Advertisement

Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 68, Issue 8, pp 923–938 | Cite as

Controls on the interannual variability of hypoxia in a subtropical embayment and its adjacent waters in the Guangdong coastal upwelling system, northern South China Sea

  • Heng Zhang
  • Weicong Cheng
  • Yuren Chen
  • Liuqian Yu
  • Wenping Gong
Article

Abstract

Coastal embayments located downwind of large rivers under an upwelling-favorable wind are prone to develop low-oxygen or hypoxic conditions in their bottom water. One such embayment is Mirs Bay, off the Guangdong coast, which is affected by upwelling and the Pearl River Estuary (PRE) plume during summer. The relative importance of physical and biochemical processes on the interannual variability of hypoxia in Mirs Bay and its adjacent waters was investigated using statistical analyses of monthly hydrographic and water quality monitoring data from 2001 to 2015. The results reveal that the southwesterly wind duration and the PRE river discharge together explain 49% of the interannual variability in the size of the hypoxic area, whereas inclusion of the nutrient concentrations inside Mirs Bay and phytoplankton on the shelf explains 75% of the interannual variability in the size of the hypoxic area. This finding suggests that the interannual variability of hypoxia in Mirs Bay is regulated by coupled physical and biochemical processes. Increase of the hypoxic area under a longer-lasting southwesterly wind is caused by increased stratification, extended bottom water residence time, and onshore transport of a low-oxygen water mass induced by stable upwelling. In contrast, a reduction in the size of the hypoxic area may be attributed to a decrease in the surface water residence time of the particulate organic matter outside Mirs Bay due to increased discharge from the PRE. The results also show that the effects of allochthonous particulate organic matter outside Mirs Bay on bottom hypoxia cannot be neglected.

Keywords

Mirs Bay Pearl River estuary Hypoxia Upwelling Plume Southwesterly wind duration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was primarily supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) through grant #41506102 and #41576089, and also supported by Joint Research Projects NSFC-NOW (Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research)-RCUK (UK Research Council) through grant #5161101656 and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (15lgjc39). We thank the Environmental Protection Department of the Hong Kong Government (HKEPD) for providing the observation data and allowing us to use them. The authors thank anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions.

References

  1. Adams KA, Barth JA, Chan F (2013) Temporal variability of near-bottom dissolved oxygen during upwelling off Central Oregon. J Geophys Res Oceans 118:4839–4854.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20361 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes SL (1964) A technique for maximizing details in numerical weather map analysis. J Appl Meteorol 3(4):396–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barth JA, Menge BA, Lubchenco J, Chan F, Bane JM, Kirincich AR, McManus MA, Nielsen KJ, Pierce SD, Washburn L (2007) Delayed upwelling alters nearshore coastal ocean ecosystems in the northern California current. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(10):3719–3724.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700462104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bricker S, Longstaff B, Dennison W, Jones A, Boicourt C, Wicks C, Woerner J (2007) Effects of nutrient enrichment in the nation’s estuaries: a decade of change, National Estuarine Eutrophication Assessment update. NOAA Coastal Ocean program decision analysis series no. 26. National Centers for Coastal Ocean science, silver spring, MD 322 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Caballero-Alfonso AM, Carstensen J, Conley DJ (2015) Biogeochemical and environmental drivers of coastal hypoxia. J Mar Syst 141:190–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Z, Gong W, Cai H, Chen Y, Zhang H (2017) Dispersal of the Pearl River plume over continental shelf in summer. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 194:252–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2017.06.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dong L, Su J, Wong LA, Cao Z, Chen JC (2004) Seasonal variation and dynamics of the Pearl River plume. Cont Shelf Res 24(16):1761–1777.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2004.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng Y, DiMarco SF, Jackson GA (2012) Relative role of wind forcing and riverine nutrient input on the extent of hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Geophys Res Lett 39:L09601.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feng Y, Fennel K, Jackson GA, DiMarco SF, Hetland RD (2014) A model study of the response of hypoxia to upwelling-favorable wind on the northern Gulf of Mexico shelf. J Mar Syst 131:63–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2013.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forrest DR, Hetland RD, DiMarco SF (2011) Multivariable statistical regression models of the areal extent of hypoxia over the Texas-Louisiana continental shelf. Environ Res Lett 6(4):045002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gan J, Li L, Wang D, Guo X (2009) Interaction of a river plume with coastal upwelling in the northeastern South China Sea. Cont Shelf Res 29:728–740.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2008.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gan J, Lu Z, Dai M, Cheung AYY, Liu H, Harrison P (2010) Biological response to intensified upwelling and to a river plume in the northeastern South China Sea: a modeling study. J Geophys Res 115:C09001.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Helly JJ, Levin LA (2004) Global distribution of naturally occurring marine hypoxia on continental margins. Deep-Sea Res II 51:1159–1168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2004.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hetland RD, DiMarco SF (2008) How does the character of oxygen demand control the structure of hypoxia on the Texas-Louisiana continental shelf? J Mar Syst 70:49–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu J, Wang XH (2016) Progress on upwelling studies in the China seas. Rev Geophys 54:653–673.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacox MG, Edwards CA (2011) Effects of stratification and shelf slope on nutrient supply in coastal upwelling regions. J Geophys Res 116:C03019.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Large W, Pond S (1981) Open Ocean momentum flux measurements in moderate to strong winds. J Phys Oceanogr 11:324–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee YJ, Lwiza KMM (2008) Characteristics of bottom dissolved oxygen in Long Island sound, New York. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 76:187–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lentz SJ, Chapman DC (2004) The importance of nonlinear cross-shelf momentum flux during wind-driven coastal upwelling. J Phys Oceanogr 34:2444–2457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li XL, Shi HM, Xia HY, Zhou YP, Qiu YW (2014) Seasonal hypoxia and its potential forming mechanisms in the Mirs Bay, the northern South China Sea. Cont Shelf Res 80:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2014.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li M, Lee YJ, Testa JM, Li Y, Ni W, Kemp WM, Di Toro DM (2016) What drives interannual variability of hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay: climate forcing versus nutrient loading? Geophys Res Lett 43:2127–2134.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin J, Xu H, Cudaback C, Wang D (2008) Inter-annual variability of hypoxic conditions in a shallow estuary. J Mar Syst 73:169–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lu Z, Gan J (2015) Controls of seasonal variability of phytoplankton blooms in the Pearl River Estuary. Deep-Sea Res II 117:86–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Monteiro PMS, van der Plas A, Mohrholz V, Mabille E, Pascal A, Joubert W (2006) Variability of natural hypoxia and methane in a coastal upwelling systems: oceanic physics or shelf biology? Geophys Res Lett 33:L16614.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paulmier A, Ruiz-Pino D (2009) Oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) in the modern ocean. Prog Oceanogr 80:113–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2008.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pitcher GC, Probyn TA, Adu R, Lucas AJ, Bernard S, Evers-King H, Lamont T, Hutchings L (2014) Dynamics of oxygen depletion in the nearshore of a coastal embayment of the southern Benguela upwelling system. J Geophys Res Oceans 119:2183–2200.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Wiseman WJ Jr (2002) Gulf of Mexico hypoxia aka “the dead zone”. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:235–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rabouille C, Conley DJ, Dai MH, Cai WJ, Chen CTA, Lansard B, Green R, Yin K, Harrison PJ, Dagg M, McKee B (2008) Comparison of hypoxia among four river-dominated ocean margins: the Changjiang (Yangtze), Mississippi, pearl, and Rhone rivers. Cont Shelf Res 28:1527–1537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2008.01.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scully ME (2013) Physical controls on hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay: a numerical modeling study. J Geophys Res Oceans 118:1239–1256.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Siedlecki SA, Banas NS, Davis KA, Giddings S, Hickey BM, MacCready P, Connolly T, Geier S (2015) Seasonal and interannual oxygen variability on the Washington and Oregon continental shelves. J Geophys Res Oceans 120:608–633.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Su J (2004) Overview of the South China Sea circulation and its influence on the coastal physical oceanography outside the Pearl River estuary. Cont Shelf Res 24(16):1745–1760.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2004.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Troup ML, Fribance DB, Libes SM, Gurka R, Hackett EE (2016) Physical conditions of coastal hypoxia in the open embayment of Long Bay, South Carolina: 2006-2014. Estuar Coasts 40:1576–1591.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0246-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vaquer-Sunyr R, Duarte CM (2008) Thresholds of hypoxia for marine biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:15451–15457Google Scholar
  34. Wang B, Wei Q, Chen J, Xie L (2012) Annual cycle of hypoxia off the Changjiang (Yangtze River) estuary. Mar Environ Res 77:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2011.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu J, Yin K, Liu H, Lee JHW, Anderson DM, Ho AYT, Harrison PJ (2010) A comparison of eutrophication impacts in two harbours in Hong Kong with different hydrodynamics. J Mar Syst 83:276–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2010.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu H, Liu S, Xie Q, Hong B, Zhou W, Zhang Y, Li T (2016) Seasonal variation of dissolved oxygen in Sanya Bay. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 19(3):276–285.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2016.1215743 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yin K, Lin Z, Ke Z (2004a) Temporal and spatial distribution of dissolved oxygen in the Pearl River estuary and adjacent coastal waters. Cont Shelf Res 24:1935–1948.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2004.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yin K, Zhang J, Qian PY, Jian W, Huang L, Chen J, Wu MCS (2004b) Effect of wind events on phytoplankton blooms in the Pearl River estuary during summer. Cont Shelf Res 24:1909–1923.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2004.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yu L, Fennel K, Laurent A (2015) A modeling study of physical controls on hypoxia generation in the northern Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res Oceans 120:5019–5039.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010634 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang H, Li S (2010) Effects of physical and biochemical processes on the dissolved oxygen budget for the Pearl River estuary during summer. J Mar Syst 79(1–2):65–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang H, Sheng J (2014) Examination of extreme sea levels due to storm surges and tides over the Northwest Pacific Ocean. Cont Shelf Res 93:81–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2014.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang J, Gilbert D, Gooday AJ, Levin L, Naqvi SWA, Middelburg JJ, Scranton M, Ekau W, Peña A, Dewitte B, Oguz T, Monteiro PMS, Urban E, Rabalais NN, Ittekkot V, Kemp WM, Ulloa O, Elmgren R, Escobar-Briones E, van der Plas AK (2010) Natural and human-induced hypoxia and consequences for coastal areas: synthesis and future development. Biogeosciences 7:1443–1467.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1443-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhou W, Yin K, Harrison PJ, Lee JHW (2012) The influence of late summer typhoons and high river discharge on water quality in Hong Kong waters. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 111:35–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhu ZF, Yu JS (2014) Estimating the occurrence of wind-driven coastal upwelling associated with ‘Aoshio” on the northeast shore of Tokyo Bay, Japan: an analytical model. Sci World J 769823Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Coastal Ocean Science and Technology Research, School of Marine SciencesSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Resources and Coastal EngineeringSunYat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster StudiesSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  4. 4.Department of OceanographyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations