Advertisement

Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 62, Issue 10–12, pp 1487–1501 | Cite as

Modelling of fluid–solid interactions using an adaptive mesh fluid model coupled with a combined finite–discrete element model

  • Axelle ViréEmail author
  • Jiansheng Xiang
  • Frank Milthaler
  • Patrick Emmet Farrell
  • Matthew David Piggott
  • John-Paul Latham
  • Dimitrios Pavlidis
  • Christopher Charles Pain
Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Multi-scale modelling of coastal, shelf and global ocean dynamics

Abstract

Fluid–structure interactions are modelled by coupling the finite element fluid/ocean model ‘Fluidity-ICOM’ with a combined finite–discrete element solid model ‘Y3D’. Because separate meshes are used for the fluids and solids, the present method is flexible in terms of discretisation schemes used for each material. Also, it can tackle multiple solids impacting on one another, without having ill-posed problems in the resolution of the fluid’s equations. Importantly, the proposed approach ensures that Newton’s third law is satisfied at the discrete level. This is done by first computing the action–reaction force on a supermesh, i.e. a function superspace of the fluid and solid meshes, and then projecting it to both meshes to use it as a source term in the fluid and solid equations. This paper demonstrates the properties of spatial conservation and accuracy of the method for a sphere immersed in a fluid, with prescribed fluid and solid velocities. While spatial conservation is shown to be independent of the mesh resolutions, accuracy requires fine resolutions in both fluid and solid meshes. It is further highlighted that unstructured meshes adapted to the solid concentration field reduce the numerical errors, in comparison with uniformly structured meshes with the same number of elements. The method is verified on flow past a falling sphere. Its potential for ocean applications is further shown through the simulation of vortex-induced vibrations of two cylinders and the flow past two flexible fibres.

Keywords

Fluid–structure interactions Finite element method Discrete force conservation  Supermesh Falling sphere Vortex-induced vibrations Deformable fibres 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge support from EPSRC (under projects EP/I00405X/1 and EP/H030123/1) and NERC (under grant NE/F012594/1), as well as the Grantham Institute for Climate Change and the High Performance Computing Service at Imperial College London. A.V. is supported by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement PIEF-GA-2010-272437, and she is also grateful to the Belgian Vocatio Foundation. P.E.F.’s work was supported by a Center of Excellence grant from the Norwegian Research Council to the Center for Biomedical Computing at Simula Research Laboratory. The content of this paper reflects only the authors views and not those of the European Commission.

References

  1. Backhaus JO, Verduin JJ (2008) Simulating the interaction of seagrasses with their ambient flow. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 80:563–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basset AB (1961) A treatise on hydrodynamics with numerous examples. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown PP, Lawler DF (2003) Sphere drag and settling velocity revisited. J Environ Eng 129(3):222–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borazjani I, Sotiropoulos F (2009) Vortex-induced vibrations of two cylinders in tandem arrangement in the proximity-wake interference region. J Fluid Mech 621:321–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clift R (1978) Bubbles, drops, and particles. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Dean RG, Dalrymple RA (1991) Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  7. Farhat C, Lesoinne M, LeTallec P (1998) Load and motion transfer algorithm for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 157:95–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farrell PE (2009) Galerkin projection of discrete fields via supermesh construction. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Farrell PE (2011) The addition of fields on different meshes. J Comput Phys 230(9):3265–3269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farrell PE, Maddison JR (2011) Conservative interpolation between volume meshes by local galerkin projection. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farrell PE, Piggott MD, Pain CC, Gorman GJ, Wilson CR (2009) Conservative interpolation between unstructured meshes via supermesh construction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:2632–2642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glowinski R, Pan TW, Periaux J (1994) A fictitious domain method for external incompressible viscous flow modeled by Navier–Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 112:133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glowinski R, Pan T-W, Hesla TI, Joseph DD (1999) A distributed Lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method for particulate flows. Int J Multiph Flow 25(5):755–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gresho PM, Sani RL (1998) Incompressible flow and the finite element method. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffith BE, Hornung RD, McQueen DM, Peskin CS (2007) An adaptive, formally second order accurate version of the immersed boundary method. J Comput Phys 223:10–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jaiman RK, Jiao X, Geubelle PH, Loth E (2006) Conservative load transfer along curved fluid–solid interface with non-matching meshes. J Comput Phys 218:372–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jiao X, Heath MT (2004) Overlaying surface meshes. Part I: algorithms. Int J Comput Geom Appl 14(6):379–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Latham J-P, Mindel J, Xiang J, Guises R, Garcia X, Pain CC, Gorman GJ, Piggott MD, Munjiza A (2009) Coupled FEMDEM/Fluids for coastal engineers with special reference to armour stability and breakage. Geomechanics and Geoengineering 4(1):39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luhar M, Coutu S, Infantes E, Fox S, Nepf H (2010) Wave-induced velocities inside a model seagrass bed. J Geophys Res 115(C12005):1–15Google Scholar
  20. Maman N, Farhat C (1995) Matching fluid and structure meshes for aeroelastic computations. A parallel approach. Comput Struct 54(4):779–785Google Scholar
  21. Mark A, van Wachem BGM (2008) Derivation and validation of a novel implicit second-order accurate immersed boundary method. J Comput Phys 227:6660–6680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mei R (1994) Flow due to an oscillating sphere and an expression for unsteady drag on the sphere at finite Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 270:133–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mittal R, Iaccarino G (2005) Immersed boundary methods. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 37:239–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Munjiza A (2004) The combined finite-discrete element method. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nino Y, Garcia M (1994) Gravel saltation: 2. Modeling. Water Resour Res 30(6):1915–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pain CC, Umpleby AP, de Oliveira CRE, Goddard AJH (2001) Tetrahedral mesh optimisation and adaptivity for steady-state and transient finite element calculations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:3771–3796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pain CC, Piggott MD, Goddard AJH, Fang F, Gorman GJ, Marshall DP, Eaton MD, Power PW, de Oliveira CRE (2005) Three-dimensional unstructured mesh ocean modelling. Ocean Model 10:5–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peskin CS (1972) Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. J Comput Phys 10:252–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Piggott MD, Gorman GJ, Pain CC, Allison PA, Candy AS, Martin BT, Wells MR (2008) A new computational framework for multi–scale ocean modelling based on adapting unstructured meshes. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 56:1003–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Piggott MD, Farrell PE, Wilson CR, Gorman GJ, Pain CC (2009) Anisotropic mesh adaptivity for multi-scale ocean modelling. Philos Trans R Soc A 367:4591–4611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van Loon R, Anderson PD, van de Vosse FN, Sherwin SJ (2007) Comparison of various fluid-structure interaction methods for deformable bodies. Comput Struct 85:833–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xiang J, Munjiza A, Latham J-P (2009) Finite strain, finite rotation quadratic tetrahedral element for the combined finite–discrete element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 79:946–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xiang J, Latham J-P, Zimmer D, Baird B, Fons M (2011) Modelling breakwater armour layers and the dynamic modelling breakwater armour layers and the dynamic response of armour units In: Proceedings of the coastal structures 2011 conference held in Yokohama, JapanGoogle Scholar
  34. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2000) The finite element method 5th edn. Butterworth–Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Axelle Viré
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jiansheng Xiang
    • 1
  • Frank Milthaler
    • 1
  • Patrick Emmet Farrell
    • 1
    • 3
  • Matthew David Piggott
    • 1
    • 2
  • John-Paul Latham
    • 1
  • Dimitrios Pavlidis
    • 1
  • Christopher Charles Pain
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Modelling and Computation Group, Department Earth Science and EngineeringImperial College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Grantham Institute for Climate ChangeImperial College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Center for Biomedical Computing, Simula Research LaboratoryOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations