Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 551–561 | Cite as

Modelling of the provisional side-branch stenting approach for the treatment of atherosclerotic coronary bifurcations: effects of stent positioning

  • Dario Gastaldi
  • Stefano Morlacchi
  • Roberto Nichetti
  • Claudio Capelli
  • Gabriele Dubini
  • Lorenza Petrini
  • Francesco MigliavaccaEmail author
Original Paper


The most common approach to treat atherosclerosis in coronary bifurcations is the provisional side-branch (PSB) stenting, which consists sequentially of the insertion of a stent in the main branch (MB) of the bifurcation and a dilatation of the side branch (SB) passing through the struts of the stent at the bifurcation. This approach can be followed by a redilatation of the MB only or by a Final Kissing Balloon (FKB) inflation, both strategies leading to a minor stent distortion in the MB. The positioning of the stent struts in the bifurcation and the stresses generated in the stent and vessel wall are worthy of investigation for a better understanding of the mechanobiology of the system. For this purpose, a computer model of an atherosclerotic coronary bifurcation based on the finite element method was developed; the effects of performing the final redilatation with the two strategies utilising one or two balloons and those created by a different stent strut positioning around the SB were investigated. Results correlate well with previous experimental tests regarding the deformation following balloon expansion. Furthermore, results confirm firstly that the re-establishment of an optimal spatial configuration of the stent after the PSB approach is achieved with both strategies; secondly, results show that case of stent positioning with one cell placed centrally (with regard to the SB) should be preferred, avoiding the presence of struts inside the vessel lumen, which may reduce hemodynamic disturbances. The central positioning also resulted in a better solution in terms of lower stresses in the stent struts and, more importantly, in the vascular tissues.


Stent Balloon Arterial tissue Bifurcation Finite element method 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ABAQUS (2008) Analysis user’s manual, ver. 6.7EFGoogle Scholar
  2. Balossino R, Gervaso F, Migliavacca F, Dubini G (2008) Effects of different stent designs on local heamodynamics in stented arteries. J Biomech 41: 1053–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Capelli C, Gervaso F, Petrini L, Dubini G, Migliavacca F (2009) Assessment of tissue prolapse after balloon expandable stenting: influence of stent cell geometry. Med Eng Phys 31: 441–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, Ludwig J, Holmes DR Jr, Spanos V, Louvard Y, Desmedt B, Di Mario C, Leon MB (2004) Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation 109: 1244–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gasser TC, Holzapfel GA (2007) Modeling plaque fissuring and dissection during balloon angioplasty intervention. Ann Biomed Eng 35: 711–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gasser TC, Ogden RW, Holzapfel GA (2006) Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J R Soc Interf 3: 15–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gervaso F, Capelli C, Petrini L, Lattanzio S, Di Virgilio L, Migliavacca F (2008) On the effects of different strategies in modelling balloon-expandable stenting by means of finite element method. J Biomech 41: 1206–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gijsen FJH, Migliavacca F, Schievano S, Socci L, Petrini L, Thury A, Wentzel JJ, van der Steen AF, Serruys PW, Dubini G (2008) Simulation of stent deployment in a realistic human coronary artery. Biomed Eng Online Aug 6 7: 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hariton I, DeBotton G, Gasser TC, Holzapfel GA (2007) Stress-modulated collagen fiber remodeling in a human carotid bifurcation. J Theor Biol 248: 460–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holzapfel GA, Sommer G, Gasser CT, Regitnig P (2005) Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H2048–H2058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iakovou I, Colombo A (2005) Contemporary stent treatment of coronary bifurcations. J Am Coll Cardiol 46: 1446–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kiousis D, Gasser T, Holzapfel GA (2007) A numerical model to study the interaction of vascular stents with human atherosclerotic lesions. Ann Biomed Eng 35: 1857–1869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lally C, Dolan F, Prendergast PJ (2005) Cardiovascular stent design and vessel stresses: a finite element analysis. J Biomech 38: 1574–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liang DK, Yang DZ, Qi M, Wang WQ (2005) Finite element analysis of the implantation of a balloon-expandable stent in a stenosed artery. Int J Cardiol 104: 314–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Loree HM, Tobias BJ, Gibson LJ, Kamm RD, Small DM, Lee RT (1994) Mechanical properties of model atherosclerotic lesion lipid pool. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 14: 230–234Google Scholar
  16. Medina A, de Lezo JS, Pan M (2006) A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesion. Rev Esp Cardiol 59: 183–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Migliavacca F, Petrini L, Montanari V, Quagliana I, Auricchio F, Dubini G (2005) A predictive study of the mechanical behaviour of coronary stents by computer modeling. Med Eng Phys 27: 13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, Fajadet J, Ban Hayashi E, Perin M, Colombo A, Schuler G, Barragan P, Guagliumi G, Molnar F, Falotico R (2002) A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 346: 1773–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mortier P, De Beule M, Van Loo D, Verhegghe B, Verdonck P (2009a) Finite element analysis of side branch access during bifurcation stenting. Med Eng Phys 31: 434–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mortier P, Holzapfel GA, De Beule M, Van Loo D, Taeymans Y, Segers P, Verdonck P, Verhegghe B (2009b) A novel simulation strategy for stent insertion and deployment in curved coronary bifurcations: comparison of three drug-eluting stents. Ann Biomed Eng [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  21. Moses JW, Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Cambier PA, Bachinsky WB, Leya F, Kuntz RE, Popma JJ, Schleckser P, Wang H, Cohen SA, Leon MB (2006) SIRIUS 2.25 investigators. Safety and efficacy of the 2.25- mm sirolimus eluting Bx velocity stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions: the SIRIUS 2.25 trial. Am J Cardiol 98: 1455–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ormiston JA, Webster MWI, Ruygrok PN, Stewart JT, White HD, Scott DS (1999) Stent deformation following simulated side branch dilatation: a comparison of five stent design. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 47: 258–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ormiston JA, Webster MWI, Seifeddin ELJ, Ruygrok PN, Stewart JT, Scott D, Currie E, Panther MJ, Shaw B, O’Shaughnessy B (2006) Drug-eluting stents for coronary bifurcations: bench testing of provisional side-branch strategies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67: 49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ormiston JA, Webster MWI, Webber B, Stewart JT, Ruygrok PN, Hatrick RI (2008) The “crush” technique for coronary artery bifurcation stenting: insight from micro-computed tomographic imaging of bench deployment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1: 351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pericevic I, Lally C, Toner D, Kelly DJ (2009) The influence of plaque composition on underlying arterial wall stress during stent expansion: the case for lesion-specific stents. Med Eng Phys 31: 428–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sheiban I, Omedè P, Biondi-Zoccai G, Moretti C, Sciuto F, Trevi GP (2009) Update on dedicated bifurcation stents. J Interv Cardiol 22: 150–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wu W, Wang WQ, Yang DZ, Qi M (2007) Stent expansion in curved vessel and their interactions: a finite element analysis. J Biomech 40: 2580–2585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zunino P, D’Angelo C, Petrini L, Vergara C, Capelli C, Migliavacca F (2009) Numerical simulation of drug eluting coronary stents: mechanics, fluid dynamics and drug release. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 198(45–46): 3633–3644. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2008.07.019 CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dario Gastaldi
    • 1
  • Stefano Morlacchi
    • 1
  • Roberto Nichetti
    • 1
  • Claudio Capelli
    • 2
  • Gabriele Dubini
    • 1
  • Lorenza Petrini
    • 1
  • Francesco Migliavacca
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratory of Biological Structure Mechanics, Structural Engineering DepartmentPolitecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly
  2. 2.Cardiac Unit, Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street HospitalUniversity College of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations