Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 359–375 | Cite as

Numerical study of surface water circulation around Sekisei Lagoon, southwest Japan

  • Li-Feng LuEmail author
  • Yasumasa Miyazawa
  • Wei Cui
  • Kazuo Nadaoka


This paper discusses the variability of surface currents around Sekisei Lagoon using a nested grid ocean circulation model. We developed a triple-nested grid system that consists of a coarse-resolution (1/60° or ∼1.85 km) model off Taiwan, an intermediate-resolution (1/300° or ∼370 m) model around the Yaeyama Islands, and a fine-resolution (1/900° or ∼123 m) model of Sekisei Lagoon. The nested grid system was forced by wind and heat flux calculated from six-hourly atmospheric reanalysis data and integrated over the period from May to July 2003. The coarse-resolution model was driven by lateral boundary conditions calculated from daily ocean reanalysis data to include realistic variation of the Kuroshio and mesoscale eddies with spatial scales of ∼500–700 km in the open ocean. The tidal forcing was included in the intermediate-resolution model by interpolating sea level data obtained from a data-assimilative tidal model. The results were then used to drive the fine-resolution model to simulate the surface water circulation around Sekisei lagoon. Model results show that (1) currents inside the lagoon are mainly driven by tide and wind; (2) there exists a strong southwestward current along the bottom slope in the southeast portion of the lagoon; the current is mainly driven by remote mesoscale eddies and at times intensified by the local wind; (3) the flow relaxation scheme is effective in reducing biases along the open boundaries. The simulated currents were used to examine the retention and dispersion of passive particles in the surface layer. Results show that the surface dispersion in the strong open ocean current region is significantly higher than that inside the lagoon.


Numerical model Sekisei Lagoon Yaeyama Islands Hydrodynamic dispersion 



This work was supported by the Global Environmental Research Fund (F-082) of the Ministry of Environment, Japan. The JCOPE2 reanalysis data were created as a part of the Japan Coastal Ocean Predictability Experiment (JCOPE) promoted by Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC). Dr. Daisuke Ambe kindly provided the gridded surface geostrophic current data to the authors. Four anonymous reviewers are thanked for their many valuable and constructive comments and suggestions.


  1. Ambe D, Imawaki S, Uchida H, Ichikawa K (2004) Estimating the Kuroshio axis south of Japan using combination of satellite altimetry and drifting buoys. J Oceanogr 60:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boris JP, Book DL (1973) Flux-corrected transport I: SHASTA, a fluid transport algorithm that works. J Comput Phys 11:38–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen C, Liu H, Beardsley RC (2003) An unstructured grid, finite-volume, three-dimensional, primitive equations ocean model: application to coastal ocean and estuaries. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 20:159–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cong L, Sheng J, Thompson KT (1996) A retrospective study of particle retention on the outer banks of the Scotian Shelf 1956–1993. Can Tech Rep Hydrogr Ocean Sci 170:132Google Scholar
  5. Conkright ME, Antonov JI, Baranova O, Boyer TP, Garcia HE, Gelfeld R, Johnson D, Locarnini RA, Murphy PP, O’Brien TD, Smolyar I, Stephens C (2002) World Ocean Database 2001, vol 1: Introduction. In: Levitus S (ed) NOAA Atlas NESDIS 42. US Government Printing Office, Washington, p 167Google Scholar
  6. Davies AM, Hall P (2002) Numerical problems associated with coupling hydrodynamic models in shelf edge regions: the surge event of February 1994. Appl Math Model 26:807–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies KA, Leichter JJ, Hench JL, Monismith SG (2008) Effects of western boundary current dynamics on the internal wave field of the Southeast Florida shelf. J Geophys Res 113:C09010. doi: 10.1029/2007JC004699 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ezer T, Thattai DV, Kjerfve B, Heyman WD (2005) On the variability of the flow along the Meso-American Barrier Reef system: a numerical model study of the influence of the Caribbean current and eddies. J Oceanogr 55:458–475Google Scholar
  9. Flather RA (1976) A tidal model of the northwest European continental shelf. Memoires de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege 6:141–164Google Scholar
  10. Griffies SM, Hallberg RW (2000) Biharmonic friction with a Smagorinsky-like viscosity for use in large-scale eddy-permitting ocean models. Mon Wea Rev 128:2935–2946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo X, Hukuda H, Miyazawa Y, Yamagata T (2003) A triply nested ocean model for simulating the Kuroshio—roles of horizontal resolution on JEBAR. J Phys Oceanogr 33:146–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ichikawa K (2001) Variation of the Kuroshio in the Tokara Strait induced by meso-scale eddies. J Oceanogr 57:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ichikawa K, Tokeshi R, Kashima M, Sato K, Matsuoka T, Kojima S, Fujii S (2008) Kuroshio variations in the upstream region as seen by HF radar and satellite altimetry data. International J Remote Sensing 29:6417–6426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kagimoto T, Miyazawa Y, Guo X, Kawajiri H (2008) High resolution Kuroshio forecast system: description and its applications. In: Hamilton K, Ohfuchi W (eds) High resolution numerical modeling of the atmosphere and ocean. Springer, New York, pp 209–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kobashi F, Kawamura H (2002) Seasonal variation and instability nature of the North Pacific Subtropical Countercurrent and the Hawaiian Lee Countercurrent. J Geophys Res 107(C11):3185. doi: 10.1029/2001JC001225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martinsen EA, Engedahl H (1987) Implementation and testing of a lateral boundary scheme as an open boundary condition in a barotropic ocean model. Coastal Eng 11:603–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matsumoto K, Takanezawa T, Ooe M (2000) Ocean tide models developed by assimilating TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter data into hydrodynamical model: a global model and a regional model around Japan. J Oceanogr 56:567–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mellor GL (2001) One-dimensional, ocean surface layer modeling: a problem and a solution. J Phys Oceanogr 31:790–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mellor GL, Blumberg A (2004) Wave breaking and ocean surface layer thermal response. J Phys Oceanogr 34:693–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mellor GL, Yamada T (1982) Development of a turbulent closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev Geophys and Space Phys 20:851–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mellor GL, Ezer T, Oey L-Y (1994) The pressure gradient conundrum of sigma coordinate ocean models. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 11:1126–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mellor GL, Hakkinen S, Ezer T, Patchen R (2002) A generalization of a sigma coordinate ocean model and an intercomparison of model vertical grids. In: Pinardi N, Woods JD (eds) Ocean forecasting: conceptual basis and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 55–72Google Scholar
  24. Mitsui J, Nadaoka K, Suzuki Y, Kumagai W, Ishigami K, Harii S, Paringit EC, Tamura H, Yasuda N, Iizuka H, Hamazaki K, Kimura T, Ueno M (2004) Comprehensive field survey and analysis for investigation of hydrodynamic environment, and sediment, heat, coral larvae transports in the Sekisei Lagoon, Okinawa. Proc Coastal Eng, JSCE 51:1055–1059 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  25. Miyazawa Y, Guo X, Yamagata T (2004) Roles of mesoscale eddies in the Kuroshio paths. J Phys Oceanogr 34:2203–2222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miyazawa Y, Kagimoto T, Guo X, Sakuma H (2008) The Kuroshio large meander formation in 2004 analyzed by an eddy-resolving ocean forecast system. J Geophys Res 113:C10015. doi: 10.1029/2007JC004226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miyazawa Y, Zhang R, Guo X, Tamura H, Ambe D, Lee J-S, Okuno A, Yoshinari H, Setou T, Komatsu K (2009) Water mass variability in the western North Pacific detected in a 15-year eddy resolving ocean reanalysis. J Oceanogr 65:737–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nadaoka K, Mitsui J, Hamazaki K, Harii S, Tamura H, Suzuki Y (2003) Field observation on hydrodynamic environment, and sediment, fresh water, and heat transports in the Sekisei Lagoon, Okinawa. Proc Coastal Eng, JSCE 50:1036–1040 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  29. Nakada S, Ishihara Y, Harashima A (2004) A numerical simulation of flow pattern in the Sekisei Lagoon. J Adv Mar Sci Tech Soci 10:35–49 (in Japanese with English abstract and figure captions)Google Scholar
  30. Oey L-Y (2006) An OGCM with movable land–sea boundaries. Ocean Model 13:176–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oey L-Y, Chen P (1992) A nested-grid ocean model: with application to the simulation of meanders and eddies in the Norwegian Coastal Current. J Geophys Res 97:20063–20086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Okamoto M, Sato T, Morita S (2000) Basic coral distribution data for long term monitoring at Sekisei Lagoon. Proceedings of OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE 2:1383–1387Google Scholar
  33. Oke PR, Allen JS, Miller RN et al (2002) A modeling study of the three-dimensional continental shelf circulation off Oregon. Part I: model-data comparisons. J Phys Oceanogr 32:1360–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paringit EC, Nadaoka K (2004) Synergistic methods in remote sensing data analysis for tropical coastal ecosystems monitoring. Proceedings of the 20th International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Congress (in DVD)Google Scholar
  35. Takeoka H (1984) Fundamental concepts of exchange and transport time scales in a coastal sea. Continent Shelf Res 3:311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tang L, Sheng J, Hatcher BG, Sale PF (2006) Numerical study of circulation, dispersion and hydrodynamic connectivity of surface waters on the Belize shelf. J Geophys Res 111:C01003. doi: 10.1029/2005JC002930 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Uchida H, Imawaki S (2003) Eulerian mean surface velocity field derived by combing drifter and satellite altimeter data. Geophys Res Lett 30:1229. doi: 10.1029/2002GL016445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilmott CJ (1981) On the validation of models. Phys Geogr 2:184–194Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Li-Feng Lu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yasumasa Miyazawa
    • 1
  • Wei Cui
    • 2
  • Kazuo Nadaoka
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Institute for Global ChangeJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and TechnologyYokohamaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Environmental Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science and EngineeringTokyo Institute of TechnologyMeguroJapan

Personalised recommendations