Advertisement

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 17–32 | Cite as

Hemodynamics and wall mechanics in human carotid bifurcation and its consequences for atherogenesis: investigation of inter-individual variation

  • H. F. Younis
  • M. R. Kaazempur-Mofrad
  • R. C. Chan
  • A. G. Isasi
  • D. P. Hinton
  • A. H. Chau
  • L. A. Kim
  • R. D. KammEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Finite element simulations of fluid–solid interactions were used to investigate inter-individual variations in flow dynamics and wall mechanics at the carotid artery bifurcation, and its effects on atherogenesis, in three healthy humans (normal volunteers: NV1, NV2, NV4). Subject-specific calculations were based on MR images of structural anatomy and ultrasound measurements of flow at domain boundaries. For all subjects, the largest contiguous region of low wall shear stress (WSS) occurred at the carotid bulb, WSS was high (6–10 Pa) at the apex, and a small localized region of WSS>10 Pa occurred close to the inner wall of the external carotid artery (ECA). NV2 and NV4 had a “spot” of low WSS distal to the bifurcation at the inner wall of the ECA. Low WSS patches in the common carotid artery (CCA) were contiguous with the carotid bulb low WSS region in NV1 and NV2, but not in NV4. In all three subjects, areas of high oscillatory shear index (OSI) were confined to regions of low WSS. Only NV4 exhibited high levels of OSI on the external adjoining wall of the ECA and CCA. For all subjects, the maximum wall shear stress temporal gradient (WSSTG) was highest at the flow divider (reaching 1,000 Pa/s), exceeding 300 Pa/s at the walls connecting the ECA and CCA, but remaining below 250 Pa/s outside of the ECA. In all subjects, (maximum principle) cyclic strain (CS) was greatest at the apex (NV1: 14%; NV2: 11%; NV4: 6%), and a second high CS region occurred at the ECA–CCA adjoining wall (NV1: 11%, NV2: 9%, NV4: 5%). Wall deformability was included in one simulation (NV2) to verify that it had little influence on the parameters studied. Location and magnitude of low WSS were similar, except for the apex (differences of up to 25%). Wall distensibility also influenced OSI, doubling it in most of the CCA, separating the single high OSI region of the carotid bulb into two smaller regions, and shrinking the ECA internal and external walls’ high OSI regions. These observations provide further evidence that significant intra-subject variability exists in those factors thought to impact atherosclerosis.

Keywords

Wall Shear Stress Common Carotid Artery Cyclic Strain Carotid Bifurcation Oscillatory Shear Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 61794) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Augst AD, Barratt DC, Hughes AD, Glor FP, Mc GTSA, Xu XY (2003) Accuracy and reproducibility of CFD predicted wall shear stress using 3D ultrasound images. J Biomech Eng 125:218–222Google Scholar
  2. Bao X, Lu C, Frangos JA (1999) Temporal gradient in shear but not steady shear stress induces PDGF-A and MCP-1 expression in endothelial cells: role of NO, NF kappa B, and egr-1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19:996–1003Google Scholar
  3. Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  4. Bathe M, Kamm RD (1999) A fluid-structure interaction finite element analysis of pulsatile blood flow through a compliant stenotic artery. J Biomech Eng 121:361–369Google Scholar
  5. Bathe KJ, Zhang H, Ji S (1999) Finite element analysis of fluid flows fully coupled with structural interactions. Comput Struct 72:1–16Google Scholar
  6. Berger SA, Jou LD (2000) Flows in stenotic vessels. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32:347–384Google Scholar
  7. Bonnet A (1995) Characterization of global minimizers for Mumford–Shah functional image segmentation. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences, Serie l-Mathematique 321:1121–1126MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Botnar R, Rappitsch G, Scheidegger MB, Liepsch D, Perktold K, Boesiger P (2000) Hemodynamics in the carotid artery bifurcation: a comparison between numerical simulations and in vitro MRI measurements. J Biomech 33:137–144Google Scholar
  9. Capers Q, Alexander RW, Lou P, De Leon H, Wilcox JN, Ishizaka N, Howard AB, Taylor WR (1997) Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression in aortic tissues of hypertensive rats. Hypertension 30:1397–3402Google Scholar
  10. Caro CG, Fitz-Gerald JM, Schroter RC (1971) Atheroma and arterial wall shear: observation, correlation and proposal of a shear dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 177:109–159Google Scholar
  11. Chan R (2001) Non-invasive ultrasound monitoring of regional carotid wall structure and deformation in atherosclerosis. In: Health sciences and technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  12. Chandran KB, Mun JH, Choi KK, Chen JS, Hamilton A, Nagaraj A, McPherson DD (2003) A method for in-vivo analysis for regional arterial wall material property alterations with atherosclerosis: preliminary results. Med Eng Phys 25:289–298Google Scholar
  13. Cheng GC, Briggs WH, Gerson DS, Libby P, Grodzinsky AJ, Gray ML, Lee RT (1997) Mechanical strain tightly controls fibroblast growth factor-2 release from cultured human vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res 80:28–36Google Scholar
  14. Chien S, Lin SJ, Weinbaum S, Lee MM, Jan KM (1988) The role of arterial endothelial cell mitosis in macromolecular permeability. Adv Exp Med Biol 242:59–73Google Scholar
  15. Chuong CJ, Fung YC (1986) On residual stresses in arteries (published erratum appears in J Biomech Eng 112(3):249, 1990). J Biomech Eng 108:189–192Google Scholar
  16. Clowes AW, Reidy MA, Clowes MM (1983) Mechanisms of stenosis after arterial injury. Lab Invest 49:208–215Google Scholar
  17. Delfino A (1996) Analysis of stress field in a model of the human carotid bifurcation. Department of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  18. Delfino A, Stergiopulos N, Moore JE Jr, Meister JJ (1997) Residual strain effects on the stress field in a thick wall finite element model of the human carotid bifurcation. J Biomech 30:777–786Google Scholar
  19. Downing JM, Ku DN (1997) Effects of frictional losses and pulsatile flow on the collapse of stenotic arteries. J Biomech Eng 119:317–324Google Scholar
  20. Draney MT, Herfkens RJ, Hughes TJ, Pelc NJ, Wedding KL, Zarins CK, Taylor CA (2002) Quantification of vessel wall cyclic strain using cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Biomed Eng 30:1033–1045Google Scholar
  21. Friedman MH, Hutchins GM, Bargeron CB, Deters OJ, Mark FF (1981) Correlation of human arterial morphology with hemodynamic measurements in arterial casts. J Biomech Eng 103:204–207Google Scholar
  22. Fry DL (1968) Acute vascular endothelial changes associated with increased blood velocity gradients. Circ Res 22:165–197Google Scholar
  23. Fry DL (1969) Certain histological and chemical responses of the vascular interface to acutely induced mechanical stress in the aorta of the dog. Circ Res 24:93–108Google Scholar
  24. Fung YC (1991) What are the residual stresses doing in our blood vessels? Ann Biomed Eng 19:237–249Google Scholar
  25. Glor FP, Long Q, Hughes AD, Augst AD, Ariff B, Thom SA, Verdonck PR, Xu XY (2003) Reproducibility study of magnetic resonance image-based computational fluid dynamics prediction of carotid bifurcation flow. Ann Biomed Eng 31:142–151Google Scholar
  26. Gonzales RS, Wick TM (1996) Hemodynamic modulation of monocytic cell adherence to vascular endothelium. Ann Biomed Eng 24:382–393Google Scholar
  27. He X, Ku DN, Moore JE Jr (1993) Simple calculation of the velocity profiles for pulsatile flow in a blood vessel using Mathematica (published erratum appears in Ann Biomed Eng 21(5):557–558, 1993). Ann Biomed Eng 21:45–49Google Scholar
  28. Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW (2000) A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elasticity 61:1–48MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. Huiskes R, Ruimerman R, van Lenthe GH, Janssen JD (2000) Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature 405:704–706Google Scholar
  30. Humphrey JD (1995) Mechanics of the arterial wall: review and directions. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 23:1–162Google Scholar
  31. Humphrey JD, Na S (2002) Elastodynamics and arterial wall stress. Ann Biomed Eng 30:509–523Google Scholar
  32. Jackson CL, Reidy MA (1993) Basic fibroblast growth factor: its role in the control of smooth muscle cell migration. Am J Pathol 143:1024–1031Google Scholar
  33. Jiang MJ, Yu YJ, Chen YL, Lee YM, Hung LS (1999) Cyclic strain stimulates monocyte chemotactic protein-1 mRNA expression in smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biochem 76:303–310Google Scholar
  34. Kaazempur-Mofrad MR, Younis H, Patel S, Isasi AG, Chung C, Chan R, Hinton DP, Lee RT, Kamm RD (2003) Cyclic strain amplitude in the human carotid bifurcation and its potential correlation to atherogenesis: idealized and anatomically-realistic models. J Eng Math 47:299–314MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaazempur-Mofrad M, Isasi A, Younis H, Chan R, Hinton D, Sukhova G, LaMuraglia G, Lee R, Kamm R (2004) Characterization of the atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation using MRI, finite element modeling, and histology. Ann Biomed Eng 32(7):947–960Google Scholar
  36. Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK, Glagov S (1985) Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis 5:293–302Google Scholar
  37. Lee RT, Yamamoto C, Feng Y, Potter-Perigo S, Briggs WH, Landschulz KT, Turi TG, Thompson JF, Libby P, Wight TN (2001) Mechanical strain induces specific changes in the synthesis and organization of proteoglycans by vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 276:13847–13851Google Scholar
  38. Lemire JM, Braun KR, Maurel P, Kaplan ED, Schwartz SM, Wight TN (1999) Versican/PG-M isoforms in vascular smooth muscle cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19:1630–1639Google Scholar
  39. Li G, Mills I, Sumpio B (1994) Cyclic strain stimulates endothelial cell proliferation: characterization of strain requirements. Endothelium 2:177–181Google Scholar
  40. Lin SJ, Jan KM, Schuessler G, Weinbaum S, Chien S (1988) Enhanced macromolecular permeability of aortic endothelial cells in association with mitosis (published erratum appears in Atherosclerosis 78(1):87, 1989). Atherosclerosis 73:223–232Google Scholar
  41. Lin SJ, Jan KM, Weinbaum S, Chien S (1989) Transendothelial transport of low density lipoprotein in association with cell mitosis in rat aorta. Arteriosclerosis 9:230–236Google Scholar
  42. Lindner V, Reidy MA (1993) Expression of basic fibroblast growth factor and its receptor by smooth muscle cells and endothelium in injured rat arteries. An en face study. Circ Res 73:589–595Google Scholar
  43. Liu Y, Lai Y, Nagaraj A, Kane B, Hamilton A, Greene R, McPherson DD, Chandran KB (2001) Pulsatile flow simulation in arterial vascular segments with intravascular ultrasound images. Med Eng Phys 23:583–595Google Scholar
  44. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S (1999) Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. Jama 282:2035–2042Google Scholar
  45. Markl M, Chan FP, Alley MT, Wedding KL, Draney MT, Elkins CJ, Parker DW, Wicker R, Taylor CA, Herfkens RJ, Pelc NJ (2003) Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:499–506Google Scholar
  46. Masawa N, Glagov S, Zarins CK (1994) Quantitative morphologic study of intimal thickening at the human carotid bifurcation: I. Axial and circumferential distribution of maximum intimal thickening in asymptomatic, uncomplicated plaques. Atherosclerosis 107:137–146Google Scholar
  47. Mason IJ (1994) The ins and outs of fibroblast growth factors. Cell 78:547–552Google Scholar
  48. Milner JS, Moore JA, Rutt BK, Steinman DA (1998) Hemodynamics of human carotid artery bifurcations: computational studies with models reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging of normal subjects. J Vasc Surg 28:143–156Google Scholar
  49. Mitsumori LM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS, Cai J, Yuan C (2003) In vivo accuracy of multisequence MR imaging for identifying unstable fibrous caps in advanced human carotid plaques. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:410–420Google Scholar
  50. Mohan S, Mohan N, Sprague EA (1997) Differential activation of NF-kappa B in human aortic endothelial cells conditioned to specific flow environments. Am J Physiol 273:C572–C578Google Scholar
  51. Moore JE Jr, Guggenheim N, Delfino A, Doriot PA, Dorsaz PA, Rutishauser W, Meister JJ (1994) Preliminary analysis of the effects of blood vessel movement on blood flow patterns in the coronary arteries. J Biomech Eng 116:302–306Google Scholar
  52. Moore JA, Steinman DA, Ethier CR (1998) Computational blood flow modelling: errors associated with reconstructing finite element models from magnetic resonance images. J Biomech 31:179–184Google Scholar
  53. Papathanasopoulou P, Zhao S, Kohler U, Robertson MB, Long Q, Hoskins P, Xu XY, Marshall I (2003) MRI measurement of time-resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:153–162Google Scholar
  54. Perktold K, Rappitsch G (1995) Computer simulation of local blood flow and vessel mechanics in a compliant carotid artery bifurcation model. J Biomech 28:845–856Google Scholar
  55. Perktold K, Resch M, Florian H (1991) Pulsatile non-Newtonian flow characteristics in a three-dimensional human carotid bifurcation model. J Biomech Eng 113:464–475Google Scholar
  56. Perktold K, Thurner E, Kenner T (1994) Flow and stress characteristics in rigid walled and compliant carotid artery bifurcation models. Med Biol Eng Comput 32:19–26Google Scholar
  57. Reape TJ, Groot PH (1999) Chemokines and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 147:213–25Google Scholar
  58. Salzar RS, Thubrikar MJ, Eppink RT (1995) Pressure-induced mechanical stress in the carotid artery bifurcation: a possible correlation to atherosclerosis. J Biomech 28:1333–1340Google Scholar
  59. Shigley JE, Mischke CR (1989) Mechanical engineering design. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Steinman DA, Thomas JB, Ladak HM, Milner JS, Rutt BK, Spence JD (2002) Reconstruction of carotid bifurcation hemodynamics and wall thickness using computational fluid dynamics and MRI. Magn Reson Med 47:149–159Google Scholar
  61. Tropea BI, Schwarzacher SP, Chang A, Asvar C, Huie P, Sibley RK, Zarins CK (2000) Reduction of aortic wall motion inhibits hypertension-mediated experimental atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20:2127–2133Google Scholar
  62. Tsao PS, Lewis NP, Alpert S, Cooke JP (1995) Exposure to shear stress alters endothelial adhesiveness: role of nitric oxide. Circulation 92:3513–3519Google Scholar
  63. Tsao PS, Buitrago R, Chan JR, Cooke JP (1996) Fluid flow inhibits endothelial adhesiveness: nitric oxide and transcriptional regulation of VCAM-1. Circulation 94:1682–1689Google Scholar
  64. Wang DL, Wung BS, Shyy YJ, Lin CF, Chao YJ, Usami S, Chien S (1995) Mechanical strain induces monocyte chemotactic protein-1 gene expression in endothelial cells. Effects of mechanical strain on monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells. Circ Res 77:294–302Google Scholar
  65. Weinbaum S, Tzeghai G, Ganatos P, Pfeffer R, Chien S (1985) Effect of cell turnover and leaky junctions on arterial macromolecular transport. Am J Physiol 248:H945–H960Google Scholar
  66. Wung BS, Cheng JJ, Chao YJ, Lin J, Shyy YJ, Wang DL (1996) Cyclical strain increases monocyte chemotactic protein-1 secretion in human endothelial cells. Am J Physiol 270:H1462–H1468Google Scholar
  67. Wung BS, Cheng JJ, Hsieh HJ, Shyy YJ, Wang DL (1997) Cyclic strain-induced monocyte chemotactic protein-1 gene expression in endothelial cells involves reactive oxygen species activation of activator protein 1. Circ Res 81:1–7Google Scholar
  68. Younis HF, Kaazempur-Mofrad MR, Chung C, Chan RC, Kamm RD (2003) Computational analysis of the effects of exercise on hemodynamics in the carotid bifurcation. Ann Biomed Eng 31:995–1006Google Scholar
  69. Zhao SZ, Xu XY, Collins MW, Stanton AV, Hughes AD, Thom SA (1999) Flow in carotid bifurcations: effect of the superior thyroid artery. Med Eng Phys 21:207–214Google Scholar
  70. Zwiebel WJ (2000) Peripheral vascular system. Ultrasound Med Biol 26(suppl 1):S92-S96Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. F. Younis
    • 1
  • M. R. Kaazempur-Mofrad
    • 1
    • 3
  • R. C. Chan
    • 2
  • A. G. Isasi
    • 1
  • D. P. Hinton
    • 2
  • A. H. Chau
    • 1
  • L. A. Kim
    • 1
  • R. D. Kamm
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Biological Engineering DivisionMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations