claes L, Wilke H-J (2007b) Creep associated changes in intervertebral disc bulging obtained with a laser scanning device. Clin Biomech 22: 737–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heuer F, Schmidt H, Wilke H-J (2008) The relation between intervertebral disc bulging and annular fiber associated strains for simple and complex loading. J Biomech 41: 1086–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hickey DS, Hukins DW (1982) Aging changes in the macromolecular organization of the intervertebral disc: an X-ray diffraction and electron microscopic study. Spine 7: 234–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holzapfel GA, Schulze-Bauer CA, Feigl G, Regitnig P (2005) Single lamellar mechanics of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 3: 125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Humzah MD, Soames RW (1988) Human intervertebral disc: structure and function. Anat Rec 220: 337–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iatridis JC, Gwynn IA (2004) Mechanisms for mechanical damage in the intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus. J Biomech 37: 1165–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iatridis JC, MacLean JJ, O’Brien M, Stokes IAF (2007) Measurements of proteoglycan and water content distribution in human lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 32: 1493–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MacLean JJ, Lee CR, Grad S, Ito K, Alini M, Iatridis JC (2003) Effects of immobilization and dynamic compression on intervertebral disc cell gene expression in vivo. Spine 28: 973–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacLean JJ, Roughley PJ, Monsey RD, Alini M, Iatridis JC (2008) In vivo intervertebral disc remodeling: kinetics of mRNA expression in response to a single loading event. J Orthop Res 26: 579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marchand F, Ahmed AM (1990) Investigation of the laminate structure of lumbar disc annulus fibrosus. Spine 15: 402–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McNally DS, Adams MA (1992) Internal intervertebral disc mechanics as revealed by stress profilometry. Spine 17: 66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Michalek AJ, Buckley MR, Bonassar LJ, Cohen I, Iatridis JC (2009) Measurement of local strains in intervertebral disc anulus fibrosus tissue under dynamic shear: contributions of matrix fiber orientation and elastin content. J Biomech 42: 2279–2285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Natarajan RN, Anderson GBJ, Patwardhan AG, Andriacchi TP (1999) Study on effect of graded facetectomy on change in lumbar motion segment torsional flexibility using three-dimensional continuum contact representation for facet joints. J Biomech Eng 121: 215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Natarajan RN, Williams JR, Lavender SA, An HS, Anderson GB (2008) Relationship between disc injury and manual lifting: a poroelastic finite element model study. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 222: 195–207Google Scholar
  33. Noailly J, Wilke HJ, Planell JA, Lacroix D (2007) How does the geometry affect the internal biomechanics of a lumbar spine bi-segment finite element model? Consequences on the validation process. J Biomech 40: 2414–2425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noailly J, Lacroix D, Planell JA (2005) Finite element study of a novel intervertebral disc substitute. Spine 30: 2257–2264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Yamamoto I, Crisco JJ (1994) Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76: 413–424Google Scholar
  36. Pearcy MJ, Tibrewal SB (1984) Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. Spine 9: 582–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Périé D, Korda D, Iatridis JC (2004) Confined compression experiments on bovine nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus: sensitivity of the experiment in the determination of compressive modulus and hydraulic permeability. J Biomech 38: 2164–2171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Race A, Broom ND, Robertson P (2000) Effect of loading rate and hydration on the mechanical properties of the disc. Spine 25: 662–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmidt H, Heuer F, Simon U, Rohlmann A, Claes L, Wilke H-J (2006) Application of a new calibration method for a three-dimensional finite element model of a human lumbar annulus fibrosus. Clin Biomech 21: 337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmidt H, Heuer F, Drumm J, Klezl Z, Claes L, Wilke H-J (2007a) Application of a calibration method provides more realistic results for a finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22: 377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmidt H, Kettler A, Heuer F, Simon U, Claes L, Wilke H-J (2007b) Intradiscal pressure, shear strain, and fiber strain in the intervertebral disc under combined loading. Spine 32: 748–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sharma M, Langrana NA, Rodriguez J (1995) Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine 20: 887–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shirazi-Adl A (1989) On the fibre composite material models of disc annulus—comparison of predicted stresses. J Biomech 22: 357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skaggs DL, Weidenbaum M, Iatridis JC, Ratcliffe A, Mow VC (1994) Regional variation in tensile properties and biochemical composition of the lumbar anulus fibrosus. Spine 19: 1310–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sun Y, Luo Z, An K (2002) Mechanical properties of single type II collagen molecule. In: Transactions of the 48th annual meeting of the orthopaedic research society, Dallas, February 10–13:27Google Scholar
  46. Wilke H-J, Neef P, Hinz B, Seidel H, Claes L (2001) Intradiscal pressure together with anthropometric data—a data set for the validation of models. Clin Biomech 16: S111–S126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Williams JR, Natarajan RN, Andersson GB (2007) Inclusion of regional poroelastic material properties better predicts biomechanical behavior of lumbar discs subjected to dynamic loading. J Biomech 40: 1981–1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wuertz K, Urban JP, Klasen J, Ignatius A, Wilke HJ, Claes L, Neidlinger-Wilke C (2007) Influence of extracellular osmolarity and mechanical stimulation on gene expression of intervertebral disc cells. J Orthop Res 25: 1513–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yamamoto I, Panjabi MM, Crisco T, Oxland T (1989) Three- dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint. Spine 14: 1256–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yao H, Gu WY (2006) Physical signals and solute transport in human intervertebral disc during compressive stress relaxation: 3D finite element analysis. Biorheology 43: 323–335Google Scholar
  51. Zhu D, Gu GS, Wu W, Cong H, Zhu WM, Jiang T, Cao ZL (2008) Micro-structure and mechanical properties of annulus fibrous of the L4-5 and L5-S1 intervertebral discs. Clin Biomech 23: S74–S82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jérôme Noailly
    • 1
  • Josep A. Planell
    • 2
    • 3
  • Damien Lacroix
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomechanics and MechanobiologyInstitute for Bioengineering of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Institute for Bioengineering of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Material Science and Metallurgical EngineeringTechnical University of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations