Variations of tidally driven three-layer residual circulation in fjords
- 357 Downloads
Residual, or tidally averaged, circulation in fjords is generally assumed to be density driven and two layered. This circulation consists of a thin surface layer of outflow and a thick bottom layer of sluggish inflow. However, development of different vertical structures in residual circulation in fjords can arise from wind, remote, and tidal forcing that may modify the two-layer circulation. Particularly, theoretical results of tidal residual flows in homogeneous semienclosed basins indicate that their vertical structure is determined by the dynamical depth of the system. This dynamical depth can be considered as the ratio between the water column depth and the depth of frictional influence in an oscillatory flow (inverse of Stokes number). When the frictional depth occupies the entire water column, the tidal residual flow is one layered as in shallow basins. But when the frictional depth is only a small portion of the water column (>6 times smaller), the tidal residual is three layered. In relatively deep fjords (say deeper than 100 m), where frictional depths typically occupy a small portion of the water column, the tidal residual flow is expected to be three layered. Ample observational evidence presented here shows a three-layered exchange flow structure in fjords. On the basis of observational and theoretical evidence, it is proposed that the water exchange structure in deep fjords (more than six frictional layers deep, or inverse Stokes number >6) is tidally driven and is three layered. The tidally driven three-layer structure of residual flows could be regarded in some cases as the fundamental structure. However, this structure will only be observed sporadically as it will be masked by wind forcing, remote forcing from the ocean, and freshwater pulses.
KeywordsFjord circulation Three-layer flows Tidal residual flow
Current data from moorings deployed in 2006 at Reloncavi Fjord were obtained under project CONA-C12F 06–02 supported by National Oceanographic Committee of Chile. A.VL acknowledges support from NSF project 0825876 and a Fellowship under Program of Short Stays 801100008 supported by CONICYT (Chile), to analyze some of the data at Universidad de Valparaiso. A.VL also acknowledges support from the Fulbright Commission and CSIC, Spain, which allowed completion of this document. Comments from two anonymous reviewers helped clarify several aspects of this presentation.
- Cáceres M, Valle-Levinson A, Fierro J, Valenzuela C, Castillo M (2010a) Variabilidad transversal del flujo y de la densidad en la boca del Fiordo Aysén. Ciencia y Tecnología del Mar 33(1):5–15Google Scholar
- Cáceres M, Valle-Levinson A, Belmar J, Bello M, Castillo M (2010b) Variabilidad transversal del flujo y salinidad en Paso Nao. Ciencia y Tecnología del Mar 33(2):45–58Google Scholar
- Castillo M, Bello M, Reyes H, Guerrero Y (2006) Patrones de corrientes y distribución vertical de temperatura y salinidad en la entrada oceánica del Canal Darwin en invierno y primavera de 2002. Ciencia y Tecnología del Mar 29(2):5–21Google Scholar
- Dyer, K. R. (1997), Estuaries, a physical introduction 2nd Edition, Wiley, 195 pp.Google Scholar
- Ianniello J (1977) Tidally induced residual currents in estuaries of constant breadth and depth. J Mar Res 35(4):755–786Google Scholar
- Officer CB (1976) Physical oceanography of estuaries. Wiley, New York, 465 ppGoogle Scholar
- Stigebrandt A (2012) Hydrodynamics and circulation of fjords. In: Bengtsson et al (eds) Encyclopedia of Lakes and Reservoirs. Springer, Netherlands, pp 327–244Google Scholar
- Stucchi DJ, Bell WH (1980) Shelf-fjord exchange on the west coast of Vancouver Island. Trans Amer Geophys Union 61:280Google Scholar
- Valle-Levinson A, Atkinson LP (1999) Spatial gradients in the flow over an estuarine channel. Estuaries 22(2A):179–193Google Scholar
- Valle-Levinson A, Sarkar N, Sanay R, Soto D, León J (2007) Spatial structure of hydrography and flow in a Chilean Fjord, Estuario Reloncaví. Estuar Coasts 30(1):113–126Google Scholar