Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 491–502 | Cite as

Simulation of oceanic volume transports through Fram Strait 1995–2005

  • Kerstin Fieg
  • Rüdiger Gerdes
  • Eberhard Fahrbach
  • Agnieszka Beszczynska-Möller
  • Ursula Schauer


We discuss the model representation of volume transports through one of the most climate-relevant ocean passages, the Fram Strait. We compare results from a coupled ocean–sea ice model with different resolutions (∼1/12° and ∼1/4°) and measurements from a mooring array along 79° N. The 1/4° model delivers a realistic mean climate state and realistic net volume transports. However, this model fails to reproduce the observed intense barotropic recirculation that reaches far north in Fram Strait. This recirculation is captured in the higher resolution version of the model. Other differences exist in the circulation over the East Greenland Shelf and in the temperature of Atlantic waters in the Fram Strait region as well as in surface heat fluxes. We find that a combination of high-resolution model results and long-term measurements can improve the interpretation of measured and simulated processes and reduce the uncertainties in exchange rates between Arctic and the North Atlantic.


Fram Strait High-resolution ocean model Time series of oceanic volume transport Climate change Arctic MOM-2 Observations 



The work reported here has been supported through the EU projects ASOF-N and DAMOCLES as well as the SFB 512 “Cyclones and the North Atlantic climate system” of the DFG. The DAMOCLES project is financed by the European Union in the 6th Framework Program for Research and Development. Forcing data for the model were taken from NCAR/NCEP reanalysis project. We thank Laura de Steur and an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments that were very helpful in improving our manuscript.


  1. Bacon S, Myers PG, Rudels B, Sutherland DA (2008) Accessing the inaccessible: buoyancy-driven coastal currents on the shelves of Greenland and Eastern Canada. In: Dickson B, Meincke J, Rhines P (eds) Arctic–Subarctic Ocean Fluxes. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 703–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beszczynska-Möller A, Fahrbach E (2006) Report with description of array performance: Report with results from sensibility study to instrument reduction. AWI, Bremerhaven, http://web-cms.awi.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Research/Research_Divisions/Climate_Sciences/chiaventone/ASOF/Deliverables/D_6_3.pdf Google Scholar
  3. Bourke RH, Newton JL, Paquette RG, Tunnicliffe MD (1987) Circulation and water masses of the East Greenland shelf. J Geophys Res 92(C7):6729–6740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Steur L, Hansen E, Gerdes R, Karcher M, Fahrbach E, Holfort J (2009) Freshwater fluxes in the East Greenland Current: a decade of observations. Geophys Res Lett 36:L23611. doi: 10.1029/2009GL041278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Döscher R, Redler R (1997) The relative importance of Northern Overflow and subpolar deep convection for the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation. J Phys Oceanogr 27:1894–1902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drange H, Gerdes R, Gao KM, Kauker F, Bentsen M (2005) Ocean general circulation modelling of the Nordic Seas. In: Drange H, Dokken T, Furevik T, Gerdes R, Berger W (eds) The Nordic Seas: an integrated perspective. AGU, Washington, DC, pp 199–220Google Scholar
  7. Fahrbach E, Meincke J, Østerhus S, Rohardt G, Schauer U, Tverberg V, Verduin J (2001) Direct measurements of volume transports through Fram Strait. Polar Res 20(2):217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Falck E, Kattner G, Budéus G (2005) Disappearance of Pacific water in the northwestern Fram Strait. Geophyical Research Letters 32:L14619. doi: 10.1029/2005GL023400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerdes R, Karcher M, Kauker F, Schauer U (2003) Causes and development of repeated Arctic Ocean warming events. Geophyical Research Letters 30(19):1980. doi: 10.1029/2003GL018080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerdes R, Hurka J, Karcher M, Kauker F, Köberle C (2005) Simulated history of convection in the Greenland and Labrador seas 1948–2001. In: Drange H, Dokken T, Furevik T, Gerdes R, Berger W (eds) The Nordic Seas: an integrated perspective. AGU, Washington, DC, pp 221–238Google Scholar
  11. Gerdes R, Karcher M, Köberle C, Fieg K (2008) Simulating the long term variability of liquid freshwater export from the Arctic Ocean. In: Dickson B, Meincke J, Rhines P (eds) Arctic–subarctic ocean fluxes. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 405–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harder M et al (1998) Simulation of sea ice transport through Fram Strait: natural variability and sensitivity to forcing. J Geophys Res 103:5595–5606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hibler WD (1979) A dynamic thermodynamic sea ice model. J Phys Oceanogr 9:815–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hibler WD, Bryan K (1987) A diagnostic ice-ocean model. J Phys Oceanogr 17:987–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holloway G (1992) Representing topographic stress for large-scale ocean models. J Phys Oceanogr 22:1033–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holfort J, Hansen E (2005) Timeseries of Polar water properties in Fram Strait. Geophys Res Lett 32:L19601. doi: 10.1029/2005GL022957 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holfort J, Hansen E, Østerhus S, Dye S, Jonsson S, Meincke J, Mortensen J, Meredith M (2008) Freshwater fluxes east of Greenland. In: Dickson RR, Meincke J, Rhines P (eds) Arctic–subarctic ocean fluxes. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 263–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jakobsson M, Macnab R, Mayer L, Anderson R, Edwards M, Hatzky J, Schenke H-W, Johnson P (2008) An improved bathymetric portrayal of the Arctic Ocean: implications for ocean modeling and geological, geophysical and oceanographic analyses. Geo Res Lett 35:L07602. doi: 10.1029/2008GL033520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones EP, Swift JH, Anderson LG, Lipizer M, Civitarese G, Falkner KK, Kattner G, McLaughlin F (2003) Tracing Pacific water in the North Atlantic Ocean. J Geophys Res 108(C4):3116. doi: 10.1029/2001JC001141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Jenne R, Joseph D (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karcher MJ, Gerdes R, Kauker F, Köberle C (2003) Arctic warming—evolution and spreading of the 1990s warm event in the Nordic Seas and the Arctic Ocean. J Geophys Res 108:3034. doi: 10.1029/2001JC001265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karcher M, Gerdes R, Kauker F, Köberle C, Yashayaev I (2005) Simulation of a 1990s fresh water event in the Nordic Seas and the subpolar North Atlantic. Geophys Res Lett 32:L21606. doi: 10.1029/2005GL023861 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kauker F, Gerdes R, Karcher M, Köberle C, Lieser J (2003) Variability of Northern hemisphere sea ice: a combined analysis of model results and observations from 1978 to 2001. J Geophys Res 108:3182. doi: 10.1029/2002JC001573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kauker F, Gerdes R, Karcher M, Köberle C (2005) Impact of North Atlantic Current changes on the Nordic Seas and the Arctic Ocean. J Geophys Res 110:C12002. doi: 10.1029/2004JC002624 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levitus S et al (1994a) Salinity: NOAA Atlas NESDIS 3, World Ocean Atlas, vol 3. US Dept of Commerce, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Levitus S et al (1994b) Temperature: NOAA Atlas NESDIS 4, World Ocean Atlas, vol 4. US Department of Commerce, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Losch M, Sidorenko D, Beszczynska-Möller A (2005) FEMSECT: An inverse section model based on the finite element method. J Geophys Res 110:C12023. doi: 10.1029/2005JC002910 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maslowski W, Marble D, Walczowski W, Schauer U, Clement JL, Semtner AJ (2004) On climatological mass, heat, and salt transports through the Barents Sea and Fram Strait from a pan-Arctic coupled ice-ocean model simulation. J Geophys Res 109:C03032. doi: 10.1029/2001JC001039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mauritzen C, Häkkinen S (1997) Influence of sea ice on the thermohaline circulation in the Arctic-North Atlantic Ocean. Geophys Res Lett 24:3257–3260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pacanowski RC (1995) MOM 2 Documentation, user’s guide and reference manual, GFDL Ocean Group Tech. Rep. 3, Geophysical Fluid Dyn. Laboratory Princeton University, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  31. Parkinson CL, Washington WM (1979) A large scale numerical model of sea ice. J Geophys Res 84:311–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosati A, Miyakoda K (1988) A general circulation model for upper ocean simulation. J Phys Oceanogr 18(11):1601–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rudels B, Friedrich HJ, Quadfasel D (1999) The Arctic circumpolar boundary current. Deep-Sea Res II 46:1023–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rudels RM, Fahrbach E, Ivanov VV, Østerhus S, Quadfasel D, Schauer U, Tverberg V, Woodgate RA (2000) Water mass distribution in Fram Strait and over the Yermak Plateau in summer 1997. Annals of Geophysics 18:687–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rudels B, Jones EP, Schauer U, Eriksson P (2004) Atlantic sources of the Arctic Ocean surface and halocline waters. Polar Res 23(2):181–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schauer U, Fahrbach E, Oesterhus S, Rohardt G (2004) Arctic warming through the Fram Strait: oceanic heat transport from 3 years of measurements. J Geophys Res 109:C 06026. doi: 10.1029/2003JC001823 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schauer U, Beszczynska-Möller A, Walczowski W, Fahrbach E, Piechura J, Hansen E (2008) Variation of flow through the Fram Strait to the Arctic ocean between 1997 and 2006. In: Dickson B, Meincke J, Rhines P (eds) Arctic–subarctic ocean fluxes. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 65–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schweckendiek U, Willebrand J (2005) Mechanisms affecting the overturning response in global warming simulations. J Climate 18(23):4925–4936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Semtner B (1976) A model for the thermodynamic growth of sea ice in numerical investigations of climate. J Phys Oceanogr 6:379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Steele M, Boyd T (1998) Retreat of the cold halocline layer in the Arctic Ocean. J Geophys Res 103:10419–10435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stevens DP (1991) The open boundary condition in the United Kingdom Fine – Resolution Antarctic Model. J Phys Oceanogr 21:1494–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Treguier AM, Theetten S, Chassignet EP, Penduff T, Smith R, Talley L, Beisheim JO, Böning C (2005) The North Atlantic subpolar gyre in four high-resolution models. J Phys Oceanogr 35:757–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walczowski W, Piechura J (2007) Pathways of the Greenland Sea warming. Geo Res Lett 34:L10608. doi: 101029/2007GL029974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerstin Fieg
    • 1
  • Rüdiger Gerdes
    • 1
  • Eberhard Fahrbach
    • 1
  • Agnieszka Beszczynska-Möller
    • 1
  • Ursula Schauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Alfred Wegener InstituteBremerhavenGermany

Personalised recommendations