Adaptive generation of multimaterial grids from imaging data for biomedical Lagrangian fluid–structure simulations
- 101 Downloads
Spatial discretization of complex imaging- derived fluid–solid geometries, such as the cardiac environment, is a critical but often overlooked challenge in biomechanical computations. This is particularly true in problems with Lagrangian interfaces, where the fluid and solid phases share a common interface geometrically. For simplicity and better accuracy, it is also highly desirable for the two phases to have a matching surface mesh at the interface between them. We outline a method for solving this problem, and illustrate the approach with a 3D fluid–solid mesh of the mouse heart. An MRI dataset of a perfusion-fixed mouse heart with 50μm isotropic resolution was semi-automatically segmented using a customized multimaterial connected-threshold approach that divided the volume into non-overlapping regions of blood, tissue, and background. Subsequently a multimaterial marching cubes algorithm was applied to the segmented data to produce two detailed, compatible isosurfaces, one for blood and one for tissue. Both isosurfaces were simultaneously smoothed with a multimaterial smoothing algorithm that exactly conserves the volume for each phase. Using these two isosurfaces, we developed and applied novel automated meshing algorithms to generate anisotropic hybrid meshes on arbitrary biological geometries with the number of layers and the desired element anisotropy for each phase as the only input parameters. Since our meshes adapt to the local feature sizes and include boundary layer prisms, they are more efficient and accurate than non-adaptive, isotropic meshes, and the fluid–structure interaction computations will tend to have relative error equilibrated over the whole mesh.
KeywordsMultimaterial grid generation Micro MRI Mouse heart Fluid–structure interaction Volume-conserving smoothing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Einstein DR, Pin FD, Kuprat AP, Jiao X, Carson JP, Kunzelman KS, Cochran RP, Guccione J, Ratcliffe M (2009) Fluid–structure interactions of the mitral valve and left heart: comprehensive strategies, past, present and future. Commun Numer Methods Eng (in press)Google Scholar
- Idelsohn SR, Del Pin F, Oñate E, Rossi R (2008) Fluid–structure interacion problems including “added-mass effect”. Int J Numer Methods Eng (submitted)Google Scholar
- Jansen KE, Shephard MS, Beall MW (2001) On anisotropic mesh generation and quality control in complex flow problems. In: 10th international meshing roundtableGoogle Scholar
- Jiao X, Zha H (2008) Consistent computation of first- and second-order differential quantities for surface meshes. In: ACM solid and physical modeling symposiumGoogle Scholar
- Jiao X, Colombi A, Ni X, Hart J (2006) Anisotropic mesh adaptation for evolving triangulated surfaces. In: 15th international meshing roundtableGoogle Scholar
- Jiao X, Einstein DR, Dyedov V, Carson JP (2009) Automatic identification and truncation of boundary outlets in complex imaging-derived biomedical geometries. Med Biol Eng Comput (submitted)Google Scholar
- Labelle F, Shewchuk JR (2007) Isosurface stuffing: fast tetrahedral meshes with good dihedral angles. ACM Trans Graph (ACM SIGGRAPH Confer Proc) 26(3): 1–57Google Scholar
- Si H (2008) Adaptive tetrahedral mesh generation by constrained Delaunay refinement. Int J Numer Methods Eng. doi: 10.1002/nme.2318
- Smits B (2005) Efficiency issues for ray tracing. In: SIGGRAPH ’05: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 courses, p 6. doi: 10.1145/1198555.1198745
- Zhang Y, Hughes TJR, Bajaj CL (2009) An automatic 3D mesh generation method for domains with multiple materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng (in press)Google Scholar