Stainless and shape memory alloy coronary stents: a computational study on the interaction with the vascular wall
- 1.1k Downloads
Balloon-expandable and self-expandable stents are the two types of coronary stents available. Basically, they differ in the modality of expansion.
The present study analyses the stress state induced on the vascular wall, by the expansion of balloon- and self-expandable stents, using the finite element method. Indeed, modified mechanical stress state is in part responsible in the restenosis process. The balloon-expandable stents herein investigated are assumed to be made of stainless steel, while the self-expandable stents are made of a shape memory alloy. The effects of the severity of the coronary stenosis, the atherosclerotic plaque stiffness and the stent design are investigated. Comparing the self-expandable stent with the balloon-expandable one, the former induces fewer stresses and lower damage to the vessel, but, on the other hand, its lower stiffness induces a lower capability to restore vasal lumen and to contrast arterial elastic recoil.
KeywordsAustenite Martensite Shape Memory Alloy NiTi Alloy Neointimal Hyperplasia
- Auricchio F, Di Loreto M, Sacco E (2001) Finite-element analysis of a stenotic revascularization through a stent insertion. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 4:249–264Google Scholar
- Carter AJ, Scott D, Laird JR, Bailey L, Kovach JA, Hoopes TG, Pierce K, Heath K, Hess K, Farb A, Virmani R (1998) Progressive vascular remodeling and reduced neointimal formation after placement of a thermoelastic self-expanding nitinol stent in an experimental model. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 44:193-201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Degertekin M, Regar E, Tanabe K, Lemos P, Lee CH, Smits P, de Feyter P, Bruining N, Sousa E, Abizaid A, Ligthart J, Serruys PW (2003) Evaluation of coronary remodeling after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation by serial three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 91:1046–1050CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Funakubo H (1987) Shape memory alloys. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Green AE, Zerna W (1968) Theoretical Elasticity. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Han RO, Schwartz RS, Kobayashi Y, Wilson SH, Mann JT, Sketch MH, Safian RD, Lansky A, Popma J, Fitzgerald PJ, Palacios IF, Chazin-Caldie M, Goldberg S (2001) Comparison of self-expanding and balloon-expandable stents for the reduction of restenosis. Am J Cardiol 88:253–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kobayashi Y, Honda Y, Christie GL, Teirstein PS, Bailey SR, Brown CL III, Matthews RV, De Franco AC, Schwartz RS, Goldberg S, Popma JJ, Yock PG, Fitzgerald PJ (2001) Long-term vessel response to a self-expanding coronary stent: a serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis from the ASSURE trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1329–1334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morice MC, Surruys PW, Sousa JE, Fajadet J, Ban Hayashi E, Perin M, Colombo A, Schuler G, Barragan P, Guagliumi G, Molnar F, Falotico (2002) A Randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 346:1773–1780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Popma JJ, Suntharalingam M, Lansky AJ, Heuser RR, Speiser B, Teirstein PS, Massullo V, Bass T, Henderson R, Silber S, von Rottkay P, Bonan R, Ho KK, Osattin A, Kuntz RE (2002) Randomized trial of 90Sr/90Y beta-radiation versus placebo control for treatment of in-stent restenosis (START). Circulation 106:1090–1096CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz RS, Henry TD. (2002) Pathophysiology of coronary artery restenosis. Rev Cardiovasc Med 3 Suppl 5: S4-S9Google Scholar
- Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid AC, Rensing BJ, Abizaid AS, Tanajura LF, Kozuma K, Van Langenhove G, Sousa AG, Falotico R, Jaeger J, Popma JJ, Serruys PW (2001) Sustained suppression of neointimal proliferation by sirolimus-eluting stents: one-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up. Circulation 104:2007–2011PubMedGoogle Scholar