Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 68, Issue 4–5, pp 575–587 | Cite as

Evaluation on surface current observing network of high frequency ground wave radars in the Gulf of Thailand

  • Xunqiang Yin
  • Junqiang Shi
  • Fangli Qiao
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on the 9th International Workshop on Modeling the Ocean (IWMO), Seoul, Korea, 3-6 July 2017


Due to the high cost of ocean observation system, the scientific design of observation network becomes much important. The current network of the high frequency radar system in the Gulf of Thailand has been studied using a three-dimensional coastal ocean model. At first, the observations from current radars have been assimilated into this coastal model and the forecast results have improved due to the data assimilation. But the results also show that further optimization of the observing network is necessary. And then, a series of experiments were carried out to assess the performance of the existing high frequency ground wave radar surface current observation system. The simulated surface current data in three regions were assimilated sequentially using an efficient ensemble Kalman filter data assimilation scheme. The experimental results showed that the coastal surface current observation system plays a positive role in improving the numerical simulation of the currents. Compared with the control experiment without assimilation, the simulation precision of surface and subsurface current had been improved after assimilated the surface currents observed at current networks. However, the improvement for three observing regions was quite different and current observing network in the Gulf of Thailand is not effective and a further optimization is required. Based on these evaluations, a manual scheme has been designed by discarding the redundant and inefficient locations and adding new stations where the performance after data assimilation is still low. For comparison, an objective scheme based on the idea of data assimilation has been obtained. Results show that all the two schemes of observing network perform better than the original network and optimal scheme-based data assimilation is much superior to the manual scheme that based on the evaluation of original observing network in the Gulf of Thailand. The distributions of the optimal network of radars could be a useful guidance for future design of observing system in this region.


Gulf of Thailand High frequency radar Observation system simulation experiment Surface current 



The authors would like to thank Dr. Somkiat Khokiattiwong from PMBC for providing the near-shore water depth, monthly averaged runoff amount of rivers around the Gulf of Thailand, and surface current observations by high frequency ground wave radar and also to the two anonymous reviewers for their thorough examination and comments that were very useful for improving the manuscript.

Funding information

The work is supported by the Public Science and Technology Research Funds Projects of Ocean (201505013), International Cooperation Project of Indo-Pacific Ocean Environment Variation and Air-Sea Interaction (GASI-IPOVAI-05 and GASI-03-IPOVAI-06), and NSFC-Shandong Joint Fund for Marine Science Research Centers (Grant No. U1406404).


  1. Atlas R, Hoffman R , Ardizzone J, et al. (2009) Development of a new cross-calibrated, multi-platform (CCMP) ocean surface wind product [C]. Paper presented at AMS 13th Conference on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land urface (IOAS-AOLS), Phoenix, AZGoogle Scholar
  2. Atlas R, Hoffman RN, Ardizzone J, Leidner SM, Jusem JC, Smith DK, Gombos D (2011) A cross-calibrated, multiplatform ocean surface wind velocity product for meteorological and oceanographic applications. Bull Am Meteor Soc 92:157–174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker N, Daley R (2000) Observation and background adjoint sensitivity in the adaptive observation-targeting problem. Q J R Meteorol Soc 126(565):1431–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergot T, Hello G, Joly A, Malardel S (1999) Adaptive observations: a feasibility study. Mon Weather Rev 127(5):743–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop C, Etherton B, Majumdar S (2001) Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part I: theoretical aspects. Mon Weather Rev 129(3):420–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop C, Toth Z (1999) Ensemble transformation and adaptive observations. J Atmos Sci 56(11):1748–1765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buizza, Gelaro R, Molteni R, et al (1995) Predictability studies with high resolution singular vectors. EcmwfGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen C, Beardsley R, Cowles G (2006) An unstructured grid, finite-volume coastal ocean model: FVCOM user manual, second edition. Oceanography 19(1):78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evensen G (2004) Sampling strategies and square root analysis schemes for the EnKF. Ocean Dyn 54(6):539–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evensen G (1994) Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J Geophys Res Oceans 99(C5):10143–10162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gelaro R, Errico R, Prive N (1999) Development of an OSSE framework for a global atmospheric data assimilation system (invited)[M]. Intelligent transportation systems architectures. Artech House, Norwood, pp 121–139Google Scholar
  12. Jackson D, Keil M, Devenish B (2008) Use of Canadian quick covariances in the Met Office data assimilation system. R Meteorol Soc 134:1567–1582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bullamermeteor Soc 77(3):437–472Google Scholar
  14. Langland R, Gelaro R, Rohaly G et al (1999) Targeted observations in FASTEX: adjoint-based targeting procedures and data impact experiments in IOP17 and IOP18. Q J R Meteorol Soc 125(561):3241–3270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Masutani M, Schlatter TW, Errico RM et al (2010) Observing system simulation experiments. In: Data Assimilation, pp 647–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morss R, Snyder C, Emanuel K (2001) Idealized adaptive observation strategies for improving numerical weather prediction. J Atmos Sci 58(2):210–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Palmer T, Buizza R, Molteni F et al (1994) Singular vectors and the predictability of weather and climate. Philos Trans Phys Sci Eng 348(1688):459–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Palmer T, Gelaro R, Barkmeijer J et al (1998) Singular vectors, metrics, and adaptive observations. J Atmos Sci 55(4):633–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pawlowicz R, Beardsley B, Lentz S (2002) Classical tidal harmonic analysis including error estimates in MATLAB using T_TIDE. Comput Geosci 28(8):929–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peng S, Zeng X, Li Z (2016) A three-dimensional variational data assimilation system for the South China Sea: preliminary results from observing system simulation experiments. Ocean Dyn 66(5):737–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saha S, Moorthi S, Wu X et al (2012) The NCEP climate forecast system version 2. J Clim 27(6):2185–2208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sakov P, Oke P (2008) Objective array design: application to the tropical Indian Ocean. J Atmos Ocean Technol 25(5):794–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saramul S, Ezer T (2014) On the dynamics of low latitude, wide and shallow coastal system: numerical simulations of the upper Gulf of Thailand. Ocean Dyn 64(4):557–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scott J, Wentz F, Hoffman R, et al. (2016) Improvements and advances to the cross-calibrated multi-platform (CCMP) ocean vector wind analysis (V2.0 release)[C]. AGU Ocean sciences meetingGoogle Scholar
  25. She J, Hoyer J, Larsen J (2007) Assessment of sea surface temperature observational networks in the Baltic Sea and North Sea. J Mar Syst 65(1–4):314–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shi J, Yin X, Shu Q et al (2018) Evaluation on data assimilation of a global high resolution wave-tide-circulation coupled model using the tropical Pacific TAO buoy observations. Acta Oceanol Sin 37(3):8–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun M, Yin X, Yang Y et al (2017) An effective method based on dynamic sampling for data assimilation in a global wave model. Ocean Dyn 67(3–4):1–17Google Scholar
  28. Tomkratoke S, Sirisup S, Udomchoke V, Kanasut J (2015) Influence of resonance on tide and storm surge in the Gulf of Thailand. Cont Shelf Res 109:112–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weatherall P, Marks KM, Jakobsson M, Schmitt T, Tani S, Arndt JE, Rovere M, Chayes D, Ferrini V, Wigley R (2015) A new digital bathymetric model of the world’s oceans. Earth Space Sci 2(8):331–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xue P, Chen C, Beardsley R et al (2011) Observing system simulation experiments with ensemble Kalman filters in Nantucket Sound, Massachusetts. J Geophys Res Atmos 116(C1):325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yin X, Qiao F, Shu Q (2011) Using ensemble adjustment Kalman filter to assimilate Argo profiles in a global OGCM. Ocean Dyn 61(7):1017–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic AdministrationQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Laboratory for Regional Oceanography and Numerical ModelingQingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina
  3. 3.Key Lab of Marine Science and Numerical Modeling, SOAQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations