Advertisement

Modeling individual-specific human optic nerve head biomechanics. Part II: influence of material properties

  • Ian A. Sigal
  • John G. Flanagan
  • Inka Tertinegg
  • C. Ross EthierEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Biomechanical factors acting within the optic nerve head (ONH) likely play a role in the loss of vision that occurs in glaucoma. In a companion paper (Sigal et al. 2008), we quantified the biomechanical environment within individual-specific ONH models reconstructed from human post mortem eyes. Our goal in this manuscript was to use finite element modeling to investigate the influence of tissue material properties on ONH biomechanics in these same individual-specific models. A sensitivity analysis was carried out by simulating the effects of changing intraocular pressure on ONH biomechanics as tissue mechanical properties were systematically varied over ranges reported in the literature. This procedure was repeated for each individual-specific model described in the companion paper (Sigal et al. 2008). The outcome measures of the analysis were first and third principal strains, as well as the derived quantity of maximum shear strain, in ONH tissues. Scleral stiffness had by far the largest influence in ONH biomechanics, and this result was remarkably consistent across ONH models. The stiffnesses of the lamina cribrosa and pia mater were also influential. These results are consistent with those obtained using generic ONH models. The compressibility of the pre-laminar neural tissue influenced compressive and shearing strains. Overall, tissue material properties had a much greater influence on ONH biomechanics than did tissue geometry, as assessed by comparing results between our individual-specific models. Material properties of ONH tissues, particularly of the peripapillary sclera, play a dominant role in the mechanical response of an ONH to acute changes in IOP and may be important in the pathogenesis of glaucoma. We need to better understand inter-individual differences in scleral biomechanical properties and whether they are clinically important.

Keywords

Biomechanics Glaucoma Optic nerve head IOP Finite elements Strain Sclera Lamina cribrosa 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Battaglioli JL and Kamm RD (1984). Measurements of the compressive properties of scleral tissue. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25(1): 59–65 Google Scholar
  2. Cook RD (1995). Finite element modeling for stress analysis. Wiley, New York zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Downs JC, Suh JK, Thomas KA, Bellezza AJ, Burgoyne CF and Hart RT (2003). Viscoelastic characterization of peripapillary sclera: material properties by quadrant in rabbit and monkey eyes. J Biomech Eng 125(1): 124–131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Downs JC, Suh JK, Thomas KA, Bellezza AJ, Hart RT and Burgoyne CF (2005). Viscoelastic material properties of the peripapillary sclera in normal and early-glaucoma monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46(2): 540–546 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards ME and Good TA (2001). Use of a mathematical model to estimate stress and strain during elevated pressure induced lamina cribrosa deformation. Curr Eye Res 23(3): 215–225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eilaghi A, Sigal IA, Olesen CG, et al (2007) The effect of nonlinear scleral properties on optic nerve head biomechanics. Summer bioengineering conference 2007. Keystone, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  7. Friberg TR and Lace JW (1988). A comparison of the elastic properties of human choroid and sclera. Exp Eye Res 47(3): 429–436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Henderson FC, Geddes JF, Vaccaro AR, Woodard E, Berry KJ, Benzel EC (2005) Stretch-associated injury in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: new concept and review. Neurosurgery 56, 5, 1101–1113; discussion 1101–1113.Google Scholar
  9. Humphrey JD (2006). Cardiovascular solid mechanics. Springer, Heidelberg Google Scholar
  10. Kotliar K, Maier M, Bauer S, Feucht N, Lohmann C and Lanzl I (2007). Effect of intravitreal injections and volume changes on intraocular pressure: clinical results and biomechanical model. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85(7): 777–781 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Olesen CG, Tertinegg I, Eilaghi A, et al (2007) Measuring the biaxial stress-strain characteristics of human sclera. Summer bioengineering conference 2007. Keystone, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  12. Ozawa H, Matsumoto T, Ohashi T, Sato M and Kokubun S (2004). Mechanical properties and function of the spinal pia mater. J Neurosurg Spine 1(1): 122–127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I and Ethier CR (2004). Finite element modeling of optic nerve head biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45(12): 4378–4387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG and Ethier CR (2005a). Factors influencing optic nerve head biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46(11): 4189–4199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I and Ethier CR (2005b). Reconstruction of human optic nerve heads for finite element modeling. Technol Health Care 13(4): 313–329 Google Scholar
  16. Sigal IA (2006) Human optic nerve head biomechanics: an analysis of generic and individual-specific models using the finite element method. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  17. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Ethier CR (2007a) Interactions between factors influencing optic nerve head biomechanics. Summer Bioengineering Conference 2007. Keystone, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  18. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I and Ethier CR (2007b). Predicted extension, compression and shearing of optic nerve head tissues. Exp Eye Res 85(3): 312–322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I and Ethier CR (2008). Modeling individual-specific human optic nerve head biomechanics. Part I: IOP-induced deformations and influence of geometry. Biomechan Model Mechanobiol (doi:  10.1007/s10237-008-0120-7)Google Scholar
  20. Spoerl E, Boehm AG and Pillunat LE (2005). The influence of various substances on the biomechanical behavior of lamina cribrosa and peripapillary sclera. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46(4): 1286–1290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tunturi AR (1978). Elasticity of the spinal cord, pia and denticulate ligament in the dog. J Neurosurg 48(6): 975–979 Google Scholar
  22. Uchio E, Ohno S, Kudoh J, Aoki K and Kisielewicz LT (1999). Simulation model of an eyeball based on finite element analysis on a supercomputer. Br J Ophthalmol 83(10): 1106–1111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Woo SL, Kobayashi AS, Schlegel WA and Lawrence C (1972). Nonlinear material properties of intact cornea and sclera. Exp Eye Res 14(1): 29–39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian A. Sigal
    • 1
    • 2
  • John G. Flanagan
    • 3
    • 4
  • Inka Tertinegg
    • 3
  • C. Ross Ethier
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical & Industrial EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Institute for Biomaterials and Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Ophthalmology and Vision SciencesUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.School of OptometryUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  5. 5.Department of BioengineeringImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations