Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 98–113 | Cite as

A mathematical model for the growth of the abdominal aortic aneurysm

  • P. N. WattonEmail author
  • N. A. Hill
  • M. Heil
Original Paper


We present the first mathematical model to account for the evolution of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. The artery is modelled as a two-layered, cylindrical membrane using nonlinear elasticity and a physiologically realistic constitutive model. It is subject to a constant systolic pressure and a physiological axial prestretch. The development of the aneurysm is assumed to be a consequence of the remodelling of its material constituents. Microstructural ‘recruitment’ and fibre density variables for the collagen are introduced into the strain energy density functions. This enables the remodelling of collagen to be addressed as the aneurysm enlarges. An axisymmetric aneurysm, with axisymmetric degradation of elastin and linear differential equations for the remodelling of the fibre variables, is simulated numerically. Using physiologically determined parameters to model the abdominal aorta and realistic remodelling rates for its constituents, the predicted dilations of the aneurysm are consistent with those observed in vivo. An asymmetric aneurysm with spinal contact is also modelled, and the stress distributions are consistent with previous studies.


Collagen Fibre Arterial Wall Abdominal Aorta Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Fibre Angle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



P. N. Watton gratefully acknowledges the award of a Research Studentship funded by the UK Medical Research Council. The authors are indebted to the Consultant Vascular Surgeons, Mr S. Dodds (Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, UK) and Mr D.A.J. Scott (St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK) for many helpful discussions about the clinical aspects and physiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms. We also acknowledge the Harwell Software Library ( ) for granting UK academics the free use of its Fortran subroutines in non-commercial applications. MA38 was employed to solve the linear system that arises in the Newton iteration, which is required to update the deformation at successive timesteps.


  1. Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Watson JD (1994) Molecular biology of the cell, 3rd edn. Garland Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Armeniades CD, Lake LW, Missirlis YF (1973) Histological origin of aortic tissue mechanics: the role of collagenous and elastic structures. Appl Polym Symp 22:319–339Google Scholar
  3. Armentano R, Levenson J, Barra J, Fischer E, Breitbart G, Pichel R, Simon A (1991) Assessment of elastin and collagen contribution to aortic elasticity in conscious dogs. Amer J Physiol 60:H1870–H1877Google Scholar
  4. Cheng CP, Parker D, Taylor CA (2002) Quantification of wall shear stress in large blood vessels using lagrangian interpolation functions with cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Biomed Eng 30:1020–1032CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Martino E, Mantero S, Inzoli F, Melissano G, Astoe D, Chiesa R, Fumero R (1998) Biomech. of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the presence of endoluminal thrombus: experimental characterisation and structural static computational analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 15:290–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Elger D, Blackketter D, Budwig R, Johansen K (1996) The influence of shape on the stresses in model abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech Eng 118:326–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fukui T, Matsumoto T, Tanaka T, Ohashi T, Kumagai K, Akimoto H, Tabayashi K, Sato M (2002) Biaxial tensile properties of aortic aneurysm tissues under equibiaxial stress. In: Proceedings of the world congress of biomechanics, Calgary, AlbertaGoogle Scholar
  8. Fung YC, Choung CJ (1986) On residual stresses in arteries. J Biomech 108:189–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fung YC, Liu SQ, Zhou JB (1993) Remodelling of the constitutive equation while a blood vessel remodels itself under stress. J Biomech Eng 115:453–459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. He CM, Roach M (1993) The composition and mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 20(1):6–13Google Scholar
  11. Heil M (1996) The stability of cylindrical shells conveying viscous flow. J Fluids Struct 10:173–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holzapfel GA (2000) Nonlinear solid mechanics. A continuum approach for engineering. Wiley, ChicesterGoogle Scholar
  13. Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW (2000) A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elasticity 61:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Humphrey JD (1995) Mechanics of the arterial wall: review and directions. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 23:1–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Humphrey JD (1999) Remodelling of a collagenous tissue at fixed lengths. J Biomech Eng 121:591–597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Humphrey JD (2002) Cardivascular solid mechanics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Lanne T, Sonesson B, Bergqvist D, Bengtsson H, Gustafsson D (1992) Diameter and Compliance in the male human abdominal aorta: influence of age and aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Surg 6:178–184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lever MJ (1995) Mass transport through the walls of arteries and veins. Biological flows. In: Jaffrin MY, Caro CG (eds) Plenum Press, New York, pp 177–197Google Scholar
  19. MacSweeney S, Young G, Greenhalgh R, Powell J (1992) Mechanical properties of the aneurysmal aorta. Brit J Surg 79:1281–1284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rachev A, Meister J (1998) A model for geometric and mechanical adaption of arteries to sustained hypertension. J Biomech Eng 120:9–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Raghavan ML, Vorp DA (2000) Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. J Biomech 33:475–482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Raghavan ML, Webster M, Vorp DA (1999) Ex-vivo bio-mechanical behavior of AAA: assessment using a new mathematical model. Ann Biomed Eng 24:573–582Google Scholar
  23. Rodriguez EK, Hoge A, McCulloch AD (1994) Stress-dependent finite growth in soft biological tissues. J Biomech 27:455–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Shadwick R (1999) Mechanical design in arteries. J Exp Biol 202:3305–3313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang DHJ, Makaroun M, Webster MW, Vorp DA (2001) Mechanical properties and microstructure of intraluminal thrombus from abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech Eng 123:536–539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Watton PN (2002) Mathematical modelling of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. PhD thesis, Department of Applied Mathematics, University of LeedsGoogle Scholar
  27. Wempner G (1973) Mechanics of solids. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilmink WBM, Quick CRG, Hubbard CS, Day NE (1999) The influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 30(2):203–208PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cardiac SurgeryUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of Glasgow, University GardensGlasgowUK
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations