Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 61, Issue 8, pp 1189–1204 | Cite as

Global upper ocean heat content and climate variability

Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Multiparametric observation and analysis of the Sea

Abstract

Observational data from the Global Temperature and Salinity Profile Program were used to calculate the upper ocean heat content (OHC) anomaly. The thickness of the upper layer is taken as 300 m for the Pacific/Atlantic Ocean and 150 m for the Indian Ocean since the Indian Ocean has shallower thermoclines. First, the optimal spectral decomposition scheme was used to build up monthly synoptic temperature and salinity dataset for January 1990 to December 2009 on 1° × 1° grids and the same 33 vertical levels as the World Ocean Atlas. Then, the monthly varying upper layer OHC field (H) was obtained. Second, a composite analysis was conducted to obtain the total-time mean OHC field (\( \bar{\bar{H}} \)) and the monthly mean OHC variability (\( \widetilde{\text{H}} \)), which is found an order of magnitude smaller than \( \widehat{\text{H}} \). Third, an empirical orthogonal function (EOF) method is conducted on the residue data (\( \widehat{\text{H}} \)), deviating from \( \widetilde{\text{H}} \) + \( \widetilde{\text{H}} \), in order to obtain interannual variations of the OHC fields for the three oceans. In the Pacific Ocean, the first two EOF modes account for 51.46% and 13.71% of the variance, representing canonical El Nino/La Nina (EOF-1) and pseudo-El Nino/La Nina (i.e., El Nino Modoki; EOF-2) events. In the Indian Ocean, the first two EOF modes account for 24.27% and 20.94% of the variance, representing basin-scale cooling/warming (EOF-1) and Indian Ocean Dipole (EOF-2) events. In the Atlantic Ocean, the first EOF mode accounts for 49.26% of the variance, representing a basin-scale cooling/warming (EOF-1) event. The second EOF mode accounts for 8.83% of the variance. Different from the Pacific and Indian Oceans, there is no zonal dipole mode in the tropical Atlantic Ocean. Fourth, evident lag correlation coefficients are found between the first principal component of the Pacific Ocean and the Southern Oscillation Index with a maximum correlation coefficient (0.68) at 1-month lead of the EOF-1 and between the second principal component of the Indian Ocean and the Dipole Mode Index with maximum values (around 0.53) at 1–2-month advance of the EOF-2. It implies that OHC anomaly contains climate variability signals.

Keywords

Dipole Mode Index (DMI) El Nino Pseudo-El Nino Global Temperature and Salinity Profile Program (GTSPP) Indian Ocean Dipole Monthly varying global (T, S) field Optimal spectral decomposition (OSD) Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) Upper ocean heat content 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Office of Naval Research, the Naval Oceanographic Office, and the Naval Postgraduate School supported this study. The author thanks Dr. Noden E. Huang at the National Central University in Taiwan for stimulating discussion, Dr. L. Charles Sun at NOAA/NODC for providing the GTSPP data, and Mr. Chenwu Fan at NPS for computing assistance.

References

  1. Ashok K, Behera S, Rao AS, Weng H, Yamagata T (2007) El Nino Modoki and its teleconnection. J Geophys Res 112:C11007. doi: 10.1029/2006JC003798 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chu PC (1999) Fundamental circulation functions for the determination of open boundary conditions. Third Conference on Coastal Oceanic and Atmospheric Prediction. American Meteorological Society 389–394Google Scholar
  3. Chu PC (2010) Observational studies on association between eastward equatorial jet and Indian Ocean dipole. J Oceanogr 66:429–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chu PC, Ivanov LM, Korzhova TP, Margolina TM, Melnichenko OM (2003a) Analysis of sparse and noisy ocean current data using flow decomposition. Part 1: theory. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 20:478–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chu PC, Ivanov LM, Korzhova TP, Margolina TM, Melnichenko OM (2003b) Analysis of sparse and noisy ocean current data using flow decomposition. Part 2: application to Eulerian and Lagrangian data. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 20:492–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chu PC, Ivanov LM, Margolina TM (2004) Rotation method for reconstructing process and field from imperfect data. Int J Bifur Chaos 14:2991–2997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chu PC, Ivanov LM, Melnichenko OM (2005a) Fall-winter current reversals on the Texas-Louisiana continental shelf. J Phys Oceanogr 35:902–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chu PC, Ivanov LM, Margolina TM (2005b) Seasonal variability of the Black Sea Chlorophyll-a concentration. J Mar Syst 56:243–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hasegawa T, Hanawa K (2003) Heat content related to ENSO variability in the Pacific. J Phys Oceanogr 33:407–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rao SA, Behera SK, Masumoto Y and T Yamagata 2002 Interannual subsurface variability in the tropical Indian Ocean with a special emphasis on the Indian Ocean Dipole. Deep–Sea Res. II, 49, 1549–1572Google Scholar
  11. Saji NH, Goswami BN, Vinayachandran PN, Yamagata T (1999) A dipole in the tropical Indian Ocean. Nature 401:360–363Google Scholar
  12. Sun LC, Thresher A, Keeley R et al. 2009 The data management system for the Global Temperature and Salinity Profile Program (GTSPP). In Proceedings of the “OceanObs’09: Sustained Ocean Observations and Information for Society” Conference (Vol. 2), Venice, Italy, 21–25 September 2009, Hall, J, Harrison D.E. and Stammer, D., Eds., ESA Publication WPP-306Google Scholar
  13. Vapnik VH (1983) Reconstruction of Empirical Laws from Observations (in Russian). Nauka, 447 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Vinayachandran PN, Saji NH, Yamagata T (1999) Response of the equatorial Indian Ocean to an unusual wind event during 1994. Geophys Res Lett 26:1613–1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Walker GT, Bliss EW (1937) World weather VI. Mem Roy Meteor Soc 4:119–139Google Scholar
  16. Weng H, Ashok SK, Behera S, Rao A, Yamagata T (2007) Impacts of recent El Nino Modoki on dry/wet conditions in the Pacific Rim during boreal summer. Clim Dyn. doi: 10.1007/s00382-007-0234-0 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag (outside the USA) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OceanographyNaval Postgraduate SchoolMontereyUSA

Personalised recommendations