Lagrangian analysis by clustering
We propose a new method for obtaining average velocities and eddy diffusivities from Lagrangian data. Rather than grouping the drifter-derived velocities in geographical bins, we group them by nearest-neighbor distance using a clustering algorithm. This yields sets with approximately the same number of observations, covering unequal areas. A major advantage is that, because the number of observations is the same for the clusters, the statistical accuracy is more uniform than with geographical bins. We illustrate the technique using synthetic data from a stochastic model, employing a realistic mean flow. The latter represents the surface currents in the Nordic Seas and is strongly inhomogeneous in space. We use the clustering algorithm to extract the mean velocities and diffusivities and compare the results with the corresponding quantities from the stochastic model. We perform a similar comparison with the means and diffusivities obtained with geographical bins. Clustering is more successful at capturing the mean flow and improves convergence in the eddy diffusivity estimates. We discuss both the advantages and shortcomings of the new method.
KeywordsLagrangian analysis Eddy diffusivity Binning Clustering
The work is part of the Poleward project, funded by by the Norwegian Research Council Norklima program (grant number 178559/S30). Details are found on http://www.iaoos.no/ and http://folk.uio.no/ingako/my_files/POLEWARD_WEBPAGE_MAIN.html.. Harald Engedahl provided the MIPOM velocities. We appreciate useful comments from two anonymous reviewers.
- Griffa A (1996) Applications of stochastic particle models to oceanographical problems. In: Adler R, Muller P, Rozovskii B (eds) Stochastic modelling in physical oceanography. Birkhauser, Boston, pp 114–140Google Scholar
- LaCasce J (2005) Statistics of low frequency currents over the western Norwegian shelf and slope I: current meters. Ocean Model 55:213–221Google Scholar
- LaCasce J, Engedahl H (2005) Statistics of low frequency currents over the western Norwegian shelf and slope II: model. Ocean Model 55:222–237Google Scholar
- Lumpkin R, Garraffo Z (2005) Evaluating the decomposition of Tropical Atlantic drifter observations. J Phys Oceanogr 22:1403–1415Google Scholar
- Lumpkin R, Treguier A-M, Speer K (2002) Lagrangian eddy scales in the Northern Atlantic Ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 32:2425–2440Google Scholar
- MacKay DJC (2003) Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Mariano A, Ryan E (2007) Lagrangian analysis and prediction of coastal and ocean dynamics (LAPCOD review). In Griffa A, Kirwan AD, Mariano AJ, Ozgokmen T, Rossby T (eds) Lagrangian analysis and prediction of coastal and ocean dynamics, Chapter 13. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 423–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rossby HT, Riser SC, Mariano AJ (1983) The western North Atlantic—a Lagrangian viewpoint. In: Robinson AR (ed) Eddies in marine science. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 66–91Google Scholar
- Rupolo V (2007) Observing turbulence regimes and Lagrangian dispersal properties in the oceans. In Griffa A, Kirwan AD, Mariano AJ, Ozgokmen T, Rossby T (eds) Lagrangian analysis and prediction of coastal and ocean dynamics, Chapter 9. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 231–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar