Advertisement

Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 62, Issue 2, pp 295–306 | Cite as

Short-term and seasonal variation in metabolic balance in Liverpool Bay

  • Anouska Panton
  • Claire MahaffeyEmail author
  • Naomi Greenwood
  • Joanne Hopkins
  • David Montagnes
  • Jonathan Sharples
Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on the UK National Oceanography Centre’s Irish Sea Coastal Observatory

Abstract

Regions of freshwater influence (ROFIs) are dynamic areas within the coastal seas that experience cycles of stability driven by density gradients and the spring-neap tidal cycle. As a result, pulses of biological production may occur on a more frequent timescale than the classic seasonal cycle. Net community production (NCP) rates and chlorophyll a concentration are presented from a site within the ROFI of Liverpool Bay and compared to similar measurements made at a site outside the ROFI during 2009. The influence of water column stability on biological production in the ROFI was also investigated using high-frequency observations from a Cefas Smartbuoy. Both sites were autotrophic from spring to autumn before becoming heterotrophic over winter. NCP at the inshore site was estimated to range from 30.8 to 50.4 gC m−2 year−1. A linear relationship detected between chlorophyll a and NCP from both sites was used to estimate metabolic balance over 1 year at the ROFI site using high-resolution chlorophyll a concentrations from the Smartbuoy but was found to poorly replicate NCP rates compared to those derived from dissolved oxygen fluxes. There was no clear biological response to periods of stratification within the ROFI, and it is proposed that changes in light attenuation in the Liverpool Bay ROFI, driven not only by stratification but also by fluctuations in riverine sediment load, most likely play an important role in controlling phytoplankton growth in this region.

Keywords

Autotrophy Heterotrophy Stratification Liverpool Bay ROFI Oxygen 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the captain and crew of RV Prince Madog as well as all research assistants on the cruises, Dr. Matthew Palmer and the PHiXT project at National Oceanography Centre Liverpool, and Sean Gaffney at British Oceanographic Data Centre. AP was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council Strategic Ocean Funding Initiative studentship (NE/F012632/1). CM would like to acknowledge a Royal Society Research Grant (RG080305). The Smartbuoy data was collected under a Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs funded programme (SLA25). We wish to thank Professor Stephen V. Smith and one anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments.

References

  1. Abdullah MI, Royle LG (1973) Chemical evidence for the dispersal of River Mersey run-off in Liverpool Bay. Estuar Coast Mar Sci 1:401–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bargeron CP, Hydes DJ, Woolf DK, Kelly-Gerreyn BA, Qurban MA (2006) A regional analysis of new production on the northwest European shelf using oxygen fluxes and a ship-of-opportunity. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 69:478–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benson BB, Krause D (1984) The concentration and isotopic fractionation of oxygen dissolved in freshwater and seawater in equilibrium with the atmosphere. Limnol Oceanogr 29:620–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blight SP, Bentley TL, Lefevre D, Robinson C, Rodrigues R, Rowlands J, Williams PJleB (1995) Phasing of autotrophic and heterotrophic plankton metabolism in a temperate coastal ecosystem. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 128:61–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blough NV, Zafirou OC, Bonilla J (1993) Optical absorption spectra of water from the Orinoco River outflow: Terrestrial input of colored organic matter to the Caribbean. J Geophys Res 98:2271–2278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borges AV, Delille B, Frankignoulle M (2005) Budgeting sinks and sources of CO2 in the coastal ocean: Diversity of ecosystems counts. Geophys Res Lett 32:L14601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borges AV, Frankignoulle M (2002) Distribution and air-water exchange of carbon dioxide in the Scheldt plume off the Belgian coast. Biogeochem 59:41–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borges AV, Frankignoulle M (2003) Distribution of surface carbon dioxide and air-sea exchange in the English Channel and adjacent areas. J Geophys Res 108:3140–3153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borges AV, Ruddick K, Schiettecatte L-S, Delille B (2008) Net ecosystem production and carbon dioxide fluxes in the Scheldt estuarine plume. BMC Ecol 8:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caffrey JM (2004) Factors controlling net ecosystem metabolism in U.S. estuaries. Estuaries 27:90–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carritt DE, Carpenter JH (1966) Comparison and evaluation of currently employed modifications of the Winkler method for determining dissolved oxygen in seawater; a NASCO report. J Mar Res 24:286–319Google Scholar
  12. Chen CTA, Borges AV (2009) Reconciling opposing views on carbon cycling in the coastal ocean: Continental shelves as sinks and near-shore ecosystems as sources of atmospheric CO2. Deep-Sea Res II 56:578–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cloern JE, Jassby AD (2008) Complex seasonal patterns of primary producers at the land-sea interface. Ecol Lett 11:1294–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cole BE, Cloern JE (1984) Significance of biomass and light availability to phytoplankton productivity in San Francisco Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 17:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collos Y, Descolas-Gros C, Fontugne M, Mortain-Bertrand A, Chrétiennot-Dinet MJ, Frikha MG (1993) Chemical, isotopic and enzymatic monitoring of free and enclosed seawater: implications for primary production estimates in incubation bottles. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 93:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cutchey SJ (2008) A study of phytoplankton bloom dynamics in Liverpool Bay using high frequency mooring data. MSc (Res) Thesis, University of East Anglia. 146pp Google Scholar
  17. Emerson S (1987) Seasonal oxygen cycles and biological new production in surface waters of the subarctic Pacific Ocean. J Geophys Res 92:6535–6544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fanning KA, Carder KL, Betzer PR (1982) Sediment resuspension by coastal waters: a potential mechanism for nutrient re-cycling on the ocean’s margins. Deep Sea Res 29:953–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gazeau F, Borges AV, Barrón C, Duarte CM, Iversen N, Middelburg JJ, Delille B, Pizay M-D, Frankignoulle M, Gattuso J-P (2005) Net ecosystem metabolism in a micro-tidal estuary (Randers Fjord, Denmark): evaluation of methods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 301:23–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenwood N, Hydes DJ, Mahaffey C, Wither A, Barry J, Sivyer DB, Pearce DJ, Hartman SE, Andres O, Lees HE (2011) Spatial and temporal variability in nutrient concentrations in Liverpool Bay, a temperate latitude region of freshwater influence. Ocean Dyn. doi: 10.1007/s10236-011-0463-y
  21. Grobbelaar JU (1990) Modelling phytoplankton productivity in turbid waters with small euphotic to mixing depth ratios. J Plank Res 12:923–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Howarth MJ, Palmer M (2011) The Liverpool Bay Coastal Observatory. Ocean Dyn. doi: 10.1007/s10236-011-0458-8
  23. Jickells TD (1998) Nutrient biogeochemistry of the coastal zone. Science 281:217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krivtsov V, Howarth MJ, Jones SE (2009) Characterising observed patterns of suspended particulate matter and relationships with oceanographic and meteorological variables: Studies in Liverpool Bay. Environ Model Softw 24:677–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krivtsov V, Howarth MJ, Jones SE, Souza AJ, Jago CF (2008) Monitoring and modelling of the Irish Sea and Liverpool Bay: An overview and an SPM case study. Ecol Model 212:37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laruelle GG, Dürr HH, Slomp CP, Borges AV (2010) Evaluation of sinks and sources of CO2 in the global coastal ocean using a spatially-explicit typology of estuaries and continental shelves. Geophys Res Lett 37:L15607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Litt E (2011) Variability of CO2 dynamics in two contrasting shelf-sea regimes on the NW European Shelf. PhD thesis, Bangor University.Google Scholar
  28. Margalef R (1978) Life-forms of phytoplankton as survival alternatives in an unstable environment. Oceanol Acta 134:493–509Google Scholar
  29. Mills DK, Laane RWPM, Rees JM, Rutgers van der Loeff M, Suylen JM, Pearce DJ, Sivyer DB, Heins C, Platt K, Rawlinson (2003) Smartbuoy: a marine environmental monitoring buoy with a difference. Elsev Oceanogr Serie 69:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Najjar RG, Keeling RF (2000) Mean annual cycle of the air-sea oxygen flux: a global view. Glob Biogeochem Cy 14:573–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olesen M, Lundsgaard C, Andrushaitis A (1999) Influence of nutrients and mixing on the primary production and community respiration in the Gulf of Riga. J Marine Syst 23:127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palmer MR (2010) The modification of current ellipses by stratification in the Liverpool Bay ROFI. Ocean Dyn 60:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pingree RD, Holligan PM, Mardell GT, Head RN (1976) The influence of physical stability on spring, summer and autumn phytoplankton blooms in the Celtic sea. J Mar Biol Ass UK 56:845–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Polton J, Palmer MR, Howarth MJ (2011) Physical and dynamical oceanography of Liverpool Bay. Ocean Dyn. doi: 10.1007/s10236-011-0431-6
  35. Robinson C, Serret P, Tilstone G, Teira E, Zubkov MV, Rees AP, Woodward EMS (2002) Plankton respiration in the Eastern Atlantic Ocean. Deep-Sea Res I 49:787–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharples J, Simpson JH (1993) Periodic frontogenesis in a Region of Freshwater Influence. Estuaries 16:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharples J, Simpson JH (1995) Semi-diurnal and longer period stability cycles in the Liverpool Bay region of freshwater influence. Cont Shelf Res 15:295–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith EM, Kemp WM (1995) Seasonal and regional variations in plankton community production and respiration for Chesapeake Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 116:217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith SV, Hollibaugh JT (1993) Coastal metabolism and the oceanic organic carbon balance. Rev Geophys 31:75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith SV, Mackenzie FT (1987) The ocean as a net heterotrophic system: implications from the carbon biogeochemical cycle. Glob Biogeochem Cy 1:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Strickland JDH, Parsons TR (1972) A Practical Handbook of Seawater Analysis. Fisheries Research Board of Canada. 167 pp.Google Scholar
  42. Sverdrup HU (1953) On conditions for the vernal blooming of phytoplankton. J Cons Perm Int Exp Mer 18:287–295Google Scholar
  43. Thomas H, Bozec Y, Elkalay K, De Baar H (2004) Enhanced open ocean storage of CO2 from shelf sea pumping. Science 304:1005–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Verspecht F, Rippeth TP, Howarth MJ, Souza AJ, Simpson JH, Burchard H (2009a) Processes impacting on stratification in a region of freshwater influence: application to Liverpool Bay. J Geophys Res 114:C11022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Verspecht F, Rippeth TP, Simpson JH, Souza AJ, Burchard H, Howarth MJ (2009b) Residual circulation and stratification in the Liverpool Bay region of freshwater influence. Ocean Dyn 59:765–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wanninkhof R (1992) Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean. J Geophys Res 97:7373–7382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Williams PJleB (1984) A review of respiration rates of marine plankton populations. In: Hobbie JE, Williams PJleB (eds) Heterotrophic activity in the sea. Plenum, New York, pp 357–389Google Scholar
  48. Yamashita Y, Panton A, Mahaffey C, Jaffé R (2010) Assessing the spatial and temporal variability of dissolved organic matter in Liverpool Bay using excitation emission matrix fluorescence and parallel factor analysis. Ocean Dyn. doi: 10.1007/s10236-010-0365-4

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anouska Panton
    • 1
  • Claire Mahaffey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Naomi Greenwood
    • 2
  • Joanne Hopkins
    • 3
  • David Montagnes
    • 4
  • Jonathan Sharples
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture ScienceLowestoftUK
  3. 3.National Oceanography Centre LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  4. 4.Institute of Integrative BiologyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations