Evolving mechanical properties of a model of abdominal aortic aneurysm
The novel three-dimensional (3D) mathematical model for the development of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) of Watton et al. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 3(2): 98–113, (2004) describes how changes in the micro-structure of the arterial wall lead to the development of AAA, during which collagen remodels to compensate for loss of elastin. In this paper, we examine the influence of several of the model’s material and remodelling parameters on growth rates of the AAA and compare with clinical data. Furthermore, we calculate the dynamic properties of the AAA at different stages in its development and examine the evolution of clinically measurable mechanical properties. The model predicts that the maximum diameter of the aneurysm increases exponentially and that the ratio of systolic to diastolic diameter decreases from 1.13 to 1.02 as the aneurysm develops; these predictions are consistent with physiological observations of Vardulaki et al. Br J Surg 85:1674–1680 (1998) and Lanne et al. Eur J Vasc Surg 6:178–184 (1992), respectively. We conclude that mathematical models of aneurysm growth have the potential to be useful, noninvasive diagnostic tools and thus merit further development.
KeywordsArterial Wall Abdominal Aorta Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Watson JD (1994) Molecular biology of the cell, 4th edn. Garland Publishing, YpsilantiGoogle Scholar
- Armentano R, Barra J, Levenson J, Simon A, Pichel R (1995) Arterial wall mechanics in conscious dogs: assessment of viscous, inertial and elastic moduli to characterize aortic wall behaviour. Circ Res 76(3): 468–478Google Scholar
- Davies MJ (1998) Aortic aneurysm formation: Lessons from human studies and experimental models. Circulation 98: 193–195Google Scholar
- He CM, Roach M (1993) The composition and mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 20(1): 6–13Google Scholar
- Humphrey JD (2002) Cardiovascular solid mechanics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Kroon M, Holzapfel GA (2007) A model for saccular cerebral aneurysm growth by collagen fibre remodelling. J Theor Biol (in press)Google Scholar
- Learoyd BM, Taylor MG (1966) Alterations with age in the viscoelastic properties of human arterial walls. Circ Res 18: 278–292Google Scholar
- Mohan D, Melvin JW (1982) Failure properties of passive human aortic tissue. II- Biaxial tension tests. J Biomech 16(1): 31–44Google Scholar
- Ogden RW, Schulze-Bauer CAJ (2000) Phenomenological and structural aspects of the mechanical response of arteries. Mech Biol AMD-242, BED-46, New York pp 125–140Google Scholar
- Shadwick R (1999) Mechanical design in arteries. J Exp Biol 202: 3305–3313Google Scholar
- Sonneson B, Lanne T, Vernersson E, Hansen F (1994) Sex difference in the mechanical properties of the abdominal aorta in human beings. J Vasc Surg 20: 959–969Google Scholar
- Watton PN (2002) Mathematical modelling of the abdominal aortic aneurysm, PhD Thesis, Dept. of Applied Mathematics, University of Leeds, LeedsGoogle Scholar