Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 60, Issue 6, pp 1479–1495

Nested circulation modelling of inter-tidal zones: details of a nesting approach incorporating moving boundaries



Nested circulation models developed to date either exclude the flooding and drying process or prohibit flooding and drying of nested boundaries; they are therefore ill-suited to the accurate modelling of inter-tidal areas. The authors have developed a nested model with moving boundaries which permits flooding and drying of both the interior domain and the nested boundaries. The model uses a novel approach to boundary formulation; ghost cells are incorporated adjacent to the nested boundary cells so that the nested boundaries operate as internal boundaries. When combined with a tailored adaptive interpolation technique, the approach facilitates a dynamic internal boundary. Details of model development are presented with particular emphasis on the treatment of the nested boundary. Results are presented for Cork Harbour, a natural coastal system with an extensive inter-tidal zone and a complex flow regime which provided a rigorous test of model performance. The nested model was found to achieve the accuracy of a high resolution single grid model for a much lower computational cost.


Nesting Circulation model Ghost cells Internal boundary Flooding and drying Moving boundary 


  1. Alapaty K, Mathur R, Odman T (1998) Intercomparison of spatial interpolation schemes for use in nested grid models. Mon Weather Rev 126:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barth A, Alvera-Azcárate A, Rixen M, Beckers J-M (2005) Two-way nested model of mesoscale circulation features in the Ligurian Sea. Prog Oceanogr 66:171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blayo E, Debreu L (1999) Adaptive mesh refinement for finite-difference ocean models: first experiments. J Phys Oceanogr 29:1239–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blayo E, Debreu L (2005) Revisiting open boundary conditions from the point of view of characteristic variables. Ocean Model 9:231–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blayo E, Debreu L (2008) Two-way embedding algorithms: a review. Ocean Dyn 58:415–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark TL, Farley RD (1984) Severe downslope windstorm calculations in two and three dimensions using anelastic interface grid nesting: a possible mechanism for gustiness. J Atmos Sci 41:329–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costello MJ, Hartnett M, Mills P, O’Mongain E, Collier L, Johnson M, Nash S, Leslie R, Berry A, Emblow C, Collins A, McCrea M (2001) Nutrient dynamics of two estuaries in Ireland: Wexford and Cork Harbours, Irish Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  8. DHI Software (2007) Mike 21 flow model: hydrodynamic module user guide, DHI Water and EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
  9. Falconer RA (1984) A mathematical model study of the flushing characteristics of a shallow tidal bay. Proc Inst Civil Eng 2 Res and Theory 77(3):311–332Google Scholar
  10. Falconer RA, Chen YP (1991) An improved representation of flooding and drying and wind stress effects in a 2-D tidal numerical model. Proc Inst Civil Eng 2 Res and Theory 91:659–678Google Scholar
  11. Fox AD, Maskell SJ (1995) Two-way interactive nesting of primitive equation ocean models with topography. J Phys Oceanogr 25:2977–2996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ginis I, Richardson RA, Rothstein LM (1998) Design of a multiply nested primitive equation ocean model. Mon Weather Rev 126:1054–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holt J, Harle K, Proctor R, Michel S, Ashworth M, Batstone C, Allen I, Holmes R, Smyth T, Haines K, Bretherton D, Smith G (2009) Modelling the global coastal ocean. Philos Trans R Soc A 367:939–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koch SE, McQueen JT (1987) A survey of nested grid techniques and their potential for use within the MASS weather prediction model, NASA Technical Memorandum 87808, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Korres G, Lascaratos A (2003) A one-way nested eddy resolving model of the Aegean and Levantine Basins: implementation and climatological runs. Ann Geophys 21:205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leitão P, Coelho H, Santosa A, Nevesa R (2005) Modelling the main features of the Algarve coastal circulation during July 2004: a downscaling approach. J Atmos Ocean Sci 10(4):421–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin B, Falconer RA (1997) Tidal flow and transport modelling using the ULTIMATE QUICKEST scheme. J Hydraul Eng 123(4):303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marchesiello P, McWilliams J, Shchepetkin A (2001) Open boundary conditions for long-term integration of regional oceanic models. Ocean Model 3:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miyakoda K, Rosati A (1977) One-way nested grid models: the interface conditions and the numerical accuracy. Mon Weather Rev 105:1092–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nash S (2010) Development of an adaptive mesh inter-tidal circulation model, PhD Thesis, College of Engineering & Informatics, National University of Ireland GalwayGoogle Scholar
  21. Nittis K, Perivoliotis L, Korres G, Tziavos C, Thanos I (2006) Operational monitoring and forecasting for marine environmental applications in the Aegean Sea. Environ Modell Softw 21:243–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nycander J, Doos K (2003) Open boundary conditions for barotropic waves. J Geophys Res 108(C5):3168–3187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Palma ED, Matano RP (1998) On the implementation of passive open boundary conditions for a general circulation model: the barotropic mode. J Geophys Res 103(C1):1319–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pullen J, Allen JS (2001) Modeling studies of the coastal circulation off the northern coast of California: statistics and patterns of wintertime flow. J Geophys Res 106(C11):26959–26984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roed LP, Cooper C (1987) A study of various open boundary conditions for wind-forced barotropic numerical ocean models. In: Nihoul JCJ, Jamart BN (eds) Three-dimensional models of marine and estuarine dynamics. Elsevier, pp 305–335Google Scholar
  26. Rowley C, Ginis I (1999) Implementation of a mesh movement scheme in a multiply nested ocean model and its application to air -sea interaction studies. Mon Weather Rev 127:1879–1896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Spall MA, Holland WR (1991) A nested primitive equation model for oceanic applications. J Phys Oceanogr 21:205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spall MA, Robinson AR (1989) A new hybrid coordinate open ocean primitive equation model. Math Comput Simul 31:241–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Staneva J, Stanev EV, Wolff JO, Badewien TH, Reuter R, Flemming B, Bartholoma A, Boldinge K (2009) Hydroynamics and sediment dynamics in the German Bight: a focus on observations and numerical modelling in the East Frisian Wadden Sea. Cont Shelf Res 29:302–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang D-L, Chang H-R, Seaman NL, Wamer TT, Fritsch JM (1986) A two-way interactive nesting procedure with variable terrain resolution. In: Koch SE, McQueen JT (1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and InformaticsNational University of Ireland, GalwayGalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations