Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 65, Issue 12, pp 1665–1684 | Cite as

Assessment of the Black Sea observing system. A focus on 2005-2012 Argo campaigns

  • Sebastian Grayek
  • Emil V. Stanev
  • Johannes Schulz-Stellenfleth
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Coastal Ocean Forecasting Science supported by the GODAE OceanView Coastal Oceans and Shelf Seas Task Team (COSS-TT)


An observing system in the Black Sea combining remote sensing data such as sea level anomalies from altimetry, sea surface temperature from satellite radiometer and data from Argo floats has been analyzed with the aim to quantify the contribution of different information sources when reconstructing the ocean state. The main research questions are: (1) do Argo float measurements substantially impact the quality of estimates, (2) what is the dependence of this quality upon the data and sampling used, and (3) are there specific Black Sea issues? Numerical model output and statistical analysis were used for this purpose. It has been demonstrated that the statistical method performs in a consistent way reproducing known geophysical patterns. Maximum footprints of sea level, salinity and temperature were illustrated, most of them clearly connected with specific thermohaline conditions and the general circulation. Reduced analysis capabilities were identified as associated with a low level of dynamical coupling between the shelf and the open ocean, mesoscale dynamics and representation of diapycnic processes in the models. The accuracy of Argo pressure measurements appeared very important to resolve the extremely sharp stratification in the upper layers. The present-day number of Argo floats operating in the Black Sea of about 10, seems optimal for operational purposes.


Observation system evaluation Observation system simulation experiment Profiling float data Ocean state reconstruction 



We are grateful to P.Y. Le Traon and S. Le Reste for the help to more correctly address the pressure errors. We thank the three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. The authors acknowledge the support of the collaborative project ’Euro-Argo Improvements for the GMES Marine Service’ (E-AIMS) funded by the European Union (grant agreement number 312642). The Argo float data were collected and made freely available by the international Argo project and the national programs that contribute to it.


  1. ARGO (2000) Argo floats data and metadata from Global Data Assembly Centre (Argo GDAC), Tech. rep., IfremerGoogle Scholar
  2. Argo data management (2013) Argo users manual, Tech. rep., Ifremer. doi: 10.13155/26387
  3. Gandin LS (1963) Objective analysis of meteorological fields. In: English translation by the Israel Program forScientific Translations, 1965. Gridromet, LeningradGoogle Scholar
  4. Grayek S, Stanev E V, Kandilarov R (2010) On the response of Black Sea level to external forcing: altimeter data and numerical modelling. Ocean Dyn 60:123–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jaoshvili S (2002) The rivers of the black sea, Tech. Rep. 71. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, in Russian and EnglishGoogle Scholar
  6. Kalman R E (1960) A new approach to linear Filtering and prediction problems. J Basic Eng 82:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kara A B, Wallcraft A J, Hurlburt H E (2005) A new solar radiation penetration scheme for use in ocean mixed layer studies: an application to the black sea using a fine-resolution hybrid coordinate ocean model (HYCOM). J Phys Oceanogr 35:12– 32Google Scholar
  8. Kara A B, Wallcraft A J, Hurlburt H E, Stanev E V (2008) Air-sea fluxes and river discharges in the Black Sea with a focus on the Danube and Bosphorus. J Mar Syst 74:74–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Le Hénaff M, De Mey P, Marsaleix P (2009) Assessment of observational networks with the Representer Matrix Spectra methodapplication to a 3D coastal model of the Bay of Biscay. Ocean Dyn 59:3–20. doi: 10.1007/s10236-008-0144-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Madec G (2008) NEMO ocean engine, Note du Pôle de modélisation No 27, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, France. ISSN No:1288–1619Google Scholar
  11. Neumann G (1943) Uber den Aufbau und die Frage der Tiefenzirkulation des Schwarzen Meeres. Ann Hydrogr Berl 71:1– 20Google Scholar
  12. Oke P, Sakov P (2012) Assessing the footprint of a regional ocean observing system. J Mar Syst 105–108:30–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Oke P, Balmaseda M, Benkiran M, Cummings J, Dombrowsky E, Fujii Y, Guinehut S, Larnicol G, Traon P-Y, Martin M (2009) Observing system evaluations using GODAE systems. Oceanography 22:144–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oke P R, Brassington G B, Griffin D A, Schiller A (2008) The Bluelink ocean data assimilation system (BODAS). Ocean Model 41(1):46–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Peneva E L, Stanev E V, Belokopytov V, Le Traon P Y (2001) Water transport in the Bosphorus straits estimated from hydro-meteorological and altimeter data: seasonal to decadal variability. J Mar Syst 31:21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reynolds R W, Smith T M, Liu C, Chelton D B, Casey K S, Schlax M G (2007) Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J Clim 20:5473–5496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schulz-Stellenfleth J, Stanev E V (2010) Statistical assessment of ocean observing networks: A study of water level measurements in the German Bight. Ocean Model 33(3–4):270–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stanev E V (2005) Understanding Black Sea Dynamics: Overview of Recent Numerical Modelling. Oceanography 18(2):52–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stanev E V, Le Traon P Y, Peneva E L (2000) Seasonal and interannual variations of sea level and their dependency on meteorological and hydrological forcing. Analysis of altimeter and surface data for the Black Sea. J Geophys Res 105(c7):17203–17216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stanev E V, Beckers J M, Lancelot C, Staneva J V, Le Traon P Y, Peneva E L, Gregoire M (2002) Coastal-open Ocean Exchange in the Black Sea: Observations and Modeling, Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci 54:601–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stanev E V, Bowman M J, Peneva E L, Staneva J V (2003) Control of Black Sea intermediate water mass formation by dynamics and topography: Comparisons of numerical simulations, survey and satellite data. J Mar Res 61:59–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stanev E V, Staneva J V, Bullister J L, Murray J W (2004) Ventilation of the Black Sea pycnocline: Parameterization of convection, numerical simulations and validations against observed chlorofluorocarbon data. Deep-Sea Res 51(12):2137–2169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Grayek
    • 1
  • Emil V. Stanev
    • 1
  • Johannes Schulz-Stellenfleth
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal ResearchGeesthachtGermany

Personalised recommendations