Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 61, Issue 7, pp 933–950

Application of an unstructured mesh model to storm surge propagation in the Mersey estuary region of the Irish Sea

Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Joint Numerical Sea Modelling Group Workshop 2010

Abstract

The storm surge period of 13–16 November 1977 when there was a major positive surge followed by a negative surge in the Irish Sea is investigated using a two-dimensional unstructured mesh model of the west coast of Britain. The model accounts for tidal and external surge forcing across its open boundaries which are situated in the Celtic Sea and off the west coast of Scotland. Although this period has been examined previously using a uniform finite-difference model, and a finite element model, neither of these could resolve the Mersey estuary which is the focus of the present study. By using a finite element model with very high mesh resolution within the Mersey, the spatial variability of surge elevations and currents within the Mersey to rapidly changing surge dynamics can be examined. The mesh in the model varies from about 7 km in deep water, to the order of 100 m in the Mersey, with the largest mesh length reaching 17 km in deep offshore regions, and smallest of order 26 m occurring in shallow coastal regions of the Mersey estuary. The model accounts for wetting/drying which occurs in shallow water coastal areas. Calculations showed that during the positive surge period, the amplitude and speed of propagation of the surge was largest in the deep water channels. This gave rise to significant spatial variability of surge elevations and currents within the estuary. As wind stresses decreased over the Irish Sea, a negative surge occurred over Liverpool Bay and at the entrance to the Mersey. However, within the Mersey there was a local positive surge which continued to propagate down the estuary. This clearly showed that although the large scale response of the Irish Sea to changing wind fields occurred rapidly, the response in the Mersey was much slower. These calculations with a west coast variable mesh model that included a high-resolution representation of the Mersey revealed for the first time how elevations and currents within the Mersey responded to Irish Sea surges that rapidly changed from positive to negative.

Keywords

Unstructured mesh Finite element Storm surge Mersey estuary Irish Sea 

References

  1. Bernier NB, Thompson KR (2006) Predicting the frequency of storm surges and extreme sea levels in the northwest Atlantic. J Geophys Res 111:C100009. doi:10.1029/2005JC003168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bobanovic J, Thompson KR, Desjardins S, Ritchie H (2005) Forecasting storm surges along the east coast of Canada and the northeastern U.S.: the storm of 21 January 2000. Atmos Ocean 44(2):151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davies AM, Hall P (2002) Numerical problems associated with coupling models in shelf edge regions. Appl Math Model 26:807–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davies AM, Jones JE (1992) A three-dimensional wind driven circulation model of the Celtic and Irish Seas. Cont Shelf Res 12:159–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies AM, Jones JE (1996) Sensitivity of tidal bed stress distributions, near bed currents, overtides and tidal residuals to frictional effects in the eastern Irish Sea. J Phys Oceanogr 26(12):2553–2575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies AM, Kwong SCM, Flather RA (2000) On determining the role of wind wave turbulence and grid resolution upon computed storm driven currents. Cont Shelf Res 20:1825–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies AM, Hall P, Howarth MJ, Knight P, Player R (2001) A detailed comparison of measured and modeled wind driven currents in the North Channel of the Irish Sea. J Geophys Res 106:19,683–19,713Google Scholar
  8. Fernandes EHL, Dyer KR, Moller OO, Niencheski LFH (2002) The Patos lagoon hydrodynamics during an El Nino event (1998). Cont Shelf Res 22:1699–1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernandes EHL, Marino-Tapia I, Dyer KR, Moller OO (2004) The attenuation of tidal and subtidal oscillations in the Patos Lagoon estuary. Ocean Dyn 54:348–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flather RA, Hubbert KP (1989) Tide and surge models for shallow water—Morecambe Bay revisited. In: Modeling marine systems. vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton. pp 135–166Google Scholar
  11. Greenberg DA, Dupont F, Lyard FH, Lynch DR, Werner FE (2007) Resolution issues in numerical models of oceanic and coastal circulation. Cont Shelf Res 27:1317–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hagen S, Westerink J, Kolar R, Horstmann O (2001) Two dimensional unstructured mesh generation for tidal models. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 35:669–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hagen SC, Horstmann O, Bennett RJ (2002) An unstructured mesh generation algorithm for shallow water modeling. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 16(2):83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hervouet J-M (2000) TELEMAC modelling system: an overview. Hydrol Process 14:2209–2210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horsburgh KJ, Wilson C (2007) Tide-surge interaction and its role in the distribution of surge residuals in the North Sea. J Geophys Res Oceans 112:CO8003. doi:10.1029/2006JC004033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones JE (2002) Coastal and shelf-sea modelling in the European context. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 40:37–141Google Scholar
  17. Jones JE, Davies AM (1998) Storm surge computations for the Irish Sea using a three-dimensional numerical model including wave-current interaction. Cont Shelf Res 18:201–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones JE, Davies AM (2005) An intercomparison between finite difference and finite element (TELEMAC) approaches to modelling west coast of Britain tides. Ocean Dyn 55:178–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones JE, Davies AM (2006) Application of a finite element model (TELEMAC) to computing the wind induced response of the Irish Sea. Cont Shelf Res 26:1519–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones JE, Davies AM (2007a) Influence of non-linear effects upon surge elevations along the west coast of Britain. Ocean Dyn 57:401–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones JE, Davies AM (2007b) A high resolution finite element model of the M2, M4, M6, S2, N2, K1 and O1 tides off the west coast of Britain. Ocean Model 19:70–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones JE, Davies AM (2008a) On the modification of tides in shallow water regions by wind effects. J Geophys Res 113. doi: 10.1029/2007JC004310
  23. Jones JE, Davies AM (2008b) Storm surge computations for the west coast of Britain using a finite element model (TELEMAC). Ocean Dyn 58:337–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones JE, Davies AM (2010) Application of a finite element model to the computation of tides in the Mersey Estuary and eastern Irish Sea. Cont Shelf Res 30:491–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lane A (2004) Bathymetric evolution of the Mersey Estuary, UK, 1906–1997: causes and effects. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 59:249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Legrand S, Deleersnijder E, Hanert E, Legat V, Wolanski E (2006) High-resolution, unstructured meshes for hydrodynamic models of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 68:36–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Legrand S, Deleersnijder E, Delhez E, Legat V (2007) Unstructured, anisotropic mesh generation for the Northwestern European continental shelf, the continental slope and the neighbouring ocean. Cont Shelf Res 27:1344–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levasseur A, Shi L, Wells NC, Purdie DA, Kelly-Gerreyn BA (2007) A three-dimensional hydrodynamic model of estuarine circulation with an application to Southampton Water. UK Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 73:753–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nicolle A, Karpytchev M (2007) Evidence for spatially variabile friction from tidal amplification and asymmetry in the Pertuis Breton Bay of Biscay, France. Cont Shelf Res 27:2346–2356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Walters RA (2005) Coastal ocean models: two useful finite element methods. Cont Shelf Res 25:775–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xing J, Davies AM (2001) A three-dimensional baroclinic model of the Irish Sea: formation of the thermal fronts and associated circulation. J Phys Oceanogr 31:94–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Oceanography CentreLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations