Advertisement

Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 63, Issue 2–3, pp 143–164 | Cite as

On the processes that influence the transport and fate of Mississippi waters under flooding outflow conditions

  • Yannis S. AndroulidakisEmail author
  • Vassiliki H. Kourafalou
Article

Abstract

The Mississippi River (MR) freshwater outflow is a major circulation forcing mechanism for the Northern Gulf of Mexico. We investigate the transport and fate of the brackish waters under flood conditions. The largest outflow in history (45,000 m3/s in 2011) is compared with the second largest outflow in the last 8 years (41,000 m3/s in 2008). Realistically forced simulations reveal the synergistic effect of enhanced discharge, winds, stratification of ambient shelf waters, and offshore circulation over the transport of plume waters. The strongest impact is attributed to the evolution of the Loop Current (LC) and associated frontal cyclonic eddies and anticyclonic rings, which exhibited distinctly different influence during the two study periods. The northward LC intrusion in the summer of 2011 weakened and blocked the buoyancy-driven downstream (westward) transport of brackish waters. The 2011 flood was thus characterized by upstream (eastward) flow and an extensive coverage of the Mississippi–Alabama–Florida shelf. An immediate response between the LC and the brackish offshore eastward spreading is computed during and after this historic event. The absence of a LC northward intrusion during the 2008 flood, in combination with wind effects, promotes downstream advection of MR waters towards the Louisiana–Texas shelf; large amounts of buoyant waters are also retained near the Delta, subject to local offshore advection under the synergistic action of LC-associated counter-rotating eddies.

Keywords

Mississippi River Buoyant plume River flood Northern Gulf of Mexico Numerical modeling HYCOM 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was made possible in part by a grant from BP/The Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative and in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF OCE-0929651). The MODIS/Aqua satellite images were provided by the Optical Oceanography Lab of USF/CMS (University of South Florida/College of Marine Science). We are grateful to HeeSook Kang (University of Miami) for performing the majority of the NGoM-HYCOM simulations and to P. Hogan and O.M. Smedstad (Naval Research Lab/SSC) for providing the regional GoM-HYCOM model fields. The manuscript greatly benefited from discussions with Rafael Schiller (MARINTEK do Brasil). We thank Nicolas Lopez (Florida State University) for providing us with in situ data for the NGoM domain from the Shipboard Automated Meteorological and Oceanographic System (SAMOS) and Richard Patchen (NOAA/NOS) for providing the compilation of the river outflow data set, which is based on daily flow measurements by the US Geological Survey (USGS).

References

  1. Allison MA, Demas CR, Ebersole BA, Kleiss BA, Little CD, Meselhe EA, Powell NJ, Pratt TC, Vosburg BM (2012) A water and sediment budget for the Lower Mississippi-Atchafalaya River in flood years 2008–2010: implications for sediment discharge to the oceans and coastal restoration in Louisiana. J Hydrol 432–433:84–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry JM (1997) Rising tide: the Great Mississippi flood of 1927 and HOW IT changed America. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bleck R (2002) An oceanic circulation model framed in hybrid isopycnic-Cartesian coordinates. Ocean Model 37:55–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosc E, Bricaud A, Antoine D (2004) Seasonal and interannual variability in algal biomass and primary production in the Mediterranean Sea, as derived from 4 years of SeaWiFS observations. Global Biochem Cycles 18:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Briggs K, Smith SR, Rolph JJ (2012) 2011 SAMOS data quality report. COAPS, Tallahassee, p 140Google Scholar
  6. Chassignet P, Smith LT, Halliwell GR, Bleck R (2003) North Atlantic simulations with the Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM): impact of the vertical coordinate choice, reference density, and thermobaricity. J Phys Ocean 33(12):2504–2526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chassignet E, Hurlburt H, Smedstad O, Halliwell G, Hogan P, Wallcraft A, Baraille R, Bleck R (2007) The HYCOM (Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model) data assimilative system. J Mar Syst 65(1–4):60–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochrane JD, Kelly FJ (1986) Low-frequency circulation on the Texas–Louisiana continental shelf. J Geophys Res 91:10,645–10,659. doi: 10.1029/JC091iC09p10645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummings JA (2005) Operational multivariate ocean data assimilation. J R Meteorol Soc 131:3583–3604Google Scholar
  10. Fabre JB (2012) Sediment flux and fate for a large-scale diversion: the 2011 Mississippi River flood, the Bonnet Carré Spillway, and the implications for coastal restoration in South Louisiana. Master Thesis, Louisiana State University, USA, 51 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Falcini F, Khan NS, Macelloni L, Horton BP, Lutken CB, McKee KL, Santoleri R, Colella S, Li C, Volpe G, D’Emidio M, Salusti A, Jerolmack DJ (2012) Linking the historic 2011 Mississippi River flood to coastal wetland sedimentation. Nat Geosci 5:803–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fong DA, Geyer WR (2001) Response of a river plume during an upwelling favorable wind event. J Geophy Res 106(C1):1067–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forget P, André G (2007) Can satellite-derived chlorophyll imagery be used to trace surface dynamics in coastal zone? A case study in the Northwestern Mediterranean sea. Sensors 7:884–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frantantoni DM, Glickson DA (2002) North Brazil current ring generation and evolution observed with SeaWiFs. J Phys Oceanogr 32(3):1058–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Halliwell G (2004) Evaluation of vertical coordinate and vertical mixing algorithms in the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM). Ocean Model 7(3–4):285–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halliwell GR, Barth A, Weisberg RH, Hogan P, Smedstad OM, Cummings J (2009) Impact of GODAE products on nested HYCOM simulations of the West Florida Shelf. Ocean Dyn 59:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hickey BM, Kudela RM, Nash JD, Bruland KW, Peterson WT, MacCready P, Lessard EJ, Jay DA, Banas NS, Baptista AM, Dever EP, Kosro PM, Kilcher LK, Horner-Devine AR, Zaron ED, McCabe RM, Peterson JO, Orton PM, Pan J, Lohan MC (2010) River influences on shelf ecosystems: introduction and synthesis. J Geophys Res 115(C00B17). doi: 10.1029/2009JC005452
  18. Hodur RM, Pullen J, Cummings J, Hong X, Doyle JD, Martin P, Rennick MA (2002) The Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS). Oceanog 15:88–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu C, Nelson JR, Johns E, Chen Z, Weisberg RH, Muller-Karger FE (2005) Mississippi River water in the Florida Straits and in the Gulf Stream off Georgia in summer 2004. Geophys Res Lett 32:L14606. doi: 10.1029/2005GL022942 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang RW (1993) Real freshwater flux as a natural boundary condition for the salinity balance and thermohaline circulation forced by evaporation and precipitation. J Phys Oceanogr 23:2428–2446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Justic D, Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Wiseman WJ Jr (1993) Seasonal coupling between riverborne nutrients, net productivity and hypoxia. Mar Pollut Bull 26:184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kara AB, Rochford PA, Hurlburt HE (2000) Mixed layer depth variability and barrier layer formation over the North Pacific Ocean. J Geophys Res 105(C7):16783–16801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kara AB, Hurlburt HE, Wallcraft AJ, Bourassa MA (2005) Black Sea mixed layer sensitivity to various wind and thermal forcing products on climatological time scales. J Climate 18(24):5266–5293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kombiadou K, Krestenitis Y (2012) Fine sediment transport model for river influenced microtidal shelf seas with application to the Thermaikos Gulf (NW Aegean Sea). Cont Shelf Res 36:41–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kourafalou VH, Oey L-Y, Wang J, Lee T (1996a) The fate of river discharge on the continental shelf 1. Modeling the river plume and the inner shelf coastal current. J Geophys Res 101:3415–3434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kourafalou VH, Lee TN, Oey LY, Wang JD (1996b) The fate of river discharge on the continental shelf 2. Transport of coastal low-salinity waters under realistic wind and tidal forcing. J Geophys Res 101:3435–3455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kourafalou VH, Peng G, Kang H, Hogan PJ, Smedstad OM and Weisberg RH (2009) Evaluation of global ocean data assimilation experiment products on South Florida nested simulations with the Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model. Ocean Dyn 59:47–66. doi: 10.1007/s10236-008-0160-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lane RR, Day JW, Thibodeaux B (1999) Water quality analysis of a freshwater diversion at Caernarvon, Louisiana. Estuaries 22:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Large WG, McWilliams JC, Doney SC (1994) Oceanic vertical mixing: a review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization. Rev Geophys 32:363–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Le Hénaff M, Kourafalou VH, Morel Y, Srinivasan A (2012) Simulating the dynamics and intensification of cyclonic Loop Current Frontal Eddies in the Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res 117:C02034. doi: 10.1029/2011JC007279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leben RR (2005) Altimeter-derived loop current metrics. In: Sturges W, Lugo Fernandez A (eds) Circulation in the Gulf of Mexico: observations and models, 161. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 181–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewis K, Allen JI (2009) Validation of a hydrodynamic-ecosystem model simulation with time-series data collected in the western English Channel. J Mar Syst 77:296–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lutken C, D'Emidio M, Falcini F, Horton BP, Jerolmack DJ, Khan NS, Li C, Macelloni L, McKee KL (2011) Connecting the historic 2011 Mississippi River flood to marsh sedimentation on the Delta. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2011Google Scholar
  34. McClain CR, Yoder JA, Atkinson LP, Blanton JO, Lee TN, Singer JJ, Muller-Karger F (1988) Variability of surface pigment concentrations in the South Atlantic Bight. J Geophys Res 93(C9):10675–10697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Millero FJ, Chen CT, Bradshaw A, Schleicher K (1980) A new high pressure equation of state for seawater. Deep Sea Res I 27:255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Milliman JD, Meade RH (1983) World-wide delivery of river sediment to the ocean. J Geol 91:1–21. doi: 10.1086/628741 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitsch WJ, Day JW, Gilliam JW, Groffman PM, Hey DL, Randall GW, Wang N (2001) Reducing nitrogen loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River basin: strategies to counter a persistent ecological problem. Bioscience 51:373–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morey SL, Martin PJ, O’Brien JJ, Wallcraft AA, Zavala-Hidalgo J (2003) Export pathways for river discharged fresh water in the northern Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res 108(C10):3303. doi: 10.1029/2002JC001674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nurnberg D, Ziegler M, Karas C, Tiedemann R, Schmidt MW (2008) Interacting loop current variability and Mississippi River discharge over the past 400 kyr. Earth Planet Sci Lett 272(1–2):278–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ortner PB, Lee TN, Milne PJ, Zika RG, Clarke ME, Podestá GP, Swart PK, Tester PA, Atkinson LP, Johnson WR (1995) Mississippi River flood waters that reached the Gulf Stream. J Geophys Res 100:13,595–13,601. doi: 10.1029/95JC01039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rabalais NN (1998) Consequences of the 1993 Mississippi River flood in the Gulf of Mexico. Regul Rivers Res Manag 14:161–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Wiseman WJ Jr, Boesch DF (1991) A brief summary of hypoxia on the northern Gulf of Mexico continental shelf: 1985–1988. In: Tyson RV, Pearson TH (eds) Modern and ancient continental shelf anoxia. Geological Society, Special Publication no. 58, London, pp 35–46Google Scholar
  43. Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Justic D, Dortch Q, Wiseman WJ Jr, Sen Gupta BK (1996) Nutrient changes in the Mississippi River and system responses on the adjacent continental shelf. Estuaries 19:386–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Scavia D (2002) Beyond science into policy: Gulf of Mexico hypoxia and the Mississippi River. Bioscience 52(2):129–142. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0129:BSIPGO]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raitsos DE, Reid PC, Lavender SJ, Edwards M, Richardson AJ (2005) Extending the SeaWiFS chlorophyll data set back 50 years in the northeast Atlantic. Geophys Res Lett 32:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schiller RV, Kourafalou VH (2010) Modeling river plume dynamics with the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model. Ocean Modell 33(1–2):101–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schiller RV, Kourafalou VH, Hogan P, Walker ND (2011) The dynamics of the Mississippi River plume: impact of topography, wind and offshore forcing on the fate of plume waters. J Geophys Res 116:C06029. doi: 10.1029/2010JC006883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmitz WJ (2005) Cyclones and westward propagation in the shedding of anticyclonic rings from the loop current. In: Sturges W, Lugo-Fernandez A (eds) Circulation in the Gulf of Mexico: observations and models, vol 161. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 241–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shi W, Wang M (2009) Satellite observations of flood-driven Mississippi River plume in the spring of 2008. Geophys Res Lett 36:L07607. doi: 10.1029/2009GL037210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Trotter PS, Johnson A, Ricks R, Smith DR, Woods D (1998) Floods on the lower Mississippi: an historical economic overview. U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. National Weather Service Tech. Attachment SR/SSD 98-9. [Available online at http://www.srh.noaa.gov/topics/attach/html/ssd98-9.htm]
  51. Tsiaras K, Kourafalou VH, Davidov A, Staneva A (2008) A three-dimensional coupled model of the western Black Sea plankton dynamics: seasonal variability and comparison to SeaWiFs data. J Geophys Res 113(C07007):doi: 10.1029/2006JC003959 Google Scholar
  52. Turner RE, Rabalais NN, Justic D (2011) Predicting summer hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico: redux. Mar Pollut Bull 64:319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Walker ND (1996) Satellite assessment of Mississippi River plume variability: causes and predictability. Remote Sens Environ 58:21–35. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(95)00259-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walker ND, Fardion GS, Rouse LJ, Biggs DC (1994) Circulation of Mississippi River water discharged into the northern Gulf of Mexico by the great flood of summer 1993. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 75(36):409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walker ND, Huh OK, Rouse LJ Jr, Murray SP (1996) Evolution and structure of a costal squirt off the Mississippi River delta: Northern Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res 101:20,643–20,655Google Scholar
  56. Walker ND, Wiseman WJ, Rouse LJ, Babin A (2005) Effects of river discharge, wind stress, and slope eddies on circulation and the satellite-observed structure of the Mississippi River plume. J Coast Res 21:1228–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walker ND, Pilley CT, Raghunathan VV, D’Sa EJ, Leben RR, Hoffmann NG, Brickley PJ, Coholan PD, Sharma N, Graber HC, Turner E (2011) Impacts of a loop current frontal eddy cyclone and wind forcing on the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill. In: Liu Y, MacFadyen A, Ji Z, Weisberg R (eds) Monitoring and modeling the deepwater horizon oil spill: a record-breaking enterprise. Geophys. Monogr. Ser, Washington, pp 103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. White J, Fulweiler R, Li C, Bargu S, Walker N, Twilley R, Green S (2009) Mississippi River flood of 2008: observations of a large freshwater diversion on physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of a shallow estuarine lake. Environ Sci Technol 43:5599–5604CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yannis S. Androulidakis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vassiliki H. Kourafalou
    • 1
  1. 1.Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science (RSMAS/MPO)University of MiamiMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations